Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Инженеры фронту

Channel

Инженеры фронту

@INFRONT_Z

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,941subscribers

+197 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001871381042
TypeChannel
Username@INFRONT_Z
Created24 December 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/INFRONT_Z

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 75% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

7,7447,9417,842.57 August 2026 — 7,744 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,744 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,746 subscribers10 August 2026 — 7,762 subscribers14 August 2026 — 7,780 subscribers17 August 2026 — 7,785 subscribers20 August 2026 — 7,792 subscribers24 August 2026 — 7,819 subscribers26 August 2026 — 7,820 subscribers29 August 2026 — 7,826 subscribers2 September 2026 — 7,831 subscribers6 September 2026 — 7,846 subscribers11 September 2026 — 7,865 subscribers14 September 2026 — 7,878 subscribers19 September 2026 — 7,941 subscribers7 August 202619 September 2026
15 measurements spanning 43 days, net +197. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,714–7,971 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 04:387,941+63
14 Sept 2026, 15:587,878+13
11 Sept 2026, 06:017,865+19
6 Sept 2026, 10:167,846+15
2 Sept 2026, 00:227,831+5
29 Aug 2026, 21:447,826+6
26 Aug 2026, 17:287,820+1
24 Aug 2026, 01:097,819+27
20 Aug 2026, 18:547,792+7
17 Aug 2026, 14:577,785+5
14 Aug 2026, 02:167,780+18
10 Aug 2026, 11:157,762+16
7 Aug 2026, 20:137,746+2
7 Aug 2026, 10:007,744no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:577,744first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 26 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.2%
avg views ÷ 7,941 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,130
1 post measured
Reaction rate
0.885%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 August 2026
Posts held14 (26 June 202624 August 2026)
Views total1,130
Reactions total10
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 20:26 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 28s
Average length
29s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

291 reactions across 14 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💯9432.3%
👍6422.0%
🤣3411.7%
3110.7%
😁165.50%
😱155.15%
🤬144.81%
🔥124.12%
🙏51.72%
🤔41.37%
😢20.687%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 291 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 26 June 2026 to 24 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

24 Aug 2026, 08:46 UTC≈1,130 views10 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @zhivoff

Глава союзного государства Лукашенко заявил, что Белоруссия готова восстановить сотрудничество с Украиной Поздравляя украинцев с 35-й годовщиной независимости, он заявил, что гостеприимная Белоруссия открыта для украинцев с «добрыми намерениями». Белорусский президент также подчеркнул историческую близость двух народов и выразил уверенность, что последующие поколения белорусов и украинцев смогут сохранить дружеские

5😁5

19 Aug 2026, 20:59 UTC≈1,700 views31 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @UAVDEV

В нашей стране возможностей чуваки, ныкавшиеся первые 2 года сво в Баку от мобилизации теперь фоткаются с губерами и рассказывают какие они патриоты. А людей, изменивших ход боевых действий в нашу пользу, публично кидают. Людям из могов и пво, на гражданскую зарплату сбивающим 99% дронов, не имеющим связи и перехватчиков и КАЖДУЮ СКА НОЧЬ несущим потери, медальку жмут дать... Вчера вот, в одном южном регионе, два тя

👍26🙏5

19 Aug 2026, 20:59 UTC≈1,480 views11 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @AlexCarrier

Случился дипломатический анекдот. Гдет неделю назад я вам показывал представителя МИДа Марию Захарову, которая полтора часа рассказывала нам про западных лицемерных пидорасов и про то, как мы их своей правдой™ победим. Можно тут посмотреть: https://t.me/AlexCarrier/16578 С ней в эфире сидели Чадаев, Уралов и ещё ктото. И полтора часа слушали, как Захарова всех победит. Это было 6 августа, я пост написал 10 августа.

🤬7👍4

19 Aug 2026, 16:57 UTC≈1,770 views25 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @milinfolivePhoto

Более четкий западный спутниковый снимок, демонстрирующий следы попадания украинских дронов в район УКСК 3С14 для крылатых ракет «Калибр» фрегатов проекта 11356Р «Адмирал Эссен» и «Адмирал Макаров» в бухте Новороссийска в ночь на 12 августа. Если у «Эссена» видны следы возгорания от попадания дрона по самим ячейкам УКСК, то у «Макарова» можно заметить отчетливую пробоину в носовой части верхней палубы левее места ра

💯18🤬7

17 Aug 2026, 11:13 UTC≈1,750 views6 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @arx_spnPhoto

💬Украина — полигон натовского вооружения💬 ✍️ Вчера новостная лента сообщила, что Украина применила дрон Nyan для ударов по России. Что же это за дрон? Это британский реактивный беспилотник-камикадзе, разработанный компанией Callen-Lenz (дочернее предприятие BAE Systems). Дрон спроектирован так, что форма «летающего крыла» из карбона и экранированное щелевидное сопло снижают заметность в ИК- и РЛ-диапазонах. Беспило

3😁3

15 Aug 2026, 17:12 UTC≈2,320 views33 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @olegtsarovPhoto

Киев открыл охоту на наш «Рассвет» Сегодня ночью ВСУ нанесли ракетный удар по промышленному предприятию в Самаре. Власти подтвердили попадание, есть пострадавшие. По данным вражеских OSINT-ресурсов, целью был РКЦ «Прогресс» — завод, где собирают ракеты «Союз-2.1б». Именно они вывели на орбиту первые партии спутников «Рассвет». В сети пишут, что ударили «по производству спутников», но это не совсем так: спутники дел

💯2310

14 Aug 2026, 06:05 UTC≈3,260 views3 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Просто лазер дерьмовый, что тут сказать. И дело не только в мощности, но и в размере пучка на цели. В плотности.

💯2🔥1

11 Aug 2026, 20:05 UTC≈3,080 views10 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Товарищи, что с бензином у вас в регионах? Собрался везти гумку, а в Москве и области закрыты многие заправки. 95го нет, 92й - в дефиците. Новостные ленты вычищены, СМИ молчат.

😁8😢2

2 Aug 2026, 09:14 UTC≈3,990 views39 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @UAVDEVVideo

Господа из Алабуги, учтите, пожалуйста, пожелания от конечных пользователей. ПС. Серийный номер 85265. То есть, более 85к уже изготовлено 🇷🇺

🤣34👍5

24 Jul 2026, 13:32 UTC≈4,860 views5 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @UAVDEVPhoto

Внутрянка блока управления от турецкой CRPA Tualaj 8300

👍5

8 Jul 2026, 20:59 UTC≈4,870 views62 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @ClanSeverPhoto

Володин призвал россиян объединиться на фоне проблем с топливом. Если соберем волю каждого в одну волю, выстоим. Справимся и с проблемами на бензоколонках. Так же как с другими проблемами справились. Хотели развалить нашу финансовую систему — не получилось, экономику в клочья разорвать — не получилось. Самое главное — консолидация. Самое главное — общее понимание Уважаемый господин Володин. Народ если объединится и в

💯51🔥11

8 Jul 2026, 17:57 UTC≈3,350 views17 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @UAVDEVPhoto

Слесарь тут выкатил хороший текст, советую почитать. От себя добавлю, что ещё в первой "злобе дня" мы ванговали что блокировки интернета, удачно наложившиеся на блок старлинка и приправленные идиотскими заявлениями от не шибко умных госдумских чебурашек, это первый ход большой шахматной партии по дискредитации Путина и его команды. Поскольку именно они являются основными сторонниками продолжения сво до устранения угр

13🤔4

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @INFRONT_Z. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Техник БПЛА🇷🇺
@texotdelBPLA · 23,524
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 18 September 2026
Гагаринг. Лаборатория электроники.
@my_el_lab · 44,085
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 29 August 2026
FPV_выZOV🇷🇺
@FPV_vyZOV · 67,842
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 21 August 2026
Military hub | СВО, FPV, дроны, БПЛА
@mil_hub · 25,260
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 14 September 2026
VORON🇷🇺FPV
@voron_fpv · 116,212
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 25 August 2026
КЦПН. Координационный Центр Помощи Новороссии.
@kcpn2014 · 34,804
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 15 September 2026
ЦСП🇷🇺ВОРОН
@csp_voron · 24,477
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 16 September 2026
Русский беспилотник
@RUSSIARB · 27,984
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 10 September 2026
Русские Хакеры – Фронту
@RussianHackersChannel · 44,329
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 28 August 2026
Беспилот | БПЛА, дроны, роботы
@bes_pilot · 43,712
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 28 August 2026

This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Инженеры фронту” (@INFRONT_Z), 7,941 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/INFRONT_Z.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.