Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 端傳媒官方頻道 Initium Media

Channel

端傳媒官方頻道 Initium Media

@theinitiumnews

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cross-platform identity · Cite this entry

11,701subscribers

-6 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001727734963
TypeChannel
Username@theinitiumnews
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/theinitiumnews

Topic

National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 82% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

11,67711,72711,7025 August 2026 — 11,707 subscribers6 August 2026 — 11,705 subscribers6 August 2026 — 11,705 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,708 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,709 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,705 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,700 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,699 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,698 subscribers14 August 2026 — 11,696 subscribers15 August 2026 — 11,698 subscribers17 August 2026 — 11,697 subscribers18 August 2026 — 11,684 subscribers19 August 2026 — 11,677 subscribers20 August 2026 — 11,681 subscribers21 August 2026 — 11,695 subscribers22 August 2026 — 11,698 subscribers24 August 2026 — 11,705 subscribers25 August 2026 — 11,703 subscribers26 August 2026 — 11,704 subscribers27 August 2026 — 11,703 subscribers28 August 2026 — 11,708 subscribers29 August 2026 — 11,715 subscribers30 August 2026 — 11,716 subscribers31 August 2026 — 11,718 subscribers1 September 2026 — 11,717 subscribers2 September 2026 — 11,719 subscribers4 September 2026 — 11,714 subscribers6 September 2026 — 11,725 subscribers9 September 2026 — 11,727 subscribers12 September 2026 — 11,719 subscribers13 September 2026 — 11,704 subscribers15 September 2026 — 11,697 subscribers17 September 2026 — 11,701 subscribers11,7015 August 202617 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 43 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,670–11,735 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 10:5711,701+4
15 Sept 2026, 09:2111,697-7
13 Sept 2026, 20:1611,704-15
12 Sept 2026, 03:3711,719-8
9 Sept 2026, 19:5911,727+2
6 Sept 2026, 14:2011,725+11
4 Sept 2026, 04:1611,714-5
2 Sept 2026, 15:3411,719+2
1 Sept 2026, 13:3211,717-1
31 Aug 2026, 16:2511,718+2
30 Aug 2026, 13:5511,716+1
29 Aug 2026, 16:0411,715+7
28 Aug 2026, 12:3411,708+5
27 Aug 2026, 13:0911,703-1
26 Aug 2026, 15:1411,704+1
25 Aug 2026, 12:1411,703-2
24 Aug 2026, 15:2711,705+7
22 Aug 2026, 22:5811,698+3
21 Aug 2026, 12:0411,695+14
20 Aug 2026, 10:2411,681first reading

Engagement

89 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 46 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.5%
avg views ÷ 11,701 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,230
27 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.16%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
27
of 89 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 15 of 27 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held89 (30 July 20263 September 2026)
Views total33,113
Reactions total42
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 00:28 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 23s
Average length
3m 23s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

107 reactions across 45 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3633.6%
👍2725.2%
🔥65.61%
🙏54.67%
👎43.74%
🤡43.74%
😢32.80%
🥱32.80%
💩21.87%
🕊21.87%
😭21.87%
🤣21.87%
🤬21.87%
🤷‍♂21.87%
🍌10.935%
🎉10.935%
👏10.935%
😁10.935%
😱10.935%
🤮10.935%
1 further kind10.935%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 50 of the 89 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 112 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 89 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Sept 2026, 00:00 UTC41 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

想免費獲得一年《端傳媒》X《紐約時報》會籍嗎?立即填寫端傳媒2026年度用戶調研問卷! 無論你平時關注哪家媒體,我們都想聽聽你對當今新聞環境的想法。 為了感謝你的支持,前100名填寫問卷的讀者將會獲得端傳媒「守護方案」(含紐約時報一年會籍)! 前100名額滿後,我們將另外抽出100位送出一年會籍。所有完成者皆可獲贈 HK$50 周邊商品券! 👉 立刻點擊連結,填寫問卷:https://theinitium.com/20260826-membership-11th-annual-survey/?utm_source=telegram&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=telegram

2 Sept 2026, 23:05 UTC88 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

「現在我終於有個人樣了。」 在瑞幸咖啡當了三年半店長的阿喆辭職了。 阿喆的店位於中國北方城市的一個著名景區,銷售額很高,以前店員多維持在十人以上,最多曾有13名店員。 從2025年起,瑞幸開始漸步推行「AI 排班」系統,AI 排班後,系統將門店店員總數降到了七、八人,但工作量並沒有減少,每位員工必須承擔更多的工作、甚至必須無償加班,工資卻沒有漲。 在瑞幸的企業敘事中,這叫「AI 賦能」、「數智化升級」。但看在第一線的員工眼裡,AI 並沒有分擔、減輕人的工作,而是命令人類做更多的工作,同時擠走「多餘的人」。 面對不會因應天氣、新人入職等因素調整KPI,也不會計算商品製作以外的必需勞動的AI排班系統,瑞幸咖啡的員工有著怎樣的掙扎?👉點擊連結,閱讀全文:https://theinitium.com/20260901-mainland-luckin-coffee-ai-transformation/?utm_source=te

2 Sept 2026, 02:01 UTC359 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

【第五期專題記者成長計劃——中國留白:看見未被解答、不可言說、不曾存在的故事】 近年閱讀中國新聞時,一個念頭愈加頻繁地浮現:如果新聞的重點不是「說了什麼」,而是「什麼沒有說」、「為什麼沒說」,那故事會長什麼樣? 將留白當作觀察和寫作的對象,激發出我們對中國報道的無限想像。 它可以是外力造就的缺席,可以落在數據難以丈量的地方,可以是關係中的「不可言說」,或是科技重塑生活而產生的新皺摺。 留白,還可以是一種提問方法:你想寫的故事中,有哪些被忽視的人和問題?你不僅要找出「空白」,更要勾勒「空白的形狀」以及由此帶來的影響,回答:誰在製造留白、誰在利用留白?留白又被誰、被什麼填滿? 我們誠摯邀請你,用好奇心、紮實的採訪和細緻入微的觀察,和我們一起探索:那些沒有「發生」、沒有留下、沒有被命名、沒有被計算的東西,如何影響人們的生命歷程、又怎樣塑造了今天的中國。 請留意,中國長報道組別報名需要提交Writing Sample。詳情請

1 Sept 2026, 14:32 UTC447 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

8月25日上午,俄羅斯遠東阿穆爾州的斯沃博德內(Svobodny)市郊,中俄兩國能源合作的「阿穆爾天然氣化工綜合體」(AGCC)巨型化工廠發生火災,工廠當時已處於投入生產前的開車調試階段。 社媒流傳的影片中,數百名穿著中石化橙色反光背心的工人從廠區向外奔逃,有人邊跑邊高喊「跑啊,要炸啦」。儘管工廠在其官方聲明中始終將事故描述爲「起火」,但現場很可能發生了嚴重爆炸。一名倖存中國工人向端傳媒表示,「衝擊波太大了」,若沒有掩蔽物阻擋緩衝,他可能也已遭不測。 截至當地時間27日下午,項目公司確認事故造成15人死亡,其中14人為中國公民,另有超過百人受傷。與執法部門關係密切的電報頻道「112」稱,初步懷疑事故由「裝有甲醇的容器」爆炸引起。 今年春天,俄當局曾檢查發現廠區存在多項安全隱患,包括防爆措施不足、使用可燃材料等,並要求5月25日前整改,但其中兩項問題逾期仍未解決。8月13日,也就是事故前12天,項目公司被罰款5萬盧布(約合6

1 Sept 2026, 11:05 UTC453 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

一隻狗殺了另一隻狗,應該「填狗命」嗎? 近日,香港接連發生多宗狗隻攻擊事件,其中兩件致命意外特別矚目。 八月十七日,元朗一隻在家中逃出的混種西班牙藏獒「拉里」,接連攻擊一隻比熊犬和一隻貴婦狗。僅隔數日,打鼓嶺一間寵物酒店內,一隻被指有格鬥犬特徵的唐狗「太陽」,在被帶回狗籠時突然發難施襲,過程歷時約一分鐘,咬死了酒店負責人。 意外發生後,香港掀起一股仇狗浪潮。網上有人要求即時「人道毀滅」涉事的拉里和太陽,更揚言事後會「開香檳慶祝」;有人在社區見到體形壯碩、疑似鬥牛犬的狗隻,便向漁護署舉報;甚至有在酒店舉辦的唐狗領養活動遭投訴。 發生狗隻攻擊事故,是誰的責任? 養狗應該要考牌嗎?👉點擊連結,閱讀全文,端傳媒跟你一起探討這場仇狗浪潮背後的責任與制度爭議:https://theinitium.com/20260831-hongkong-anti-dogs-sentiments/?utm_source=telegram&utm_m

1 Sept 2026, 02:03 UTC467 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

【#端小聚】和端一起做新聞!成長計劃舊生圍爐 你還想做新聞嗎? 端傳媒成長計劃已經來到第五期招募,過去已有超過40位記者與新聞相關專業人才的加入,產出不少優秀報道及作品。 這場線上端小聚,我們邀請參與過成長計劃的記者與製作人,透過第一手的真實經驗分享,讓你更了解成長計劃背後的樣貌:他們為何加入成長計劃?他們面臨哪些困難,獲得哪些啟發?專題記者與項目製作人需要具備哪些特質? ⊹ 活動時間:2026年9月9日(三)21:00-22:00(UTC+8) ⊹ 報名時間:即日起至2026年9月9日(三)12:00(UTC+8)為止 ⊹ 報名連結:https://buff.ly/gL93phB ⊹ 主持:端傳媒總編輯 - 陳婉容 ⊹ 分享: 端傳媒成長計劃第二期記者 - Janice 端傳媒成長計劃第三期記者 - 孫漫漫 端傳媒成長計劃第三期項目製作人 - Hong

31 Aug 2026, 23:05 UTC454 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

2026年8月14日,台灣立法院通過總預算案,比法定期限晚了266天,成為台灣史上最晚通過的總預算案。原列歲出總額為新台幣3兆349億7437萬1000元,審議結果共計減列480億元。 其中,國民黨不分區立委翁曉玲提案凍結、刪減總統國務機要費。針對這個案子,總統府副秘書長何志偉曾列席時說明該預算最大部分是用於採購37家「庇護工廠」所做的共1.5萬盒中秋節糕餅禮盒。在提案表決之前,韓國瑜也親自幫總統府說情,但仍遭堅持減列與凍結,導致總統府無法履行採購,引發新一輪政治風波。 爭議延燒後,藍營立委發起「認購」庇護工廠中秋禮盒:台北市長蔣萬安表示正在盤點;新北市長長侯友宜、台中市長盧秀燕、花蓮縣的立委傅崑萁都表示會向縣市內的庇護工場認購中秋禮盒。 對於此次風波,中華民國智障者家長總會發出聲明,表示在總統府有清楚的說明下,立委仍「明知故刪」,讓弱勢成為政治籌碼;該協會也呼籲,庇護工場應以「全年性工作機會」取代節慶性的訂單、不要讓障礙

31 Aug 2026, 12:04 UTC514 views2 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

小時候,外婆是偷偷塞零用錢給你的人,是把好吃的留給你的人,也是你長大後,才慢慢發現她其實有好多故事還沒說完的人。 飯桌上有粉葛湯、蒸魚、炒青菜和飯後果。電視和收音機開著,外公看馬,外婆一邊做飯一邊嘮叨。那些看似再普通不過的週末晚餐,就是「長大」與「老去」交會的時刻。 👉請點擊連結,閱讀全文,走進一個外孫的視角,聽他說起與外婆相處的點滴,也聽見一個家庭、一座城市,以及一代人的故事:https://theinitium.com/20260830-finding-a-worthy-grave-ngau-tau-kok-memory/?utm_source=telegram&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=telegram_0831 在華人的親情倫理,一個「外」字,彷彿就為親情劃界——儘管,我們之間都有愛。

2

31 Aug 2026, 04:01 UTC534 views1 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

你還記得小時候玩的第一款遊戲嗎?可能是一盤的卡帶、一張偷偷買的遊戲光碟,或是一台放學回家就想打開的掌機。 那時候,遊戲是「我的」。但後來,遊戲慢慢變了。 從單機到連線,從本地存檔到雲端伺服器,從一次買斷到免費遊玩、課金、抽卡。遊戲不再只是我們進去「玩一玩」的地方,也開始成為一個持續運作的世界。其他玩家留下的腳印會出現在你的遊戲裡;排行榜、角色強度、限定活動,甚至卡池更新的時間,都可能影響你怎麼玩、玩多久,以及願意花多少錢。 遊戲真正數位化的,是我們的記憶、社交方式,以及慾望。 👉請點擊連結,閱讀全文,每張卡帶、每盤遊戲碟都代表着一段個體生命的歷程,它們有的見證着此時此刻的歡愉,有的從過去而來,訴說一段差點被塵封的往事:https://theinitium.com/20260829-game-on-when-games-get-digitalized/?utm_source=telegram&utm_medium=soci

😭1

31 Aug 2026, 00:03 UTC549 views1 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

現年36歲的克蘭西被控殺害了她的三名子女:5歲的科拉(Cora)、3歲的道森(Dawson)與8個月大的卡蘭(Callan)。她本人在案發後墜樓導致下半身癱瘓,坐輪椅出庭,面臨「一級謀殺」罪指控。 案件發生在2023年1月24日。克蘭西的前夫派崔克(Patrick Clancy)從位於美國麻州的家中外出,返家後他發現屋內異常安靜、臥房的門上了鎖。他先看到克蘭西躺臥自家後院,受到重傷,幾乎失去意識。當醫療人員抵達救助克蘭西時,派崔克在地下室發現三個孩子,他們已遭彈力帶勒斃。 克蘭西跳樓自殺未遂,雖然活了下來,但下半身癱瘓。 本案件受到矚目之處在於,克蘭西曾經反覆向家人及醫療相關人士求助,卻無法阻止悲劇發生。克蘭西的辯護團隊指出,她曾求助多名醫療人員,並服用醫師開立的各種藥物,撥打過自殺防治熱線,也曾申請一項全日住院式的產後婦女治療計畫,但未被收治。 這場審判,也讓「產後精神病」再次被推到大眾視線中央。當精神疾病已經出現幻覺

1

30 Aug 2026, 10:03 UTC592 views2 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

8月17日晚,重慶時代峰峻所在的長江國際樓下,追星女性與一群前來嘲諷她們的年輕男性發生衝突。幾天之內,相關視頻片段在牆內外社交媒體流傳,並被不斷剪輯、轉述,甚至重新解釋。 衝突發生的原因衆說紛紜。 隨着事件發酵,原始的衝突視頻被平臺陸續刪除,相關社媒帖文變得難以檢索。在真相缺失的情況下,輿論對這場衝突出現截然不同的解讀。在警方和官媒口中,這場衝突由「不理性追星」引發,首先是一場需要治理、管制的事件。在虎撲和微博上,這是男性終於團結覺醒,反抗極端女權的時刻。在Threads上,這是一場由男性發起的、針對年輕女性的厭女暴力。在網左、毛左聚集的網站中,這場衝突甚至變成了「人民」對資本文化工業的反抗。 同一場衝突,為何會被說成完全不同的故事? 👉 點擊連結,看不同立場如何重新定義這場衝突,以及那些被反覆解釋的「追星女」,與始終難以被解釋的男性:https://theinitium.com/20260828-mainland-ti

👍1🤮1

30 Aug 2026, 04:01 UTC569 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

熱浪來了,政客為何說要慶祝? 今年夏天,熱浪席捲英國,也帶來野火、乾旱與農業生產等一連串衝擊。在這個背景下,英國改革黨副黨魁泰斯(Richard Tice)卻說,與其「垂頭喪氣」,不如多享受炎熱,甚至慶祝英格蘭葡萄酒和氣泡酒可能因此受惠。 乍看之下,這像是一場關於氣候變遷的政策爭論。但泰斯的發言可能不只是為了討論氣候政策。 泰斯刻意將討論轉化為「慶祝 vs. 垂頭喪氣」、「快樂希望 vs. 恐懼悲觀」、「明智 vs. 傲慢」的情緒對比。這種說法真正要爭取的,或許並不是讓選民接受某一項氣候政策,而是讓選民開始把不同政策立場,與「怎樣的政治人物」連結起來。 👉請點擊連結,閱讀全文,政治人物之所以用特定方式談論政策,其所關注的並不只是關於單一政策本身的良窳,甚至也未必是想要說服人們同意其政策立場。相反地,他們只是把這些政策討論當成一個名義、一個契機,是要藉著這些討論來定位自己和對手:https://theinitium.com

Showing the 12 most recent of 89 posts we hold for @theinitiumnews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

獨立媒體 inmediahk.net
@inmediahknet · 39,025
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 31 August 2026
香港人的蘋果
@appledailyhk26 · 30,121
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 7 September 2026
777文宣傳播稿件大合集
@hkposter777 · 22,381
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 20 September 2026
美国之音
@voachinese · 34,682
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 3 September 2026
RTHK即時新聞
@rthk_new_c · 49,581
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 25 August 2026
NOW 新聞
@nowtv_news · 42,741
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 29 August 2026
【李老师不是你老师】官方电报
@lilaoshibushinilaoshi · 48,585
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 26 August 2026
中国数字时代
@cdtchinesefeed · 44,229
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 29 August 2026

This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cross-platform identity — Wikidata

A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.

Q22100888 on Wikidata, read 13 September 2026
LabelInitium Media
DescriptionSingapore news company
X / Twitter@initiumnews
YouTubeUCavaX73lVLIMjzw3AkFm3Tw
Official sitehttps://theinitium.com

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“端傳媒官方頻道 Initium Media” (@theinitiumnews), 11,701 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/theinitiumnews.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.