🐮🐮卷起来👍 PS 这只是App内核最强性能,具体怎样还得看你本地宽带和节点

Channel
前女友们用过的机场—始于机场,不止机场
@gebaopiCloud
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
101,579subscribers
+1,819 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001215156916 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @gebaopiCloud |
| Description | 投稿: [email protected] 机场主投稿请按如下格式 机场名: 机场官网: 机场频道: 机场群组: 机场套餐: 机场订阅: 机场特色:(可选) 本频道会对线路和落地,运营时间各方面综合考虑,不保证进行頻道推送。 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 62 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/gebaopiCloud |
Topic
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 81% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Nov 2026, 11:47 | 101,579 | -4 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 04:38 | 101,583 | +16 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 05:50 | 101,567 | -2 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 08:29 | 101,569 | +5 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 07:24 | 101,564 | +25 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 10:19 | 101,539 | +16 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 11:36 | 101,523 | +44 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 11:20 | 101,479 | +12 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 14:17 | 101,467 | +22 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 13:07 | 101,445 | +20 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 12:29 | 101,425 | +95 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 11:37 | 101,330 | +57 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 09:26 | 101,273 | +59 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 12:48 | 101,214 | -6 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 09:27 | 101,220 | +34 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 06:18 | 101,186 | +9 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 05:27 | 101,177 | -30 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 01:51 | 101,207 | -45 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 21:16 | 101,252 | +4 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 19:36 | 101,248 | first reading |
Engagement
49 posts held, back to 26 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 191 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 16.5%
- avg views ÷ 101,579 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 16,800
- 14 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 14
- of 49 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 49 (26 June 2026 – 3 November 2026) |
| Views total | 235,100 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Nov 2026, 17:10 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈393
- Videos
- ≈19
- Links
- ≈905
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 1m 30s
- Average length
- 1m 30s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 14 posts held from the last 30 days (14.3%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
"X 教授" 帕特里克・斯图尔特去世,享年 86 岁 英国演员帕特里克·斯图尔特于 2026 年 10 月 28 日在洛杉矶家中去世,享年 86 岁。其社交账号声明称,他因阿尔茨海默病和路易体失智症离世。 他因《星际迷航:下一代》的皮卡德舰长、《X 战警》系列的 X 教授等角色为人熟知,并将在今年 12 月上映的《复仇者联盟:毁灭日》中再次出演 X 教授。 界面新闻 🌸 科技圈· 茶馆 · 投稿
皮卡德舰长 + X教授 r.i.p 🕯️
Hello StashLink Terminal,你的 Mac,随手可及 在外面想看一眼 Agent 跑到哪了、重启个进程、翻一下日志,现在打开 Stash 就能做到。 连接经由 StashLink,在你的设备之间直接完成。无需开启远程登录,无需暴露端口,无需公网 IP。设备之间使用端到端加密直连传输和私有 iCloud 交换信息,密钥只在你的设备上,StashLink 会自动选择合适的直连方式,包括穿越 NAT。StashLink Terminal 的每一次请求都会使用保存在钥匙串的私钥签名,Stash Mac 只有在验签通过后才会开 shell。 你还可以为每个会话命名标题,终端会话内容保留在 Mac 上,锁屏、断网等情况均不影响。 本次更新需同时升级 Stash for iOS(Build 1358) 与 Stash for Mac(Build 577) ,并且需要在 Mac 的 Stash > StashLink…
Clash 正式版更新公告:iOS 1.0.13|tvOS 1.0.16 | macOS 1.0.15 四家模块,一个 Clash。 小火箭、Surge 的模块,Loon 的插件,Quan X 的重写,复制链接粘进来就生效,里面的脚本一起跑:不限大小、不限数量、不限运行时间,Sub-Store 这样的大脚本也能直接用。HTTPS 解密,一键装证书。实测 B 站、YouTube、知乎的广告都没了。 十万节点,照样轻快。 125 MB、10 万节点、200 万条规则的超大配置,在 iPad 上直接导入就能用,连上只占 18 MB 内存;整体内存再降近四成。 这一版还有: · 内核升级到 mihomo v1.19.33,全部源码开源 · 配置页会标出被模块改掉的设置,写明改成了什么 · 节点搜索后测速只测搜索结果,测速失败直接显示原因 · 填了回环地址就生效,用 SideStore 签名也能连上 · 修复 iPadOS 15、i…
#Bettbox v1.19.7 正式版本更新 https://github.com/appshubcc/Bettbox/releases/tag/v1.19.7 主要更新: - 新的Slogan:Better Network Toolbox - 新增数十款设计精良,精致实用的多端网络调试工具(包含兼容官方协议的iPerf3高性能实现,以及更多首发Mihomo调试功能) - 新增 WebDAV 自动备份,并支持备份密码AES加密 - 请求页与连接页合并展示,桌面侧边栏设置按钮调整 - 优化流媒体解锁检测,并新增单个项目批量节点检测 - 新增首页及工具箱页面可选浅色大图标:无界水印 - 新增Android端首色自动莫奈取色 (Android 12+) - 优化配置覆写的处理逻辑和性能 - macOS Dock栏图标与窗口显示状态同步 - 改进 Windows 便携版目录以及数据读取逻辑 - 修复 Linux 端自动 DNS 管…
https://www.php.net/archive/2026.php#2026-10-21-5
⚠️【紧急预警】PHP 核心曝两个严重 RCE 漏洞,补丁北京时间 10 月 21 日(周三)22:00 发布 各位机场、IDC 老板和运维请注意: PHP 官方安全团队 10 月 20 日在 php.net 发布预告,将于 10 月 21 日 14:00 UTC(北京时间 22:00)发布安全更新,修复两个严重漏洞,CVSS v4.0 评分均为 9.2。如果细节提前泄露或发现在野利用,官方会提前发布。 📌 目前已知 编号:CVE-2026-109618、CVE-2026-109619 安全公司 watchTowr 已确认两个都是远程代码执行(RCE),也就是可以拿 shell。 漏洞在 PHP 本身,不在某个面板或框架里。面板代码写得再干净也挡不住。 Sansec 等安全公司称 PHP 5.4 及以后的版本都受影响。具体范围以官方公告为准。 只有 8.2、8.3、8.4、8.5 会收到官方补丁。8.1 及以下(包括大量…
偶然又翻到海豚的天梯表,怀念黄金时代的百花齐放,本以为广东三线+上海双线即将标配,不曾想盛极必衰。。。
双核心驱动!鸿蒙也是先用上黑科技了👍 群友指出几年前就有类似操作了,我孤陋寡闻了😂 畅想一下,iOS上一直只能开一个vpn,导致需要vpn启动的软件互相抢占,比如翻墙软件尤其是机场私有客户端和抓包软件,不能共存,那能不能双核心运作?
主核心mihomo负责tun,副核心adguard负责dns解析Adguard专属规则去广告。双核clashbox开始运行。
Clash By Hako 今日最新TF 极大优化了节点规则的内存使用,总算mohomo内核iOS端可以用上了👍 延续上次海量节点压测,目前iOS端 对节点优化最好的当属 QuanX,Loon,Clash by Hako
Showing the 12 most recent of 49 posts we hold for @gebaopiCloud. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@gebaopiCloud edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 12 September 2026
- Most recent edit
- 12 September 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@appshub_channel · 6,8003 postsClash by Clash Channel
@clashbyclash · 5,5343 posts风向旗参考快讯
@xhqcankao · 168,0223 postsQuantumult X News
@QuanXNews · 40,4382 postsStash Channel
@StashFeed · 27,8332 posts港新日美雲服務裸金屬 - 牛彼☁️
@KuaiCheDao_Info · 7,4031 postLoon News
@LoonNews · 48,2711 post小众机场测评
@sstrojan · 23,8301 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@zaihuapd · 289,46310 posts在花小茶馆🍵
@zaihuaSpace · 7,42210 postsنوبل پزشکی
@nobelprize · 2632 postsQuantumult X
@QuanXApp · 54,0292 postsQuantumult X News
@QuanXNews · 40,4382 posts⬇️ 𝘽𝙚𝙩𝙩𝙗𝙤𝙭 𝘾𝙝𝙖𝙣𝙣𝙚𝙡
@appshub_channel · 6,8001 post灯塔加速器
@Beacon_Link · 6031 postStephen
@braydenwilmoth · 11 post前女友们新开的茶室 | 机场交流群
@EXAIRPORTSGroup · 35,9671 post肯の机 频道
@kendejiio · 3,9611 postLoon-0x00
@Loon0x00 · 44,4411 postLoon News
@LoonNews · 48,2711 postNewlearnerの自留地
@NewlearnerChannel · 68,2221 post色色小站 人生来就是为了色色
@sesexiaozhan · 1,3111 postStash
@StashFans · 26,5731 postStash Channel
@StashFeed · 27,8331 postSurge TestFlight Feed
@SurgeTestFlightFeed · 13,0471 post风向旗参考快讯
@xhqcankao · 168,0221 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 1
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 0
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@gebaopiCloud named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 4 posts, 8 August 2026 – 12 August 2026 · confirmed gone 5 November 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@jngchannel · 17,012#1
@zaihuapd · 289,463#2
@haitun_channel · 38,978#3
@ffqchannel · 68,658#4
@tkv_ktv · 2,430#5
@jctest6666 · 10,818#6
@xhqcankao · 168,022#7
@GodlyNews1 · 71,076#8
@duang_speedtest · 32,792#9
@PinYunPs · 19,304#10
@airport_cn · 16,659#11
@Bronyaspeed · 10,355#12
@ACA_Channel · 7,436#13
@jcplnanmin · 27,741#14
@Nexitally_Official · 21,073#15
@vps_xhq · 50,779#16
@OuONotification · 7,949#17
@cheap_proxy · 26,277#18
@DNSPODT · 73,194#19
@akile_notice · 19,009#20
@Tjjcfx · 17,872#21
@xiaozhenag04 · 3,971#22
@zhetengsha · 53,646#23
@LoonNews · 48,271#24
@NewlearnerChannel · 68,222#25
@coalcloud · 5,979#26
@AppleNuts · 37,713#27
@kuromis_xiaoxi · 13,749#28
@jichangtj · 135,568#29
@nodeseekc · 40,340#30
@wearemjj · 9,733#31
@CE_Observe · 77,502#32
@RecMataChannel · 1,506#33
@woshadiao · 114,518#34
@Aa28413761 · 26,836#35
@qunyouwen · 89,062#36
@waitu_channel · 14,649#37
@SHWLGROUP · 16,620#38
@NobyDa · 64,442#39
@SurgeTestFlightFeed · 13,047#40
@tnews365 · 167,104#41
@KuaiCheDao_Info · 7,403#42
@zhujiwiki_info · 10,677#43
@FutureEcho_Notice · 7,324#44
@FlClash · 53,871#45
@zrj96 · 17,798#46
@amytelecom_Official · 13,569#47
@AladdinNotice · 4,713#48
@landiansub · 46,998#49
@cool_scripts · 16,364#50
@yomoemby_notice · 5,976#51
@SIM_CN · 10,005#52
@odysseyplus · 24,736#53
@vpscang · 12,081#54
@yamby_release · 37,370#55
@surfboardnews · 28,391#56
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 15 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@XFLTDtop · 19,418
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 5 October 2026
@Nexitally_Official · 21,073
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 26 September 2026
@flower_cloud · 36,053
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 3 September 2026
@DuyaoSS · 67,265
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 20 August 2026
@jichangtj · 135,568
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 15 August 2026
@haitun_channel · 38,978
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 39 here — alongside 38 others — read 1 September 2026
@The_Lord_Rings · 76,579
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 22 here — alongside 21 others — read 28 September 2026
@cheap_proxy · 26,277
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 13 September 2026
@ffqchannel · 68,658
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 22 August 2026
@Gfwpro · 20,917
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 33 here — alongside 32 others — read 28 September 2026
@Legado_Channels · 93,162
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 17 August 2026
@Quantumultxxxx · 21,963
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 37 here — alongside 36 others — read 25 September 2026
@FreeVPN8 · 43,367
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 30 here — alongside 29 others — read 30 August 2026
@ShadowrocketNews · 47,261
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 27 August 2026
@GodlyNews1 · 71,076
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 20 August 2026
@wxgqlfx · 34,187
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 37 here — alongside 36 others — read 5 September 2026
@yamby_release · 37,370
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 29 here — alongside 28 others — read 1 September 2026
@ibilibili · 49,519
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 40 here — alongside 39 others — read 14 September 2026
@WFVPN · 40,639
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 32 here — alongside 31 others — read 31 August 2026
@LoonNews · 48,271
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 27 August 2026
@surfboardnews · 28,391
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 9 September 2026
@go4sharing · 59,416
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 40 here — alongside 39 others — read 29 August 2026
@zhetengsha · 53,646
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 26 August 2026
@zaihuapd · 289,463
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 40 here — alongside 39 others — read 12 August 2026
This channel appears in 60 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“前女友们用过的机场—始于机场,不止机场” (@gebaopiCloud), 101,579 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gebaopiCloud.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.