Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for emit Light();

Channel

emit Light();

@idawnlightc

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

579subscribers

+5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001215852602
TypeChannel
Username@idawnlightc
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/idawnlightc

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

574579576.57 August 2026 — 574 subscribers8 August 2026 — 574 subscribers29 August 2026 — 577 subscribers14 September 2026 — 579 subscribers7 August 202614 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 38 days, net +5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 573–580 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Sept 2026, 12:17579+2
29 Aug 2026, 23:37577+3
8 Aug 2026, 03:31574no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:38574first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

11 reactions across 4 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🐳436.4%
😁436.4%
🗿327.3%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 06:40 UTC51 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @Laoself

https://notashelf.dev/posts/taste-is-all-thats-left

7 Aug 2026, 04:27 UTC37 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @outvivid

🔴 Linux 内核 sctp 模块本地提权漏洞 SCTPhantom。 - 腾讯朱雀实验室利用 AI 辅助发现了一个于 2008 年引入的 sctp 模块的漏洞。 - Kernel 上游和 Debian Sid 已经发布修复版本。 CVE: CVE-2026-64564 CVSS: 8.5 (作者自评) Fixed-In: 6.6.148, 6.12.101, 6.18.42, 7.1.6, 7.2-rc5 matrix.tencent.com/~ [感谢一位匿名订户提供信息。] #SCTPhantom #Kernel

6 Aug 2026, 09:02 UTC456 viewsread 8 August 2026

https://forums.swift.org/t/our-android-app-is-written-in-swift/88778

5 Aug 2026, 07:32 UTC65 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @tnews365Photo

东京大学研究生院生物医学信息专业,去年秋季将“六四天安門”字样写入招生网页的metadata中,似为使其被中国搜索引擎屏蔽。页面本身并无相关内容。 校方今年3月获知此事,令当事单位删除该关键词,并更新系统,防止页面源码再被植入不当关键词。 东大宣传部门表示,如果确实存在阻碍特定国家访问的意图,这将与东大接纳国内外多元化学生和教职员工的方针背道而驰,属于不当之举,对此深感遗憾。当事的新领域创成科学研究科表示,目前正在核实该关键词被写入的具体经过。 (东大新闻社)

5 Aug 2026, 02:37 UTC215 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

关于Google pay支付bug的一些吐槽 问题的来龙去脉参考楼主主页另一篇帖子。 太长不看:工程师写代码不动脑子一刀切,面对bug傲慢至极,前倨而后恭,思之令人发笑。 楼主的手机应该是比较早出问题的之一,最开始楼主认为是国产系统的问题,反映给了OPPO,那边的工程师次日就给了反馈表示会修。但当楼主发现国内其他安卓品牌也有类似问题的时候,就意识到这可能是安卓的问题。 楼主遂在公司内向Google wallet组提交了bug report,抽象的是两天无人回应[doge] 楼主于是将相关问题发到内部老中大群,有热心安卓组群友将问题转发给了相关组的工程师,问题才真的被定位。 但是!楼主不得不吐槽,在定位到这是为了修三星的bug引入的问题之后,他们的回复都变得简短而推脱,大意就是意料之中、左右为难、要按照三星的要求blabla。楼主因为不了解安卓的业务细节,也不敢妄下断言这个修复是否合理。 转机出现在一名(应该是mana

4 Aug 2026, 15:13 UTC76 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @ManjusakaH

https://fxtwitter.com/AikidoSecurity/status/2084584370556530882 Node.js 生态核心库之一 Keyv 被上游供应链攻击,请注意防范

4 Aug 2026, 05:43 UTC79 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @rynif

Polymarket: JUST IN: Anthropic CEO reportedly increasingly concerned that new hires are working there for a paycheck, as opposed to the company’s mission. https://twitter.com/Polymarket/status/2084289229400502285

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @idawnlightc. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“emit Light();” (@idawnlightc), 579 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/idawnlightc.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.