Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 端傳媒官方頻道 Initium Media

Channel

端傳媒官方頻道 Initium Media

@theinitiumnews

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cross-platform identity · Cite this entry

18,026subscribers

+6,319 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001727734963
TypeChannel
Username@theinitiumnews
Description端傳媒成立於2015年,作為一家專注原創深度報導的媒體,端傳媒已獲得逾100項新聞及攝影大獎,是華文世界不可或缺的深度報導和多元聲音。 華爾街日報聯合訂閱方案: https://bit.ly/3xO2LZj 訂閱會員:http://bit.ly/2wVfM6g 學生方案:https://bit.ly/3bUODnu
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 November 2026
Measurements held60
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/theinitiumnews

Topic

National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 82% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

11,67718,02614,851.55 August 2026 — 11,707 subscribers6 August 2026 — 11,705 subscribers6 August 2026 — 11,705 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,708 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,709 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,705 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,700 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,699 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,698 subscribers14 August 2026 — 11,696 subscribers15 August 2026 — 11,698 subscribers17 August 2026 — 11,697 subscribers18 August 2026 — 11,684 subscribers19 August 2026 — 11,677 subscribers20 August 2026 — 11,681 subscribers21 August 2026 — 11,695 subscribers22 August 2026 — 11,698 subscribers24 August 2026 — 11,705 subscribers25 August 2026 — 11,703 subscribers26 August 2026 — 11,704 subscribers27 August 2026 — 11,703 subscribers28 August 2026 — 11,708 subscribers29 August 2026 — 11,715 subscribers30 August 2026 — 11,716 subscribers31 August 2026 — 11,718 subscribers1 September 2026 — 11,717 subscribers2 September 2026 — 11,719 subscribers4 September 2026 — 11,714 subscribers6 September 2026 — 11,725 subscribers9 September 2026 — 11,727 subscribers12 September 2026 — 11,719 subscribers13 September 2026 — 11,704 subscribers15 September 2026 — 11,697 subscribers17 September 2026 — 11,701 subscribers26 September 2026 — 11,711 subscribers4 October 2026 — 16,821 subscribers9 October 2026 — 17,444 subscribers13 October 2026 — 17,463 subscribers14 October 2026 — 17,466 subscribers16 October 2026 — 17,461 subscribers17 October 2026 — 17,457 subscribers18 October 2026 — 17,455 subscribers19 October 2026 — 17,457 subscribers20 October 2026 — 17,448 subscribers22 October 2026 — 17,441 subscribers23 October 2026 — 17,448 subscribers24 October 2026 — 17,441 subscribers25 October 2026 — 17,440 subscribers26 October 2026 — 17,439 subscribers27 October 2026 — 17,434 subscribers28 October 2026 — 17,443 subscribers29 October 2026 — 17,444 subscribers30 October 2026 — 17,437 subscribers31 October 2026 — 17,436 subscribers1 November 2026 — 17,870 subscribers2 November 2026 — 17,954 subscribers3 November 2026 — 17,999 subscribers4 November 2026 — 18,022 subscribers5 November 2026 — 18,018 subscribers6 November 2026 — 18,026 subscribers5 August 20266 November 2026
60 measurements spanning 92 days, net +6,319. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,725–18,978 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 60
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Nov 2026, 05:1918,026+8
5 Nov 2026, 07:4718,018-4
4 Nov 2026, 09:3918,022+23
3 Nov 2026, 11:4517,999+45
2 Nov 2026, 08:5017,954+84
1 Nov 2026, 11:1617,870+434
31 Oct 2026, 10:3117,436-1
30 Oct 2026, 07:3717,437-7
29 Oct 2026, 07:4617,444+1
28 Oct 2026, 08:4717,443+9
27 Oct 2026, 08:5417,434-5
26 Oct 2026, 07:3717,439-1
25 Oct 2026, 08:0617,440-1
24 Oct 2026, 04:5717,441-7
23 Oct 2026, 05:0017,448+7
22 Oct 2026, 01:5717,441-7
20 Oct 2026, 18:5817,448-9
19 Oct 2026, 20:1817,457+2
18 Oct 2026, 19:1817,455-2
17 Oct 2026, 20:1717,457first reading

Engagement

124 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.52%
avg views ÷ 18,026 subscribers
Avg views / post
634
35 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.395%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
35
of 124 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 21 of 35 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held124 (30 July 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total22,178
Reactions total56
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 15:52 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈3,780
Videos
≈7
Links
≈3,960

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
3m 23s
Average length
3m 23s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

163 reactions across 61 posts, in 26 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤5332.5%
👍3119.0%
🫡95.52%
😢74.29%
😭74.29%
🔥63.68%
👎53.07%
🙏53.07%
👏42.45%
🤡42.45%
🤬42.45%
🍾31.84%
💩31.84%
🖕31.84%
🥱31.84%
🕊21.23%
🤣21.23%
🤮21.23%
🤷‍♂21.23%
🥰21.23%
6 further kinds63.68%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 71 of the 124 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 168 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 124 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 35 posts held from the last 30 days (2.86%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

6 Nov 2026, 14:04 UTC152 viewsread 6 November 2026
Photo

2026 年 11 月 6 日,澳門民主派前議員區錦新因澳門安全法「顛覆國家政權」等罪名,被判囚 12 年 6 個月。 2025 年 7 月,澳門司法警察局拘捕時年 68 歲的區錦新,指有強烈跡象顯示他「長期勾結境外反華組織及敵對勢力」,違反澳門國安法第 13 條。這是澳門 1999 年主權移交、國安法 2009 年生效以來,首次引用國安法發動拘捕。 區錦新自 1993 年開始擔任澳門市政議員,1999 年主權移交後連續 5 屆擔任立法會議員,資歷超過 20 年。2021 年區錦新宣佈不尋求連任,而其多年競選拍檔吳國昌與多名民主派參選者共 21 人,被指不效忠澳門特區被取消參選資格(DQ),為澳門史上最大規模的 DQ 事件。 2020 年,端傳媒曾訪問區錦新與另一位澳門民主派元老吳國昌,彼時正值六四事件 31 年前夕,澳門的六四紀念晚會卻被警方以不利防疫為由驟然煞停。過去澳門舉辦六四悼念活動多少受官方刁難,但全面禁制卻是首…

6 Nov 2026, 13:35 UTC163 views1 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

「你的社會支援系統來自在地,那你就要把整個美濃的社會發展理念,放在所有政黨之上。」—— 美濃愛鄉協進會前總幹事 鍾永豐 在一片被視為綠營鐵票倉的高雄版圖裡,客家庄美濃始終顯得特立獨行。2024 年總統大選,賴清德在美濃僅領先侯友宜約兩個百分點,政黨票由國民黨居首;2022 年高雄市長選舉,陳其邁在此與柯志恩僅有 228 票之差。 這份「非藍非綠」的選票意向,並非政治搖擺,而是根植於深刻的生產歷史。鍾永豐分析,美濃緊密的地方認同不只靠血緣與地緣,更源於昔日高強度菸葉勞動鍛造出的「交工」換工網絡。1990 年代長達八年的反水庫運動中,返鄉青年與農民堅持不領補償回饋金、不替特定政黨站台,成功阻擋國家級工程,也奠定了地方自主的政治傳統。 走過菸業衰微與農產轉型,這套以鄉里社群為核心的自主意識延續至今。美濃人談政治謹守分寸、不輕易表態,比起藍綠政黨的招牌,在地人更在乎誰能真正回應這片土地的需求。 👉點擊連結,閱讀全文,走進高雄美濃…

❤1

6 Nov 2026, 13:03 UTC174 viewsread 6 November 2026
Photo

10月28日早上,西班牙發生了本國歷史上傷亡最慘重的高鐵事故。這是十個月內,同一條路線第二次發生重大追撞,奪走逾 110 條人命。曾是現代化與安全代名詞的西班牙「高鐵奇蹟」,正面臨前所未有的信任危機⋯⋯ 10 月底在烏爾達(Urda)發生的追撞事故中,連續列車控制系統(LZB)當機導致 63 公里路段失去主防護,馬德里阿托查(Atocha)行控中心調度員疑似在軌道遭佔用的情況下,錯誤指示後方列車以正常速度行駛,導致後方列車與前方停駛的列車相撞。交通部長普恩特將事故定調為「人為疏失」,隨即引發鐵路工會與在野黨強烈抨擊,痛批官方找基層當「替死鬼」推卸維護責任;普恩特最終宣布辭職。 工會與專家直指,悲劇背後是深層的系統失靈。服役超過三十年的 LZB 系統零件停產、頻繁當機,高壓作業的行控中心長期缺乏防呆保護機制;西班牙國家鐵路公司前戰略總監更指出,體制放任缺乏第一線實務經驗的新人直接接掌調度核心,暴露出嚴重的管理斷層。 過去三十…

6 Nov 2026, 11:04 UTC254 viewsread 6 November 2026
Photo

今日(11月6日),澳門首宗國安案件判刑。 69歲的澳門前民主派議員區錦新被裁定「顛覆國家政權罪」、兩項「與澳門特別行政區以外的組織、團體或個人建立聯繫作出危害國家安全的行為罪」、「違反保密罪」等罪成,判監12年半。 自 2025 年 7 月被捕至今,家屬難以與他聯絡;這場僅耗時三日的審訊全程閉門,由官方指派法官與律師,宣判前夕「突襲式」派籌,其後極速宣告旁聽額滿。在重重封閉與沉默之中,澳門完成了這場歷史性的國安審判。 對幾代澳門人而言,區錦新的名字曾長期錨定在公共生活裡。曾任小學教師的他,自 1993 年踏入議會,在直選僅佔少數的體制中連續多年當選議員。他曾形容,民主派就像躍進沙丁魚群的鯰魚,讓建制緊張;哪怕議會功能再「花瓶」,只要能指出問題,「我們是覺得有用的。」 1992 年創辦「新澳門學社」、多年來主持議事亭前地的六四燭光晚會,到退休後關注東望洋燈塔保育,他見證了澳門公共空間的消長——從 2020 年兩名女兒在街…

6 Nov 2026, 08:05 UTC430 views3 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

澳門首宗國安法案件今日(11月6日)宣判。69 歲的澳門民主派前立法會議員區錦新被初級法院刑事法院裁定「顛覆國家政權罪」、兩項「與澳門特別行政區以外的組織、團體或個人建立聯繫作出危害國家安全的行為罪」、「違反保密罪」等罪成,合共判囚 12 年半,預料將服刑至 2038 年,屆時已屆 82 歲高齡。 法院判詞指,區錦新長期配合境外敵對組織收集、散佈顛覆國家政權的政治主張,煽動對中央仇恨以圖推翻國家制度;又指其於 2021 年任議員期間,向境外洩漏閉門會議機密。本案於今年 9 月進行閉門審訊,由法庭「指定法官」審理及「指派律師」辯護。宣判前一日,當局「突襲式」開放公眾取籌旁聽,有市民稱自己4點02分到場,法院即稱「額滿」,僅 4 家本地媒體成功入席。 判刑後,區錦新妻子鄭妙珊首度發表公開信,指案件是「政治審判,是人格羞辱的莫須有迫害」,並表示作為家屬,目前只盼能獲准與在囚丈夫正常通訊及不受剝削地定期探訪。 區錦新的海外法律代表…

👎1🤬1🤮1

5 Nov 2026, 14:04 UTC706 views0 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

2025 年 11 月,中國快時尚電商 Shein,在巴黎有 170 年歷史的 BHV 百貨開設全球第一家實體店。這段引發議論的合作關係,在七個月之後告終。BHV 在百餘個品牌出走後易主,2026 年 Shien 在法國的銷售額下跌四成。 Shein 近年藉由演算法與超低定價,在歐洲市場攻城掠地。但線下門店價格一旦貼上標籤就難以調整,再加上租金成本,原有的超低定價便難以為繼。實體門店供貨須提前生產大量產品作為庫存,也讓 Shein 失去靈活敏捷的核心優勢。 開業初期,Shein 的忠實顧客期待在實體店享有線上的極致低價,現實卻令人失望。在薪資停滯、物價飛漲的法國,價格依然是消費者的第一考量。當他們對 Shein 低價的期待落空,便轉而購買其他品牌⋯⋯ 👉點擊連結,閱讀全文:https://theinitium.com/20261104-international-shein-bhv-paris/?utm_source=te…

5 Nov 2026, 13:03 UTC557 viewsread 6 November 2026
Photo

「領養的出發點應該是一個孩子失去了家庭照顧,需要另外一個家庭,而不是一個成年人想要孩子,所以體系就要去給他找一個孩子。」 1992 年,張雯第一次走進中國的一家兒童福利院。她至今還記得那裡撲面而來的尿布味,與無人照料的孩子。此後,她投身國際收養與兒童救助 30 多年,經歷中國國際收養從興起到衰落,最終在 2024 年基本結束的整個過程。 這條職業軌跡裡,有一個看似矛盾、其實一以貫之的變化:作為一個從事國際收養的人,她後來開始希望國際收養不再必要。早年,她面對的問題是:福利院裡有那麼多孩子,要怎樣為他們找到家庭;後來她開始追問:這些孩子為什麼會進入福利院? 張雯指出,收養絕非成年人的權利,更不應從家長需求出發去「製造」可收養兒童。真正的核心在於看見孩子的需求。若能透過醫療與經濟支援陪伴原生家庭,許多孩子原本不必被迫分離。她因此認為,國際收養最終應走向消解,由體系轉向支持家庭⋯⋯ 👉點擊連結,閱讀全文:https://the…

5 Nov 2026, 12:02 UTC497 views1 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

「吃下這塊麵包會不會讓我立刻變胖?」、「沒有做空腹有氧,我今天是不是退步?」、「如果不把食物吐出來,體重計上的數字會不會一發不可收拾?」 Hilary 是一名健身教練。在大家眼裡,她是個「飲食清淡、熱愛運動的健康女孩」;但實際上,她受飲食失調困擾長達十年。 在她的記憶中,童年的餐桌從不溫馨,而是權力與情緒宣洩的地方。長輩長期的身材羞辱,讓她自小深陷「變胖就等於不配被愛」的恐懼。為了掌控身體、證明自己的價值,她一頭栽進健身、成為一名精算熱量的「卡路里專家」。 然而,長期的身體剝奪最終引來反撲。在一次因過飽引發的嘔吐後,她發現:「原來吃進去的東西,只要吐出來就不會變胖。」自此,她跌入節食、暴食與催吐的成癮循環。直到某個深夜催吐到身體痙攣、呼吸困難,她癱軟在冰冷的地板上,才突然驚醒:「我引以為傲的『自律』,不過是一場徹頭徹尾的自我毀滅。」 但醒來之後,開口求助往往比咬牙死撐更難。承認自己患上飲食失調,過程好比一場「出櫃」——你…

👍1

5 Nov 2026, 11:04 UTC462 viewsread 6 November 2026
Photo

根據帝國理工學院(Imperial College London)、網際網路檔案館(Internet Archive)與史丹佛大學(Stanford University)於今年4月發表的研究,2025 年上半年新上線的網站中,有超過三分之一(35%)的內容由人工智慧參與生成。 研究檢驗了關於 AI 內容的六大假說,包括「語意收縮」、「正面化」、「真相衰退」、「知識孤島」、「資訊熵稀釋」,以及「風格單一化」。結果發現,六項假說中,只有「語意收縮」和「正面化」兩項在統計上成立,其餘四項則未獲證實。換句話說,AI 對網際網路造成的影響,主要是讓內容更同質,想法更正面。 那麼,為什麼 AI 的回答總是偏向正面?一個經常被討論的原因,是大型語言模型在訓練後期採用的「人類回饋強化學習」(RLHF),可能讓模型更傾向「討好使用者」⋯⋯ 👉點擊連結,閱讀全文:https://theinitium.com/20261104-tech-in…

5 Nov 2026, 10:02 UTC555 views1 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

2026年9月初,黃之鋒勾結外國勢力案定罪當天,移居英國的攝影記者 Peter 終於打開電腦硬盤內,拍攝學民思潮的舊照片。 與黃之鋒同年、30歲的 Peter Wong 是攝影師,也曾是學民思潮成員,他在14年前記錄了學民初始誕生的面貌。那是他攝影的起點,也是黃之鋒一代中學生,投身香港社會運動的起點。14年間,他由一個喜歡拍攝的中學生變成攝影記者;同時間,黃之鋒由一個關心社會、國際知名的中學生踏入30歲,變成國安法下被定罪判囚十年的囚犯。 親歷2010年代的社運風潮、那個「好像『做乜都無事』的時空」,當時憧憬著成為一名攝影記者的Peter曾想像,自己會不會像著名攝影師 Pete Souza 跟拍奧巴馬8年一樣,能持續追縱一個未來立法會議員的成長? 後來,現實逐漸沖淡了他成為 Pete Souza 的想像,他也很多年沒有提及自己的中學回憶;當日的夥伴也各散東西。 但是,黃之鋒被定罪、被判刑,還是讓他內心泛起漣漪。9月初,他…

❤1

5 Nov 2026, 08:05 UTC663 views7 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

前香港眾志秘書長黃之鋒被控國安法下串謀勾結外國勢力罪,今天(11月5日)在高等法院被判囚 10 年,其中 2 個月 2 日刑期,與其「顛覆國家政權罪」刑期同期執行。現年 30 歲、已還押近六年的黃之鋒,原本預計於 2027 年 1 月獲釋;加刑後他須服刑至 2036 年,出獄時或已約 40 歲。 本案量刑的核心爭議,在於罪行是否屬於《國安法》規定的「罪行重大」。辯方曾力陳,黃之鋒在《國安法》生效後的參與程度有限、手法不複雜,嚴重性不及黎智英案;加上他及早認罪、已被羈押近 6 年,請求法庭以接近10年囚禁為量刑起點,給予認罪及求情的全數扣減,讓他能在尚可貢獻社會的年紀重新融入社會。 然而法官譚耀豪駁回辯方主張,裁定本案屬「罪行重大」,並列出多項關鍵理由包括: 一、角色關鍵且有預謀:法庭指黃之鋒與羅冠聰分工明確,黃完全知悉羅在海外的行動,並在本地及海外以文章協力聲援;二人是刻意調整角色以推進罪行,完全知悉法律後果; 二、非主…

🖕3😭2❤1🤬1

5 Nov 2026, 04:03 UTC471 views7 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

「如果佢十年後先出返嚟,我唔會去諗到時嘅香港係一個點樣嘅香港,我只會諗我希望到時嘅我係一個點樣嘅我。」—— 前學民思潮成員錢詩文 今天(11月5日),30歲的黃之鋒因被控勾結外國勢力罪在香港高等法院被判刑十年,預計在2036年出獄,屆時或已40歲。至今,他已經被還柙超過2170天。 曾經意氣風發的少年,在已經沒有政治進路的香港,無論是以前被加諸、或是黃之鋒自己主動嵌入的角色經已大多消失。在重刑之中,在消散之中,在「無」之中,要怎樣自處呢? 他最近給朋友的獄中信寫道:「你我自細已對個世界咁有要求……將個要求擺返係自己身上,又點會唔得呢?既然老早已對個社會咁有訴求,我地都應然對自己有番相稱嘅訴求,越不得過且過地過活,方支撐得起我地對世界嘅訴求,共勉。」 端傳媒訪問了前學民思潮成員 Louis、錢詩文,和何嘉柔,嘗試透過這六年的書信和探訪對話,談談他們與黃之鋒的記憶。 👉點擊連結,閱讀全文:https://theinitiu…

🫡5🥰1😢1

Showing the 12 most recent of 124 posts we hold for @theinitiumnews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

獨立媒體 inmediahk.net
@inmediahknet · 38,610
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 31 August 2026
香港人的蘋果
@appledailyhk26 · 29,416
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 7 September 2026
777文宣傳播稿件大合集
@hkposter777 · 22,561
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 20 September 2026
美国之音
@voachinese · 42,194
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 3 September 2026
RTHK即時新聞
@rthk_new_c · 49,002
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 25 August 2026
NOW 新聞
@nowtv_news · 42,366
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 29 August 2026
【李老师不是你老师】官方电报
@lilaoshibushinilaoshi · 49,084
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 26 August 2026
中国数字时代
@cdtchinesefeed · 51,923
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 29 August 2026

This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cross-platform identity — Wikidata

A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.

Q22100888 on Wikidata, read 1 November 2026
LabelInitium Media
DescriptionSingapore news company
X / Twitter@initiumnews
YouTubeUCavaX73lVLIMjzw3AkFm3Tw
Official sitehttps://theinitium.com

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“端傳媒官方頻道 Initium Media” (@theinitiumnews), 18,026 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/theinitiumnews.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.