Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for هرمتیکا

Channel

هرمتیکا

@Hermetica7

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

3,717subscribers

+50 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001411063645
TypeChannel
Username@Hermetica7
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 November 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live27 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 27 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Hermetica7

Topic

Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (2 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@Hermetica7/792 · this entry8 Dec 2025, 01:21 UTC@hermeticabooks/3258 Dec 2025, 01:21 UTC1.00under a minute
@Hermetica7/804 · this entry7 Feb 2026, 19:57 UTC@hermeticabooks/3297 Feb 2026, 19:57 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@hermeticabooks5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (5–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 13 comparable posts for this entry, running 3 December 2025 to 7 February 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @Hermetica7 — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

3,6673,7173,6926 August 2026 — 3,667 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,667 subscribers9 August 2026 — 3,668 subscribers12 August 2026 — 3,673 subscribers16 August 2026 — 3,680 subscribers19 August 2026 — 3,674 subscribers26 August 2026 — 3,680 subscribers29 August 2026 — 3,686 subscribers1 September 2026 — 3,693 subscribers4 September 2026 — 3,692 subscribers9 September 2026 — 3,693 subscribers13 September 2026 — 3,700 subscribers18 September 2026 — 3,710 subscribers27 September 2026 — 3,717 subscribers6 August 202627 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 52 days, net +50. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,660–3,725 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Sept 2026, 07:393,717+7
18 Sept 2026, 02:413,710+10
13 Sept 2026, 11:403,700+7
9 Sept 2026, 19:193,693+1
4 Sept 2026, 14:383,692-1
1 Sept 2026, 09:143,693+7
29 Aug 2026, 14:133,686+6
26 Aug 2026, 08:393,680+6
19 Aug 2026, 19:333,674-6
16 Aug 2026, 16:163,680+7
12 Aug 2026, 22:353,673+5
9 Aug 2026, 18:263,668+1
6 Aug 2026, 16:113,667no change
6 Aug 2026, 16:073,667first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 30 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 56s
Average length
2m 56s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Recent posts

7 Feb 2026, 19:57 UTC≈3,400 viewsread 7 August 2026

📚معرفی کتاب کتاب «طوفان نوح در سال ۳۵۲۰ پیش از میلاد رخ داده است» نشان می‌دهد که طوفان، رویدادی واقعی و تاریخی بوده که در سال ۳۵۲۰ ق.م اتفاق افتاده است. این کتاب نشان می‌دهد که روایت سفر پیدایش دربارهٔ طوفان، گزارشی دقیق و مبتنی بر مشاهدهٔ مستقیم از رخدادی است که توصیف می‌کند. همچنین آشکار می‌سازد که طوفان، فاجعه‌ای با ابعاد جهانی بوده و پیامدهایی بالقوه و جدی برای تمدن امروز بشر داشته است. آیا گزارش کتاب پیدایش از ط…

4 Feb 2026, 07:31 UTC≈2,690 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @MohammadHossein_Ghiasi

«فانتزی جنگ» ۱. قیاس جراح و جنگ: می‌گویند جنگ مثل عمل جراحی است. جراحی که کتاب‌هایش را می‌خواند، تکنیک‌هایش را به‌روز می‌کند و با کمترین خونریزی، بیماری را برطرف می‌کند. اما جنگ چه؟ آیا جنگ یک علم دقیق است؟ یا آشوبی است که نتیجه‌اش را نه ژنرال‌ها، که تاریخ — آن هم سال‌ها بعد — مشخص می‌کند؟ آیا می‌توان ویرانی یک کشور را با تیغ جراحی مقایسه کرد؟ این قیاس، فریبنده و خطرناک است. ۲. غیرقابل پیش‌بینی بودن جنگ: قبلاً گفته…

29 Jan 2026, 11:32 UTC≈2,380 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @MohammadHossein_Ghiasi

«وقتی سیاست عقب می‌نشیند» «تاریخ جانور غول‌آسا و قدرتمندی است بر فراز ما و با این‌وجود باید نگاه خیره‌ی سنگین‌اش را تاب آورده، آن را به خدمت خویش واداریم.» این قرن/آلن بدیو/ فواد جراح باشی/ نشر بیدگل ۱- در دوره‌ی قاجار، ساختار حکمرانی ایران شباهت‌هایی به نظام‌های غیرمتمرکز داشت. قدرت‌های محلی در مناطق مختلف فعال بودند و در قبال حفظ اقتدار خود، مالیاتی سالانه به شاه پرداخت می‌کردند. با این حال، این نظام نه حاصل طراح…

29 Jan 2026, 06:57 UTC≈2,030 viewsread 7 August 2026

در سال 1997، زبیگنیو برژینسکی، عضو موسس کمیسیون سه جانبه و عضو [شورای] روابط خارجی... در کتاب خود، "صفحه بزرگ شطرنج" ... بیان کرد که برای حکومت بر جهان، ایالات متحده باید آسیای مرکزی را اشغال کند. این امر تداوم هدف، طراحی و تلاش نخبگان را آشکار می کند. عوامل آن در یک دوره 100 ساله همان منش را حفظ کرده اند. دستیابی به این هدف مستلزم یک جنگ بزرگ، یک جنگ جهانی است که به احتمال زیاد به دنبال حمله قریب الوقوع آمریکا و اسر…

4 Jan 2026, 07:19 UTC≈2,220 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @mehrdailynote

دیکتاتورمفید و پترودلار ‌دلیل واقعی تهاجم آمریکا به ونزوئلا به توافقی برمی‌گردد که هنری کیسینجر در سال ۱۹۷۴ با عربستان سعودی بست. ‌ و من می‌خواهم توضیح دهم که چرا این واقعاً درباره بقای خود دلار آمریکا است. نه مواد مخدر. نه تروریسم. نه «دموکراسی». این درباره سیستم پترودلار است که آمریکا را برای ۵۰ سال قدرت اقتصادی غالب نگه داشته. و ونزوئلا همین حالا تهدید به پایان دادن به آن کرده. اینجا آنچه واقعاً اتفاق افتاده: ونزو…

26 Dec 2025, 12:07 UTC≈2,370 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

کتاب طلوع آتلانتیس شامل مقالات منتخب از شماره های مجله کمیاب Atlantis Rising آیدی مترجم: @Hermetism فهرست مطالب 🔹اسرار فلز جیوه 🔹آیا صندق عهد الکتریکی بود؟ 🔹کیمیاگری کوانتوم 🔹فلزات باستانی از آتش خدایان 🔹کانن دویل و جام مقدس 🔹نقشه پیری ریس چقدر قدمت دارد؟ 🔹اسرار انجماد سریع ماموت ها 🔹آیا عیسی از هند بازدید نمود؟ 🔹دنبال کردن مسیر DNA تا آتلانتیس 🔹راز کوه سینا 🔹شواهدی برای قدمت بسیار زیاد انسان در یونان باستان 🔹مقصد م…

25 Dec 2025, 06:48 UTC≈2,940 viewsread 7 August 2026

درود بر دوستان گرامی به زودی ۲ کتاب دیگر از مانلی پی هال خدمت علاقمندان عرضه خواهد شد. ترجمه یکی از این کتاب ها ۳ سال قبل به پایان رسیده بود ولی ویرایش کتاب باقی مانده بود که اکنون در مراحل پایانی قرار دارد. سپاسگزارم

24 Dec 2025, 11:51 UTC≈2,620 viewsread 7 August 2026

ابوالهول از دیدگاه پلینی (قرن اول میلادی) در برابر آن‌ها [اهرام] ابوالهول قرار دارد که شایسته است حتی بیش از خود اهرام توصیف شود، با این حال مصریان آن را نادیده گرفته و درباره‌اش سکوت کرده‌اند. ساکنان این ناحیه آن را به عنوان یک خدا می‌دانند. آنان بر این باورند که شاهی به نام هارمایس [تحریف نام یونانی «هارماخیس»؛ در برخی متون پلینی «آمازیس» آمده است] در درون آن دفن شده و می‌کوشند چنین وانمود کنند که این پیکره به آن م…

18 Dec 2025, 21:32 UTC≈2,240 viewsread 7 August 2026

«ملک‌الشعرا» عنوانی بود حکومتی برای شاعر بزرگ دوران. اما رقابت برای کسب عنوان «ملک‌الشعرا»، منجر به آن شد که شعرای ایران به مدیحه‌سرایان حاکمان تبدیل شوند. قاآنی ملک‌الشعرای ایران از دوران محمدشاه بود. زمانی که ناصرالدین شاه به تخت نشست و امیرکبیر را به صدراعظمی ایران منصوب کرد؛ قاآنی به روال معمول قصیده‌ای در مدح صدراعظم جدید سرود. قاآنی که خود پیشتر مدیحه‌گوی صدراعظم قبلی بود، در مدحش رسید به مصرعِ «به جای ظالمی ش…

10 Dec 2025, 17:01 UTC≈2,250 viewsread 7 August 2026

درود بر همراهان گرامی یکی از دوستان عزیز سوال کردن که نظر شخصی بنده دربارهٔ آتلانتیس چیه. در جواب باید عرض کنم که بر اساس مطالعاتی که دربارهٔ آتلانتیس داشتم احتمال اینکه آتلانتیس در زیر یخ های قطب جنوب باشه بیشتر هست. بله نظریه آتلانتیس زیر یخ که نخستین بار فلمآت مطرح کرد رو بیشتر قبول دارم. درباره این نظریه قبلا مطلب مفصلی آماده کرده بودیم که در کتاب "آتلانتیس، اهرام و سیل ها" به عنوان ضمیمه گنجانده شده. با این حال …

8 Dec 2025, 16:22 UTC≈2,180 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @Atlantis9360BCFile

مقاله ای از دکتر زانگر درباره اینکه احتمالا آتلانتیس همان ترواست. ترجمه: هرمس @Atlantis9360BC

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @Hermetica7. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

دنياى گمشده
@lostworldss · 33,229
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 4 September 2026
Satvica Holistic Academy
@satvica · 30,299
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 7 September 2026
ArianAstrologer
@arianastrologer · 28,853
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 11 September 2026
نورالانوار
@erfanvametafizik · 34,167
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 3 September 2026
جهان‌های موازی™
@Parallel_WORLDS · 31,061
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 6 September 2026
Astrology
@shortastrology · 22,804
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 19 September 2026
دعانویسی و علوم غریبه
@metaphysic132 · 34,544
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 3 September 2026
🌹روح وروان درعالم هستی 🌹
@Roohe_bartar · 30,741
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 7 September 2026
پراجکت لئون.اخبار جنگ،ترامپ،رژیم،در لحظه!هرشب آپدیت صوتی!
@ProjectLeon7 · 50,421
Telegram ranks this channel #87 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 25 August 2026

This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“هرمتیکا” (@Hermetica7), 3,717 subscribers as measured 27 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Hermetica7.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.