Channel
@otabek_akromov
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
4,828subscribers
-177 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001200393750 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @otabek_akromov |
| Created | 1 January 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/otabek_akromov |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 69% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 06:21 | 4,828 | -24 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 07:18 | 4,852 | +2 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 10:41 | 4,850 | -37 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 19:40 | 4,887 | -11 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 06:56 | 4,898 | +31 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 22:34 | 4,867 | -15 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 09:17 | 4,882 | -13 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 06:28 | 4,895 | -13 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 10:23 | 4,908 | -16 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 20:14 | 4,924 | -31 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 23:23 | 4,955 | -25 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 21:52 | 4,980 | -25 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:43 | 5,005 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:17 | 5,005 | first reading |
24 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 24 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
850 reactions across 24 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 380 | 44.7% | |
| 💯 | 149 | 17.5% | |
| 🔥 | 138 | 16.2% | |
| ❤ | 79 | 9.29% | |
| 🤣 | 36 | 4.24% | |
| 🤬 | 19 | 2.24% | |
| 🤝 | 12 | 1.41% | |
| 👏 | 10 | 1.18% | |
| 👌 | 9 | 1.06% | |
| 😢 | 8 | 0.941% | |
| 👎 | 5 | 0.588% | |
| 😱 | 5 | 0.588% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 850 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Марказий Осиё сиёсатини ўқитишда қўллайдиган усулим ҳақида ANUда Марказий Осиё сиёсатини ўқитиш бир принципга амал қиламан: қандай мавзу ўтишимдан қатъий назар, минтақанинг умумий назарий дебатларга қандай ҳисса қўшишини ва уларни қайтатан кўриб чиқишини кўрсатиш. Ушбу курс бу ерда анчадан бери (15 йилча) ўқитилади. Аввалги ёндашувда мавзулар асосан даврлар бўйича қурилган, яъни курс маълум маънода Марказий Осиё тар…
🔥11❤4💯3
Икки дўстнинг ватанпарварлик ҳақида суҳбати Икки яқин дўст ўртасида ватанпарварлик ҳақида қизиқ бир суҳбатни гувоҳи бўлдим. Иккаласи ҳам бир-бирининг салоҳиятини яхши билади, аммо ватанпарварликни мутлақо бошқача тушунади. — Сени қобилиятингни яхши биламан. Албатта, чет элда ўқишинг, PhD қилишинг керак. Бу ерда яхши иш қилишинг қийин. Чунки диссертацияни ҳимоя қилишинг илмий ишингга эмас, бир одамнинг хоҳишига боғл…
👍28❤7💯3🔥3👎1
Пашинян ташқи сиёсатда ортга қайтмоқдами? Кеча Никол Пашинян Евроосиё иқтисодий иттифоқи ҳозирча Арманистон учун устувор бўлиб қолаётганини, бироқ Европа Иттифоқига аъзо бўлиш стратегик мақсад эканини айтди. Бу баёнот Пашиняннинг аввалги риторикасидан анча фарқ қилади. Бир пайтлар у ЕОИИ йиғилишларида иштирок этишдан очиқ-ойдин қочиб, Арманистоннинг келажак йўли ЕИқи билан боғлиқ эканини қатъий таъкидларди. Кўплаб …
👍18🔥8❤2
Jeffry Checkel bilan Syurix Universitetidagi suhbat 2023-yilda men Syurix Universitetida PhD tadqiqotchisi sifatida bir semestr bo'ldim. U yerda Evropadagi turli universitetlardan kelgan olimlar bilan uchrashdim. Shulardan biri Jeffry Checkel, mashhur olim, professor, bilan qizg’in Xalqaro munosabatlar va nazariyalar tog’risida suhbat qurdik. Orada men undan nimaga hamma nazariyalar G’arb olimlari tomonidan yaratil…
👍14🔥4👎1
Паст рейтинг ортидаги ҳақиқат Кўпчилик илмий муҳитда энг нуфузли нашриётлар ёки журналлар билан ишлаш қийин, пастроқ рейтингдагилари эса тезкор ва муаллифга нисбатан ҳурматлироқ бўлади, деб ўйлайди. Амалда эса баъзан аксинча бўлади. Паст рейтингли журналлар ойлаб жавоб бермаслиги, қарорларни кечиктириши ёки ўз хатосини тан олиш ўрнига муаллифнинг вақтини беҳуда сарф қилиши мумкин. Илмий фаолиятда энг муҳим ресурс — …
💯13🔥8👍7❤5
💯 қўшиламан шу фикрга.
💯6👍3🔥3
Китобларни ёқиш ёки йўқ қилиш бу халқнинг хотираси, тарихи ва келажагига қарши ҳужумдир. Россия зарбалари натижасида миллионлаб украин китоблари, жумладан ўқув йили бошланиши арафасида юз минглаб мактаб дарсликларининг йўқ қилиниши маданий геноциднинг ёрқин кўринишидир. Чунки маданиятни йўқ қилиш халқни маънан йўқ қилишга қаратилган. Тарих буни аввал ҳам кўрган: китоблар ёқила бошлаганда, аслида ғоялар ва хотиралар ё…
🤬19💯12😢5🔥4❤3
"Одамлар чекловлар туфайли ҳалол бўлиб қоладилар" (People are kept honest by constraint.) — Никколо Макиавелли Ҳалолликни, биринчи навбатда, сиёсат нуқтаи назаридан ўқиш лозим. Демократик институтлар дастлаб ҳокимиятни монополиялаштиришга интилиши мумкин бўлган "подшолар"ни чеклаш учун яратилади. Вақт ўтиши билан эса бу чекловлар сиёсий маданиятга айланади: ҳокимиятга келган ҳар бир раҳбар, навбати келганда, уни тар…
👍13🔥10❤6
Айрим даврларда ташқи душманлар воқеликдан эмас, заруратдан туғилади. Чунки иқтисодий ва ижтимоий қийинчиликлар даври ташқи таҳдидлар учун энг "қулай" мавсумдир. 👉🏿 https://t.me/otabek_akromov
💯20👍6
Сунъий интеллект базаси ёлғончи инсониятнинг ёлғон маълумотларидан иборат ва у, янги ялғончилар учун янги ялғонларни яратади. Қулашда ҳам "парвоз" бор. @Hamid_Sodiq
👍36💯19❤4🔥2🤣2
Китоблар/асарлар мулоқоти Китобни эмас, китоблар ўртасидаги мулоқотни ўқинг. Айниқса ижтимоий фанларда ҳар бир муҳим асар охирги сўз ва якуний хулоса эмас, балки катта мулоқотнинг бир қисми, холос. Чунки ҳар бир янги асар аввалгисини синайди, қайта талқин қилади ёки унинг чегараларини кўрсатади. Биргина китоб билан чекланиш — воқеликнинг фақат бир қиррасини кўриш демакдир. Китобни унинг танқидчилари, давомчилари ва …
👍17🔥8💯3👏2❤1
Кучли аргумент ҳам нотўғри аудиторияда кучсиз эшитилади Кеча PhD'даги муҳим босқичлардан бири — Confirmation of Candidature (номзодликни тасдиқлаш) ҳимоясидан муваффақиятли ўтдим. Кечаги ҳимоядан кейин бир нарса ҳақида кўп ўйладим: аудиторияни тўғри танлаш. Биз одатда яхши нутқ, кучли аргумент ёки мукаммал тақдимот ҳақида кўп гапирамиз. Аммо буларнинг барчаси тўғри аудитория бўлмаса, кутилган таъсирни бермаслиги мум…
👍23💯21❤12
Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @otabek_akromov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Otabek Akromov” (@otabek_akromov), 4,828 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/otabek_akromov.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.