Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for InvestigateJ6

Channel

InvestigateJ6

@InvestigateJ6

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

463subscribers

-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001602013715
TypeChannel
Username@InvestigateJ6
CreatedBetween 1 November 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/InvestigateJ6

Growth

463468465.57 August 2026 — 468 subscribers7 August 2026 — 468 subscribers21 August 2026 — 467 subscribers28 August 2026 — 464 subscribers4 September 2026 — 463 subscribers7 August 20264 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 28 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 462–469 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Sept 2026, 11:19463-1
28 Aug 2026, 22:14464-3
21 Aug 2026, 14:16467-1
7 Aug 2026, 01:17468no change
7 Aug 2026, 01:03468first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 21 January 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

132 reactions across 17 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4634.8%
👌2317.4%
🔥1712.9%
custom 5202021044105257611129.09%
❤‍🔥118.33%
👍107.58%
🤯32.27%
💯21.52%
🖕21.52%
🫡21.52%
🍾10.758%
👏10.758%
🤔10.758%
🤝10.758%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 132 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 January 2025 to 13 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

13 May 2026, 18:22 UTC171 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Who’s ready to join the J6 West Plaza Federal Civil Rights lawsuit? If you were a peaceful protester on J6 assaulted by police on the West Plaza, or elsewhere on Capitol grounds— go to investigatej6.org/class-action-lawsuit

5

6 Jan 2026, 19:25 UTC≈1,710 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Whitehouse.gov acknowledges the West Plaza attacks on peaceful J6 protesters today, January 6th 2026. https://x.com/investigatej6/status/2008613871901437957?s=46

🔥3🖕1

5 Jan 2026, 19:30 UTC≈1,030 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

In case you missed it, here’s the lie: https://x.com/investigatej6/status/2007855639947805018?s=46

👍2🖕1

5 Jan 2026, 19:29 UTC≈1,010 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

AAG Harmeet Dhillon lied about the J6 statute of limitations for police brutality. Today her and Jesus Osete are bragging about how responsive they are to civil rights issues brought to their attention on X (today it’s stopping DEI at a symphony), while ignoring criticism of Harmeet’s lie and their inaction on behalf of J6ers unlawfully assaulted by police. Call civil rights at the number above and submit a complai

1

5 Jan 2026, 19:25 UTC793 viewsread 7 August 2026

https://x.com/investigatej6/status/2008257561297121776?s=46

3 Jan 2026, 00:18 UTC200 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

ATTN: those confused about the J6 statute of limitations expiring this coming Tuesday, and Harmeet Dhillon’s obfuscation. https://x.com/investigatej6/status/2007238725152190815?s=46

🤯2

2 Jan 2026, 22:09 UTC984 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

PLEASE SHARE! BONDI BLANCHE DHILLON & PIRRO ARE RUNNING OUT THE CLOCK ON J6. THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS FOR CRIMINAL POLICE-BRUTALITY CHARGES UNDER 18 U.S.C. § 242 (Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law) ENDS IN FOUR DAYS! 🇺🇸 x.com/InvestigateJ6/status/2007202865954353420

🫡2👍1

10 Sept 2025, 02:16 UTC≈1,740 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Who’s ready to join the J6 West Plaza Federal Civil Rights lawsuit? If you were a peaceful protester on J6 assaulted by police on the West Plaza, or elsewhere on Capitol grounds— go to investigatej6.org/class-action-lawsuit

🔥9

17 Aug 2025, 20:03 UTC657 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

PLEASE IMMEDIATELY REPOST THIS AND SEND IT TO YOUR GROUP CHATS TO GET REPOSTED MORE: x.com/julie_kelly2/status/1957126803039883354?s=46 HARMEET DHILLON HAS NOT MENTIONED J6 VICTIMS ONCE IN HER TENURE AFTER DENOUNCING THEM ON THE SIXTH 2021.

👌4💯2

24 Jul 2025, 17:49 UTC≈1,130 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🚨 🇺🇸 J6 WEST PLAZA POLICE BRUTALITY VICTIMS LATEST UPDATE. FILL OUT FORM TO APPLY FOR SETTLEMENT: investigatej6.org/class-action-lawsuit/ SIGN UP NOW!

👍3🔥2👌1👏1🤔1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @InvestigateJ6. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“InvestigateJ6” (@InvestigateJ6), 463 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/InvestigateJ6.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.