Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Hamid Sodiq | Rasmiy kanal

Channel

Hamid Sodiq | Rasmiy kanal

@Hamid_Sodiq

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

18,816subscribers

-590 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001432010622
TypeChannel
Username@Hamid_Sodiq
Created1 September 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Hamid_Sodiq

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 81% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (3 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@fikrat/286103 Aug 2026, 10:06 UTC@Hamid_Sodiq/5478 · this entry3 Aug 2026, 10:11 UTC1.005 minutes
@fikrat/286155 Aug 2026, 10:35 UTC@Hamid_Sodiq/5487 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 10:36 UTC1.00under a minute
@fikrat/286113 Aug 2026, 12:09 UTC@Hamid_Sodiq/5503 · this entry8 Aug 2026, 00:06 UTC1.004 days
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@fikrat5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.004 minutes@fikrat (41)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 1 of the 3 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 23 comparable posts for this entry, running 2 August 2026 to 8 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @fikrat. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 8 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

18,81619,45519,135.56 August 2026 — 19,406 subscribers6 August 2026 — 19,406 subscribers7 August 2026 — 19,455 subscribers8 August 2026 — 19,446 subscribers9 August 2026 — 19,424 subscribers10 August 2026 — 19,397 subscribers11 August 2026 — 19,383 subscribers12 August 2026 — 19,357 subscribers13 August 2026 — 19,408 subscribers16 August 2026 — 19,374 subscribers17 August 2026 — 19,364 subscribers18 August 2026 — 19,362 subscribers19 August 2026 — 19,346 subscribers20 August 2026 — 19,323 subscribers22 August 2026 — 19,305 subscribers23 August 2026 — 19,287 subscribers25 August 2026 — 19,250 subscribers26 August 2026 — 19,232 subscribers27 August 2026 — 19,220 subscribers27 August 2026 — 19,215 subscribers29 August 2026 — 19,186 subscribers30 August 2026 — 19,170 subscribers31 August 2026 — 19,157 subscribers1 September 2026 — 19,124 subscribers2 September 2026 — 19,106 subscribers3 September 2026 — 19,089 subscribers4 September 2026 — 19,067 subscribers7 September 2026 — 19,017 subscribers10 September 2026 — 18,929 subscribers12 September 2026 — 18,890 subscribers14 September 2026 — 18,866 subscribers16 September 2026 — 18,841 subscribers18 September 2026 — 18,816 subscribers6 August 202618 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 43 days, net -590. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 18,720–19,551 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 09:3718,816-25
16 Sept 2026, 00:1918,841-25
14 Sept 2026, 10:2018,866-24
12 Sept 2026, 17:1618,890-39
10 Sept 2026, 17:1818,929-88
7 Sept 2026, 11:2119,017-50
4 Sept 2026, 12:5819,067-22
3 Sept 2026, 01:1619,089-17
2 Sept 2026, 01:0319,106-18
1 Sept 2026, 03:5719,124-33
31 Aug 2026, 04:4219,157-13
30 Aug 2026, 05:0619,170-16
29 Aug 2026, 02:3319,186-29
27 Aug 2026, 23:1619,215-5
27 Aug 2026, 02:1219,220-12
26 Aug 2026, 03:0319,232-18
25 Aug 2026, 03:5519,250-37
23 Aug 2026, 18:4819,287-18
22 Aug 2026, 00:3719,305-18
20 Aug 2026, 20:0319,323first reading

Engagement

80 posts held, back to 2 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 68 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
18.8%
avg views ÷ 18,816 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,530
23 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
23
of 80 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held80 (2 August 20263 September 2026)
Views total81,144
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 01:27 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
5m 05s
Average length
1m 42s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

3 Sept 2026, 00:31 UTC274 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🌐 Namangan shahrida jonli uchrashuv 🗓 12-sentabr, 2026-yil ⏱️ Soat 14:30 🎙 Jonli uchrashuv Mavzu: Geosiyosiy yuklama: Vodiy intellektual bardoshi qanday sinovdan o‘tadi Ekspertlar: 🔗 Siyosatshunoslar: Hamid Sodiq, Abduvali Soyibnazarov, Jahongir Akramov va Avazbek Isoboev 🔗 Tarixchi: G'aybulla Boboyorov 🔗 Jurnalist: G‘ayratxo‘ja Saydaliyev Tomoshabinlar bevosita savollar berish va fikr bildirish imkoniyatiga ega

1 Sept 2026, 12:31 UTC≈1,720 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

⚠️ Bugun 21:00 da Siyosatshunos Fazliddin Madiyev bilan yopiq telegram kanalimizda suhbatimiz bor. 🎙 Mavzu: Mustaqillikka ilmiy yondashuv Suhbat yopiq formatda bo‘lib o‘tadi. Faqat to'lov qilganlar qatnasha oladi. Murojaat uchun:➡️@nurbekgofurov

1 Sept 2026, 07:14 UTC≈2,670 viewsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @fikrat

🇺🇿Mustaqillik bayrami muborak! Fikrat jamoasi barcha yurtdoshlarimizni O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Mustaqilligining 35 yilligi bilan samimiy muborakbod etadi! Yurtimiz tinch, xalqimiz farovon, mustaqilligimiz abadiy bo‘lsin!

31 Aug 2026, 16:19 UTC≈2,910 viewsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @iBook_uzPhoto

🌍 Siyosatni aslida nima belgilaydi? Davlatlar qarorlarini aslida nima belgilaydi? Nega ayrim hududlar dunyo siyosatida doimo muhim bo‘lib kelgan? Bu safargi podcastimizda Robert D. Kaplanning “Geografiya qasosi” kitobi asosida geosiyosatning davlatlar taqdiri va xalqaro munosabatlarga ta’siri haqida suhbatlashamiz. 🗺 Geosiyosat hammasini o‘zgartiradimi? 👁 U biz ko‘rmaydigan qanday kuch? 🌐 Siyosat ortida geografiya

31 Aug 2026, 01:05 UTC≈3,040 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

🌐 Namangan shahrida jonli uchrashuv 🗓 12-sentabr, 2026-yil ⏱️ Soat 14:30 🎙 Jonli uchrashuv Mavzu: Geosiyosiy yuklama: Vodiy intellektual bardoshi qanday sinovdan o‘tadi Ekspertlar: 🔗 Siyosatshunoslar: Hamid Sodiq, Abduvali Soyibnazarov, Jahongir Akramov va Avazbek Isoboev 🔗 Tarixchi: G'aybulla Boboyorov 🔗 Jurnalist: G‘ayratxo‘ja Saydaliyev Tomoshabinlar bevosita savollar berish va fikr bildirish imkoniyatiga ega

30 Aug 2026, 16:24 UTC≈3,010 viewsread 3 September 2026

Азиз ватандошлар, Мамлакатимизнинг Мустақиллик куни муборак бўлсин! Мустақиллик масъулияти ҳар биримизнинг зиммамизда эканлигини жиддий англашимиз керак! @Hamid_Sodiq

30 Aug 2026, 12:06 UTC≈3,280 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Фикрат жамоасининг 29 август куни ўтказилган жонли учрашувидан лавҳалар. @Hamid_Sodiq

29 Aug 2026, 06:46 UTC≈3,860 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🎥 ⁉️⁉️⁉️⁉️⁉️ Mavzu: Rossiya “yadro xavfi”: raketalar qayerda? Tomosha qiling ➡️https://youtube.com/live/uxeEU6R-GpE?feature=share Rasmiy sahifalarimizga obuna bo'ling telegram |instagram | facebook | youtube | fikratonline

29 Aug 2026, 02:33 UTC≈3,620 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

BUGUN 🌐 Toshkent shahrida jonli uchrashuv 🗓 29-avgust, 2026-yil ⏱️ Soat 14:30 🎙 Jonli uchrashuv Mavzu: Kiber suverenitet: mustaqillik kimga tegishli? Ekspertlar: 🔗 Siyosatshunoslar: Hamid Sodiq va Hamza Boltayev 🔗 Tarixchi: G'aybulla Boboyorov 🔗 Jurnalist: G‘ayratxo‘ja Saydaliyev Tomoshabinlar bevosita savollar berish va fikr bildirish imkoniyatiga ega bo‘ladilar. 📚 Ekspertlar tarjima qilgan “QO'RQUV” kitobini

28 Aug 2026, 17:54 UTC≈3,470 viewsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @sanjarshamss

Siyosatshunos Hamid Sodiq bilan ortda qolgan haftani tahlil qildik, sizdan kutganimiz - like, comment, share, yoki dislike: https://www.youtube.com/live/oF3GnRRk4N8?si=u331DCyGkJmlX-4c

Showing the 12 most recent of 80 posts we hold for @Hamid_Sodiq. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@Hamid_Sodiq edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
9 August 2026
Most recent edit
30 August 2026

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 34 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

iBooK.uz
@iBook_uz · 37,906
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 31 August 2026
.
@MubashshirAhmad · 30,901
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 6 September 2026
Elektron kutubxona
@e_kutubxona · 71,309
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 2 September 2026
Muhammad Ali | Rasmiy Blog
@Muhammadali_Eshonqulov · 58,024
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 22 August 2026
Abror Muxtor Aliy
@abrormuxtoraliyrasmiy · 23,895
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 17 September 2026
Global Tahlil l Rasmiy sahifa
@globaltahliluz · 22,685
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 20 September 2026
FATVO.UZ | Расмий канал
@diniysavollar · 196,795
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 11 August 2026
Mubosharat
@Mubosharat · 30,322
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 7 September 2026
Iqtisodchi Kundaligi
@iqtisodchi_kundaligi · 33,007
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 4 September 2026
Rossiyadagi vatandoşlar
@vatandosh_rossiya · 2,831
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 11 September 2026
Геосиёсат | Politics
@GeoPolitico · 26,735
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 11 September 2026
ТУРКИЯДАГИ ЎЗБЕКЛАР
@turkiyadagi_uzbeklar · 30,940
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 7 September 2026
Audio kutubxona
@audio_kitobxona · 38,881
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 30 August 2026
Xayrulla HAMIDOV ijodi /official
@Xayrulla_Hamidov_adabiyot · 28,739
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 9 September 2026
Vaqt.uz | Rasmiy
@vaqtuz_rasmiy · 44,473
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 29 August 2026
AlQuranuz-Shayx Alijon qori
@alquranuz · 132,284
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 13 August 2026
Kislorod
@kislorod_H2O · 26,885
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 11 September 2026
Kun.uz | Rasmiy kanal
@kunuz · 70,499
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 20 August 2026
Kun.uz | Online
@kunonline · 45,620
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 27 August 2026
Raqamli kutubxona
@raqamli_kutubxona · 23,894
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 17 September 2026
Doktorantlar va ilmiy izlanuvchilar | PhD, DSc
@ILM_NUR_2020 · 24,362
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 16 September 2026
BoburAkmalov
@boburakmalov · 68,020
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 4 September 2026
23.5° бурчак остида
@burchakostida · 31,917
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 6 September 2026
Bek Olimjon
@DrBekOlimjon · 28,760
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 9 September 2026

This channel appears in 40 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Hamid Sodiq | Rasmiy kanal” (@Hamid_Sodiq), 18,816 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Hamid_Sodiq.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.