Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Имам Абу Ханифа رحمه الله

Channel

Имам Абу Ханифа رحمه الله

@ImamAbuHanifa1

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

37subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003040638166
TypeChannel
Username@ImamAbuHanifa1
CreatedBetween 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ImamAbuHanifa1

Growth

353836.57 August 2026 — 37 subscribers8 August 2026 — 38 subscribers10 August 2026 — 38 subscribers15 August 2026 — 37 subscribers22 August 2026 — 35 subscribers29 August 2026 — 36 subscribers7 September 2026 — 37 subscribers377 August 20267 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 31 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 35–38 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Sept 2026, 16:2137+1
29 Aug 2026, 18:5636+1
22 Aug 2026, 18:1735-2
15 Aug 2026, 03:5637-1
10 Aug 2026, 21:0138no change
8 Aug 2026, 22:0038+1
7 Aug 2026, 23:0337first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 18 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

20 reactions across 6 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍945.0%
❤840.0%
😁315.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 20 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 18 April 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 19:42 UTCviews —

Имам Абу Ханифа رحمه الله pinned «Передаётся от Абдульазиза ибн Аби Зурмы: он сказал, что слышал, как Нуайм ибн Амр говорил: я слышал, как Абу Ханифа сказал: «Удивительно! Люди говорят, что я выношу фетвы на основе личного мнения, но я выношу фетвы только на основе предания (асар)» 📚Муснад…»

22 Jul 2026, 21:44 UTC623 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Опровержение клеветы о том, что Ибн аль-Мубарак оставил (учение) Абу Ханифы. Шамс аль-Аимма аз-Заранджари аль-Бухари, умерший в 512 году хиджры, упомянул в «Манакиб Аби Ханифа» следующее: шейх Абу Абдуллах ибн Аби Хафс, да помилует его Аллах, сказал: некоторые порочащих и завистники говорят, что Абдуллах ибн аль-Мубарак оставил высказывания Абу Ханифы, оставил его вопросы и оставил передачу (хадисов/знания) от него.…

❤3

23 Apr 2026, 16:00 UTC96 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Хуштади, Аллах дал тебе язык, но не вложил в него ума; тебе лучше успокоиться.

👍2

23 Apr 2026, 14:54 UTC81 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026

как думаете, нужен этому каналу чат или нет? 👍🏽 - да 👎🏽 - нет

👍7

22 Apr 2026, 11:36 UTC71 viewsread 10 August 2026

неужели никто не знает “главного мухаддиса”?😁

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @ImamAbuHanifa1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Имам Абу Ханифа رحمه الله” (@ImamAbuHanifa1), 37 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ImamAbuHanifa1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.