🔞❤️🧑🦳 看到这条消息的人2026全家暴富接不接⬇️⬇️
👍11
Signed 全网收质量频道 @adggku

Channel
@fire88666
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
28,231subscribers
+11,824 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002322060968 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @fire88666 |
| Created | 10 February 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 39 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/fire88666 |
Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Oct 2026, 19:29 | 28,231 | +175 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 07:38 | 28,056 | +76 |
| 9 Oct 2026, 05:36 | 27,980 | +47 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 17:20 | 27,933 | +265 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 18:20 | 27,668 | +475 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 15:41 | 27,193 | +309 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 04:21 | 26,884 | +291 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 03:58 | 26,593 | +316 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 11:02 | 26,277 | +267 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 11:22 | 26,010 | +462 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 15:57 | 25,548 | +841 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 06:16 | 24,707 | +404 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 09:07 | 24,303 | +220 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 01:26 | 24,083 | +218 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 04:29 | 23,865 | +170 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 07:53 | 23,695 | +332 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 07:26 | 23,363 | +280 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 05:28 | 23,083 | +185 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 03:43 | 22,898 | +107 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 02:43 | 22,791 | first reading |
301 posts held, back to 10 February 2025 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 100 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 301 (10 February 2025 – 14 October 2026) |
| Views total | 15,300 |
| Reactions total | 1,528 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Oct 2026, 18:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 13 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
3,057 reactions across 287 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 87.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 2,680 | 87.7% | |
| ❤ | 199 | 6.51% | |
| 🤩 | 66 | 2.16% | |
| 😍 | 39 | 1.28% | |
| 😡 | 22 | 0.72% | |
| 🔥 | 15 | 0.491% | |
| 👏 | 11 | 0.36% | |
| 🥰 | 9 | 0.294% | |
| 🎉 | 8 | 0.262% | |
| 🙏 | 5 | 0.164% | |
| 😭 | 3 | 0.098% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 288 of the 301 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,057 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 301 most recent posts we hold, published 10 February 2025 to 14 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔞❤️🧑🦳 看到这条消息的人2026全家暴富接不接⬇️⬇️
👍11
Signed 全网收质量频道 @adggku
✅频道主推荐 🔍TG最全soso资源搜索群🔍 https://t.me/addlist/szCQddiAA4MxZGI1 🥰点击链接一键加入🥰 😀😀😀😀😀
👍31
Signed TGBot Pro
看篇找不到资源怎么办?点链接前往搜索 📥📥📥📥📥📥📥📥📥📥 https://t.me/jiso?start=a_7666741257 搜索关键词: 萝莉 狗头 黑丝 白丝 少妇😍😍😍😍
👍13
公益继续我们不散 破解游戏如下 🔽点击下方按钮下载🔽
👍13
Signed 全网收质量频道 @adggku
三角洲大肥鱼国服永久公益解密内核 认准:BIG FAT FISH(大肥鱼) 正在永久公益中!正在永久公益中! ❤️ 支持设备:安卓 ROOT ❤️ 支持内核:4.x - 6.x 全系 ❤️支持天机/骁龙 处理器 ❤️支持区服:C国服 ❤️支持模式:内核/纯c 功能说明🎚 ✅方框 ✅骨骼 ✅干员 ✅血量 ✅距离 ✅手持 ✅头甲 ✅物资 🟢全图模型漏打 🟢战斗模式 🟢添加独立大小雷达 ✅自瞄配置:陀螺仪自瞄+触摸自瞄 🔗频道下载 ✅驱动1 ✅驱动2 ✔️大肥鱼公益解密卡密/各种疑难杂症点我查看 🌟🙃🌟➡️ @BIGFATFISH6 🎉肥鱼我呀会坚持一直一直一直工艺下去哒!
👍10
✅频道主推荐 🔍TG最全soso资源搜索群🔍 https://t.me/addlist/szCQddiAA4MxZGI1 🥰点击链接一键加入🥰 😀😀😀😀😀
👍9
Signed TGBot Pro
狗头专业破解频道以下为破解的业务主要范围 ❤️🎮🎮🎮🎮🎮 如果你是学生党没钱玩项目的话那就进狗头频道 你想玩的游戏收费项目都有!造福学生!打压收费! 🌟🙃🌟➡️ @pj7645 (进频道找你想玩的游戏破解版)
👍4
点击下面按键教大家如何挣钱.无押金挣钱.免费带你找靠谱项目.让大家变成人才❗️❗️❗️
👍11
Signed 全网收质量频道 @adggku
✅频道主推荐 🔍TG最全soso资源搜索群🔍 https://t.me/addlist/szCQddiAA4MxZGI1 🥰点击链接一键加入🥰 😀😀😀😀😀
👍18
Signed TGBot Pro
点击下面按键教大家如何挣钱.无押金挣钱.免费带你找靠谱项目.让大家变成人才❗️❗️❗️
👍10
Signed 全网收质量频道 @adggku
RD-YRVWL-LTVC5-RABL4 RD-X5YWE-874UJ-WALZ6 RD-BTXQZ-UBT44-P53EF RD-WAJ45-UZ9F4-KU9WG RD-SQZYV-DHVLM-YP472 RD-9UMRK-SWSZS-GJ6GM RD-GWHUX-QKQDX-LP7EE RD-NU98F-VLSPW-3EY3Z RD-JW63R-JUVQS-NF5E2 RD-XBSF2-PG7N3-65ETG RD-4RUZW-PMLM7-G4BLB RD-WUTGC-KBXST-QEJ4P RD-SNQDG-CHU2C-NDW35 RD-ZUKRK-4G3ZW-TDX5P RD-7GU6R-VSJBQ-YDYFE RD-35WW8-6DR3G-GJWPX RD-TWTU5-N2CFU-KGAUN RD-8JUHB-2T2NK-84DGP RD-7KPRQ-9NA9M-VJANT RD-RNXH8-EEK6G-QQT2A …
👍8
✅频道主推荐 🔍TG最全soso资源搜索群🔍 https://t.me/addlist/szCQddiAA4MxZGI1 🥰点击链接一键加入🥰 😀😀😀😀😀
👍7
Signed TGBot Pro
Showing the 12 most recent of 301 posts we hold for @fire88666. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Fireworks主频道” (@fire88666), 28,231 subscribers as measured 14 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fire88666.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.