🙂投稿内核破解 @pj6667788 和平精英吾爱追锁解密内核 @wuai99 ✅频道主推荐 🔍TG最全soso资源搜索群🔍 https://t.me/+7FSKC4qVWxc0ZDRl https://t.me/+7FSKC4qVWxc0ZDRl 🥰点击链接加入🥰 😀😀😀😀😀
Signed Channel Help

Channel
@zwaaa3
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
111,038subscribers
+10,993 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1002394950796 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @zwaaa3 |
| Description | 投稿内核破解 @pj6667788 交流群 https://t.me/sotsyy5 专注优质内核破解公益 TG最强内核破解频道 无广公益内核频道 @zwaaa33333 免责声明 本频道中的所有内容均来源于网络,仅供个人学习和研究使用,请在24小时之内删除,请勿用于任何商业用途或非法用途。如果您喜欢该资源,请支持正版,购买正版资源。如有任何内容侵犯了您的权益,请及时联系我们,我们将立即予以删除. |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 28 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/zwaaa3 |
Software piracy — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Sept 2026, 10:35 | 111,038 | +1,160 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 04:17 | 109,878 | +548 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 11:00 | 109,330 | +299 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 04:02 | 109,031 | +207 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 03:54 | 108,824 | +479 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 00:16 | 108,345 | +456 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 20:55 | 107,889 | +463 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 19:17 | 107,426 | +317 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 17:23 | 107,109 | +361 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 15:42 | 106,748 | +269 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 16:57 | 106,479 | +314 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 19:16 | 106,165 | +471 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 02:06 | 105,694 | +449 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 16:03 | 105,245 | +580 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 15:01 | 104,665 | +264 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 15:33 | 104,401 | +535 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 14:54 | 103,866 | +343 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 18:03 | 103,523 | +397 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 16:58 | 103,126 | +1,815 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 01:43 | 101,311 | first reading |
931 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 79 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 237 of 706 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 931 (6 August 2026 – 8 September 2026) |
| Views total | 570,482 |
| Reactions total | 3,793 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Sept 2026, 19:25 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 28 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
5,264 reactions across 381 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 91.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 4,834 | 91.8% | |
| ❤ | 124 | 2.36% | |
| 😍 | 63 | 1.20% | |
| 🔥 | 55 | 1.04% | |
| 🤓 | 55 | 1.04% | |
| 🕊 | 45 | 0.855% | |
| 🤪 | 21 | 0.399% | |
| 🤩 | 17 | 0.323% | |
| 🍌 | 16 | 0.304% | |
| 😇 | 13 | 0.247% | |
| 🥰 | 6 | 0.114% | |
| 👾 | 5 | 0.095% | |
| 😁 | 5 | 0.095% | |
| 😡 | 2 | 0.038% | |
| 😭 | 2 | 0.038% | |
| 🐳 | 1 | 0.019% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 384 of the 931 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,264 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 931 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 8 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🙂投稿内核破解 @pj6667788 和平精英吾爱追锁解密内核 @wuai99 ✅频道主推荐 🔍TG最全soso资源搜索群🔍 https://t.me/+7FSKC4qVWxc0ZDRl https://t.me/+7FSKC4qVWxc0ZDRl 🥰点击链接加入🥰 😀😀😀😀😀
Signed Channel Help
❗️❗️soso搜索资源群 🥰 🥰🥰🥰 🥰🥰🥰 ✅频道主推荐 TG最全soso资源搜索群🔍 https://t.me/+AkLuH_2Vyd4zYWI1 https://t.me/+AkLuH_2Vyd4zYWI1 🥰点击链接加入🥰
Signed Channel Help
🙂投稿内核破解 @pj6667788 和平精英吾爱追锁解密内核 @wuai99 ✅频道主推荐 🔍TG最全soso资源搜索群🔍 https://t.me/+7FSKC4qVWxc0ZDRl https://t.me/+7FSKC4qVWxc0ZDRl 🥰点击链接加入🥰 😀😀😀😀😀
Signed Channel Help
年租广告位 频道主强推 全网最稳微信租号盘 租微信 不封控 不封号 纯精聊盘 😀费用80-100日结 😀用途:引流/电商 接待客户 无任何风险 😀单号每月轻松上千 每天在家躺平赚钱 另外定时在内部群发🧧 😀市场不止有我一家 口碑才是硬道理 〔寻求稳定认准·🏆倩倩集团〕老牌集团✅业界第一 🔥宁赚万家一块 不赚千家百块🔥 🀄️🀄️🀄️🀄️🀄️🀄️🀄️🀄️🀄️ 高价无限收抖音代发视频 😃😃-😃😃单条视频 秒查单 📱https://t.me/+A4RsViPEIlczNjJk
Signed 倩倩(从头再来)
🙂投稿内核破解 @pj6667788 和平精英吾爱追锁解密内核 @wuai99 ✅频道主推荐 🔍TG最全soso资源搜索群🔍 https://t.me/+7FSKC4qVWxc0ZDRl https://t.me/+7FSKC4qVWxc0ZDRl 🥰点击链接加入🥰 😀😀😀😀😀
Signed Channel Help
吴迪内核公益破解(和平精英无畏契约王者荣耀萤火突击CFM三角洲PUBG失控进化辅助直装内核) pinned a file
Photo, posted without a caption
File, posted without a caption
❗️❗️soso搜索资源群 🥰 🥰🥰🥰 🥰🥰🥰 ✅频道主推荐 TG最全soso资源搜索群🔍 https://t.me/+AkLuH_2Vyd4zYWI1 https://t.me/+AkLuH_2Vyd4zYWI1 🥰点击链接加入🥰
Signed Channel Help
嗯嗯自瞄怎么总拉修改🥲(没开任何改内存的解密)
😀今天我整合了挂圈各大热门频道! 以下频道是挂圈热门频道大合集 库洛米公益频道 enen内核频道 林羽内核频道 小雪内核频道 狗头公益破解频道 光头强工艺内核频道 雪花工艺内核频道 TP工艺内核频道 葫芦娃工艺频道 互推日进500+参与联系负责人 @didb431 全网收广告位出的直接私信我 ------------------------------------- 点我一键加入全部频道 点我一键加入全部频道 点我一键加入全部频道
吴迪内核公益破解(和平精英无畏契约王者荣耀萤火突击CFM三角洲PUBG失控进化辅助直装内核) pinned a video
Showing the 12 most recent of 931 posts we hold for @zwaaa3. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@zwaaa3 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@zwaaa3 named 5 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“吴迪内核公益破解(和平精英无畏契约王者荣耀萤火突击CFM三角洲PUBG失控进化辅助直装内核)” (@zwaaa3), 111,038 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zwaaa3.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.