Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Patrick M. Byrne

Channel

Patrick M. Byrne

@PatrickMByrne

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry

42,636subscribers

-2,053 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001494406837
TypeChannel
Username@PatrickMByrne
DescriptionAdvocates constitutional republicanism for government, blockchain for institutions, and educational choice for human capital https://patrickbyrne.locals.com for my commentary, explanations, and insights. To help, join: https://www.AmericaProject.com
Created24 January 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 October 2026
Measurements held49
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/PatrickMByrne

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

42,63644,68943,662.56 August 2026 — 44,689 subscribers6 August 2026 — 44,682 subscribers7 August 2026 — 44,640 subscribers8 August 2026 — 44,622 subscribers9 August 2026 — 44,598 subscribers10 August 2026 — 44,530 subscribers11 August 2026 — 44,513 subscribers12 August 2026 — 44,501 subscribers14 August 2026 — 44,470 subscribers15 August 2026 — 44,399 subscribers16 August 2026 — 44,355 subscribers18 August 2026 — 44,331 subscribers19 August 2026 — 44,310 subscribers20 August 2026 — 44,252 subscribers21 August 2026 — 44,231 subscribers22 August 2026 — 44,192 subscribers24 August 2026 — 44,138 subscribers25 August 2026 — 44,111 subscribers26 August 2026 — 44,088 subscribers27 August 2026 — 44,068 subscribers28 August 2026 — 44,031 subscribers29 August 2026 — 44,010 subscribers30 August 2026 — 43,997 subscribers31 August 2026 — 43,977 subscribers1 September 2026 — 43,956 subscribers2 September 2026 — 43,931 subscribers3 September 2026 — 43,907 subscribers5 September 2026 — 43,855 subscribers8 September 2026 — 43,748 subscribers11 September 2026 — 43,670 subscribers13 September 2026 — 43,606 subscribers14 September 2026 — 43,549 subscribers16 September 2026 — 43,523 subscribers19 September 2026 — 43,466 subscribers26 September 2026 — 43,287 subscribers4 October 2026 — 43,068 subscribers9 October 2026 — 42,972 subscribers13 October 2026 — 42,895 subscribers14 October 2026 — 42,838 subscribers15 October 2026 — 42,828 subscribers16 October 2026 — 42,787 subscribers17 October 2026 — 42,780 subscribers18 October 2026 — 42,751 subscribers19 October 2026 — 42,728 subscribers21 October 2026 — 42,721 subscribers22 October 2026 — 42,694 subscribers23 October 2026 — 42,674 subscribers24 October 2026 — 42,654 subscribers25 October 2026 — 42,636 subscribers6 August 202625 October 2026
49 measurements spanning 80 days, net -2,053. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 42,328–44,997 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 49
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Oct 2026, 06:4442,636-18
24 Oct 2026, 06:3642,654-20
23 Oct 2026, 05:0942,674-20
22 Oct 2026, 05:0142,694-27
21 Oct 2026, 00:3042,721-7
19 Oct 2026, 19:4142,728-23
18 Oct 2026, 16:3842,751-29
17 Oct 2026, 15:3842,780-7
16 Oct 2026, 16:1642,787-41
15 Oct 2026, 17:0642,828-10
14 Oct 2026, 16:1542,838-57
13 Oct 2026, 04:1842,895-77
9 Oct 2026, 00:1742,972-96
4 Oct 2026, 13:4043,068-219
26 Sept 2026, 06:2243,287-179
19 Sept 2026, 06:3943,466-57
16 Sept 2026, 19:3643,523-26
14 Sept 2026, 21:4143,549-57
13 Sept 2026, 06:1743,606-64
11 Sept 2026, 06:2043,670first reading

Engagement

305 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 155 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.19%
avg views ÷ 42,636 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,070
126 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.99%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
126
of 305 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 October 2026
Posts held305 (4 August 2026 – 25 October 2026)
Views total386,300
Reactions total11,562
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken25 Oct 2026, 16:37 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈8,960
Videos
≈1,130
Links
≈10,700

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
6h 24m
Average length
14m 48s

Measured directly from 26 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

28,632 reactions across 305 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍6,77123.6%
💯4,06614.2%
❤3,86413.5%
🔥3,72813.0%
🤬3,39511.9%
🙏2,0437.14%
👏2,0097.02%
🤔7292.55%
🤣6752.36%
⚡3611.26%
😁2490.87%
🤯2030.709%
😭1420.496%
😢1340.468%
😱890.311%
🤩620.217%
🥰550.192%
🎉400.14%
🆒100.035%
💔70.024%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 305 of the 305 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 28,632 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 305 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 25 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

25 Oct 2026, 02:39 UTC≈2,320 views57 reactionsread 25 October 2026
Video

Excellent discussion by Martin Gary and Ralph of the Venezuelan Project (our work to hack & penetrate the Maduro regime of Venezuela, leading to disrupting their own election heist on July 28, 2024 and the heist of November 5, 2024). Lara Logan episode #100.

👍39❤7🔥4🎉3🤬2🤔1😭1

24 Oct 2026, 19:05 UTC≈2,190 views97 reactionsread 25 October 2026
Photo

Black Republicans (a.k.a. "Frederick Douglass Republicans" fdfnational.org ) are "the republican wing of the Republican Party." The most common-sense and principled. We need to start speaking to each other better than we have been and these guys are the place to start. https://x.com/JustJenRX/status/2113795248069476430

🔥60👍20❤8🎉3👏3🙏3

24 Oct 2026, 03:36 UTC≈3,140 views82 reactionsread 25 October 2026
Video

X | Locals | Telegram

❤44💯20👍13🔥2🙏2🤔1

24 Oct 2026, 03:34 UTC≈2,210 views65 reactionsread 25 October 2026
Photo

They seem nice https://x.com/TRobinsonNewEra/status/2113617662886433166

🤬58😢5😱1🆒1

24 Oct 2026, 03:07 UTC≈3,190 views69 reactionsread 25 October 2026
Photo

USDOJ If it’s true that you are looking into this family, you should contact Millie__Weaver. https://x.com/Millie__Weaver/status/2110557290214359136

🔥58👍10❤1

24 Oct 2026, 02:06 UTC≈5,080 views74 reactionsread 25 October 2026
Photo

This is an interesting nugget in AbsoluteWithE‘s long-accumulating story. DEA was against the information about Venezuela getting to Trump. Because our election systems are controlled by drug cartels. THAT’S the reason DEA got involved.💡 https://x.com/EmeraldRobinson/status/1902727797514047494

👍52🔥16❤3🤯3

24 Oct 2026, 02:04 UTC≈2,910 views67 reactionsread 25 October 2026
Photo

DataRepublican published some shocking videos this week. But in 2020, during the lockdown, there were plenty of zoom calls: a typical call had 400 people, with a couple dozen of them being government officials. The rest being antifa “activists“ plotting their insurrection. https://x.com/Millie__Weaver/status/1323427356783071232

👍42🔥19🤯3❤2🤬1

24 Oct 2026, 00:44 UTC≈2,530 views68 reactionsread 25 October 2026
Photo

We went through this in that crazy period after Election Day 2020. Netanyahu was the first foreign leader to congratulate Biden, publicly anyway. But anyone who wasn’t living under a rock, had a sinking feeling that a terrible scam was getting codified into history. https://x.com/Ne_pas_couvrir/status/2113572680322470063

👍36💯26❤3🤔3

24 Oct 2026, 00:08 UTC≈2,050 views64 reactionsread 25 October 2026
Photo

TL;DR “You, the British taxpayer, are funding this gay Somali man, who likely has committed immigration fraud, to produce self-indulgent nonsense dressed up as research at a Western university, while he lectures you on the need to decolonize Western academia.” https://x.com/AveryDaye/status/2113317457540563317

🤬51💯8❤2👍1🔥1🤯1

24 Oct 2026, 00:05 UTC≈2,270 views86 reactionsread 25 October 2026
Photo

Frederick Douglass Republicans are the most principled Republicans there are. @IeshaSchreiner is as grounded and smart as they come The Republican Party is not as welcoming to Black Americans as it should be. I'll take 1 of her over 100 Country Club Republicans all day long. https://x.com/Dj15851Johnson/status/2113440969354002435

👍59❤19🙏6💯2

24 Oct 2026, 00:03 UTC≈2,020 views90 reactionsread 25 October 2026
Photo

It is so heart-warming to see all these wonderful Black Americans come forward and show they have woken up. America has plenty of poor people to worry about before we go worrying about the rest of the world. https://x.com/ImMeme0/status/2113368931104686317

❤62💯18🙏10

24 Oct 2026, 00:00 UTC≈2,090 views89 reactionsread 25 October 2026
Photo

Love her https://x.com/ScottPresler/status/2113268794013417744

❤69🔥13🙏7

Showing the 12 most recent of 305 posts we hold for @PatrickMByrne. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@PatrickMByrne edited 11 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
22 August 2026
Most recent edit
23 October 2026

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

1st Amendment Praetorian
@FirstAmendmentPraetorian · 3,490
#1
Marco Polo
@MarcoPolo501c3 · 31,946
#2
Dot Connecting Anons
@dotconnectinganons · 27,092
#3
BREAKING HEADLINES
@BREAKINGHEADLINES · 66,064
#4
Sergeant News Network 🇺🇸
@SGTnewsNetwork · 110,113
#5
The Federalist
@FDRLSTT · 23,826
#6
Ethical Skeptic
@EthicalSkeptic · 3,231
#7
PatriotAU️️️
@ThePatriotAU · 13,900
#8
Jack Posobiec
@Jack_Posobiec · 114,954
#9
Gateway Pundit
@gatewaypunditofficial · 109,306
#10
⚡️ 🇺🇸 Sidney Powell 🇺🇸 🗽
@SidneyPowell · 124,011
#11
Captain Keshel and Co. American Election Integrity HQ
@ElectionHQ2024 · 68,175
#12
General Flynn ️
@RealGenFlynn · 146,262
#13
GEORGENEWS
@georgenews · 141,734
#14
KanekoaTheGreat
@KanekoaTheGreat · 115,103
#15
BioClandestine
@bioclandestine · 138,031
#16
X22 Report Official
@realx22report · 158,323
#17
Charlie Kirk
@CharlieKirk · 149,098
#18
WarRoom: Official Telegram Channel
@BannonWarRoom · 51,021
#19
We The Media
@WeTheMedia · 140,811
#20
Donald J. Trump
@real_donaldjtrump · 582,914
#21
Ron Watkins [CodeMonkeyZ]
@CodeMonkeyZ · 123,646
#22
ULTRA Pepe Lives Matter 🐸
@PepeMatter · 143,615
#23
David Clements
@theprofessorsrecord · 49,907
#24
Resist the Mainstream
@ResisttheMainstream · 127,298
#25
The Vigilant Fox 🦊
@VigilantFox · 119,212
#26
The General
@GeneralMCNews · 143,027
#27
il Donaldo Trumpo
@RealDonaldoTrumpo · 154,456
#28
DavidNinoRodriguez
@ninoscorner · 78,773
#29
Insider Paper
@insiderpaper · 108,031
#30
Enthéos
@RealEntheos · 31,009
#31
TruthHammer 🙏🇺🇸 (DM's & Channel Spam are FAKERS.)
@TruthHammer · 45,337
#32
Edward Dowd
@Edward_Dowd · 12,246
#33
Joe Oltmann Official
@joeoltmann · 18,162
#34
JovanHuttonPulitzer
@JovanHuttonPulitzer · 26,068
#35
The Justice League
@THEREALTORIABROOKE · 26,652
#36
Donald Trump Jr
@TrumpJr · 349,130
#37
StormyPatriotJoe ⭐️⭐️⭐️ Channel
@stormypatriotjoe21 · 72,218
#38
The Epoch Times
@epochtimes · 125,602
#39
Pepe Deluxe
@PepeDeluxed · 56,218
#40
💊 ℝ𝕖𝕕.ℙ𝕚𝕝𝕝.ℙ𝕙𝕒𝕣𝕞𝕒𝕔𝕚𝕤𝕥 💊
@RPPharmacistOfficial · 50,813
#41
TheStormHasArrived17
@TheStormHasArrived17 · 90,527
#42
SpookdBlog
@SpookdBlogChat · 5,620
#43
Liz Harrington
@LizHarrington76 · 22,457
#44
Marjorie Taylor Greene
@RealMarjorieGreene · 56,142
#45
Just Human ⭐️⭐️⭐️
@realjust_human · 30,258
#46
Shadow of Ezra
@ShadowofEzra · 145,334
#47
The Patriot Voice
@PatriotVoiceOfficial · 31,842
#48
James O'Keefe
@JamesOKeefeIII · 163,670
#49
Election Wizard
@realelectionwizard · 21,085
#50
Police frequency
@police_frequency · 69,367
#51
Q) The Storm Rider /Official Page
@qthestormrider777 · 153,511
#52
TWP
@TheWashingtonPundit · 5,558
#53
The Western Journal
@WesternJournal · 50,031
#54
Rise of the New Media - Brian Cates
@riseofthenewmedia · 17,946
#55
James Woods ★★★
@JamesWoodsFans · 72,206
#56
Lara Logan
@NoAgendaLara · 25,768
#57
Praying Medic News
@PrayingMedicNews · 24,140
#58
One America News Network
@OANNTV · 141,771
#59
Burning Bright
@reBurningBright · 12,337
#60
Professor Patriot
@professor_patriot_official · 13,069
#61
Political Moonshine
@PoliticalMoonshine · 5,543
#62
1984 Prevention Team
@prevent1984 · 7,909
#63
ANN VANDERSTEEL CHANNEL
@AnnVandersteelTruth · 28,877
#64
Publius
@Publius_76 · 5,801
#65
Raheem Kassam
@RaheemKassam · 7,709
#66
🇺🇸👊🏻Richard Citizen Journalist 👊🏻🇺🇸
@Richardcitizenjournalists · 107,515
#67
Jeffrey Peterson - jeff.pro
@jeffdotpro · 23,749
#68
Benny Johnson
@BennyJohnson · 62,135
#69
LauraAboli
@LauraAbolichannel · 166,526
#70
Disclose.tv
@disclosetv · 318,618
#71
Dan Scavino FORCE🇺🇸🦅
@DanScavinoFORCE · 88,600
#72
The Library
@The_Library_II · 18,682
#73
PROJECT CAMELOT
@projectcamelotKerry · 74,772
#74
Mike Lindell
@MichaelJLindell · 77,387
#75
loop_rm_3117211
@looP_rM_3117211 · 348
#76
SantaSurfing
@SantaSurfing · 122,245
#77
Right Side Broadcasting Network (RSBN)
@rsbnetwork · 101,204
#78

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 28 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

JovanHuttonPulitzer
@JovanHuttonPulitzer · 26,068
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 11 September 2026
Marco Polo
@MarcoPolo501c3 · 31,946
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 4 September 2026
⚡️ 🇺🇸 Sidney Powell 🇺🇸 🗽
@SidneyPowell · 124,011
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 13 August 2026
David Clements
@theprofessorsrecord · 49,907
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 25 August 2026
Tracy Beanz
@TracybeanzOfficial · 26,041
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 12 September 2026
Jeffrey Peterson - jeff.pro
@jeffdotpro · 23,749
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 17 September 2026
Sarah Huckabee Sanders
@SarahHuckabee · 23,415
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 16 September 2026
The Federalist
@FDRLSTT · 23,826
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 15 September 2026
Ron Watkins [CodeMonkeyZ]
@CodeMonkeyZ · 123,646
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 13 August 2026
Captain Keshel and Co. American Election Integrity HQ
@ElectionHQ2024 · 68,175
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 20 August 2026
Enthéos
@RealEntheos · 31,009
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 5 September 2026
Jon Herold
@patelpatriot · 82,797
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 2 September 2026
Liz Harrington
@LizHarrington76 · 22,457
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 19 September 2026
Josh Hawley
@Josh_Hawley · 25,621
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 12 September 2026
Marjorie Taylor Greene
@RealMarjorieGreene · 56,142
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 22 August 2026
The Library
@The_Library_II · 18,682
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 5 October 2026
Lara Logan
@NoAgendaLara · 25,768
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 13 September 2026
Mike Lindell
@MichaelJLindell · 77,387
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 18 August 2026
General Flynn ️
@RealGenFlynn · 146,262
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 12 August 2026
@intheMatrixxx
@mgshowchannel · 19,146
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 2 October 2026
Mark Levin Warroom
@MarkRLevin · 38,152
Telegram ranks this channel #88 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 30 August 2026

This channel appears in 21 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Referenced elsewhere

This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.

Wikipedia

One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.

پاتریک بیرنه (fa.wikipedia.org)
“…= | website = http://www.deepcapture.com http://t.me/patrickmbyrne }} '''پاتریک ام. بیرنه''' ({{lang-en|Patrick M. Byrne}}؛ زادهٔ…”
read 25 October 2026

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Patrick M. Byrne” (@PatrickMByrne), 42,636 subscribers as measured 25 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PatrickMByrne.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.