Channel
@realtimenewsbroadcasts
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
60,003subscribers
-1,056 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001173826177 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @realtimenewsbroadcasts |
| Description | 除此Telegram頻道及Instagram（@realtimehk）之外，本台並無任何社交媒體賬號、專頁或姊妹頻道，亦不接受任何報料，敬希垂注。 頻道目的 示威頻繁時，新聞傳媒多有即時直播，但一般為現場情況感到焦急的廣大市民實在難以同時追看多個傳媒從不同角度拍攝的片段。因此本頻道提供實時直播新聞的畫面及消息，望協助市民不論身在何方，亦可清晰地了解現場的最新動態。 行動 示威進行時，本頻道會盡量覆蓋最多新聞直播頻道，盡力於每五至十分鐘更新不同角度的畫面。沒有示威行動時，會因應情況不定時更新。 |
| Created | 1 July 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/realtimenewsbroadcasts |
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 19:36 | 60,003 | -37 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 16:57 | 60,040 | -47 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 23:59 | 60,087 | -53 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 05:16 | 60,140 | -62 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 19:20 | 60,202 | -91 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 12:19 | 60,293 | -64 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 05:18 | 60,357 | -23 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 15:39 | 60,380 | -16 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 17:18 | 60,396 | -28 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 19:56 | 60,424 | +22 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 22:14 | 60,402 | -36 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 19:54 | 60,438 | -6 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 17:15 | 60,444 | -27 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 15:17 | 60,471 | -27 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 12:17 | 60,498 | -23 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 09:22 | 60,521 | -30 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 08:12 | 60,551 | -77 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 14:18 | 60,628 | -28 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 05:17 | 60,656 | -23 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 02:11 | 60,679 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 8 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 101 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
1150 #大埔 #宏福苑 #五級火 #四大訴求 #聯署 #國安法 大埔宏福苑五級火後，有大學生發起網上聯署，要求包括： 1. 持續支援受災居民 2. 成立獨立調查委員會 3. 重新審視工程監管制度 4. 全力追究監管疏忽，問責政府官員 據多間傳媒報道，聯署發起人於昨日被國安處以意圖煽動拘捕，並帶返住所搜証。 駐港國安公署昨日亦曾發稿，指仍有人散播虛假消息，意圖煽動對政府仇恨。 更多報導：https://www.inmediahk.net/node/%E6%94%BF%E7%B6%93/%E3%80%90%E5%AE%8F%E7%A6%8F%E8%8B%91%E4%BA%94%E7%B4%9A%E7%81%AB%E3%80%91%E8%81%AF%E7%BD%B2%E7%99%BC%E8%B5%B7%E4%BA%BA%E8%A2%AB%E5%B8%B6%E8%BF%94%E8%AD%A6%E7%BD%B2-%E9%97%…
1918 #大埔 #宏福苑 #五級火 大埔宏福苑五級火造成的死亡人數增至128人，包括一名殉職消防員。截至下午3時許，79名傷者中，一人仍於深切治療部留醫。 火警期間，警方接獲467宗失蹤人口個案，其中部分重覆。失聯人士中，39人確認死亡，35人送院治理，110人確認安全，尚有約200情況未明。 保安局局長鄧炳強指，目前仍有89具遺體未確認身份，其中約一半於單位內尋獲，相信可於短期內確認身份。餘下約40具遺體則需要更多時間確認，但不排除有機會再於現場尋獲更多遺體。 更多報導：https://news.rthk.hk/rthk/ch/component/k2/1833749-20251128.htm #RTHK
0646 #大埔 #宏福苑 #五級火 大埔宏福苑五級火造成的死亡人數增至94人，包括一名殉職消防員。截至早上5時，78名傷者中，有12人危殆、28人嚴重、16人穩定、22人已出院。 消防滅火工作仍然持續，7座大廈火勢已大致救熄，有個別單位仍然冒出火光。 更多報導：https://news.rthk.hk/rthk/ch/component/k2/1833684-20251128.htm #RTHK
0130 #大埔 #宏福苑 #五級火 消防處於凌晨一時許見記者，表示搜救及滅火行動仍未完結。截至現時為止，於火警現場死亡人數增至79人，另外4人送院後證實不治，失蹤人數尚待確認。 #now
0335 #大埔 #宏福苑 #五級火 大埔宏福苑大火發生超過一日，目前消防處滅火及搜救仍在 在進行中。 時至晚上8時，火警中死亡人數增至65人，另有77人受傷。 詳細報導：https://news.rthk.hk/rthk/ch/component/k2/1833636-20251127.htm #RTHK
消防澄清死亡數字為四十四人，其中四十人於現場證實不治，另外四人於送院後證實不治。
0557 #大埔 #宏福苑 #五級火 消防及警察於清晨約5點50分見記者。 消防處表示七座起火大樓當中，有四座火勢受控。火災暫已造成四十人死亡。 警察稱負責相關大廈維修工程公司兩名董事及一名顧問涉嫌誤殺被捕，三男現正被拘留調查。 #now
0335 #大埔 #宏福苑 #五級火 大埔宏福苑大火焚燒超過12小時，至今仍未救熄。 時至凌晨1時，火警中死亡人數增至36人，另有29人留醫，其中7人危殆。據政府數字，現場仍有279人失聯。 詳細報導：https://news.rthk.hk/rthk/ch/component/k2/1833461-20251127.htm #RTHK
0200 #大埔 #宏福苑 #五級火 大埔宏福苑大火自昨日下午起，焚燒接近十二小時仍未救熄。消防處於晚上六時將火警升至五級，並出動超過700名消防員參與救援。 時至昨日晚上11時45分，消防處於火場救出43人。其中9人現場證實死亡，4人送院後證實不治，包括沙田消防局一名消防員。傷者中7人情況危殆、12人情況嚴重。 消防處副處長陳慶勇回應記者提問時表示，火場中兩、三座大廈情況仍然嚴峻，目前難以估計何時能救熄。 詳細報導：https://www.inmediahk.net/node/%E6%94%BF%E7%B6%93/%E3%80%90%E5%AE%8F%E7%A6%8F%E8%8B%91%E4%BA%94%E7%B4%9A%E7%81%AB%E3%80%91%E6%B6%88%E9%98%B2%E8%99%95%E7%A8%B1%E6%83%85%E6%B3%81%E5%9A%B4%E5%B3%BB-%E6%9A%AB%…
Sticker, posted without a caption
1327 特別天氣報告 天文台於下午1時20分改發八號東南烈風或暴風信號。 #天文台
Sticker, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @realtimenewsbroadcasts. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 28 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“實時現場新聞直播（及 獨家實時消息）” (@realtimenewsbroadcasts), 60,003 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/realtimenewsbroadcasts.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.