Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 热点吃瓜大事件

Channel

热点吃瓜大事件

@Gua718

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

9,917subscribers

-7,061 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001500901033
TypeChannel
Username@Gua718
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live24 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 24 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Gua718

Topic

Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 86% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

9,91716,97813,447.57 August 2026 — 16,978 subscribers8 August 2026 — 16,970 subscribers9 August 2026 — 16,635 subscribers10 August 2026 — 16,144 subscribers11 August 2026 — 15,806 subscribers12 August 2026 — 15,443 subscribers13 August 2026 — 15,162 subscribers14 August 2026 — 14,968 subscribers16 August 2026 — 14,475 subscribers17 August 2026 — 14,054 subscribers18 August 2026 — 13,887 subscribers19 August 2026 — 13,802 subscribers20 August 2026 — 13,725 subscribers21 August 2026 — 13,605 subscribers23 August 2026 — 13,407 subscribers24 August 2026 — 13,159 subscribers25 August 2026 — 13,091 subscribers26 August 2026 — 13,111 subscribers27 August 2026 — 13,006 subscribers28 August 2026 — 12,806 subscribers29 August 2026 — 12,525 subscribers30 August 2026 — 12,377 subscribers31 August 2026 — 12,262 subscribers1 September 2026 — 12,093 subscribers3 September 2026 — 11,971 subscribers4 September 2026 — 11,909 subscribers8 September 2026 — 11,807 subscribers11 September 2026 — 11,508 subscribers13 September 2026 — 10,880 subscribers14 September 2026 — 10,635 subscribers16 September 2026 — 10,439 subscribers18 September 2026 — 10,434 subscribers24 September 2026 — 9,917 subscribers7 August 202624 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 48 days, net -7,061. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,858–18,037 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
24 Sept 2026, 22:429,917-517
18 Sept 2026, 15:3910,434-5
16 Sept 2026, 08:1910,439-196
14 Sept 2026, 17:2210,635-245
13 Sept 2026, 04:1510,880-628
11 Sept 2026, 03:4111,508-299
8 Sept 2026, 04:4011,807-102
4 Sept 2026, 23:0111,909-62
3 Sept 2026, 06:2711,971-122
1 Sept 2026, 22:4612,093-169
31 Aug 2026, 23:3612,262-115
30 Aug 2026, 19:4412,377-148
29 Aug 2026, 18:1512,525-281
28 Aug 2026, 19:4612,806-200
27 Aug 2026, 23:1613,006-105
26 Aug 2026, 23:2513,111+20
25 Aug 2026, 22:5513,091-68
24 Aug 2026, 23:5613,159-248
23 Aug 2026, 09:5713,407-198
21 Aug 2026, 18:3613,605first reading

Engagement

101 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 49 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 101 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
45m 22s
Average length
45s

Measured directly from 60 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

21 reactions across 12 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤21100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 101 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 21 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 101 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 13:28 UTC152 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

大型讽刺现场!科大讯飞公关高管翻车,天天处理舆情却栽在私生活 科技圈最新大瓜刷屏全网,科大讯飞品牌市场中心副总经理韩煜尘,也就是大家口中的公关副总裁,因婚内出轨女下属一事,被公司火速开除,事情在各大社群疯狂发酵。 韩煜尘在行业内深耕多年,是公司公关体系的核心搭建者,平时专门负责帮企业化解各类负面舆情危机,还拿下过不少行业品牌奖项。令人唏嘘的是,常年替别人灭火的公关大佬,最后自己变成了最大的舆情风波主角。 本次风波由女方丈夫实名举报引爆,一份长达22页的PDF举报材料全网流转,大量聊天记录随之曝光,爆料两人维持一年多的婚外关系,聊天里不少露骨内容流出,瞬间点燃网友讨论热潮。 8月31日科大讯飞火速下发内部人事通知,第一时间解除韩煜尘全部职务,快速和涉事高管切割止损。官方通告只写明人事调整,并未对外公开本次免职的详细缘由。 截至目前该事件的细节全部来源于网络爆料,官方没有针对举报内容作出回应。不少网友感慨,精通危机公关的高…

2 Sept 2026, 13:27 UTC140 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

脑洞爽剧爆火出圈!AI成人短剧《全班地铁求生》刷屏全网引热议 近期短视频平台爆款不断,一部脑洞超大的AI成人短剧《全班地铁求生》火速刷屏。凭借全班出行遇异变、全车仅剩一名男生的猎奇设定,迅速收割海量流量,掀起全网讨论热潮。 剧情采用末世求生+校园闯关模式,班级乘坐地铁途中突发空间错乱,列车被彻底封闭隔离。神秘求生系统降临车厢,物资匮乏、危机丛生,全班数十名女生仅靠唯一一名男主带队求生。男主凭借冷静思维和超强应变能力,带领众人搜集物资、破解系统任务、化解各类突发危险,一路逆袭闯关、绝境求生。 紧凑节奏、密集反转加上密闭空间的压迫感,让不少观众直呼上头。但也有网友吐槽剧情套路化严重,部分二创衍生版本存在擦边低俗改编,观感参差不齐。 如今AI短剧量产速度极快,各类脑洞无限流题材层出不穷。平台也持续整治不良改编内容,提醒观众理性追剧,区分虚构剧情与现实,自觉远离低俗擦边版本。 #AI短剧 #全班地铁求生 #地铁求生 #脑洞短剧 …

2 Sept 2026, 13:26 UTC120 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Telegram必备的搜索引擎,极搜JISOU帮你精准找到,想要的群组、频道、视频、音乐 👉 t.me/jisou2?start=a_7665108467

2 Sept 2026, 13:26 UTC109 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

三观炸裂!《拼逼逼》AI短剧争议出圈,女主疯狂赚钱供养摆烂男主引全网怒斥 短视频平台一部名为《拼逼逼》的AI短剧近期快速刷屏,狗血又压抑的剧情引发大量网友不满,相关话题争议不断。 剧集故事槽点满满,女主日复一日辛苦打工挣钱,省吃俭用替男主角偿还高额债务。即便男主一直消极摆烂、逃避责任,没有丝毫担当与悔改,女主依旧选择一味妥协付出,独自扛起全部的生活重压。这种女性无底线牺牲的恋爱脑人设,让很多观众看完之后心里十分不适。 不少网友在评论区纷纷发声怒斥,认为整部短剧的价值导向严重跑偏。明明祸端由男主而起,剧情却反复渲染女生无条件兜底付出,刻意制造狗血冲突博取流量,长期观看很容易误导年轻人的婚恋认知。 很多观众吐槽当下流水线产出的AI短剧,为了播放量不断堆砌离谱桥段,故事逻辑漏洞百出。大家纷纷呼吁短剧创作需要守住底线,拒绝输出畸形的恋爱观念。 目前该短剧片段依旧在网络传播,网友观点两极分化,不少人呼吁平台加强审核管控,规范AI…

2 Sept 2026, 13:25 UTC88 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

彻底炸圈!王者COS开启邪门新赛道,孙权魔改整活引得大批玩家破防😱 最近王者荣耀二次元圈子掀起一场不小的舆论风波,一批画风猎奇的魔改COS二创在各大平台疯狂刷屏,一条“邪门整活赛道”意外爆火,不少普通玩家看完之后直呼难以接受。 本次遭到二次魔改的英雄包含孙权、澜、曜、西施、小乔等一众高人气角色。这些英雄原本是帅气、唯美的国风形象,经过小众圈子的二次创作之后画风大变,造型猎奇违和感极强,和原版人设反差巨大,刷新了很多网友的认知。 不少玩家看完之后十分抵触,表示经典的游戏角色形象遭到恶意魔改,怪异低俗的画面严重影响游戏观感,甚至在登录游戏选择英雄的时候,脑海里都会浮现魔改画面,造成不好的体验。 这件事也让网上的观点分成两派。一部分网友觉得只是小众圈子的娱乐玩梗,没必要过分较真;但更多玩家对此强烈抵制,认为这类猎奇创作毫无底线,违背二次元创作初衷,还很容易对未成年群体产生不良引导。 很多玩家呼吁二次创作应当守住底线,玩梗把握…

1 Sept 2026, 12:07 UTC193 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

抖音网红鱿鱼吖直播突发事故,意外走光片段全网疯传 抖音网红鱿鱼吖近期爆出直播大瓜,凭借清纯邻家少女形象圈粉的她,在一场居家直播当中发生放送事故。因为坐姿与衣物方面出现疏漏,镜头短暂出现意外画面,仅仅一秒就被直播间观众迅速录屏截图。 相关素材流出之后,迅速在各大吃瓜社群扩散,一时间全网热议,舆论两极分化。一部分粉丝认为这只是无心的直播失误,主播本人并不知情,不该被恶意放大传播;也有不少网友围观吃瓜,各类玩梗言论层出不穷。 与此同时,网络上还冒出大量经过二次加工的虚假截图,真假混杂进一步扩大风波。截至目前,鱿鱼吖本人没有公开发声回应,平台也暂未发布相关处理通报。 需要提醒大家,私自传播、扩散这类隐私画面属于侵权违法行为,请勿转发原始素材,拒绝人肉网暴,理性看待网传事件,静待当事人后续表态。 #鱿鱼吖 #网红顶级大瓜 #直播漏点事故 #抖音吃瓜热点 #全网炸裂大瓜 #网红翻车现场 #网传仅供参考

Showing the 12 most recent of 101 posts we hold for @Gua718. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“热点吃瓜大事件” (@Gua718), 9,917 subscribers as measured 24 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Gua718.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.