CPDR已确认实体卡带都能领取,但未有详细情况公布。
❤🔥2🌚1🥰1

Channel
@SwitchNewCN
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
7,445subscribers
+18 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001140748122 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @SwitchNewCN |
| Created | 11 August 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/SwitchNewCN |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Sept 2026, 07:56 | 7,445 | -6 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 15:02 | 7,451 | -2 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 13:13 | 7,453 | +7 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 21:15 | 7,446 | -5 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 19:07 | 7,451 | +5 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 04:24 | 7,446 | +2 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 22:23 | 7,444 | -2 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 02:17 | 7,446 | +8 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 02:22 | 7,438 | +3 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 13:01 | 7,435 | +8 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 14:01 | 7,427 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:16 | 7,427 | first reading |
30 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 10 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 30 (30 July 2026 – 26 August 2026) |
| Views total | 12,891 |
| Reactions total | 45 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Aug 2026, 22:49 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
108 reactions across 16 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 27 | 25.0% | |
| 💯 | 18 | 16.7% | |
| 👍 | 17 | 15.7% | |
| 😁 | 14 | 13.0% | |
| ❤🔥 | 9 | 8.33% | |
| 🥰 | 9 | 8.33% | |
| 😢 | 5 | 4.63% | |
| 🌚 | 4 | 3.70% | |
| 💩 | 2 | 1.85% | |
| 🤣 | 2 | 1.85% | |
| 🐳 | 1 | 0.926% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 30 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 108 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 26 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
CPDR已确认实体卡带都能领取,但未有详细情况公布。
❤🔥2🌚1🥰1
此前购买过 Nintendo Switch 数字版《巫师3 狂猎》的玩家,将可以直接在eShop领取免费的 Nintendo Switch 2原生版《巫师3 狂猎 重制版》。 卡带版是否支持、如何处理暂未确认。
👍16❤1
CDPR宣布《巫师4》将于2028年推出。
🥰6
《符文工房6》首个展示视频公开!发售日、平台等未定。 #符文工房6
🌚3
《牧场物语》新作首个视频公开,正在开发中,暂未公布标题。
美任宣布,完成此前推出的「DK Challenge」,将有机会获得对应的39张实体版奖励卡片套装。 该活动为限时挑战,9月1日15:59结束。
❤5
堵音已新增《超级马力欧 阳光》OST。 #NintendoMusic
#HOME #火红叶绿 Switch 移植版《宝可梦 火红 / 叶绿》将于10月开启连接「Pokémon Home」 该传送为单向传输,送入「Pokémon Home」里的宝可梦将无法返回《火红/叶绿》,但可以传送到其他有对应签证的游戏中(冠军/朱紫/ZA等) 完成「Pokémon Home」里「火红/叶绿」图鉴,将可在「神秘礼品」中获得幻之宝可梦 时拉比。
❤2
#HOME 3DS 软件「Pokémon Bank」将于2027年2月26日终止服务 在2023年 「3DS任天堂eShop」服务终止后,「Pokémon Bank」多年来以免费服务的方式持续提供服务,但日前宝可梦官方发布公告称,「Pokémon Bank」将于2027年2月26日终止服务。在此之后,玩家将无法在3DS上将任何宝可梦存入或者提取,也无法将宝可梦从「Pokémon Bank」发送到「Pokémon Home」中。「Pokémon Bank」服务将完全终止,3DS及过往系列宝可梦游戏将面临断代。 有分析指,宝可梦官方该决策可能受Switch 移植版《宝可梦 火红 / 叶绿》市场反响大受欢迎的影响,推测多款旧平台宝可梦游戏将会陆续以各种形式移植至Switch/Swtich2 平台并连通「Pokémon Home」以解决断代问题。目前,《火红/叶绿》已定于今年10月连通「Pokémon Home」。 有玩家指出,…
😢5💩2
Nintendo Switch Online 会员头像可兑换素材更新,《斯普拉遁 涂击队》头像第4弹现已上架。
❤1
#流言 《塞尔达传说》40周年纪念版Switch2主机和手柄外包装疑遭泄露。
❤2🤣2
Nintendo Switch Online 会员头像可兑换素材更新,《斯普拉遁 涂击队》头像第3弹现已上架。
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 30 posts we hold for @SwitchNewCN. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“NS新闻转报” (@SwitchNewCN), 7,445 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SwitchNewCN.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.