晚安玛卡巴卡
👍39

Channel
@SPIKE_Cheat
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
27,804subscribers
+13,449 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1004297273589 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @SPIKE_Cheat |
| Created | Between 1 May 2026 and 6 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 28 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 50 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 28 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/SPIKE_Cheat |
Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 52% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 28 Oct 2026, 12:37 | 27,804 | +41 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 09:37 | 27,763 | +17 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 09:16 | 27,746 | -33 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 12:28 | 27,779 | -10 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 15:30 | 27,789 | +17 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 14:15 | 27,772 | +40 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 13:20 | 27,732 | +31 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 05:12 | 27,701 | -1 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 01:29 | 27,702 | -7 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 03:28 | 27,709 | +12 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 01:08 | 27,697 | +89 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 00:28 | 27,608 | +28 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 21:56 | 27,580 | +66 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 21:08 | 27,514 | +73 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 15:54 | 27,441 | +238 |
| 9 Oct 2026, 21:56 | 27,203 | +30 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 17:57 | 27,173 | +330 |
| 30 Sept 2026, 02:22 | 26,843 | +993 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 05:00 | 25,850 | +365 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 03:00 | 25,485 | first reading |
252 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 142 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 252 (6 August 2026 – 27 October 2026) |
| Views total | 226,608 |
| Reactions total | 3,046 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Oct 2026, 09:19 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
7,141 reactions across 247 posts, in 28 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 5,131 | 71.9% | |
| ❤ | 398 | 5.57% | |
| 💩 | 398 | 5.57% | |
| 👎 | 353 | 4.94% | |
| 🖕 | 265 | 3.71% | |
| 🤣 | 204 | 2.86% | |
| 🤮 | 154 | 2.16% | |
| 🤡 | 43 | 0.602% | |
| 🤬 | 38 | 0.532% | |
| 🫡 | 33 | 0.462% | |
| 😍 | 29 | 0.406% | |
| 🤔 | 11 | 0.154% | |
| 🥰 | 11 | 0.154% | |
| 🎄 | 10 | 0.14% | |
| 🎉 | 9 | 0.126% | |
| 🤝 | 8 | 0.112% | |
| 👏 | 6 | 0.084% | |
| 🍌 | 5 | 0.07% | |
| 🕊 | 5 | 0.07% | |
| 😭 | 5 | 0.07% | |
| 8 further kinds | 25 | 0.35% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 247 of the 252 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,141 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 252 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 27 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
晚安玛卡巴卡
👍39
你们统一先给这个机器人发一条消息,这样子明天机器人能主动发给们,不然发不了
👍43
今天发言的人可以每人赠送一张天卡
👍42👎3
😀今天我整合了挂圈各大热门频道! 以下频道是挂圈热门频道大合集 库洛米公益内核频道 狗头公益破解内核频道 enen内核频道 林羽内核频道 zero驱动频道 时间驱动频道 twt驱动频道 paradise驱动频道 小雪内核频道 光头强工艺内核频道 雪花工艺内核频道 TP工艺内核频道 葫芦娃工艺频道 ------------------------------------- 点我一键加入全部频道 点我一键加入全部频道
👍45🤬1
😀今天我整合了挂圈各大热门频道! 以下频道是挂圈热门频道大合集 库洛米公益内核频道 狗头公益破解内核频道 enen内核频道 林羽内核频道 zero驱动频道 时间驱动频道 twt驱动频道 paradise驱动频道 小雪内核频道 光头强工艺内核频道 雪花工艺内核频道 TP工艺内核频道 葫芦娃工艺频道 ------------------------------------- 点我一键加入全部频道 点我一键加入全部频道
👍22❤1
SPIKE 瓦/和平内核调试器 pinned a file
🎮[SPIKE 2.2.0更新日志] [+]新增两款解密 [+]继续重构优化屎山 SPIKE赞赏授权地址: https://luoye.oopb.cn/shop/EXYMHSV6 📱官方聊天频道 💵提示:请先进入绘制-更多绘制-先选择局部方案-选择效果最好的解密方案先-再自行决定是否开启全图
👍62🤬5❤2🤣1
如果因为额外加密导致打不开的请私信我,有bug也能反馈 @Spike_abc
👍43🤬2
🎮[SPIKE 2.2.0更新日志] [+]新增两款解密 [+]继续重构优化屎山 SPIKE赞赏授权地址: https://luoye.oopb.cn/shop/EXYMHSV6 📱官方聊天频道 💵提示:请先进入绘制-更多绘制-先选择局部方案-选择效果最好的解密方案先-再自行决定是否开启全图
👍53🤬2
有什么需要优化更新的吗?
👍63🤬2
回来了,跟群里各位说一声,非常抱歉。 这一周断更,很多朋友私我,以为我放弃这个项目了,先跟大家说声抱歉,让大家心里落空。 原因其实很简单:新版本的架构算法试好几版都不满意,加上近期学业压力比较大,上一周我们刚刚期中考,因为搜题被发现,手机也被教务处没收了,今天中午才写完检讨拿回来。而且我也不想仓促发一个bug多、质量差的版本敷衍一直在跟着学的大家,干脆暂停更新,沉下心重写部分模块、整理文档。 新版本也快要完工啦。 感谢愿意留下来等我的人,我们继续慢慢打磨我们自己的乌托邦。 上一周购买卡密的用户会统一加时的不用担心
👍57🤬2
三角洲公益雷达机器人 签到获取积分兑换卡密 @bbblajibot
👍57🤔4👏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 252 posts we hold for @SPIKE_Cheat. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@SPIKE_Cheat edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
此次更新我们花费了极大的努力清理查处重构代码,极高提高辅助的流畅度与占用优化,稍后用户可选择是否更新启动器
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Spike和平还有谁玩?
Results were not being shown when we read this poll, so no share was published for any option. That is not zero — it is an absence, and we record it as one.
防观察端口需要不?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 252 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 27 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“SPIKE 瓦/和平内核调试器” (@SPIKE_Cheat), 27,804 subscribers as measured 28 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SPIKE_Cheat.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.