Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 追猎杯通知频道🥤

Channel

追猎杯通知频道🥤

@ZLBNB666

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

52,206subscribers

+2,225 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001676826963
TypeChannel
Username@ZLBNB666
Description项目导航链接🔗 https://t.me/ZLBNB666/194 追猎杯唯一频道🥤 https://t.me/+3PoQpTxY0VZjYTll 唯一聊天交流群 https://t.me/+eriIC04LIqU5ODc1 频道广告位 @ChouyuA
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ZLBNB666

Topic

Software piracy — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 64% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

49,98152,20651,093.57 August 2026 — 49,981 subscribers8 August 2026 — 49,995 subscribers8 August 2026 — 50,023 subscribers9 August 2026 — 50,005 subscribers10 August 2026 — 50,001 subscribers11 August 2026 — 49,996 subscribers12 August 2026 — 49,987 subscribers14 August 2026 — 49,982 subscribers15 August 2026 — 50,005 subscribers16 August 2026 — 50,007 subscribers18 August 2026 — 50,010 subscribers19 August 2026 — 49,998 subscribers20 August 2026 — 50,016 subscribers21 August 2026 — 50,019 subscribers22 August 2026 — 50,026 subscribers24 August 2026 — 49,982 subscribers25 August 2026 — 49,995 subscribers26 August 2026 — 50,057 subscribers27 August 2026 — 50,133 subscribers28 August 2026 — 50,242 subscribers28 August 2026 — 50,373 subscribers30 August 2026 — 50,493 subscribers31 August 2026 — 50,612 subscribers31 August 2026 — 50,670 subscribers2 September 2026 — 50,695 subscribers2 September 2026 — 50,763 subscribers4 September 2026 — 51,136 subscribers7 September 2026 — 51,481 subscribers10 September 2026 — 51,732 subscribers12 September 2026 — 51,815 subscribers14 September 2026 — 51,937 subscribers15 September 2026 — 52,069 subscribers18 September 2026 — 52,206 subscribers7 August 202618 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 42 days, net +2,225. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 49,647–52,540 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 07:5852,206+137
15 Sept 2026, 22:3952,069+132
14 Sept 2026, 04:1951,937+122
12 Sept 2026, 12:2051,815+83
10 Sept 2026, 09:1951,732+251
7 Sept 2026, 04:0251,481+345
4 Sept 2026, 11:1651,136+373
2 Sept 2026, 22:5550,763+68
2 Sept 2026, 00:2250,695+25
31 Aug 2026, 21:5550,670+58
31 Aug 2026, 00:3550,612+119
30 Aug 2026, 02:4750,493+120
28 Aug 2026, 23:5350,373+131
28 Aug 2026, 03:2350,242+109
27 Aug 2026, 02:3350,133+76
26 Aug 2026, 02:5350,057+62
25 Aug 2026, 06:1649,995+13
24 Aug 2026, 08:1949,982-44
22 Aug 2026, 13:1450,026+7
21 Aug 2026, 04:3450,019first reading

Engagement

423 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 91 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.33%
avg views ÷ 52,206 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,260
250 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.954%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
250
of 423 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 248 of 250 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 September 2026
Posts held423 (31 July 202619 September 2026)
Views total564,499
Reactions total5,381
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken20 Sept 2026, 04:06 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
128
Videos
110
Links
66

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 20 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
24m 26s
Average length
37s

Measured directly from 40 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

7,436 reactions across 415 posts, in 27 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 90.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍6,74190.7%
4405.92%
🤪260.35%
🤔250.336%
😡240.323%
😍220.296%
😘200.269%
🤡170.229%
🌚160.215%
😱160.215%
🐳150.202%
🔥140.188%
🎉110.148%
😇100.134%
🤩80.108%
😭70.094%
🥰50.067%
👀30.04%
🤬30.04%
20.027%
7 further kinds110.148%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 418 of the 423 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,436 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 423 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 19 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 422 we hold a reading for · 0.2%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ZLBNB666. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 423 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 19 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

19 Sept 2026, 20:55 UTC307 views13 reactionsread 20 September 2026
Forwarded from @kuluomi886File

库洛米❤️三角洲 V27.5.0 更新内容: 🎮公益暗区算法解密版本点我 适配三角洲最新加密 1.优化 a1 接口 2.新增动态解密 a2 接口 3.修复漏人问题 4.优化占用 5.优化稳定性 6.修复辅助投影问题(全息投影)  这个是个测试版,明天适配大部分机型 公益解密卡密: @kuluomi886 ❗️❗️➡️点我加入官方频道 ❗️❗️➡️点我加入官方群组

👍121

18 Sept 2026, 23:10 UTC≈1,070 views16 reactionsread 19 September 2026
Forwarded from @kuluomi886File

库洛米 三角洲 V25.0.0 更新内容: 1.适配三角洲最新加密,重写解密算法 2.修复大地图问题 3.新增全息投影(角色填充),有些小 bug,下个版本修复 4.优化若干问题 5.修复脱框以及几秒卡顿问题 库洛米采用的是引擎算法解密,纯读取数据解密明文,不会被特征,特别稳定流畅 公益解密卡密: @kuluomi886 ❗️❗️➡️点我加入官方频道 ❗️❗️➡️点我加入官方群组

👍123🐳1

18 Sept 2026, 13:44 UTC289 views32 reactionsread 18 September 2026
Forwarded from @pj7645Photo

三角洲蝎子解密算法2.0版本破解 自瞄 物资 解密 全部移到data执行卡密乱输 🔗点我下载🔗 #三角洲 #内核 狗头频道 @pj7645 狗头破解交流群 https://t.me/goutou46

👍302

18 Sept 2026, 09:36 UTC≈1,580 views31 reactionsread 20 September 2026
File

和平精英正式服1.38.12.15979全局不拉回加速脚本 发布日期:2026.9.17 当前状态:未和谐正常使用 原理: 通过修改游戏对局时间戳实现不拉回加速效果 ,前几次都是和谐的都是时间戳分布地址,只要原理不和谐的话不拉回加速可以跑一辈子,因为你和谐我的地址我就继续换个地址改照样不拉回 和谐思路1:修复方案很简单——服务器对对局内时间戳(或全部时间戳)加校验即可彻底和谐不拉回加速. 和谐思路2:改对局时间戳即可实现不拉回加速,稳定可用。目前只校验了部分时间戳地址,没校验的部分和 call 函数调用或者hook都可以直接篡改。建议全量加上校验,就能彻底和谐这类加速 和谐思路3:地铁加速已经和谐 直接把地铁加速校验搬到经典也可以和谐掉 点击查看和平精英不拉回加速效果视频 ps:每段时间自动转发脚本

👍265

Signed 小学生兔头

18 Sept 2026, 00:10 UTC286 views12 reactionsread 18 September 2026
Forwarded from @kuluomi886File

库洛米 V24.0.0 更新内容: 1.适配最新三角洲解密 2.补充框内自瞄 3.修复部分设备脱框卡顿问题 4.增加稳定性 5.修复部分设备大地图没有效果 6.修复若干问题及其 bug 7.增加半全息投影(下个版本完全写好,这个版本会闪) 已全体加时 10h,依旧是纯算法,0 内存几乎零延迟解密,流畅稳定 赞助链接🔗: https://luoye.yjsfk.cn/shop/kuluomi886 ❗️❗️➡️ 点我加入官方频道 ❗️❗️➡️ 点我加入官方群组 🤩新手小白教程不会的点我查看

👍12

17 Sept 2026, 22:49 UTC≈3,400 views7 reactionsread 20 September 2026
Photo

Gemini 和平🎮 无畏契约🎮 王者公益解密🎮 ✅和平:✅断点子追✅ 模型漏打 ✅算法解密 ✅密钥绘制 ✅美化 ✅瓦手: 零延迟算法解密 掩体漏打 ✅王者: ✅自瞄独家算法 ✅全英雄自瞄 ✅适配全机型 ✅丝滑流畅 ✅精美简洁UI ✔️官方频道: @GROKZS 🩵交流群

👍7

Signed 不知名小辈

17 Sept 2026, 20:23 UTC≈3,450 views27 reactionsread 20 September 2026
Photo

GPT差点失去一个三年老用户了

👍252

Signed 臭鱼

17 Sept 2026, 17:18 UTC≈3,530 views38 reactionsread 20 September 2026

三角洲不动内存解密坐标方法已更新 游戏如何定位真实坐标的slot也在shellcode算法里,无需模拟执行,已经测试可以使用 已经测试用该消息的方法让注入追踪裸奔自带假装绿玩只要不是设备黑成煤炭的自带无视举报属性绝密航天随便清图杀12个吃满50个举报只封行为1 其他检测依旧没加随便裸奔-效果

👍326

Signed 臭鱼

17 Sept 2026, 14:52 UTC151 views31 reactionsread 17 September 2026
Forwarded from @kuluomi886File

库洛米 V24.0.0 更新内容: 1.适配最新三角洲解密 2.补充框内自瞄 3.修复部分设备脱框卡顿问题 4.增加稳定性 5.修复部分设备大地图没有效果 6.修复若干问题及其 bug 7.增加半全息投影(下个版本完全写好,这个版本会闪) 已全体加时 10h,依旧是纯算法,0 内存几乎零延迟解密,流畅稳定 赞助链接🔗:https://luoye.yjsfk.cn/shop/kuluomi886 ❗️❗️➡️ 点我加入官方频道 ❗️❗️➡️ 点我加入官方群组 🤩新手小白教程不会的点我查看

👍31

17 Sept 2026, 11:44 UTC≈3,870 views29 reactionsread 20 September 2026
Video

和平精英不拉回加速效果视频

👍27😍2

Signed 小学生兔头

17 Sept 2026, 11:40 UTC≈4,800 views34 reactionsread 20 September 2026
File

和平精英正式服1.38.12.15979全局不拉回加速脚本 发布日期:2026.9.17 当前状态:未和谐正常使用 原理: 通过修改游戏对局时间戳实现不拉回加速效果 ,前几次都是和谐的都是我发布的时间戳分布地址,只要原理不和谐的话不拉回加速可以跑一辈子,因为你和谐我的地址我就继续换个地址改照样不拉回 和谐思路1:修复方案很简单——服务器对对局内时间戳(或全部时间戳)加校验即可彻底和谐不拉回加速. 和谐思路2:改对局时间戳即可实现不拉回加速,稳定可用。目前只校验了部分时间戳地址,没校验的部分和 call 函数调用或者hook都可以直接篡改。建议全量加上校验,就能彻底和谐这类加速 和谐思路3:地铁加速已经和谐 直接把地铁加速校验搬到经典也可以和谐掉 点击查看和平精英不拉回加速效果视频 ps:每段时间自动转发脚本

👍294😍1

Signed 小学生兔头

17 Sept 2026, 10:43 UTC≈1,160 views28 reactionsread 17 September 2026
Photo

Gemini 和平🎮 无畏契约🎮 王者公益解密🎮 ✅和平:✅断点子追✅ 模型漏打 ✅算法解密 ✅密钥绘制 ✅美化 ✅瓦手: 零延迟算法解密 掩体漏打 ✅王者: ✅自瞄独家算法 ✅全英雄自瞄 ✅适配全机型 ✅丝滑流畅 ✅精美简洁UI ✔️官方频道: @GROKZS 🩵交流群

👍27😡1

Signed 不知名小辈

Showing the 12 most recent of 423 posts we hold for @ZLBNB666. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@ZLBNB666 edited 7 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
25 August 2026
Most recent edit
19 September 2026

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“追猎杯通知频道🥤” (@ZLBNB666), 52,206 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ZLBNB666.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.