Channel
@zwaaa333
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
76,732subscribers
+18,500 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002646686148 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @zwaaa333 |
| Description | 公益内核破解频道 交流群组 https://t.me/xhtaaaa 投稿破解 @xhtaat 禁止搬运，二改，倒卖，此频道破解的所有辅助 免责声明 本频道中的所有内容均来源于网络，仅供个人学习和研究使用，请在24小时之内删除，请勿用于任何商业用途或非法用途。如果您喜欢该资源，请支持正版，购买正版资源。如有任何内容侵犯了您的权益，请及时联系我们，我们将立即予以删除. |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 42 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/zwaaa333 |
Software piracy — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Oct 2026, 20:56 | 76,732 | +47 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 18:47 | 76,685 | +31 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 22:07 | 76,654 | +36 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 22:56 | 76,618 | +4 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 19:58 | 76,614 | -49 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 16:46 | 76,663 | -6 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 10:30 | 76,669 | +98 |
| 9 Oct 2026, 05:37 | 76,571 | +293 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 17:16 | 76,278 | +1,482 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 14:39 | 74,796 | +1,361 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 10:38 | 73,435 | +474 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 13:16 | 72,961 | +457 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 23:15 | 72,504 | +413 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 08:58 | 72,091 | +644 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 02:40 | 71,447 | +990 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 16:21 | 70,457 | +1,037 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 03:36 | 69,420 | +458 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 18:46 | 68,962 | +330 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 16:29 | 68,632 | +366 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 18:56 | 68,266 | first reading |
1,889 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 181 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 567 of 714 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 1,889 (7 August 2026 – 19 October 2026) |
| Views total | 662,879 |
| Reactions total | 5,483 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 19 Oct 2026, 21:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 19 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 15 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
11,627 reactions across 841 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 84.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 9,858 | 84.8% | |
| ❤ | 885 | 7.61% | |
| 🤔 | 229 | 1.97% | |
| 🖕 | 184 | 1.58% | |
| 🥰 | 180 | 1.55% | |
| 🤡 | 47 | 0.404% | |
| 🤝 | 46 | 0.396% | |
| 😍 | 37 | 0.318% | |
| 💩 | 21 | 0.181% | |
| 👏 | 16 | 0.138% | |
| 🤩 | 16 | 0.138% | |
| 😡 | 15 | 0.129% | |
| 😈 | 13 | 0.112% | |
| 🤓 | 13 | 0.112% | |
| 👎 | 12 | 0.103% | |
| 🤪 | 11 | 0.095% | |
| 🕊 | 9 | 0.077% | |
| 😱 | 8 | 0.069% | |
| 🔥 | 7 | 0.06% | |
| 🤣 | 6 | 0.052% | |
| 5 further kinds | 14 | 0.12% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 846 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11,627 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 9 September 2026 to 19 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @zwaaa333. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold for this entry (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 9 September 2026 to 19 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🫥 CUC裸奔无畏契约半火✔️ ✅目前瓦手最稳定的半火功能 👊裸奔内透 👊追踪范围 👊裸奔无后 ✅无视下发 ✅无视加密 ✅不动内存 ✅操作简单: 一键启动 新手也可轻松使用 🤖不消耗任何设备性能 自定义范围大小 🛒赞助地址 https://ds.xiaoman.top/links/92123F55 👊解绑地址点我 反馈加时联系 @kefu1049 🍁[点击]免费获取卡密🍁 官方频道 @cucpd 更新内容： 解决上个版本使用人数过多删除部分特征数据 更换新数据 解决因为特征导致的三方禁网问题 注意：行为也会导致三方禁网问题 请完善与提升自身的演技
Signed 客服
1. 极大提升自瞄算法 2. 极大增强自瞄隐蔽性 3. 优化流畅性❤️ 📢 官方唯一渠道 🔗 唯一发布频道：@Playnb666（其余全部假冒） 🔑 公益卡密领取：@Playnb666 💬 问题BUG反馈：@Playfloat
Signed @Playnb666
小糊涂破解（和平精英无畏契约王者荣耀萤火突击CFM三角洲PUBG辅助直装内核） pinned «我操他妈的电报上骗子怎么这么多啊！！直到我遇到他 @adggnbkefu 我才知道一小时可以挣1988元 目前已经拿下苹果18了😁»
我操他妈的电报上骗子怎么这么多啊！！直到我遇到他 @adggnbkefu 我才知道一小时可以挣1988元 目前已经拿下苹果18了😁
Signed 阿呆 （全网收管理） @adggku
无痕依旧无敌，为什么没有打广告？因为主播这边确实有事情. 没有办法唉，请大家多多理解. 目前行为的问题还在积极处理当中. 电报无痕频道：https://t.me/ok19986 提卡客服唯一联系方式：@k66776688 ：@k66776688 ：@k66776688
🥰1
Signed 不要唠嗑 买卡 请咨询 禁止记者
小糊涂破解（和平精英无畏契约王者荣耀萤火突击CFM三角洲PUBG辅助直装内核） pinned Deleted message
闲鱼代发，挂个商品，每天什么都不用做！一个60元，每天都有额外20元奖励，日结！ 不聊任何违规内容，不卖会员卡，不卖门票，不聊客户，不搞诈骗，纯绿色代发！一个号可以一直做一直做，无限续租！ 市场价30-40元之间！ 我们给到了60元，无限收！ 诚招各位小代理！ 🤑本频道担保🤑 项目对接交流群🥰 https://t.me/+OniPQ9U4bio0OWRl https://t.me/+OniPQ9U4bio0OWRl
Keep官方和平授权数据号🎮 售卖和平最强最质量账号❗️ 买我们卡网的优势如下⬇️ 🧐价格横扫所有市场最低价 ✔️单买一个也是批发最低价格 ✔️每个账号经过挑选以及检测才上架 ✔️百分百售后任何问题 卡网链接: http://xsfk.hgbro.com/shop/haoKeep 本卡网里售卖的任何账号出现问题🔗 请联系客服进行售后(带上购买截图卡密截图和问题询问) 客服账号:@GROK_kefu 本店唯一通知频道:@Keephao 客服全天24小时在线解决📣 卡网全天24小时自助售卖📣 我会一直宣传直到你也用上低价质量的数据号为止‼️‼️
Signed 森岛 常胜将军🇨🇦
？自己号封了开挂🤡没号玩？ 点我入手全游戏开挂满级皮肤账号低价账号 只需几块钱买到一个满级开挂号😂 📩💵😁购买网址😁📩💵 https://aoafk.melog.top/shop/V5YPKDEA 全游戏开科技满级便宜号购买💠🎮🎮🎮🎮🎮🎮🎮🎮🎮🎮🎮 ⚠️官网频道 @WGSJH888 🐔账号问题在线解决问题客服 @WGSJH520 双向给客服发不了信息联系机器人补号 @duolaam123_bot 👇上号器+上号视频之类的👇 https://wwass.lanzoub.com/iE9qi3qm0v3g 免费送号活动点我查看
❤2🤔1
Signed 频道主全网收管理@WGSJH520
出破解教程 @xhtaat
🤪4
Signed 小糊涂
投稿破解 @xhtaat 备注游戏名称 发送辅助频道与卡网 apk(直装 容器直装) sh 全部能破 投稿就行
Signed 小糊涂
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed 小糊涂
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,889 posts we hold for @zwaaa333. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@zwaaa333 edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
先发他妈妈的还是他爸爸的
The shares total 132%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 9 September 2026 to 19 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Republishes 62 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones this channel has forwarded most; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@zwaaa333 named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“小糊涂破解（和平精英无畏契约王者荣耀萤火突击CFM三角洲PUBG辅助直装内核）” (@zwaaa333), 76,732 subscribers as measured 19 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zwaaa333.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.