Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 王者宙斯官方频道🇨🇳

Channel

王者宙斯官方频道🇨🇳

@HeXian886

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

45,929subscribers

-308 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001943456362
TypeChannel
Username@HeXian886
Description禁止将宙斯上传qq微信等等大陆所有平台,这是不允许的,否则后果自负 宙斯仅供学习参考,切勿用于非法行为,下载后请务必在24小时内删除! 交流群 https://t.me/ZSNHJLQ 官方客服 @zsnb147258
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/HeXian886

Topic

Software piracy — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 50% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

45,92946,59346,2616 August 2026 — 46,237 subscribers7 August 2026 — 46,246 subscribers8 August 2026 — 46,265 subscribers9 August 2026 — 46,248 subscribers10 August 2026 — 46,225 subscribers11 August 2026 — 46,205 subscribers12 August 2026 — 46,166 subscribers13 August 2026 — 46,174 subscribers14 August 2026 — 46,126 subscribers16 August 2026 — 46,069 subscribers17 August 2026 — 46,005 subscribers18 August 2026 — 45,996 subscribers20 August 2026 — 45,990 subscribers21 August 2026 — 45,991 subscribers22 August 2026 — 46,152 subscribers24 August 2026 — 46,593 subscribers25 August 2026 — 46,539 subscribers26 August 2026 — 46,503 subscribers27 August 2026 — 46,505 subscribers28 August 2026 — 46,460 subscribers29 August 2026 — 46,457 subscribers30 August 2026 — 46,483 subscribers31 August 2026 — 46,514 subscribers1 September 2026 — 46,498 subscribers2 September 2026 — 46,468 subscribers3 September 2026 — 46,450 subscribers5 September 2026 — 46,376 subscribers8 September 2026 — 46,233 subscribers11 September 2026 — 46,125 subscribers13 September 2026 — 46,054 subscribers14 September 2026 — 46,020 subscribers16 September 2026 — 46,006 subscribers18 September 2026 — 45,929 subscribers6 August 202618 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 43 days, net -308. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 45,829–46,693 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 23:5945,929-77
16 Sept 2026, 13:4046,006-14
14 Sept 2026, 18:5546,020-34
13 Sept 2026, 08:1846,054-71
11 Sept 2026, 13:4146,125-108
8 Sept 2026, 22:3746,233-143
5 Sept 2026, 12:0246,376-74
3 Sept 2026, 13:3846,450-18
2 Sept 2026, 10:3646,468-30
1 Sept 2026, 14:0946,498-16
31 Aug 2026, 13:4846,514+31
30 Aug 2026, 12:4746,483+26
29 Aug 2026, 12:0446,457-3
28 Aug 2026, 11:1346,460-45
27 Aug 2026, 14:4346,505+2
26 Aug 2026, 15:0346,503-36
25 Aug 2026, 14:4546,539-54
24 Aug 2026, 14:0546,593+441
22 Aug 2026, 19:5346,152+161
21 Aug 2026, 09:4745,991first reading

Engagement

88 posts held, back to 23 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 97 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.2%
avg views ÷ 45,929 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,150
29 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.496%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
36
of 88 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 September 2026
Posts held88 (23 July 20269 September 2026)
Views total149,367
Reactions total741
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken22 Sept 2026, 05:41 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
239
Videos
18
Links
2

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

1,732 reactions across 73 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1,26473.0%
27015.6%
😢573.29%
😭352.02%
🤔341.96%
💔90.52%
🙈90.52%
🌚80.462%
😴80.462%
🤩70.404%
🥴70.404%
🤓60.346%
😍40.231%
20.115%
❤‍🔥20.115%
🎉20.115%
😐20.115%
🙏20.115%
🤨20.115%
🔥10.058%
1 further kind10.058%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 73 of the 88 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,732 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 88 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 9 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Sept 2026, 08:36 UTC≈5,550 views29 reactionsread 22 September 2026

宙斯亲自推荐一款朋友的王者算法解密项目 限时公益 全网都没更新出来 GROK吊打所有王者解密 https://t.me/GROKJM

👍1514

8 Sept 2026, 12:41 UTC≈6,000 views20 reactionsread 19 September 2026

本来我都懒得搞了 作者最近进入摆烂时刻了 看你们在群里天天说没项目玩 赛季末最后更新一波吧

👍191

8 Sept 2026, 12:38 UTC≈6,000 views22 reactionsread 19 September 2026

明天更新udp解密 比un模拟器更牛逼 敬请期待 评论区抽三张周卡

👍22

3 Sept 2026, 20:26 UTC≈3,430 views30 reactionsread 6 September 2026
Photo

野鸡内核作者 你要笑死我嘛 给你大头干出来了知道求饶了 哦对了 他又出了个新项目 大家擦亮眼睛避免被圈😂😂

👍1413😍2🎉1

1 Sept 2026, 07:17 UTC≈5,330 views61 reactionsread 6 September 2026
Photo

翟国强 370784200112013515 山东省安丘市新安街道石灰埠村144号 汉族2026-09-01 14:54:25 姓名: 翟国强 账号: 13105620019 身份证: 370784200112013515 核验结果: 支付宝三要素一致✅ 野鸡内核作者大头 沙币东西 听说圈了不少代理费 有仇的报仇咯 代理们争取给他送进去哈 我记得老是在QQ群晒流水装逼来着

👍479🙈5

1 Sept 2026, 04:31 UTC687 views20 reactionsread 1 September 2026

项目停更两天 被人圈了 晚上发布野鸡内核作者的大头照 问了一下 被他圈的代理什么的不少 准备联手搞一下 nm这次你死定了好吧😘 搞完这个事后 给大家更新内部方案用 〈某内部项目解密〉

👍173

31 Aug 2026, 00:57 UTC≈2,100 views17 reactionsread 31 August 2026

ksu跟杂鱼面具 〈gki模式不支持〉 已经适配 再测试测试,下午发包

👍161

30 Aug 2026, 06:38 UTC≈3,120 views25 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Poll

月卡免费帮做面具环境 包能使用 是否支持此业务

  1. 可以73%
  2. 太麻烦了30%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

👍25

30 Aug 2026, 06:37 UTC≈3,110 views34 reactionsread 31 August 2026

新版解密因为有面具限制 推荐大家刷 阿尔法面具 或德尔塔 这俩面具都能全系适配 ksu 杂鱼等面具 有的版本过高可能用不了 此次更新解密 优缺点总汇: 优点:无需频繁更新,一次能用一个月甚至更久 缺点:有面具限制

👍2011😭2🙏1

30 Aug 2026, 05:42 UTC≈3,170 views26 reactionsread 31 August 2026

已更新我用蓝奏浏览器分享了[宙斯解密], 下载链接:https://wwr.lanzoui.com/b0pnu108d 提取码 : 6666, 你可以不限速下载哦 成为神:https://luoye.yjsfk.cn/shop/zsnb666 新版使用方法略有差异 观看视频教程使用 并且新版有的面具玩不了 比如ksu 32457版本 这种版本太高的面具 推荐阿尔法面具 德尔塔面具 这两种全系列支持 ksu跟杂鱼 不支持gki模式 不支持版本过高的版本

👍214😭1

Showing the 12 most recent of 88 posts we hold for @HeXian886. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@HeXian886 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
28 August 2026
Most recent edit
28 August 2026

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

30 Aug 2026, 06:38 UTCAnonymous Poll722 voters

月卡免费帮做面具环境 包能使用 是否支持此业务

  1. 可以73%
  2. 太麻烦了30%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

25 Aug 2026, 13:10 UTCAnonymous Poll867 voters

卡网手续费要不要取消

  1. 不用 就当喂狗了32%
  2. 需要 能省一分是一分72%

The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

15 Aug 2026, 12:59 UTCAnonymous Poll1,270 voters approx.

支持选项1还是2 明天中午十二点截止投票 投票结束后 秒出安装包

  1. 选择163%
  2. 选项237%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 88 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 9 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“王者宙斯官方频道🇨🇳” (@HeXian886), 45,929 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/HeXian886.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.