🌟会突破这次加密的 请相信
👍582🥱187🤔76❤64🫡29🔥16🦄16🥰14

Channel
@angel_kernel
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry
74,811subscribers
+19,985 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003981178442 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @angel_kernel |
| Description | 王者Angle作者反馈: @Jinang_Hello 交流群组: @angeljlpd 交流群误封请联系: @AngelKF110 本项目不会诋毁任何人及项目 网络上任何流言也要注意甄别 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 3 August 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 22 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/angel_kernel |
Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 51% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 04:07 | 74,811 | +233 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 05:47 | 74,578 | +385 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 03:56 | 74,193 | +385 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 04:57 | 73,808 | +633 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 06:33 | 73,175 | +603 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 03:36 | 72,572 | +642 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 23:15 | 71,930 | +1,132 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 06:36 | 70,798 | +1,413 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 19:49 | 69,385 | +1,068 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 19:02 | 68,317 | +1,349 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 18:03 | 66,968 | +888 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 16:55 | 66,080 | +745 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 08:34 | 65,335 | +3,038 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 20:08 | 62,297 | +2,840 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 08:26 | 59,457 | +449 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 10:24 | 59,008 | +1,946 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 07:27 | 57,062 | +594 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 03:54 | 56,468 | +490 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 00:51 | 55,978 | +448 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:36 | 55,530 | first reading |
207 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 56 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 207 (3 August 2026 – 28 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,051,000 |
| Reactions total | 29,471 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 30 Aug 2026, 04:19 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
29,361 reactions across 202 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 20,646 | 70.3% | |
| ❤ | 3,344 | 11.4% | |
| 🤔 | 1,249 | 4.25% | |
| 🥱 | 1,213 | 4.13% | |
| 😍 | 648 | 2.21% | |
| 🫡 | 472 | 1.61% | |
| 🥰 | 237 | 0.807% | |
| 🤩 | 168 | 0.572% | |
| 😁 | 157 | 0.535% | |
| 🦄 | 137 | 0.467% | |
| 💋 | 134 | 0.456% | |
| 💘 | 127 | 0.433% | |
| ❤🔥 | 102 | 0.347% | |
| 👏 | 97 | 0.33% | |
| 👌 | 94 | 0.32% | |
| 🐳 | 88 | 0.3% | |
| 💯 | 86 | 0.293% | |
| 🔥 | 81 | 0.276% | |
| 🍾 | 72 | 0.245% | |
| 😘 | 63 | 0.215% | |
| 5 further kinds | 146 | 0.497% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 207 of the 207 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 29,471reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 207 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🌟会突破这次加密的 请相信
👍582🥱187🤔76❤64🫡29🔥16🦄16🥰14
晓龙至尊处理器联系我测试解密 @Jinang_Hello 找到了 不用联系了 感谢配合
👍295🤔53🥱39❤17🔥13🦄11🤩9🥰9
demo版本解密现在就是这样的 等我解决好 发正式
👍272🫡40🥱27❤24🤔22💋7🍓5🦄4
解密demo版本而已 虽然能解 但是不完美 提前发包只是避免又说天使去二改什么什么的
👍106❤12
算法解密demo(测试版) 现在在解决成功 一帧→失败后停住/空窗→过几秒恢复这个问题 等待发正式版本吧 实在着急的可以先玩着 虽然能解密但是不完美
👍97❤35
Angel Demo 算法解密
👍169❤23🤔15💋9😍2
天机的用户联系我 测试解密 @Jinang_Hello 找到了 不用联系了 感谢配合
👍249🥱26🥰16👌11🤔11❤9🍓7👏5
已有思路 更新中 还是那句话解密不动内存 和谐也只是掉框而已 有点脑子的都知道
👍562🫡62🤔39🥱26❤21👏15☃12🥰11
加密又更新了 正在分析中 能够正常解密的就继续玩 不受影响
👍297🤔22❤13🥱13☃6💋3💯3😁2
玩自瞄必须开这个 准度大大提升 记得开兼容触摸
👍111❤26🍾13🤔2
🎮❗️❗️❗️❗️Angel(天使)王者公益算法解密内核[3.9版本] ✔️修复解密问题 ✔️修复自瞄圆圈问题 ✔️优化ui ✔️修复部分人解密失败 👉现在建议先使用Dit_ko驱动 Angel驱动还在完善中 部分人用不了 💻支持CPU渲染后端 安卓16以下推荐使用 😁纯算法解密 无视任何检测 ❌如果内存解密作者死全家 ❌如果内置端口作者死全家 ⭐音量键控制UI隐藏 or 显示 ⚡️解密教程必须看 https://t.me/angeljlpd/4731 ⚡️解密教程必须看 ⭐卡密:@Angel_kernel ✉️作者 @Jinang_Hello 🔝更新频道 https://t.me/angel_kernel 🚨Angel声明: https://t.me/angel_kernel/6049 🤩换装教程:https://t.me/angeljlpd/22697 👽APK使用教程:https://t.me/…
❤169👍49🍾8🔥7🤔5👏2
稍微再优化一下就发包 吐槽一下学校弄起来还是太麻烦了
👍86❤13❤🔥7👌7🤔7
Showing the 12 most recent of 207 posts we hold for @angel_kernel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@angel_kernel edited 9 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Citation-graph rank — 12,686 of 1,626,935entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 48 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“王者Angel公益官方频道(天使)” (@angel_kernel), 74,811 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/angel_kernel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.