SpaceX发布重大星舰揭秘!第14次飞行发射窗口! 来源: YouTube

Channel
SpaceX航天軍事頻道
@Space2233
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
3,889subscribers
+48 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001238371452 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Space2233 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Space2233 |
Topic
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 81% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 12:01 | 3,889 | +1 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 10:02 | 3,888 | +13 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 18:37 | 3,875 | -4 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 13:22 | 3,879 | -3 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 02:24 | 3,882 | -3 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 17:15 | 3,885 | +7 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 08:04 | 3,878 | +5 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 02:27 | 3,873 | +11 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 07:13 | 3,862 | +12 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 13:48 | 3,850 | +5 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 00:55 | 3,845 | +3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:15 | 3,842 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:47 | 3,841 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:15 | 3,841 | first reading |
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 15m 09s
- Average length
- 1m 41s
Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
5 reactions across 3 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 5 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
SpaceX回收团队仍在努力从印度洋回收第13次飞行的Starship。他们一直在克服严峻的条件和越来越汹涌的海况,试图把这艘长52米的航天器引导回港口。 来源: X/SpaceX
真的不可能在太空中冷却数据中心吗? 来源: YouTube
NASA在星舰助推器V3着陆失败后直接测试了新方案!HLS演示日程... 来源: YouTube
在返回途中,SpaceX在拖曳Ship 40时遭遇意外问题…… 来源: YouTube
❤1
希望 Ship 40 到了澳大利亚的时候,别最后变成这坨屎一样。 #starship 来源: X/Lunar Citizen
SpaceX Starship 八月发射
没想到,中美AI大战的受害者居然是俄罗斯🤣 昨天在某个平台看到一个一直关注的军事大佬表示:近期前线观察称,俄军光纤无人机的出现频率明显下降。 原因不是乌克兰突然找到了破解方法,而是俄罗斯拿不到足够便宜的光纤了。 传统FPV(无人机)会被信号屏蔽器干扰,于是俄罗斯人前两年发明了抗干扰的光纤无人机。 给大家科普一下光纤无人机的原理: 无人机拖着一卷十几甚至几十公里长的光纤飞行,通过物理线路传输画面和控制信号。 它不怕电子干扰,几乎无法被传统电子战设备切断,因此一度成为俄军在前线最棘手的武器之一,也是乌克兰军人最大的威胁(没办法反制)。 但缺陷也很明显:每飞一架,就要消耗十几到几十公里光纤。 俄罗斯唯一的本土光纤生产厂此前遭到袭击并停产,如今很大程度上依赖某东方大国供应。 偏偏最近,该大国正在大规模建设AI数据中心。 AI集群内部需要连接数万张GPU,对高速光纤的需求远高于传统数据中心。 该国头部厂商的产能已经被…
❤2
我们捕捉到撞击了吗?一枚 Falcon 9 火箭的残骸在这个星期三8月5日撞上了月球。网上流传着用 AI 制作的假视频,但事实是,没有人以直播的方式有力地记录下这次撞击。 在我们的直播中,我们观察到了一道小小的闪光。 来源: X/Astrofísicos en Acción
🚀🌙 一枚 SpaceX Falcon 9 火箭的上面级在周三清晨,8月5日,大约美国东部时间凌晨2:35撞上了月球——这次是一次非故意撞击,发生在月球西侧边缘的 Einstein 和 Bell 陨石坑附近,速度大约是每小时5,400英里。 这一级自2025年1月15日以来一直在漂移,当时它把 Blue Ghost 和 Resilience 着陆器送往月球,然后被留在一条穿越月球的轨道上。19个月后,它的轨迹终于和月球表面相交。 撞击是通过观测推断出来的:智利的天文学家使用 Very Large Telescope 探测到了钠和锂气体云,而 Massachusetts 的观测则补充确认了钠发射。预计一台月球轨道器稍后会拍到新的撞击坑图像。 有两点值得说明:这次的是火箭的第二级(上面级),不是可回收的助推器——而且这和大家熟知的2022年3月 Falcon 9 撞月事件是不同的,那次涉及的是另一枚2015年前后的级段。这个轨…
SpaceX 与路易斯安那州即将敲定一项协议,这家航天公司将收购墨西哥湾北岸约 13 万英亩土地。(13万英亩约等于526 平方公里,大约等于新加坡国土面积的72%,上海7个城区面积总和的80%) 数月来,关于这项协议的传闻一直不断。如今,《The Times-Picayune | The New Orleans Advocate》报道称,路易斯安那州州长杰夫·兰德里预计将在本月晚些时候正式宣布这一协议。 根据该协议,SpaceX 将获得拉斐特西南方向一段长约 18 英里的湿地控制权。这片区域名为 Pecan Island(山核桃岛),由于一项法律和解协议而得以出售。该和解协议解决了数十起针对埃克森美孚的诉讼,这些诉讼指控其造成污染以及海岸土地流失。
马斯克宣布:在星舰第14飞中,将开始把Starlink V3卫星部署到轨道。
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @Space2233. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@JShangrong · 24,860
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 15 September 2026
@voachinese · 34,682
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 3 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“SpaceX航天軍事頻道” (@Space2233), 3,889 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Space2233.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.