این توییت رو نتونستم نزارم خیلی جدیه لطفا لطفا نشر بدید نجمه امینی، ۲۳ ساله در خطر جدی اجرای حکم اعدام قرار دارد؛ این پرونده به انتشار یک پست اعتراضی در اینستاگرام مرتبط است. نگرانیها درباره وضعیت او رو به افزایش است لطفا نشر بدید چرا باید یک زندگی برای منتشر کردن فقط یک پست گرفته شود؟ توییت اول 🚨URGENT: Najmeh Amini, 23, is reportedly at serious risk of execution. Reports indicate her case is linked to a protest…

Channel
𝖶𝗈𝗆𝖾𝗇 𝖻𝗂𝗍𝖼𝗁 𝖿𝗋𝖾𝖾𝖽𝗈𝗆
@HooNeyDailY
On this record: Topic · Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,169subscribers
-206 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002455594206 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @HooNeyDailY |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 29 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/HooNeyDailY |
Topic
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Previous handles
@HooNeyDailY was previously reachable at this handle, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today — only that this channel no longer does.
held 6 August 2026 – 6 August 2026
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Aug 2026, 05:03 | 2,169 | -32 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 04:17 | 2,201 | -4 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 23:52 | 2,205 | -6 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 21:47 | 2,211 | -47 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 18:26 | 2,258 | -46 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 04:56 | 2,304 | -10 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 09:01 | 2,314 | -58 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:50 | 2,372 | -3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:47 | 2,375 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:50 | 2,375 | first reading |
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
512 reactions across 15 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5346151406300586654 | 261 | 51.0% | |
| custom 5345843405605857009 | 166 | 32.4% | |
| custom 5201983068004430965 | 53 | 10.4% | |
| custom 5202001411809750857 | 22 | 4.30% | |
| custom 6046455560604225281 | 7 | 1.37% | |
| custom 5251654588120990491 | 2 | 0.391% | |
| custom 5377681860732156643 | 1 | 0.195% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 515 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 1
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 1
- of 18 we hold a reading for · 6%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @HooNeyDailY. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
واقعاً من
Sticker, posted without a caption
custom 53458434056058570099
پابلیک شیراش کمه
custom 534615140630058665415
•کلام آخر: همه باید آزاد باشند و نباید کسی را به خاطر انتخاب کردن یا انتخاب نکردن موهای بدنش سرزنش کرد و یا زیر سوال برد. اما هر موقع که میخواهید موهای بدن خود را شیو کنید از خود بپرسید که ″آیا تمایل من برای شیوکردن موهای بدنم بازتابی از عشق به خودم و استقلال بدنی است یا عملی است که توسط هنجار های زیبایی شکل گرفته که هدفشان سو استفاده از اینسکیوریتی های بدن زنان بوده است؟″ Rebecca M.Herzig: مفهوم «انتخاب فردی» د…
custom 534615140630058665443custom 534584340560585700916
اولین تبلیغ ژیلت برای تیغ زنانه «Milady Décolleté» به طور خاص اصلاح موهای زیر بغل را هدف قرار داد: «Milady Décolletéیک افزودنی زیبا به میز توالت Milady است - و مشکلی شخصی و خجالتآور را حل میکند. Milady Décolleté ژیلت مورد استقبال زنان در همه جا قرار گرفته است - اکنون که یکی از ویژگیهای لباس خوب و آراستگی خوب، سفید و صاف نگه داشتن زیر بغل است.»
custom 534615140630058665437custom 534584340560585700917
تبلیغات مشابه پس از تبلیغ ژیلت در سال ۱۹۱۷ به سرعت در سراسر ایالات متحده رواج یافت. در سال ۱۹۲۲، مجله هارپرز بازار یکی از اولین تبلیغات مجلهای را که به طور خاص موهای زیر بغل را هدف قرار میداد، منتشر کرد: «بدون خجالت، گفتگویی صمیمانه با زنان امروزی اگر میخواهند خجالت نکشند، باید زیر بغلهای بیعیب و نقصی داشته باشند.» طبق گزارش هاب اسپات، تا دهه ۱۹۶۰، ۹۸٪ از زنان آمریکایی بین ۱۵ تا ۴۴ سال گزارش دادند که مقداری از …
custom 534584340560585700932custom 534615140630058665422
•ژیلت و تاریخچه آن: ژیلت در ابتدا(سال ۱۹۰۱) تمرکزش روی مردان و سربازان ارتش آمریکا بود اما در سال ۱۹۱۵ آن ها فهمیدند می توانند با احساس شرم دادن به زنان محصول جدید خود یعنی ژیلت مخصوص بانوان را به آن ها بفروشند.(که این ترفند کاملاً جواب داد) شرکت Gillette یکی از عوامل اصلی بدنام سازی موی بدن زنان در US است. اولین تیغ زنانه توسط ژیلت در سال ۱۹۱۵ با ترفند های بازاریابی زنان را نسبت به خودشان شرمسار کرد که این ترفند …
custom 534584340560585700941custom 534615140630058665420
•موی بدن و ابزاری برای نژاد پرستی؟! در قرن بیستم «بی مویی» مترادف با «پاکی» و «زنانگی سفید پوست» شده بود. یعنی استاندارد زیبایی طوری تعریف شده بود که فقط ویژگی های ظاهری زنان سفید پوست«زیبا» و «تمیز» تلقی شود.(از نظر علمی کم مو نبودند،و حتی برخی مطالعات نشان داده افراد سفید پوست موی بدن بیشتری نسبت به افراد سیاه پوست دارند،اما منظور این است آنها بیشتر شیو میکردند) و ابزار طرد کردن مهاجران و ترویج برتری نژادی شد. •ا…
custom 534615140630058665444custom 534584340560585700920
″BODY HAIR″ THE SHAME OF ONE SEX IS THE GLORY OF THE OPPOSITE SEX. -زنان و موی بدن:برداشت و نگرش های اجتماعی مویبدن زنان از نظر خیلی از افراد جامعه، غیر طبیعی-کثیف-چندش و زشت نامیده می شود،و در مقابل موی بدن مردان عادی نامیده می شود و ویژگی مردانه ای شناخته می شود. مردی که موی بدن دارد هیچ شرمی ندارد و جامعه و مردم به او گیر نمی دهند که موهای خود را شیو کن و این فشار و اجبار بیشتر برای زنان دیده می شود. موی بدن…
custom 534615140630058665476custom 534584340560585700926
https://t.me/boost/HooNeyDailY
custom 53458434056058570094custom 53776818607321566431
تولدم نزدیکه بوست بگیرید برای اینجا خوشگلکنم اینجارو
custom 520198306800443096553custom 520200141180975085722
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @HooNeyDailY. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@harmonyau · 4315 posts𝖢𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗉𝖺𝗍𝗁𝗂𝖺
@abyssoftime · 1012 postsAshes kingdom
@Ashes_Kingdom · 971 post› HERisteria 🏳⚧
@HERisteria · 6,0971 post،𝐇𝐨𝐦𝐞🕯𝐅𝐢𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧ُ
@HOME_FICTION · 6841 postCrow , the clown.
@Its_WhitGrotesque · 1081 postمحتوای دعواهای ذهنی نیک تو حموم
@Nicoladamnedproblems · 6251 post𝗌𝗂𝗅𝗏𝖾𝗋 — Hope won't be killed. (Closed)
@SVTify · 2101 postادونائور
@edonaur · 2991 postHelp Trans Girl 🏳⚧
@helptransgirl · 1951 post📹
@ilovegreen · 2211 postشُــڪوفـہ پُــرتِــقآل.🖤
@porteghalblossom · 261 post arabella پك جیوو
@pup1woo · 601 postmon chatén پک ایروها
@r0hafile · 2361 post gay kids 、پک اسکیز 🔒
@skzpacks · 4901 postDumpster diving
@theinkwitch · 911 post᭄𝐕¡᥎𝖨 ³🦎
@vivivivivi123ix · 2251 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝖶𝗈𝗆𝖾𝗇 𝖻𝗂𝗍𝖼𝗁 𝖿𝗋𝖾𝖾𝖽𝗈𝗆” (@HooNeyDailY), 2,169 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/HooNeyDailY.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.