Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Таблицы и Скрипты Гугл для бизнеса и анализа🤘🏻

Channel

Таблицы и Скрипты Гугл для бизнеса и анализа🤘🏻

@GoogleSheets_ru

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

3,390subscribers

-6 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001982743241
TypeChannel
Username@GoogleSheets_ru
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/GoogleSheets_ru

Growth

3,3883,3983,3936 August 2026 — 3,396 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,398 subscribers10 August 2026 — 3,396 subscribers13 August 2026 — 3,397 subscribers16 August 2026 — 3,395 subscribers19 August 2026 — 3,396 subscribers23 August 2026 — 3,395 subscribers26 August 2026 — 3,388 subscribers29 August 2026 — 3,392 subscribers1 September 2026 — 3,388 subscribers5 September 2026 — 3,390 subscribers3,3906 August 20265 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 30 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,387–3,400 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Sept 2026, 20:363,390+2
1 Sept 2026, 08:163,388-4
29 Aug 2026, 07:243,392+4
26 Aug 2026, 07:343,388-7
23 Aug 2026, 02:443,395-1
19 Aug 2026, 11:543,396+1
16 Aug 2026, 21:543,395-2
13 Aug 2026, 08:483,397+1
10 Aug 2026, 03:313,396-2
7 Aug 2026, 03:123,398+2
6 Aug 2026, 18:473,396first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 6 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 48s
Average length
3m 48s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

192 reactions across 19 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍6031.3%
🔥6031.3%
🥱2714.1%
💯115.73%
🤯73.65%
🎉63.13%
👏63.13%
custom 530085802122675093752.60%
21.04%
21.04%
🆒21.04%
👌21.04%
🏆10.521%
🙏10.521%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 192 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 February 2026 to 28 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
100
across the posts below
Posts paid on
12
of 20 we hold a reading for · 60%
Most on one post
18
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @GoogleSheets_ru. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 February 2026 to 28 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

28 Jul 2026, 15:33 UTC708 views7 reactions3 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Какая-то странная синяя точка на диаграмме. Не мышью выделяется

custom 53008580212267509375🔥1🤯1

24 Jul 2026, 08:35 UTC940 views9 reactions11 Starsread 7 August 2026

Posted without readable text

👍3🔥3👏1🤯1🥱1

20 Jul 2026, 10:47 UTC≈1,030 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Привет! Все наши проекты для Макс при перходе на новый адрес API никак не изменяются. Просто вместо целевого адреса мы используем свой прокси provodox.googlesheets.ru Упрощенная версия такого прокси без дополнительных затрат на оборудование и хостинг https://t.me/contributor_pw/706

🔥31💯1

9 Jul 2026, 06:58 UTC≈1,130 viewsread 7 August 2026

...ребята, для тех, кто не спит, ...если хотите можете немного поотж размять котелок 🧠, и попробовать решить задачку в Google Sheets без скриптов: Напишите самую КОРОТКУЮ 🤏 формулу для вывода всех возможных названий столбцов в Таблице Google Sheets от A до ZZZ (A, ..., BE, ..., KN, ..., и-и до ZZZ). Условия задачки: - самая короткая формула (производительность не учитываем); - новая Таблица с листом по умолчанию; -

18 Jun 2026, 09:53 UTC≈1,690 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

...ну вот, теперь официально 📗 задокументировано (как это индусы догадались? ...наверное, у них хна закончилась) Наконец-то, разработчики Google удосужились внести ясность в документацию (🔗 https://support.google.com/docs/answer/3267071?hl=ru), если быть точнее - в последний абзац раздела "Примечания" по функции CELL: - "sheet" – возвращает название листа, где находится ячейка, на которую указывает аргумент ссылка.

👍3🔥2🤯2

16 Jun 2026, 14:30 UTC≈1,580 views6 reactions3 Starsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Хорошо. Все явно заинтереснованы понять, как использовать ИИ, особенно в чатах или в роли агентов. Осталось несколько вопросов. Например, с появлением новых AI-сервисов насколько сильно изменилось использование вами компьютера?

  1. Никак не изменилось45%
  2. Портативные устройства стали ближе9%
  3. ИИ дает возможность быстрее и легче взаимодействовать с компьютером: слепя бастряя пичять29%
  4. Использую голосовй ввод даже на кухне6%
  5. У меня шлем Ксавье11%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

👍2🥱21🔥1

15 Jun 2026, 11:08 UTC≈1,100 views6 reactions11 Starsread 7 August 2026
Poll

А как вы сейчас применяете ИИ к своим Таблицам?

  1. Никак - руками, или гуглю / спрашиваю тут18%
  2. Спрашиваю в чате (GPT/DeepSeek/Gemini), формулу вставляю сам55%
  3. И живёт прямо в Таблице (Gemini в Sheets, расширения, аддон OpenAI и т.п.)7%
  4. Гоняю агента с доступом к данным (Claude Code, Cursor, собственная наработка)15%
  5. У меня сервер автономных мультиагентов, я тут случайно5%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

👍2🥱2💯1🔥1

13 Jun 2026, 18:35 UTC≈1,140 views5 reactions8 Starsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Как вести канал про Таблицы в мире моментальных ответов?

  1. Рассказывать, как применяю ИИ к Таблицам66%
  2. Показывать боевые провалы Агентов на реальных Таблицах32%
  3. Ловить, где ИИ врёт в формулах, и чинить за ним42%
  4. Нести нейрослоп. Чаще! И курсы!15%
  5. Закрыть канал, идти на завод25%

The shares total 180%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

👍2💯1🔥1🥱1

5 Jun 2026, 10:22 UTC≈2,660 views10 reactions10 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Специалист по автоматизации Google Sheets / Google Apps Script 💰 80–140 тыс. на руки 📍 Удаленно / гибрид 🕒 Фуллтайм ЭнергоТрансГрупп - оператор железнодорожного подвижного состава. Ищем человека на поддержку и развитие внутренних автоматизаций в Google Workspace. Стек: • Google Apps Script • Google Sheets • JavaScript • SQL / BigQuery • API-интеграции • HTML/CSS для простых интерфейсов • Firebase Задачи: • Разра

👍3🥱3🔥21💯1

18 May 2026, 04:52 UTC≈1,530 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

...немного мифического 📖 блуда по Google Sheets. В давние-стародавние 🦖 времена..., так стоп ...как много Вы знаете о недокументированной функции TEXT.LEGACY ❓ По сути, видимо, это вечный пациент, предоставленной для конечного пользователя более современной функции TEXT, ...который скорее мёртв 🗿, чем жив или наоборот, ну или как во всем известной фразе без знаков препинания: "Да нет наверное". ...но в его кармане,

👍3👌2🤯2

9 May 2026, 09:46 UTC≈1,280 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

С Днем Победы советского народа в Великой Отечественной Войне против немецко-фашистских захватчиков! С Праздником, товарищи!

👍12🎉6🥱3

7 May 2026, 14:04 UTC≈1,510 views9 reactions18 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

ChatGPT теперь и в Google Таблицах OpenAI запустила официальное приложение ChatGPT Spreadsheets - надстройку для Google Sheets (бета) и Excel. Работает прямо внутри таблицы, без переключения между инструментами. Что умеет: - Создавать таблицы с нуля по текстовому описанию («сделай трекер задач с дедлайнами и статусами») - Анализировать данные по всем листам, находить ошибки в формулах, выявлять паттерны - Редактиро

🔥5👍3💯1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @GoogleSheets_ru. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

16 Jun 2026, 14:30 UTCAnonymous Poll85 voters

Хорошо. Все явно заинтереснованы понять, как использовать ИИ, особенно в чатах или в роли агентов. Осталось несколько вопросов. Например, с появлением новых AI-сервисов насколько сильно изменилось использование вами компьютера?

  1. Никак не изменилось45%
  2. Портативные устройства стали ближе9%
  3. ИИ дает возможность быстрее и легче взаимодействовать с компьютером: слепя бастряя пичять29%
  4. Использую голосовй ввод даже на кухне6%
  5. У меня шлем Ксавье11%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

15 Jun 2026, 11:08 UTCAnonymous Poll101 voters

А как вы сейчас применяете ИИ к своим Таблицам?

  1. Никак - руками, или гуглю / спрашиваю тут18%
  2. Спрашиваю в чате (GPT/DeepSeek/Gemini), формулу вставляю сам55%
  3. И живёт прямо в Таблице (Gemini в Sheets, расширения, аддон OpenAI и т.п.)7%
  4. Гоняю агента с доступом к данным (Claude Code, Cursor, собственная наработка)15%
  5. У меня сервер автономных мультиагентов, я тут случайно5%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

13 Jun 2026, 18:35 UTCAnonymous Poll88 voters

Как вести канал про Таблицы в мире моментальных ответов?

  1. Рассказывать, как применяю ИИ к Таблицам66%
  2. Показывать боевые провалы Агентов на реальных Таблицах32%
  3. Ловить, где ИИ врёт в формулах, и чинить за ним42%
  4. Нести нейрослоп. Чаще! И курсы!15%
  5. Закрыть канал, идти на завод25%

The shares total 180%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 February 2026 to 28 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Google Таблицы
@google_sheets · 60,664
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 22 August 2026
Магия Excel
@lemur_excel · 49,881
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 25 August 2026
ЭКСЕЛЬХАК
@excelhackru · 73,670
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 19 August 2026
Финансовый анализ
@fin_analytics · 41,310
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 29 August 2026
Excel Everyday
@excel_everyday · 52,425
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 24 August 2026
Секреты аналитики | Data Science, BI, Tableau
@analytics_secrets · 46,841
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 27 August 2026
Системный и Бизнес-анализ
@ba_sa_analytics · 51,879
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 24 August 2026

This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Таблицы и Скрипты Гугл для бизнеса и анализа🤘🏻” (@GoogleSheets_ru), 3,390 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GoogleSheets_ru.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.