Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for iUi公益

Channel

iUi公益

@iUiPD

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

49,607subscribers

+7,606 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002550303193
TypeChannel
Username@iUiPD
Descriptioni-UI 追求极致的动画美学与性能 细节拉满、高度用户自定化 --基于imgui的拓展窗口绘图 开发者不会主动联系你 本项目也没有任何收费及内部 本人也不会诋毁任何人及项目 网络上任何流言也要注意甄别 本项目仅供逆向UI灵感分享与学习研究 体验者的任何行为和造成的任何损失都与作者无关 若有侵权违法行为,请联系我删除内容 请在24小时内删除本应用[下载代表同意本协议]
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live2 September 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 2 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/iUiPD

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 32% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

20,800 average views per post against 49,607 subscribers — an engagement rate of 41.9%. Across the 1,252 registered channels in the same cohort — 31,632–99,655 subscribers, posting mainly in Chinese — the middle half sit between 1.01% and 5.92%, with a median of 2.62%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (3 August 2026 2 September 2026)
Posts measured72 of 73 published in the window (0 exact, 72 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled1,497,870
Mature posts only76.8% over 34 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers49,607 measured 2 September 2026
Cohortb31623:zho · 1,252 channels · p10 0.348% · p25 1.01% · p50 2.62% · p75 5.92% · p90 13.0%
Position in cohort99.281th percentile · 16.0× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.01% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageChinese · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 2 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

42,00149,60745,8047 August 2026 — 42,001 subscribers8 August 2026 — 42,269 subscribers9 August 2026 — 42,606 subscribers10 August 2026 — 42,937 subscribers11 August 2026 — 43,168 subscribers12 August 2026 — 43,460 subscribers13 August 2026 — 43,643 subscribers14 August 2026 — 43,995 subscribers15 August 2026 — 44,402 subscribers17 August 2026 — 44,911 subscribers18 August 2026 — 45,151 subscribers19 August 2026 — 45,458 subscribers20 August 2026 — 45,737 subscribers21 August 2026 — 46,068 subscribers22 August 2026 — 46,492 subscribers24 August 2026 — 47,041 subscribers25 August 2026 — 47,343 subscribers26 August 2026 — 47,603 subscribers27 August 2026 — 48,085 subscribers28 August 2026 — 48,510 subscribers29 August 2026 — 48,777 subscribers30 August 2026 — 49,048 subscribers31 August 2026 — 49,218 subscribers1 September 2026 — 49,349 subscribers2 September 2026 — 49,607 subscribers7 August 20262 September 2026
25 measurements spanning 26 days, net +7,606. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 40,860–50,748 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
2 Sept 2026, 07:3449,607+258
1 Sept 2026, 07:4649,349+131
31 Aug 2026, 06:3249,218+170
30 Aug 2026, 08:2649,048+271
29 Aug 2026, 05:4248,777+267
28 Aug 2026, 04:3748,510+425
27 Aug 2026, 02:4648,085+482
26 Aug 2026, 03:0147,603+260
25 Aug 2026, 05:3747,343+302
24 Aug 2026, 07:0747,041+549
22 Aug 2026, 14:1246,492+424
21 Aug 2026, 08:1246,068+331
20 Aug 2026, 08:0745,737+279
19 Aug 2026, 08:3545,458+307
18 Aug 2026, 08:3345,151+240
17 Aug 2026, 10:1544,911+509
15 Aug 2026, 20:4444,402+407
14 Aug 2026, 12:4743,995+352
13 Aug 2026, 01:5543,643+183
12 Aug 2026, 00:3243,460first reading

Engagement

88 posts held, back to 17 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 59 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
41.1%
avg views ÷ 49,607 subscribers
Avg views / post
20,400
71 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.699%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
72
of 88 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held88 (17 June 20262 September 2026)
Views total1,447,810
Reactions total10,117
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 06:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1
Links
6

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 3 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
3m 48s
Average length
12s

Measured directly from 19 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

19,803 reactions across 87 posts, in 50 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍10,37852.4%
3,46817.5%
🤔9965.03%
💩9654.87%
👎6783.42%
🤬5502.78%
🖕3972.00%
🤣3291.66%
🍌2951.49%
😭1940.98%
🤓1640.828%
🥰1620.818%
😡1250.631%
🔥1130.571%
😁1080.545%
💯950.48%
🌚920.465%
🤡890.449%
😍600.303%
🤮580.293%
30 further kinds4872.46%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 87 of the 88 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 19,803 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 88 most recent posts we hold, published 17 June 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 13:51 UTC≈8,380 views182 reactionsread 3 September 2026

iUi[4.0.3]版本已上传至葫芦资源网盘 https://drive.uc.cn/s/7ea09a7579324?public=1 1.适配新版本道具角色 2.解密数组及闪框

🤬105👍656💩5😁1

2 Sept 2026, 11:42 UTC≈9,870 views165 reactionsread 3 September 2026

iUi[4.0.2]版本已上传至葫芦资源网盘 https://drive.uc.cn/s/7ea09a7579324?public=1

👎78👍56🤔146🖕6🍌2🤬2👏1

2 Sept 2026, 10:55 UTC≈7,500 views32 reactionsread 3 September 2026

落叶公益内核新频道 之前的因为一些原因不用了 https://t.me/luoyenb521

👍293

2 Sept 2026, 10:55 UTC≈7,440 views29 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

😂菠萝全网最低价数据号😂 🍍全网售后最好且质量数据号🍍 🔥全网最低价只为做口碑不多赚一分钱🔥 ✅价格低 质量高 售后快 永不跑路✅ ✅人工验号保障账号质量100%✅ ⭐菠萝数据号购买链接⭐: https://wkaiw.oqzgb.com/shop/BLSJH 😙购买账号时请点开录屏😙 ✈️菠萝数据号官方通知频道: https://t.me/菠萝数据号 ✅唯一售后客服 @BLKF886✅

👍263

1 Sept 2026, 23:08 UTC≈13,100 views373 reactionsread 3 September 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

👍212🤬79👎21🤔13😍119😘8🔥7

1 Sept 2026, 22:53 UTC≈13,100 views75 reactionsread 3 September 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

👍55💯10👎64

1 Sept 2026, 19:26 UTC≈4,460 views11 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

😂菠萝全网最低价数据号😂 🍍全网售后最好且质量数据号🍍 🔥全网最低价只为做口碑不多赚一分钱🔥 ✅价格低 质量高 售后快 永不跑路✅ ✅人工验号保障账号质量100%✅ ⭐菠萝数据号购买链接⭐: https://wkaiw.oqzgb.com/shop/BLSJH 😙购买账号时请点开录屏😙 ✈️菠萝数据号官方通知频道: https://t.me/菠萝数据号 ✅唯一售后客服 @BLKF886✅

👍74

1 Sept 2026, 19:26 UTC≈4,510 views15 reactionsread 2 September 2026

落叶公益内核新频道 之前的因为一些原因不用了 https://t.me/luoyenb521

👍95👎1

1 Sept 2026, 09:23 UTC≈2,560 views20 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

😂菠萝全网最低价数据号😂 🍍全网售后最好且质量数据号🍍 🔥全网最低价只为做口碑不多赚一分钱🔥 ✅价格低 质量高 售后快 永不跑路✅ ✅人工验号保障账号质量100%✅ ⭐菠萝数据号购买链接⭐: https://wkaiw.oqzgb.com/shop/BLSJH 😙购买账号时请点开录屏😙 ✈️菠萝数据号官方通知频道: https://t.me/菠萝数据号 ✅唯一售后客服 @BLKF886✅

👍19🌚1

31 Aug 2026, 11:52 UTC≈3,830 views30 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

😂菠萝全网最低价数据号😂 🍍全网售后最好且质量数据号🍍 🔥全网最低价只为做口碑不多赚一分钱🔥 ✅价格低 质量高 售后快 永不跑路✅ ✅人工验号保障账号质量100%✅ ⭐菠萝数据号购买链接⭐: https://wkaiw.oqzgb.com/shop/BLSJH 😙购买账号时请点开录屏😙 ✈️菠萝数据号官方通知频道: https://t.me/菠萝数据号 ✅唯一售后客服 @BLKF886✅

👍27👎21

31 Aug 2026, 11:52 UTC≈3,760 views31 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Video

朋友的项目你们可以加一下 落叶公益内核功能齐全自瞄打火箭都没问题 https://t.me/luoyenb521

👍29👎2

30 Aug 2026, 07:52 UTC≈4,710 views40 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Photo

😂菠萝全网最低价数据号😂 🍍全网售后最好且质量数据号🍍 🔥全网最低价只为做口碑不多赚一分钱🔥 ✅价格低 质量高 售后快 永不跑路✅ ✅人工验号保障账号质量100%✅ ⭐菠萝数据号购买链接⭐: https://wkaiw.oqzgb.com/shop/BLSJH 😙购买账号时请点开录屏😙 ✈️菠萝数据号官方通知频道: https://t.me/菠萝数据号 ✅唯一售后客服 @BLKF886✅

👍373

Showing the 12 most recent of 88 posts we hold for @iUiPD. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 311,166 of 1,630,085 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“iUi公益” (@iUiPD), 49,607 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/iUiPD.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.