Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 豆瓣精选

Channel

豆瓣精选

@douban_read

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

36,297subscribers

-544 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001206770471
TypeChannel
Username@douban_read
Description感谢支持和关心我们众多读者朋友,我们将从投稿中筛选出真实、善意、公允的内容,努力为大家提供一个真正服务于读者的内容精选。
Created3 February 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 September 2026
Measurements held29
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/douban_read

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 41% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

36,29736,84136,5696 August 2026 — 36,841 subscribers6 August 2026 — 36,836 subscribers7 August 2026 — 36,826 subscribers8 August 2026 — 36,815 subscribers9 August 2026 — 36,794 subscribers10 August 2026 — 36,777 subscribers11 August 2026 — 36,759 subscribers13 August 2026 — 36,735 subscribers14 August 2026 — 36,715 subscribers16 August 2026 — 36,696 subscribers17 August 2026 — 36,667 subscribers18 August 2026 — 36,651 subscribers19 August 2026 — 36,627 subscribers20 August 2026 — 36,622 subscribers21 August 2026 — 36,602 subscribers22 August 2026 — 36,575 subscribers24 August 2026 — 36,553 subscribers25 August 2026 — 36,532 subscribers26 August 2026 — 36,523 subscribers27 August 2026 — 36,505 subscribers28 August 2026 — 36,490 subscribers29 August 2026 — 36,483 subscribers30 August 2026 — 36,471 subscribers31 August 2026 — 36,442 subscribers1 September 2026 — 36,437 subscribers2 September 2026 — 36,402 subscribers3 September 2026 — 36,379 subscribers5 September 2026 — 36,347 subscribers8 September 2026 — 36,297 subscribers6 August 20268 September 2026
29 measurements spanning 33 days, net -544. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 36,215–36,923 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 29
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Sept 2026, 19:3836,297-50
5 Sept 2026, 10:2036,347-32
3 Sept 2026, 15:3736,379-23
2 Sept 2026, 09:1136,402-35
1 Sept 2026, 07:1836,437-5
31 Aug 2026, 10:1436,442-29
30 Aug 2026, 08:2436,471-12
29 Aug 2026, 08:0536,483-7
28 Aug 2026, 08:4636,490-15
27 Aug 2026, 09:4436,505-18
26 Aug 2026, 12:5236,523-9
25 Aug 2026, 13:4636,532-21
24 Aug 2026, 11:5436,553-22
22 Aug 2026, 22:1736,575-27
21 Aug 2026, 13:2636,602-20
20 Aug 2026, 11:4636,622-5
19 Aug 2026, 10:3536,627-24
18 Aug 2026, 11:1336,651-16
17 Aug 2026, 12:1236,667-29
16 Aug 2026, 02:5336,696first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 12 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 70 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
2,230
Videos
128
Links
1,300

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

583 reactions across 11 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
28148.2%
👍24141.3%
🙏6110.5%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 583 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 12 March 2026 to 8 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Apr 2026, 02:25 UTC≈17,700 views151 reactionsread 9 September 2026
Photo

我特别引以为傲的一件事是,上大学的时候我因机缘巧合拿到了学校图书馆无人售货小摊的经营权,一经接手我便立马上架了卫生巾,独立包装一元一片。之后我的经营权被图书馆管理没收,在交涉的过程中,我提出要求无论如何都要维持卫生巾的销售,后面几番拉扯对方答应了我的要求。 这件事除了我和身边的朋友,没多少人知道,有一种做无名英雌的爽感。现在我已毕业多年,在小红书上搜发现卫生巾还在卖,他们有好好遵守承诺,我感觉到幸福和满足。 说点自恋的话,这个破烂的世界会因为我的存在而稍微变得好那么一点点,所以我一定一定要坚持活下去,我不能放弃生的希望。 source

120👍21🙏10

5 Apr 2026, 17:45 UTC≈10,200 views58 reactionsread 9 September 2026
Photo

每天都得反PUA source

👍58

5 Apr 2026, 17:41 UTC≈7,290 views33 reactionsread 9 September 2026
Photo

笑死哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈 source

👍31🙏2

24 Mar 2026, 18:24 UTC≈11,400 views70 reactionsread 9 September 2026

从去年郑智化控诉深圳机场无障碍设施与配套服务的缺位,到近期兰州铁路局针对建议列车售卖卫生巾的女乘客发布失实声明,最终都指向同一个核心议题:公共空间,到底属于谁? 那些指责郑智化“夸大其词、浪费公共资源”的人,那些激烈反对铁路列车售卖卫生巾的男性,论调背后都藏着同一个心照不宣的预设:公共空间只属于“标准的人”,而这个所谓的“标准”,往往指向的是健全的顺性别异性恋成年男性。 于是,当不符合这套默认“标准”的人——女性、身心障碍者、老人与儿童、性少数群体等等——向公共空间提出合理诉求时,ta们的需求往往被污名化为“巨婴”,好像ta们切实存在的困难诉求,甚至不应该被作为公共议题讨论。郑智化事件的评论区里,对我来说最刺眼的一条留言是:“我们凭什么要让残疾人享受特权!”;而对铁路列车售卖卫生巾大为破防的男性最常挂在嘴边的谬论是:“今天敢要求卖卫生巾,明天是不是就要避孕套,后天是不是还要在高铁上设产房?” 这些看似荒诞的反对声,背后藏着

52👍14🙏4

12 Mar 2026, 10:05 UTC≈11,900 views51 reactionsread 9 September 2026
Photo

今年三八节的宣传语 source

👍492

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @douban_read. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

看鉴中国 OutsightChina
@OutsightChina · 41,222
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 29 August 2026
竹新社
@tnews365 · 157,625
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 12 August 2026
中国数字时代
@cdtchinesefeed · 42,221
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 29 August 2026
电报时报
@times001 · 84,956
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 18 August 2026
Solidot
@solidot · 44,631
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 28 August 2026
被捕人士關注組
@youarenotalonehk · 48,355
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 28 August 2026
ahhhhfs|A姐分享
@abskoop · 306,977
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 17 August 2026
APPDO 数字生活指南
@AppDoDo · 40,324
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 30 August 2026
Newlearnerの自留地
@NewlearnerChannel · 67,141
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 21 August 2026
黑洞资源笔记
@piracy6 · 77,239
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 19 August 2026

This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“豆瓣精选” (@douban_read), 36,297 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/douban_read.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.