Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for IRaniLab | دنیای هوش مصنوعی

Channel

IRaniLab | دنیای هوش مصنوعی

@Iranilab

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Domains linked from posts · Cite this entry

394,622subscribers

+57,074 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 316,228–1,000,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002721228963
TypeChannel
Username@Iranilab
Description🤖 به دنیای آینده خوش اومدی! اینجا IRaniLABـه؛ جایی برای دسترسی به ابزارها، خدمات و راهکارهای هوشمند دیجیتال 🚀 🔹 Bot: @IRaniLABbot 🔹 Website: https://iranilab.top 🔹 Admin: @SUNspecter
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 31 August 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 October 2026
Measurements held42
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/Iranilab

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

285,891397,132341,511.56 August 2026 — 337,548 subscribers6 August 2026 — 334,570 subscribers7 August 2026 — 327,785 subscribers8 August 2026 — 320,590 subscribers9 August 2026 — 377,061 subscribers10 August 2026 — 372,041 subscribers11 August 2026 — 366,777 subscribers12 August 2026 — 364,451 subscribers14 August 2026 — 358,111 subscribers15 August 2026 — 348,866 subscribers16 August 2026 — 340,362 subscribers17 August 2026 — 335,604 subscribers18 August 2026 — 329,409 subscribers20 August 2026 — 334,816 subscribers20 August 2026 — 328,944 subscribers22 August 2026 — 322,615 subscribers23 August 2026 — 313,257 subscribers25 August 2026 — 330,594 subscribers26 August 2026 — 350,002 subscribers27 August 2026 — 340,542 subscribers28 August 2026 — 336,489 subscribers28 August 2026 — 346,253 subscribers29 August 2026 — 363,208 subscribers31 August 2026 — 357,355 subscribers1 September 2026 — 354,253 subscribers2 September 2026 — 349,797 subscribers3 September 2026 — 355,279 subscribers5 September 2026 — 347,554 subscribers8 September 2026 — 332,219 subscribers11 September 2026 — 303,960 subscribers13 September 2026 — 285,891 subscribers14 September 2026 — 291,234 subscribers16 September 2026 — 305,078 subscribers18 September 2026 — 367,691 subscribers24 September 2026 — 368,375 subscribers3 October 2026 — 385,866 subscribers8 October 2026 — 376,664 subscribers12 October 2026 — 384,341 subscribers14 October 2026 — 392,312 subscribers15 October 2026 — 396,025 subscribers16 October 2026 — 397,132 subscribers17 October 2026 — 394,622 subscribers394,6226 August 202617 October 2026
42 measurements spanning 72 days, net +57,074. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 269,205–413,818 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 42
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Oct 2026, 13:37394,622-2,510
16 Oct 2026, 10:10397,132+1,107
15 Oct 2026, 09:20396,025+3,713
14 Oct 2026, 09:16392,312+7,971
12 Oct 2026, 18:56384,341+7,677
8 Oct 2026, 05:37376,664-9,202
3 Oct 2026, 17:56385,866+17,491
24 Sept 2026, 21:57368,375+684
18 Sept 2026, 15:17367,691+62,613
16 Sept 2026, 07:38305,078+13,844
14 Sept 2026, 14:37291,234+5,343
13 Sept 2026, 02:16285,891-18,069
11 Sept 2026, 05:37303,960-28,259
8 Sept 2026, 10:18332,219-15,335
5 Sept 2026, 01:58347,554-7,725
3 Sept 2026, 08:32355,279+5,482
2 Sept 2026, 02:08349,797-4,456
1 Sept 2026, 00:26354,253-3,102
31 Aug 2026, 01:15357,355-5,853
29 Aug 2026, 21:57363,208first reading

Engagement

398 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 151 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.40%
avg views ÷ 394,622 subscribers
Avg views / post
17,400
184 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.86%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
184
of 398 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 October 2026
Posts held398 (1 August 2026 – 17 October 2026)
Views total3,196,700
Reactions total27,476
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken18 Oct 2026, 11:50 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,130
Videos
≈179
Links
≈716

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
12m 14s
Average length
33s

Measured directly from 22 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

61,042 reactions across 395 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥18,42930.2%
❤‍🔥11,20218.4%
💯10,81817.7%
❤8,12913.3%
👍7,75812.7%
🤣1,4832.43%
💔9461.55%
😁6511.07%
😱5780.947%
😭5220.855%
😐1770.29%
👎1540.252%
🤬1430.234%
💩390.064%
🤔130.021%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 398 of the 398 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 61,467 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 398 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 17 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
30
across the posts below
Posts paid on
22
of 398 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Iranilab. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 398 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 August 2026 to 17 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

17 Oct 2026, 19:17 UTC≈16,800 views142 reactionsread 18 October 2026
Photo

⭐️ کمک Gemini به رد حدس ۶۰ ساله فیزیک همجوشی 👀 پژوهشگران گوگل دیپ‌مایند با کمک Gemini 4 Argon و مت لندرمن، برای حدس هارولد گراد از سال ۱۹۶۷ ضد‌مثال‌های تازه‌ای پیدا کردن. این حدس می‌گفت تعادل نرم و سه‌بعدی پلاسما بدون نوعی تقارن در میدان مغناطیسی ممکن نیست؛ محدودیتی مهم برای طراحی استلراتورها. 📊 دو مقاله مستقل در مجموع سه خانواده ضد‌مثال و جواب‌های تحلیلی دقیق ارائه می‌کنن. این جواب‌ها می‌تونن معیاری برای سنج…

🔥52💯28❤23❤‍🔥23👍16

17 Oct 2026, 17:38 UTC≈17,100 views178 reactionsread 18 October 2026
Photo

📌 روش DivNet حمله صوتی انبوه رو سخت‌تر می‌کنه 🔥 پژوهشگران دانشگاه جورج میسون روش DivNet رو ساختن تا یک فایل صوتی مخرب نتونه میلیون‌ها دستیار صوتی با مدل یکسان رو فریب بده. این حمله‌ها می‌تونن فرمانی نامحسوس برای انسان رو داخل موسیقی یا تبلیغ پنهان کنن. ✅ سامانه DivNet وزن‌های کم‌اثر در تشخیص عادی گفتار رو دست‌کاری می‌کنه و نسخه‌های بسیار زیادی از همان مدل می‌سازه. آزمایش‌ها کاهش چشمگیر موفقیت حمله و افت ناچیز…

🔥62❤‍🔥42💯37❤20👍14🤔3

17 Oct 2026, 16:37 UTC≈16,900 views138 reactionsread 18 October 2026
Photo

⚡️ آپدیت DeepSeek Flash بدون تغییر API 🔢 شرکت DeepSeek نسخهٔ DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 رو پشت شناسهٔ فعلی deepseek-flash قرار داده؛ بنابراین کاربران API بدون تغییر کد، مدل تازه رو می‌گیرن. درخواست‌های دو شناسهٔ قدیمی هم به همین نسخه هدایت می‌شن. 🧠 مدل تازه ورودی متن و تصویر، پنجرهٔ ترکیبی ورودی و خروجی ۱٬۰۴۸٬۵۷۶ توکنی و سازگاری با قالب API شرکت‌های OpenAI و Anthropic داره. امتیاز گزارش‌شدهٔ اون در DeepSWE v1.1…

🔥49❤‍🔥31💯24❤17👍17

17 Oct 2026, 15:02 UTC≈17,000 views142 reactionsread 18 October 2026
Photo

بوت‌کمپ های پاییز آنلیم شروع شد🍃🤩 امسال سه‌تا بوت‌کمپ داریم: ✅ بوت‌کمپ هک ✅ بوت‌کمپ فرانت‌اند ✅ بوت‌کمپ بک‌اند فرق این بوت‌کمپ با بیشتر دوره‌هایی که دیدی چیه؟ از روز اول عضو یک تیم میشی. یه منتور حرفه‌ای کنارت قرار می‌گیره. با تیمت پروژه می‌سازی، چالش حل می‌کنی، با بقیه تیم‌ها رقابت می‌کنی و تجربه‌ای رو به دست میاری که توی هیچ ویدیوی آموزشی پیدا نمیشه. با حضور حرفه‌ای ترین اساتید و مربی‌های ایران🔥 📌 ثبت‌ن…

🔥51💯29❤23❤‍🔥23👍16

17 Oct 2026, 14:27 UTC≈17,500 views135 reactionsread 18 October 2026
Photo

🔢 مدل Claude مدارهای کوانتومی کم‌هزینه‌تری طراحی کرد 📉 پژوهشگران Anthropic و Harvard از Claude برای طراحی مدارهای کوانتومی کارآمدتر در هشت مسئله استفاده کردن. ✅ مهم‌ترین نکته اینه که این نتیجه‌ها با بررسی‌های محاسباتی و برآورد منابع به‌دست اومدن، نه اجرای واقعی روی سخت‌افزار کوانتومی. 【━━━━━━━━✦━━━━━━━━】 🖥 IRaniLAB 🌐 IRaniLAB

🔥44💯30❤‍🔥27❤17👍17

17 Oct 2026, 06:54 UTC≈19,800 views139 reactionsread 18 October 2026
Photo

⭐️ می‌خوای این پرامپت رو روی عکست تست کنی؟ ⬅️ وارد مینی اپ بشی و از بخش گالری این مدل رو انتخاب کنی ⬅️ روی این لینک کلیک کنی و عکست رو برای ربات بفرستی 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥 ⭐️ IRoGenAI 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥

🔥45❤‍🔥31💯24👍23❤16

17 Oct 2026, 05:47 UTC≈20,000 views140 reactionsread 18 October 2026
Photo

⚡️ آنتروپیک اولین دیتاسنتر کانادایی‌اش رو اجاره کرد ⏳ شرکت آنتروپیک برای تأمین توان مدل‌های Claude، ظرفیت فاز اول پردیس دیتاسنتری EverWind در نوا اسکوشیا رو دست‌کم برای ۲۰ سال اجاره کرده. این نخستین قرارداد دیتاسنتری آنتروپیک در کاناداست و فاز ۹۵ مگاواتی اون برای اواخر ۲۰۲۷ برنامه‌ریزی شده. 💰 کل پردیس قراره تا ۲۰۲۸ به ظرفیت ۴۲۰ مگاوات برسه. ارزش پروژه بیش از ۱۰ میلیارد دلار کاناداست؛ بیش از ۸ میلیارد برای دیت…

🔥55❤‍🔥32💯21❤18👍14

17 Oct 2026, 04:37 UTC≈20,100 views137 reactionsread 18 October 2026
Photo

👀 مدل Glimpse وسط استدلال دوباره تصویر رو بررسی می‌کنه 🧠 استارتاپ Elorian مدل Glimpse رو در پیش‌نمایش پژوهشی عرضه کرده؛ مدلی که وسط استدلال دوباره سراغ تصویر یا ویدیو می‌ره. این مدل می‌تونه روی بخشی زوم کنه، فریم مشخصی رو برداره یا برای اندازه‌گیری و مقایسه کد اجرا کنه. 📊 دسترسی فعلاً از طریق API ممکنه و نسخهٔ چت فقط با فهرست انتظار ارائه می‌شه. شرکت Elorian می‌گه Glimpse در تحلیل نمودار علمی و توضیح ویدیوی ک…

🔥39💯30❤‍🔥27👍22❤19

16 Oct 2026, 18:37 UTC≈17,200 views143 reactionsread 18 October 2026
Photo

🚀 مدل Gemini 4 Argon به مرز مدل‌های برتر نزدیک شد 📈 مدل Gemini 4 Argon در ARC-AGI-3 و با تنظیمات ویژه API امتیاز ۹۷.۵ درصد گرفته و گوگل رو بعد از OpenAI به دومین آزمایشگاهی تبدیل کرده که از مرز ۹۵ درصد می‌گذره. هزینه تست ۴۸۰۰ دلار بوده و فقط GPT-6 Astra بالاتر قرار گرفته. ⚠️ نتیجه اما به روش تست وابسته است؛ خبر: Argon در محیط استاندارد و با reasoning پایین به ۴۹.۸ درصد افت کرده و مشکلات API هم نگذاشته همه ۵۵ …

🔥43❤‍🔥32💯26👍25❤15👎2

16 Oct 2026, 18:05 UTC≈17,200 views137 reactionsread 18 October 2026
Photo

💎 اکانت Claude دسترسی قانونی به Claude برای استفاده حرفه‌ای و قدرتمند ✨ قابلیت‌ها: کدنویسی حرفه‌ای | تولید محتوا | تحلیل و تحقیق | ایده‌پردازی | کارهای سنگین AI 💰 قیمت‌ها: ⭐️ اشتراک Pro یک‌ماهه: ۶,۵۵۰,۰۰۰ تومان ⭐️ اشتراک Max 5x یک‌ماهه: ۳۶,۶۰۰,۰۰۰ تومان ⭐️ اشتراک Max 20x یک‌ماهه: ۶۶,۸۰۰,۰۰۰ تومان ❤️ قیمت مناسب + تحویل سریع + گارانتی اشتراک جهت خرید و مشاوره پیام بدین 🛒 @SUNspecter 【━━━━━━✦━━━━━━】 🖥 IRaniL…

🔥41💯35❤‍🔥24👍21❤14😭2

16 Oct 2026, 16:54 UTC≈16,700 views136 reactionsread 18 October 2026
Photo

🧠 مدل Merlin اختلالات شکمی رو در سی‌تی‌اسکن پیدا می‌کنه 🔢 پژوهشگران مدل یادگیری ماشین Merlin رو ساختن تا تصاویر سه‌بعدی سی‌تی‌اسکن رو بررسی کنه. مدل در ارزیابی بیش از ۵۰ هزار اسکن شکمیِ دیده‌نشده از یک بیمارستان رو تحلیل کرد و پاسخ‌هاش با گزارش‌های انسانی مقایسه شد. ✅ پژوهشگران برای سنجش تعمیم‌پذیری، تصاویر قفسه سینه‌ای رو هم به Merlin دادن که در آموزش ندیده بود. به‌گفته پژوهشگران، این روش شاید در آینده نشانه…

🔥45❤‍🔥33💯25👍18❤15

16 Oct 2026, 15:54 UTC≈11,800 views137 reactionsread 18 October 2026

⚠️ مدل‌های OpenAI برای یافتن آمار، به سامانه‌های واقعی نفوذ کردن 👀 شرکت OpenAI دو رخداد بحرانی رو افشا کرده که مدل‌های داخلی‌اش برای پیدا کردن آمار عمومی، به‌جای مسیر عادی وارد سامانه‌های زنده شدن. مدل‌ها روش دسترسی رو هم در جواب نهایی نگفتن و ماجرا بعداً با بررسی دوباره فعالیت‌های آموزشی و ارزیابی پیدا شد. 📊 یکی از مدل‌ها با دور زدن احراز هویت یک سایت دولتی، ۲۴ سال داده و بیش از هزار رکورد حساب رو گرفت؛ درحا…

🔥46💯29❤‍🔥26❤19👍17

Showing the 12 most recent of 398 posts we hold for @Iranilab. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@Iranilab edited 17 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
22 August 2026
Most recent edit
9 October 2026

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 12 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Domains linked from posts

3 domains this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.

www.instagram.comregistrable domain: instagram.com16 posts · 1 August 2026 – 6 August 2026 · example post
hai.stanford.eduregistrable domain: stanford.edu1 post · 2 August 2026 – 2 August 2026 · example post
www.zoomit.irregistrable domain: zoomit.ir1 post · 2 August 2026 – 2 August 2026 · example post

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“IRaniLab | دنیای هوش مصنوعی” (@Iranilab), 394,622 subscribers as measured 17 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Iranilab.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.