Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝖶𝗈𝗆𝖾𝗇 𝖻𝗂𝗍𝖼𝗁 𝖿𝗋𝖾𝖾𝖽𝗈𝗆

Channel

𝖶𝗈𝗆𝖾𝗇 𝖻𝗂𝗍𝖼𝗁 𝖿𝗋𝖾𝖾𝖽𝗈𝗆

@HooNeyDailY

On this record: Topic · Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,169subscribers

-206 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002455594206
TypeChannel
Username@HooNeyDailY
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live29 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 29 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/HooNeyDailY

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Previous handles

@HooNeyDailY was previously reachable at this handle, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today — only that this channel no longer does.

@HooNeyDailY
held 6 August 20266 August 2026

Growth

2,1692,3752,2726 August 2026 — 2,375 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,375 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,372 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,314 subscribers13 August 2026 — 2,304 subscribers16 August 2026 — 2,258 subscribers19 August 2026 — 2,211 subscribers22 August 2026 — 2,205 subscribers26 August 2026 — 2,201 subscribers29 August 2026 — 2,169 subscribers6 August 202629 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 23 days, net -206. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,138–2,406 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
29 Aug 2026, 05:032,169-32
26 Aug 2026, 04:172,201-4
22 Aug 2026, 23:522,205-6
19 Aug 2026, 21:472,211-47
16 Aug 2026, 18:262,258-46
13 Aug 2026, 04:562,304-10
10 Aug 2026, 09:012,314-58
6 Aug 2026, 22:502,372-3
6 Aug 2026, 05:472,375no change
6 Aug 2026, 03:502,375first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

512 reactions across 15 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 534615140630058665426151.0%
custom 534584340560585700916632.4%
custom 52019830680044309655310.4%
custom 5202001411809750857224.30%
custom 604645556060422528171.37%
custom 525165458812099049120.391%
custom 537768186073215664310.195%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 515 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 18 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @HooNeyDailY. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 20:01 UTC≈276 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026

این توییت رو نتونستم نزارم خیلی جدیه لطفا لطفا نشر بدید نجمه امینی، ۲۳ ساله در خطر جدی اجرای حکم اعدام قرار دارد؛ این پرونده به انتشار یک پست اعتراضی در اینستاگرام مرتبط است. نگرانی‌ها درباره وضعیت او رو به افزایش است لطفا نشر بدید چرا باید یک زندگی برای منتشر کردن فقط یک‌ پست گرفته شود؟ توییت اول 🚨URGENT: Najmeh Amini, 23, is reportedly at serious risk of execution. Reports indicate her case is linked to a protest

5 Aug 2026, 17:53 UTC962 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

custom 53458434056058570099

5 Aug 2026, 17:53 UTC921 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026

پابلیک شیراش کمه

custom 534615140630058665415

5 Aug 2026, 14:41 UTC≈1,000 views59 reactionsread 7 August 2026

•کلام آخر: همه باید آزاد باشند و نباید کسی را به خاطر انتخاب کردن یا انتخاب نکردن موهای بدنش سرزنش کرد و یا زیر سوال برد. اما هر موقع که می‌خواهید موهای بدن خود را شیو کنید از خود بپرسید که ″آیا تمایل من برای شیو‌کردن موهای بدنم بازتابی از عشق به خودم و استقلال بدنی است یا عملی است که توسط هنجار های زیبایی شکل گرفته که هدفشان سو استفاده از اینسکیوریتی های بدن زنان بوده است؟″ Rebecca M.Herzig: مفهوم «انتخاب فردی» د

custom 534615140630058665443custom 534584340560585700916

5 Aug 2026, 14:41 UTC688 views54 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

اولین تبلیغ ژیلت برای تیغ زنانه «Milady Décolleté» به طور خاص اصلاح موهای زیر بغل را هدف قرار داد: «Milady Décolletéیک افزودنی زیبا به میز توالت Milady است - و مشکلی شخصی و خجالت‌آور را حل می‌کند. Milady Décolleté ژیلت مورد استقبال زنان در همه جا قرار گرفته است - اکنون که یکی از ویژگی‌های لباس خوب و آراستگی خوب، سفید و صاف نگه داشتن زیر بغل است.»

custom 534615140630058665437custom 534584340560585700917

5 Aug 2026, 14:41 UTC821 views54 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

تبلیغات مشابه پس از تبلیغ ژیلت در سال ۱۹۱۷ به سرعت در سراسر ایالات متحده رواج یافت. در سال ۱۹۲۲، مجله هارپرز بازار یکی از اولین تبلیغات مجله‌ای را که به طور خاص موهای زیر بغل را هدف قرار می‌داد، منتشر کرد: «بدون خجالت، گفتگویی صمیمانه با زنان امروزی اگر می‌خواهند خجالت نکشند، باید زیر بغل‌های بی‌عیب و نقصی داشته باشند.» طبق گزارش هاب اسپات، تا دهه ۱۹۶۰، ۹۸٪ از زنان آمریکایی بین ۱۵ تا ۴۴ سال گزارش دادند که مقداری از

custom 534584340560585700932custom 534615140630058665422

5 Aug 2026, 14:40 UTC747 views61 reactionsread 7 August 2026

•ژیلت و تاریخچه آن: ژیلت در ابتدا(سال ۱۹۰۱) تمرکزش روی مردان و سربازان ارتش آمریکا بود اما در سال ۱۹۱۵ آن ها فهمیدند می توانند با احساس شرم دادن به زنان محصول جدید خود یعنی ژیلت مخصوص بانوان را به آن ها بفروشند.(که این ترفند کاملاً جواب داد) شرکت Gillette یکی از عوامل اصلی بدنام سازی موی بدن زنان در US است. اولین تیغ زنانه توسط ژیلت در سال ۱۹۱۵ با ترفند های بازاریابی زنان را نسبت به خودشان شرمسار کرد که این ترفند

custom 534584340560585700941custom 534615140630058665420

5 Aug 2026, 14:40 UTC738 views64 reactionsread 7 August 2026

•موی بدن و ابزاری برای نژاد پرستی؟! در قرن بیستم «بی مویی» مترادف با «پاکی» و «زنانگی سفید پوست» شده بود. یعنی استاندارد زیبایی طوری تعریف شده بود که فقط ویژگی های ظاهری زنان سفید پوست«زیبا» و «تمیز» تلقی شود.(از نظر علمی کم مو نبودند،و حتی برخی مطالعات نشان داده افراد سفید پوست موی بدن بیشتری نسبت به افراد سیاه پوست دارند،اما منظور این است آنها بیشتر شیو‌ میکردند) و ابزار طرد کردن مهاجران و ترویج برتری نژادی شد. •ا

custom 534615140630058665444custom 534584340560585700920

5 Aug 2026, 14:40 UTC≈1,320 views102 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

″BODY HAIR″ THE SHAME OF ONE SEX IS THE GLORY OF THE OPPOSITE SEX. -زنان و موی بدن:برداشت و نگرش های اجتماعی موی‌بدن زنان از نظر خیلی از افراد جامعه، غیر طبیعی-کثیف-چندش و زشت نامیده می شود،و در مقابل موی بدن مردان عادی نامیده می شود و ویژگی مردانه ای شناخته می شود. مردی که موی بدن دارد هیچ شرمی ندارد و جامعه و مردم به او گیر نمی دهند که موهای خود را شیو کن و این فشار و اجبار بیشتر برای زنان دیده می شود. موی بدن

custom 534615140630058665476custom 534584340560585700926

4 Aug 2026, 16:45 UTC≈1,150 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://t.me/boost/HooNeyDailY

custom 53458434056058570094custom 53776818607321566431

4 Aug 2026, 16:45 UTC≈1,100 views75 reactionsread 7 August 2026

تولدم نزدیکه بوست بگیرید برای اینجا خوشگل‌کنم اینجارو

custom 520198306800443096553custom 520200141180975085722

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @HooNeyDailY. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝖶𝗈𝗆𝖾𝗇 𝖻𝗂𝗍𝖼𝗁 𝖿𝗋𝖾𝖾𝖽𝗈𝗆” (@HooNeyDailY), 2,169 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/HooNeyDailY.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.