Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 不知名公益破解(三角洲无畏契约和平精英王者荣耀)

Channel

不知名公益破解(三角洲无畏契约和平精英王者荣耀)

@DUOLEA66

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

35,899subscribers

+16,871 since we began measuring on 19 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002530342136
TypeChannel
Username@DUOLEA66
Description我不是资源的创造者,我只是勤劳的小蜜蜂 本频道中的所有内容均来源于网络,仅供个人学习和研究使用,请在24小时之内删除,请勿用于任何商业用途或非法用途。如有任何内容侵犯了您的权益,请及时联系我们,我们将立即予以删除
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded19 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held23
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/DUOLEA66

Topic

Software piracy — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

19,02835,89927,463.519 August 2026 — 19,028 subscribers19 August 2026 — 19,028 subscribers19 August 2026 — 19,423 subscribers20 August 2026 — 19,974 subscribers21 August 2026 — 20,664 subscribers22 August 2026 — 21,390 subscribers24 August 2026 — 22,328 subscribers25 August 2026 — 22,827 subscribers26 August 2026 — 23,275 subscribers27 August 2026 — 24,218 subscribers28 August 2026 — 25,228 subscribers29 August 2026 — 26,021 subscribers30 August 2026 — 26,769 subscribers31 August 2026 — 27,441 subscribers1 September 2026 — 27,913 subscribers2 September 2026 — 28,338 subscribers4 September 2026 — 28,976 subscribers6 September 2026 — 30,219 subscribers9 September 2026 — 31,968 subscribers11 September 2026 — 33,132 subscribers13 September 2026 — 34,225 subscribers15 September 2026 — 35,156 subscribers17 September 2026 — 35,899 subscribers19 August 202617 September 2026
23 measurements spanning 29 days, net +16,871. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,497–38,430 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 23
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 06:3835,899+743
15 Sept 2026, 07:5535,156+931
13 Sept 2026, 15:2134,225+1,093
11 Sept 2026, 21:2033,132+1,164
9 Sept 2026, 13:5631,968+1,749
6 Sept 2026, 06:1630,219+1,243
4 Sept 2026, 03:3628,976+638
2 Sept 2026, 15:3528,338+425
1 Sept 2026, 16:1827,913+472
31 Aug 2026, 16:4527,441+672
30 Aug 2026, 13:3526,769+748
29 Aug 2026, 11:3526,021+793
28 Aug 2026, 09:0725,228+1,010
27 Aug 2026, 08:1324,218+943
26 Aug 2026, 06:0423,275+448
25 Aug 2026, 08:2222,827+499
24 Aug 2026, 09:3322,328+938
22 Aug 2026, 20:3521,390+726
21 Aug 2026, 13:4420,664+690
20 Aug 2026, 14:3819,974first reading

Engagement

341 posts held, back to 17 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 66 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.0%
avg views ÷ 35,899 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,590
266 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.819%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
266
of 341 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 September 2026
Posts held341 (17 August 202621 September 2026)
Views total955,955
Reactions total7,828
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken21 Sept 2026, 19:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
764
Videos
157
Links
967

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 21 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
15m 56s
Average length
31s

Measured directly from 31 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

9,844 reactions across 341 posts, in 37 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 81.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍8,02581.5%
9629.77%
🥰1481.50%
😍1201.22%
💩670.681%
😱650.66%
🤔570.579%
🤓400.406%
🤣380.386%
🖕360.366%
🔥350.356%
😭350.356%
👎300.305%
🍌230.234%
🤩190.193%
😁170.173%
🤬150.152%
🤡120.122%
👏110.112%
🌭100.102%
17 further kinds790.803%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 341 of the 341 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9,844 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 341 most recent posts we hold, published 17 August 2026 to 21 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

21 Sept 2026, 19:18 UTC40 views8 reactionsread 21 September 2026

😁 章鱼哥公益解密内核 😀 主流游戏已适配:三角洲、和平、失控进化、王者、无畏契约 获取三角洲公益内核点我 获取和平公益内核点我 获取失控进化公益内核点我 获取王者公益内核点我 获取瓦手公益内核点我 获取全游戏上号器点我 想要适配什么游戏在评论区留言,你留言我适配. 争做26年的慈善家🤩 lol、暗区、codm、同步开发中 ❤️ 频道 @ij666666

👍7😘1

Signed hoh .

21 Sept 2026, 18:34 UTC225 views7 reactionsread 21 September 2026

https://t.me/luoyenb521 这个频道马上更新三角洲公益解密

👍7

Signed 陪我久一点 云寄售luoye.yjsfk.cn

21 Sept 2026, 17:52 UTC405 views5 reactionsread 21 September 2026
File

免费的开户工具! ⭐HERO免费开盒助手 ✅开户专用✅ ✅户籍猎手✅ 安装包下载链接 https://wwawi.lanzouq.com/iy1DC48m5p1g 提取码 : 8888 售后客服 @xxiHERO

👍5

Signed 全网收广告位@ai520i

21 Sept 2026, 16:52 UTC812 views29 reactionsread 21 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍22😱4🤔3

Signed 洛雨

21 Sept 2026, 16:40 UTC854 views24 reactionsread 21 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍203🤔1

Signed 洛雨

21 Sept 2026, 16:26 UTC595 views12 reactionsread 21 September 2026

我朋友项目 玩和平的可以加一下这个公益频道

👍12

Signed 陪我久一点 云寄售luoye.yjsfk.cn

21 Sept 2026, 16:21 UTC928 views18 reactionsread 21 September 2026
Photo

✅失控进化TR内核v1.0.8破解 ✅刷入压缩包驱动 卡密乱输 🔗点我下载🔗 #失控进化

👍171

21 Sept 2026, 15:42 UTC949 views26 reactionsread 21 September 2026

投稿联系 直接发包发卡密 带卡密来 @Lingxiaoxi6 不要带使用过的卡密, 直接发包和卡密就行了,磨磨唧唧的不回复(有些发卡密的还自己用了,就没搞)

👍251

21 Sept 2026, 14:14 UTC≈1,780 views35 reactionsread 21 September 2026
Photo

✅和平精英CEO引擎漏打追锁 ✅漏打 追踪 卡密乱输 🔗点我下载🔗 #和平精英 #内核

👍32🍌21

21 Sept 2026, 12:47 UTC≈2,320 views38 reactionsread 21 September 2026
Photo

Telegram必备的搜索引擎,极搜JISOU帮你精准找到,想要的群组、频道、视频、音乐 👉 t.me/jisou2?start=a_6493145491

👍361🍌1

Signed 极搜🔍资源搜索@JISOU

21 Sept 2026, 12:46 UTC≈1,940 views39 reactionsread 21 September 2026

户籍猎手已公益

👍37🍌1👎1

Signed 全网收广告位@ai520i

21 Sept 2026, 12:17 UTC≈2,170 views25 reactionsread 21 September 2026

推荐一款朋友的和平落叶🎮三角洲🎮公益项目 三角洲拥有最先进的解密 大家可以去支持一下 https://t.me/luoyenb521 入住就送广告免费发我有管的频道 luoye.yjsfk.cn 流水1000

👍22🤮21

Signed 陪我久一点 云寄售luoye.yjsfk.cn

Showing the 12 most recent of 341 posts we hold for @DUOLEA66. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@DUOLEA66 edited 6 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
19 August 2026
Most recent edit
20 September 2026

Polls

The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

3 Sept 2026, 15:54 UTCAnonymous Poll1,150 voters approx.

玩那种的多,那个投票多就多更新那个

  1. 内核43%
  2. 直装26%
  3. 改文件41%

The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

29 Aug 2026, 10:17 UTCAnonymous Poll1,070 voters approx.

神烦狗单解密和范围已经开

  1. 67%
  2. 狗都不玩33%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

21 Aug 2026, 13:22 UTCAnonymous Poll609 voters

学生蛋们要开学了吧🤓

  1. 不上了62%
  2. 开学了46%

The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

18 Aug 2026, 13:24 UTCAnonymous Poll593 voters

三角洲内核解密的,支持虚拟机要不要兄弟萌

  1. 75%
  2. 不要31%

The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 341 most recent posts we hold, published 17 August 2026 to 21 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 16 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“不知名公益破解(三角洲无畏契约和平精英王者荣耀)” (@DUOLEA66), 35,899 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DUOLEA66.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.