Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for &'a ::rynco::UntitledChannel

Channel

&'a ::rynco::UntitledChannel

@rynif

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

4,437subscribers

+53 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001305205308
TypeChannel
Username@rynif
Created30 April 2018measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 September 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/rynif

Growth

4,3774,4374,4076 August 2026 — 4,384 subscribers6 August 2026 — 4,384 subscribers12 August 2026 — 4,377 subscribers15 August 2026 — 4,388 subscribers18 August 2026 — 4,407 subscribers22 August 2026 — 4,414 subscribers25 August 2026 — 4,425 subscribers4 September 2026 — 4,428 subscribers9 September 2026 — 4,437 subscribers6 August 20269 September 2026
9 measurements spanning 35 days, net +53. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,368–4,446 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Sept 2026, 17:194,437+9
4 Sept 2026, 02:014,428+3
25 Aug 2026, 13:274,425+11
22 Aug 2026, 07:494,414+7
18 Aug 2026, 23:524,407+19
15 Aug 2026, 15:254,388+11
12 Aug 2026, 04:224,377-7
6 Aug 2026, 04:164,384no change
6 Aug 2026, 04:084,384first reading

Engagement

49 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 49 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
17s
Average length
17s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

96 reactions across 19 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🥰3031.3%
😁2425.0%
❤‍🔥99.38%
🤯77.29%
🕊66.25%
😇55.21%
44.17%
🐳44.17%
🤗44.17%
🗿11.04%
🤔11.04%
🤨11.04%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 27 of the 49 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 172 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 49 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 13:53 UTC246 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

完全一致的姿势.jpg

🥰7

Signed Rynco Maekawa

8 Aug 2026, 09:26 UTC304 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

とり: https://twitter.com/Aoitori_775/status/2085822155133276199

🥰3

Signed Rynco Maekawa

8 Aug 2026, 06:40 UTC366 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @popdailydose

我非常喜欢使用人工智能。每天早上,我都打开威艾斯-代码,启动微软副驾驶员。我还可以运行奇米代码,来尝试和国内最先进的大模型奇米-三聊天和完成工作。大模型们输出的词元都很聪明,还有的大模型可以生成图片!所以我觉得词元这个词汇未免有些狭隘,我提议不如干脆叫它新智元。当运行重复性工作时,廉价的深度求索-威四-闪电就能大展身手。我看着智能体们工作,喝一口凉白开,很难想象世界已经变化了这么大。这一切都源于几年前,聊天-生成式预训练变换器出现的那一刻

😁1

Signed Rynco Maekawa

8 Aug 2026, 05:42 UTC420 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Anastasios Nikolas Angelopoulos: Kimi. Short for Kriminal. https://twitter.com/ml_angelopoulos/status/2085754754505101616 Reuters: Chinese startup Moonshot's AI model breaks out of testing environment, researchers say reut.rs/45Rp2bP reut.rs/45Rp2bP https://twitter.com/Reuters/status/2085676111317401748

😁5

Signed Rynco Maekawa

8 Aug 2026, 05:39 UTC389 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

二次元的事情你们少管.jpg

Signed Rynco Maekawa

8 Aug 2026, 05:30 UTC362 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Bananyana 🍌: it's for the smaller hitbox i swear!!! https://twitter.com/nyacelcore/status/2085863964273975794

🥰7

Signed Rynco Maekawa

8 Aug 2026, 04:02 UTC332 viewsread 8 August 2026

https://nso.edu/press-release/nsf-inouye-solar-telescope-enables-major-discovery-of-a-hidden-solar-process/

Signed Rynco Maekawa

7 Aug 2026, 18:55 UTC354 viewsread 8 August 2026

https://fixupx.com/SpaceX/status/2085786988225925349/photo/1

Signed didi

7 Aug 2026, 18:54 UTC334 viewsread 8 August 2026

https://fixupx.com/SpaceX/status/2085786988225925349

Signed didi

7 Aug 2026, 17:06 UTC284 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @SolidotR

观鸟活动或有助于延缓大脑衰老 #科学 发表在《Journal of Neuroscience》期刊上的一项研究发现,资深观鸟者的大脑结构与普通人之间存在一些差异,或许正是这些差异让他们能更好地识别陌生鸟类。这或许表明,观鸟活动能重塑人的大脑,其作用机制与学习一门语言或一种乐器类似。这类活动或许能增强参与者的认知储备,即提升大脑抵御衰老、适应损伤的能力。 在学习或练习某项技能时,大脑会强化并优化相关神经通路,这种能力被称为“神经可塑性”,是人类发展专业技能的基础。为探究观鸟活动是否同样能重塑大脑,加拿大约克大学的研究人员对 48 名业余观鸟者进行了大脑结构与功能分析。受试者年龄在 22-79 岁之间,两组在性别、年龄和受教育程度上均相当,其中有一半经筛查测试被判定为资深观鸟者,而另一半为新手。 https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/becoming-an-expert-birder-

🕊6🗿1

Signed NAVI

7 Aug 2026, 13:13 UTC382 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

世界平和なんて噓だ 皆一人ぼっちだ

🤗4

Signed Rynco Maekawa

Showing the 12 most recent of 49 posts we hold for @rynif. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

每日消费电子观察
@CE_Observe · 74,327
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 19 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“&'a ::rynco::UntitledChannel” (@rynif), 4,437 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rynif.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.