😁 章鱼哥公益解密内核 😀 主流游戏已适配:三角洲、和平、失控进化、王者、无畏契约 获取三角洲公益内核点我 获取和平公益内核点我 获取失控进化公益内核点我 获取王者公益内核点我 获取瓦手公益内核点我 获取全游戏上号器点我 想要适配什么游戏在评论区留言,你留言我适配. 争做26年的慈善家🤩 lol、暗区、codm、同步开发中 ❤️ 频道 @ij666666
👍7😘1
Signed hoh .

Channel
@DUOLEA66
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
35,899subscribers
+16,871 since we began measuring on 19 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002530342136 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @DUOLEA66 |
| Description | 我不是资源的创造者,我只是勤劳的小蜜蜂 本频道中的所有内容均来源于网络,仅供个人学习和研究使用,请在24小时之内删除,请勿用于任何商业用途或非法用途。如有任何内容侵犯了您的权益,请及时联系我们,我们将立即予以删除 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 19 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 23 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/DUOLEA66 |
Software piracy — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 06:38 | 35,899 | +743 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 07:55 | 35,156 | +931 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 15:21 | 34,225 | +1,093 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 21:20 | 33,132 | +1,164 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 13:56 | 31,968 | +1,749 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 06:16 | 30,219 | +1,243 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 03:36 | 28,976 | +638 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 15:35 | 28,338 | +425 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 16:18 | 27,913 | +472 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 16:45 | 27,441 | +672 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 13:35 | 26,769 | +748 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 11:35 | 26,021 | +793 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 09:07 | 25,228 | +1,010 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 08:13 | 24,218 | +943 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 06:04 | 23,275 | +448 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 08:22 | 22,827 | +499 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 09:33 | 22,328 | +938 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 20:35 | 21,390 | +726 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 13:44 | 20,664 | +690 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 14:38 | 19,974 | first reading |
341 posts held, back to 17 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 66 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 341 (17 August 2026 – 21 September 2026) |
| Views total | 955,955 |
| Reactions total | 7,828 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 21 Sept 2026, 19:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 21 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 31 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
9,844 reactions across 341 posts, in 37 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 81.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 8,025 | 81.5% | |
| ❤ | 962 | 9.77% | |
| 🥰 | 148 | 1.50% | |
| 😍 | 120 | 1.22% | |
| 💩 | 67 | 0.681% | |
| 😱 | 65 | 0.66% | |
| 🤔 | 57 | 0.579% | |
| 🤓 | 40 | 0.406% | |
| 🤣 | 38 | 0.386% | |
| 🖕 | 36 | 0.366% | |
| 🔥 | 35 | 0.356% | |
| 😭 | 35 | 0.356% | |
| 👎 | 30 | 0.305% | |
| 🍌 | 23 | 0.234% | |
| 🤩 | 19 | 0.193% | |
| 😁 | 17 | 0.173% | |
| 🤬 | 15 | 0.152% | |
| 🤡 | 12 | 0.122% | |
| 👏 | 11 | 0.112% | |
| 🌭 | 10 | 0.102% | |
| 17 further kinds | 79 | 0.803% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 341 of the 341 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9,844 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 341 most recent posts we hold, published 17 August 2026 to 21 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
😁 章鱼哥公益解密内核 😀 主流游戏已适配:三角洲、和平、失控进化、王者、无畏契约 获取三角洲公益内核点我 获取和平公益内核点我 获取失控进化公益内核点我 获取王者公益内核点我 获取瓦手公益内核点我 获取全游戏上号器点我 想要适配什么游戏在评论区留言,你留言我适配. 争做26年的慈善家🤩 lol、暗区、codm、同步开发中 ❤️ 频道 @ij666666
👍7😘1
Signed hoh .
https://t.me/luoyenb521 这个频道马上更新三角洲公益解密
👍7
Signed 陪我久一点 云寄售luoye.yjsfk.cn
免费的开户工具! ⭐HERO免费开盒助手 ✅开户专用✅ ✅户籍猎手✅ 安装包下载链接 https://wwawi.lanzouq.com/iy1DC48m5p1g 提取码 : 8888 售后客服 @xxiHERO
👍5
Signed 全网收广告位@ai520i
Photo, posted without a caption
👍22😱4🤔3
Signed 洛雨
Photo, posted without a caption
👍20❤3🤔1
Signed 洛雨
我朋友项目 玩和平的可以加一下这个公益频道
👍12
Signed 陪我久一点 云寄售luoye.yjsfk.cn
✅失控进化TR内核v1.0.8破解 ✅刷入压缩包驱动 卡密乱输 🔗点我下载🔗 #失控进化
👍17❤1
投稿联系 直接发包发卡密 带卡密来 @Lingxiaoxi6 不要带使用过的卡密, 直接发包和卡密就行了,磨磨唧唧的不回复(有些发卡密的还自己用了,就没搞)
👍25❤1
✅和平精英CEO引擎漏打追锁 ✅漏打 追踪 卡密乱输 🔗点我下载🔗 #和平精英 #内核
👍32🍌2❤1
Telegram必备的搜索引擎,极搜JISOU帮你精准找到,想要的群组、频道、视频、音乐 👉 t.me/jisou2?start=a_6493145491
👍36❤1🍌1
Signed 极搜🔍资源搜索@JISOU
户籍猎手已公益
👍37🍌1👎1
Signed 全网收广告位@ai520i
推荐一款朋友的和平落叶🎮三角洲🎮公益项目 三角洲拥有最先进的解密 大家可以去支持一下 https://t.me/luoyenb521 入住就送广告免费发我有管的频道 luoye.yjsfk.cn 流水1000
👍22🤮2❤1
Signed 陪我久一点 云寄售luoye.yjsfk.cn
Showing the 12 most recent of 341 posts we hold for @DUOLEA66. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@DUOLEA66 edited 6 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
玩那种的多,那个投票多就多更新那个
The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
神烦狗单解密和范围已经开
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
学生蛋们要开学了吧🤓
The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
三角洲内核解密的,支持虚拟机要不要兄弟萌
The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 341 most recent posts we hold, published 17 August 2026 to 21 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 16 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“不知名公益破解(三角洲无畏契约和平精英王者荣耀)” (@DUOLEA66), 35,899 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DUOLEA66.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.