Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Holger Fischer Rechtsanwalt

Channel

Holger Fischer Rechtsanwalt

@HolgerFischerRA

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

18,440subscribers

-394 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001426274927
TypeChannel
Username@HolgerFischerRA
Description❕Offizieller Kanal von RA Holger Fischer❕
Created25 April 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 November 2026
Measurements held58
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/HolgerFischerRA

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 61% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

18,44018,83418,6376 August 2026 — 18,834 subscribers6 August 2026 — 18,834 subscribers7 August 2026 — 18,831 subscribers8 August 2026 — 18,825 subscribers9 August 2026 — 18,824 subscribers10 August 2026 — 18,823 subscribers11 August 2026 — 18,818 subscribers12 August 2026 — 18,814 subscribers13 August 2026 — 18,809 subscribers14 August 2026 — 18,799 subscribers16 August 2026 — 18,790 subscribers17 August 2026 — 18,789 subscribers18 August 2026 — 18,786 subscribers19 August 2026 — 18,780 subscribers20 August 2026 — 18,776 subscribers21 August 2026 — 18,770 subscribers23 August 2026 — 18,764 subscribers24 August 2026 — 18,756 subscribers25 August 2026 — 18,753 subscribers26 August 2026 — 18,749 subscribers27 August 2026 — 18,747 subscribers28 August 2026 — 18,743 subscribers29 August 2026 — 18,744 subscribers30 August 2026 — 18,738 subscribers31 August 2026 — 18,734 subscribers1 September 2026 — 18,726 subscribers3 September 2026 — 18,716 subscribers4 September 2026 — 18,708 subscribers7 September 2026 — 18,697 subscribers10 September 2026 — 18,683 subscribers12 September 2026 — 18,674 subscribers14 September 2026 — 18,669 subscribers15 September 2026 — 18,659 subscribers17 September 2026 — 18,643 subscribers28 September 2026 — 18,597 subscribers5 October 2026 — 18,568 subscribers9 October 2026 — 18,545 subscribers13 October 2026 — 18,528 subscribers14 October 2026 — 18,524 subscribers15 October 2026 — 18,523 subscribers16 October 2026 — 18,520 subscribers17 October 2026 — 18,517 subscribers19 October 2026 — 18,516 subscribers20 October 2026 — 18,509 subscribers21 October 2026 — 18,503 subscribers22 October 2026 — 18,499 subscribers23 October 2026 — 18,498 subscribers24 October 2026 — 18,493 subscribers25 October 2026 — 18,485 subscribers26 October 2026 — 18,481 subscribers28 October 2026 — 18,476 subscribers29 October 2026 — 18,474 subscribers30 October 2026 — 18,464 subscribers31 October 2026 — 18,461 subscribers1 November 2026 — 18,454 subscribers2 November 2026 — 18,449 subscribers3 November 2026 — 18,444 subscribers4 November 2026 — 18,440 subscribers6 August 20264 November 2026
58 measurements spanning 90 days, net -394. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 18,381–18,893 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 58
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Nov 2026, 13:1618,440-4
3 Nov 2026, 10:5118,444-5
2 Nov 2026, 07:5418,449-5
1 Nov 2026, 05:5918,454-7
31 Oct 2026, 03:3818,461-3
30 Oct 2026, 03:4818,464-10
29 Oct 2026, 02:4018,474-2
28 Oct 2026, 01:2018,476-5
26 Oct 2026, 23:4518,481-4
25 Oct 2026, 21:1518,485-8
24 Oct 2026, 19:0818,493-5
23 Oct 2026, 21:0618,498-1
22 Oct 2026, 22:5718,499-4
21 Oct 2026, 21:0018,503-6
20 Oct 2026, 18:1118,509-7
19 Oct 2026, 14:4618,516-1
17 Oct 2026, 15:4118,517-3
16 Oct 2026, 18:1818,520-3
15 Oct 2026, 19:4918,523-1
14 Oct 2026, 21:3918,524first reading

Engagement

41 posts held, back to 8 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 60 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
69.2%
avg views ÷ 18,440 subscribers
Avg views / post
12,800
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.696%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 41 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 October 2026
Posts held41 (8 June 2026 – 31 October 2026)
Views total89,270
Reactions total621
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken5 Nov 2026, 03:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈2,050
Videos
≈1,080
Links
≈6,540

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
16m 54s
Average length
8m 27s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

3,399 reactions across 41 posts, in 40 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍73521.6%
🔥72821.4%
🙏44813.2%
🤮43612.8%
❤2938.62%
😈1343.94%
🤬992.91%
💯661.94%
👏601.77%
🖕551.62%
😡441.29%
🤔381.12%
😢330.971%
🤡330.971%
😱320.941%
🕊290.853%
🙈250.736%
😭210.618%
🌭170.5%
✍130.382%
20 further kinds601.77%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 41 of the 41 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,399 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 41 most recent posts we hold, published 8 June 2026 to 31 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 7 posts held from the last 30 days (42.9%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

31 Oct 2026, 13:27 UTC≈4,870 views130 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Ein kurzer Hinweis: Derzeit laufen, wenn man verschiedenen Quellen zuhört, Vorbereitungen für einen massiven Schlag gegen den Iran. Dazu passen die Empfehlungen zur Krisenvorsorge vieler Regierungen. Während sich die Hälfte der alternativen Medien hierzulande mit möglichen Krawallen am heutigen 31.10. beschäftigt und im Mainstream wie in den alternativen Medien ein baldiger heißer Krieg mit Russland prophezeit wird, …

👍66🤔23❤14😐7💯6🙏6🕊4🔥2

29 Oct 2026, 06:26 UTC≈3,770 views40 reactionsread 5 November 2026

https://www.youtube.com/live/NMP-VuNqBOQ?is=Vfr7rN7gQ2hLGQ7L

🔥29👍9🙏2

14 Oct 2026, 06:45 UTC≈9,310 views60 reactionsread 5 November 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

🙏39👍9❤5⚡3🔥2🤔1🤝1

14 Oct 2026, 06:43 UTC≈8,970 views65 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Richtigstellung: Bodo Schiffmann hat in seinem Video zu den aktuellen Haftbedingungen von Reiner Füllmich nicht berichtet, Füllmich sei krank, sondern nur, dass angesichts des geschilderten Zustandes das Risiko einer Krankheit besteht.

👍55❤6🦄2🤡1😘1

13 Oct 2026, 21:08 UTC≈48,300 views181 reactionsread 5 November 2026

⬆️ Reiner Füllmich wurde kurz nach einem Telefoninterview auf Youtube plötzlich, ohne Vorankündigung, in die JVA Lingen verlegt, obwohl dort offensichtlich keine reguläre Zelle für ihn frei ist. Er liegt vorläufig in einer Kellerzelle, in der es schimmelt. Ein geplantes zweites Interview konnte dadurch nicht mehr stattfinden. Seine persönlichen Sachen inklusive Kleidung durfte er bei der Verlegung nicht mitnehmen. E…

🙏100❤31👍22🕊10😱10🥴4🔥2👻1

13 Oct 2026, 19:45 UTC≈7,500 views95 reactionsread 5 November 2026

https://www.youtube.com/live/wc8_4qeDuVM?is=cu1IX39Ay6CG0XoG

🙏62😭21🤬6🤔3❤2🔥1

7 Oct 2026, 07:05 UTC≈6,550 views50 reactionsread 5 November 2026

https://transition-news.org/geschichte-von-unten

👍44❤6

30 Sept 2026, 16:33 UTC≈10,000 views80 reactionsread 5 November 2026

https://www.kla.tv/Medienkommentare/42730

👍65🙏11❤2🔥2

23 Sept 2026, 06:39 UTC≈11,800 views135 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Bitte anhören. Ich sehe Joachim Gerlach, nach vielen Interviews mit Sören Schumann, in denen er beteiligt war, inzwischen ähnlich kritisch. Ich meide deswegen inzwischen den einen wie den anderen. Man darf trotzdem nicht aus den Augen verlieren, dass das Spike-Protein nachwirkt und Schaden anrichtet.

👍109💯15❤8🔥3

23 Sept 2026, 06:38 UTC≈12,300 views67 reactionsread 5 November 2026

https://www.youtube.com/live/P_hypeb2Ns4?is=mAx3DX9LbsRVU2PN

👍57❤7👎1👏1🤔1

17 Sept 2026, 16:01 UTC≈14,400 views196 reactionsread 5 November 2026

⬆️ Merkel hat damals fast wortgleich Gates‘ Parole übermommen, dass die Pandemie erst vorbei sei, wenn jeder geimpft sei. Mir ist das damals schon aufgefallen. Seither wissen wir, dass sie unter Druck von Gates stand. Welcher Druck das gewesen sein soll, ganz konkret, sagt sie nicht. Zuwendungen von Gates‘ Stiftung allein erklären es nicht. Wenn Gates aber mit seinen Geldversprechen an eine Regierung eine Diensthandl…

🔥82🤮49💯26😈16❤11👍9🤔2🍌1

17 Sept 2026, 15:42 UTC≈10,800 views119 reactionsread 5 November 2026

https://youtu.be/SL3eJ1CK5y8?is=gJb4ApnvhvgeenJX

🤮59😡34🔥10😈8🖕3❤2🤡2🤬1

Showing the 12 most recent of 41 posts we hold for @HolgerFischerRA. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Tom Lausen ‼️❗️original Datenanalyst
@TomLausen · 45,187
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 27 August 2026
Dr. med. Carola Javid- Kistel MITEINANDER MUTIG SEIN- ÄRZTE STEHEN AUF FÜR PATIENTEN.....🙏❤
@miteinander_mutig_sein · 27,073
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 11 September 2026
Anwälte-für-Aufklärung
@Anwaelte_fuer_Aufklaerung · 47,953
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 26 August 2026
RA Ludwig - Querdenkeranwalt
@RA_Ludwig · 63,049
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 21 August 2026
Politik Spezial
@PolitikSpezial · 26,579
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 11 September 2026
Dave Brych Kanal
@davebrych_public · 27,408
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 10 September 2026
Rolf Kron - Ärzte stehen auf Offizieller Kanal
@Rolf_Kron · 43,815
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 28 August 2026
Kanal Rechtsanwalt Dirk Sattelmaier
@rasattelmaier · 38,428
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 31 August 2026
Martin Sichert Infokanal
@martinsichertinfo · 20,947
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 25 September 2026
▫️Rechtsanwältin Beate Bahner
@rechtsanwaeltin_beate_bahner · 81,976
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 18 August 2026
Achtung, Reichelt!
@AchtungReichelt · 21,401
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 23 September 2026

This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Holger Fischer Rechtsanwalt” (@HolgerFischerRA), 18,440 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/HolgerFischerRA.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.