e_zero: jandan.net/t/6204728 OO: 93 XX: 4 思绪云骞: 《地下街机厅的对决!宿敌居然是纪委大人!》 OO: 61, XX: 0 享受堕落: 那是他的童年啊,可以暂时离开冰冷世界的地方。 OO: 49, XX: 0 laozhuya: 好幸福的说 OO: 29, XX: 0 超级彩笔: 好多游戏至今还能有用户就是这类人,像传奇,有人不理解为啥还有人玩、甚至还充钱? 他们就类似这些中年人在办公室里,没工作或者做完了,就想找个东西打发时间放松一下,你让他去开把LOL、开个黑猴?有那精力么?甚至一个游戏名字太长都懒得读完,更别说去学习一款陌生的游戏,这时候看到一个传奇,点进去自己就会玩,顶多比以前多了些功能,但并不影响,那它的市场价值就出来了,街机也是同理。 OO: 24, XX: 0 沐灶金: 40多岁的副厅啊 OO: 22, XX: 0

Channel
煎蛋无聊图
@jandan_pic
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
25,263subscribers
+168 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001076595214 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @jandan_pic |
| Created | 15 October 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/jandan_pic |
Topic
Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 02:40 | 25,263 | -5 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 18:17 | 25,268 | +2 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 04:18 | 25,266 | -4 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 14:00 | 25,270 | +24 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 12:59 | 25,246 | +18 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 11:01 | 25,228 | -6 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 14:16 | 25,234 | +4 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 23:26 | 25,230 | +4 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 20:43 | 25,226 | -3 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 18:48 | 25,229 | +14 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 16:02 | 25,215 | -4 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 16:18 | 25,219 | +10 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 17:16 | 25,209 | +17 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 15:42 | 25,192 | +6 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 16:16 | 25,186 | +12 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 18:18 | 25,174 | +2 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 16:58 | 25,172 | +10 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 21:47 | 25,162 | +1 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 12:14 | 25,161 | -4 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 11:04 | 25,165 | first reading |
Engagement
1,019 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.42%
- avg views ÷ 25,263 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 358
- 433 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.737%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 433
- of 1,019 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 252 of 433 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 1,019 (5 August 2026 – 3 September 2026) |
| Views total | 155,150 |
| Reactions total | 714 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 10:34 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 23m 31s
- Average length
- 16s
Measured directly from 91 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,449 reactions across 535 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 1,167 | 80.5% | |
| 👎 | 282 | 19.5% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 541 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,449 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 6 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
卷心菜: jandan.net/t/6204633 OO: 94 XX: 14 蛋友24d9a30d3322: 假发质量? OO: 57, XX: 0 沐游烦恼: 病情比别人严重 OO: 17, XX: 0 万神殿: 少健身,多撸管,睾酮低,头发多。 OO: 15, XX: 0
Q_Z: jandan.net/t/6204694 OO: 96 XX: 3 麦辣辣辣汉堡: 外卖小哥看了瞳孔地震 OO: 38, XX: 0 binfox1: 张十八 你将永无开悟之日。 OO: 38, XX: 0
杯面骑士: jandan.net/t/6204688 OO: 94 XX: 3 绫绫憇: 某太阳:嘿嘿嘿 OO: 69, XX: 0 清纯骑士: 热知识:现在很多国家连自己印自己国家钞票的技术都没有,都是找老中老美帮自己印的 OO: 28, XX: 1 蛋友17092717db194: 金主爱她爹干过 OO: 19, XX: 0 知产二大爷: 有没有可能其实已经印了呢 OO: 5, XX: 0
浮华暂借问: jandan.net/t/6204658 OO: 97 XX: 7 丧彪: 要么老图 要么摆拍,现在没有这种质量的技师了 OO: 43, XX: 2 绫绫憇: 剧透:女主后面和男主复合了 OO: 30, XX: 0 变老的大二: 丧彪 自己家自己老婆 OO: 15, XX: 0
四月天: jandan.net/t/6204644 OO: 100 XX: 3 Yeah耶: 中间看着很像某个meme图里翘手的老板 OO: 6, XX: 0 蛋友e659236477c1e: 去找心理委员了 OO: 6, XX: 0
👍3
杯面骑士: jandan.net/t/6204714 OO: 112 XX: 1 小坷垃: 你V我50 我不光信你.我还喊你万岁.. OO: 25, XX: 0
👍2
浮华暂借问: jandan.net/t/6204634 OO: 83 XX: 12 一对奶白的雪子: 骆驼祥子只用拉车 OO: 61, XX: 1 木螺丝: 我们也要快进到美国那种一人3份工的福报里了么 OO: 36, XX: 6 coldster: 木螺丝 统计就业算三个人 OO: 26, XX: 1
👎2
非必要不封图: jandan.net/t/6204699 OO: 95 XX: 10 binfox1: 还是西药见效就是快 OO: 30, XX: 0 魔术师彼安布楚莱莎: 只希望这些学生争取自己权益的行为不要被曲解和迫害 OO: 8, XX: 0
👍5
千里光: jandan.net/t/6204613 OO: 75 XX: 10 蛋友e659236477c1e: 姐:你的,太短。 OO: 24, XX: 0 观竹吃笋: 坏人坐一半, 好人坐到底。 那么坏人每次都只需要付半价吗? OO: 5, XX: 0
场地湿滑: jandan.net/t/6204638 OO: 79 XX: 9 蛋友17061eb66b370: 死了以后埋3个坑 OO: 29, XX: 0 dongzxs: 要相信他们一部分人的屁股已经歪了,完全背离了当初的方向和理想,就是异化了,跟历史、朝代没关系,社会就是这样,人性不变的。非变革无法解决,循环往续。 OO: 15, XX: 0 three: 前段时间中美网友大对账很多人对美国人打好几份工作才能保持收支平衡还表示不能理解呢 OO: 5, XX: 0
👍4
Q_Z: jandan.net/t/6204557 OO: 79 XX: 7 蛋友1706375246a46: 美国两百多斤的可不在少数 OO: 25, XX: 2 蛋友8fc1d0d8ab51b0: 那咋了,胖猫好玩 OO: 11, XX: 1
👎3👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,019 posts we hold for @jandan_pic. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@funnypics2000 · 215 posts笔记本:好图收藏与整理:头像和其他
@linyunbook4 · 65511 posts每日無數汪
@wushuwang · 2,10411 postsPika广播电台 | 上班中
@PikaRadio · 12110 posts螺莉莉的黑板报
@im_RORIRI · 3,8155 posts二手数字泔水以及更多
@nichoIascw · 7904 postsTurnA后花园
@aturnsfw · 1053 posts可爱小狗
@keaixiaogou · 2,5013 posts乱七八糟
@everthingaboutbullshit · 32 posts二手鱼奇谭
@idlefishFuckyBargainers · 7832 posts灵车漂移 ~ 波音 ver. ~
@tesla_drifting · 1,5202 posts数字踪迹
@vwebarchive · 412 postsFlyingSky's Channel
@FlyingSky233 · 4951 postcampestria noctis | Free 🇵🇸
@NightPlains · 1031 post泛用型 ACG 记录频道 · 剧透注意
@ak1ra_acg · 281 postアキラの小冊子
@ak1ra_ch · 1501 post#ak1ra-lab
@ak1ra_lab · 271 post晓空ノ频道💖
@akatsukisora · 971 post荔枝木
@lychee_wood · 17,7381 postアミナ・コイムのひみつ基地
@meme_sammlung · 3,3641 post可爱动物随手收藏
@moeanimals · 3591 post这才是真正的骚话
@nicholascw_nsfw · 551 post贪玩电动(停售实体版)
@oojbk · 2,1091 postRandom Collect
@randomcollect · 11 post小熊猫的交易之路
@redPandaStock · 1,2021 post&'a ::rynco::UntitledChannel
@rynif · 4,4541 post每日沙雕墙
@woshadiao · 115,3241 post每日沙雕墙 Ⅱ
@woshadiaoo · 6091 post今天又发现了哪个漂亮小姐姐
@xiaojiejiexixi · 3,1691 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@CE_Observe · 74,794#1
@zaihuapd · 282,472#2
@fucku_idiot · 40,335#3
@bluebird_channel · 7,915#4
@snowodka · 722#5
@baguabox · 33,433#6
@acgdaily · 16,627#7
@goworkbitch · 24,812#8
@JISFW · 12,753#9
@FoolishTraceWind · 16,646#10
@solidot · 47,464#11
@xhqcankao · 163,238#12
@tnews365 · 164,267#13
@miaowu · 19,936#14
@pingrangTV · 29,178#15
@Hearse_Drifting · 10,547#16
@outvivid · 9,009#17
@KarenMoeMoe · 9,401#18
@cnbeta_com · 27,529#19
@LetITFlyW · 9,586#20
@DNSPODT · 71,856#21
@tesla_drifting · 1,520#22
@funnyweibo · 4,875#23
@NewlearnerChannel · 67,412#24
@vps_xhq · 49,725#25
@oojbk · 2,109#26
@KatyushaUnion · 3,663#27
@landiansub · 44,850#28
@GodlyNews1 · 68,855#29
@lifepofour · 2,209#30
@abcthoughts · 6,944#31
@BigXhead_Aeroplane · 1,899#32
@ijustseesee · 2,855#33
@NewsFW · 6,823#34
@NewWorldObservationLog · 6,956#35
@milkice_portal · 3,223#36
@SwitchNewCN · 7,447#37
@today_bean · 2,889#38
@sspai · 38,228#39
@memes_backup · 2,879#40
@billchenla · 3,156#41
@jike_collection · 35,819#42
@archlinuxcn · 11,175#43
@Laoself · 3,028#44
@titan_pain · 20,773#45
@mokeyjay_channel · 2,731#46
@nt_cubic · 2,042#47
@programmerjokes · 107,064#48
@wtfhifi · 2,021#49
@WjwOfficial · 5,952#50
@cnphotog_collect · 6,787#51
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 14 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@goworkbitch · 24,812
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 15 September 2026
@ruheyushadiaoxiangchu · 28,742
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 9 September 2026
@baguabox · 33,433
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 38 here — alongside 37 others — read 4 September 2026
@fucku_idiot · 40,335
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 30 August 2026
@pingrangTV · 29,178
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 8 September 2026
@nCoV2019 · 33,065
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 4 September 2026
@CE_Observe · 74,794
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 19 August 2026
@cyber_confessional · 40,109
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 35 here — alongside 34 others — read 30 August 2026
@zaobaosg · 36,845
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 1 September 2026
@woshadiao · 115,324
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 14 August 2026
@cnbeta_com · 27,529
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 10 September 2026
@jike_collection · 35,819
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 2 September 2026
@tnews365 · 164,267
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 12 August 2026
@cdtchinesefeed · 44,229
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 29 August 2026
@VoiceofPooh · 22,612
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 20 September 2026
@sspai · 38,228
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 31 August 2026
@solidot · 47,464
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 28 August 2026
@rthk_new_c · 49,581
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 25 August 2026
@realtimenewsbroadcasts · 60,003
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 28 August 2026
@NewlearnerChannel · 67,412
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 21 August 2026
@qunyouwen · 89,462
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 17 August 2026
@times001 · 84,914
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 18 August 2026
This channel appears in 22 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“煎蛋无聊图” (@jandan_pic), 25,263 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jandan_pic.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.