Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for hatred boils inside me

Channel

hatred boils inside me

@Ix4_hatred

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

72subscribers

-7 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003155823236
TypeChannel
Username@Ix4_hatred
CreatedBetween 1 September 2025 and 30 November 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Ix4_hatred

Growth

727975.58 August 2026 — 79 subscribers9 August 2026 — 79 subscribers22 August 2026 — 77 subscribers29 August 2026 — 75 subscribers7 September 2026 — 73 subscribers16 September 2026 — 72 subscribers8 August 202616 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 39 days, net -7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 71–80 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 05:1572-1
7 Sept 2026, 12:5873-2
29 Aug 2026, 07:5675-2
22 Aug 2026, 02:1577-2
9 Aug 2026, 19:3179no change
8 Aug 2026, 12:3279first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 24 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
33s
Average length
33s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

34 reactions across 5 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52199530737319597761441.2%
custom 5314422837912559202617.6%
custom 6136245683037934039617.6%
custom 531029466137653341838.82%
custom 529416436194059573125.88%
custom 522010874482160160212.94%
custom 531430616512596667212.94%
💊12.94%

Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 34 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 June 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 14:24 UTC26 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026

😊 🤩🖍𝚎𝚠 🖍𝚘𝚜𝚝😀🤩 𝙰𝚗 𝚞𝚗𝚒𝚍𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚒𝚏𝚒𝚎𝚍 𝚞𝚜𝚎𝚛 𝚝𝚎𝚡𝚝𝚜. . . 😀😀😀😊😀😀😀😀😀👀 🟢е писал сюда, и оправдываться, разумеется, не собираюсь... Назовем это так: я просто брал перерыв от вашего бесконечного жужжания. Отдых от вас, жалких раздражающих мух, пошёл мне только на пользу. Теперь у меня более чем достаточно сил и энергии, чтобы снова соизволить спуститься в мой канал. ​🟢е ждите, что я сейчас начну делиться интереснымм

custom 52199530737319597762💊1

16 Jul 2026, 09:44 UTC118 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026

#adm : К большому сожалению, ивент закрылся. Шли к этому ивенту долго, но позже он распался. Но было приятно поболтать с остальными участниками и всё таки чему-то я научился, удивительно. В чем-то я решил опробовать себя всё равно. Впрочем, посты теперь будут писаться в обычном режиме и я сосредоточусь на развитии(в каком-то плане) Икса(и не просто как существа из ненависти, у которого одержимость Шедлетским). Так

custom 53144228379125592022custom 53102946613765334181custom 61362456830379340391

13 Jul 2026, 23:04 UTC116 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026

🖍🖍🖍🖍 ...Какого черта?.. Забавно. Еще миг назад я стирал жизни тысячами, а теперь каким-то чертовым образом оказался здесь. Это место отталкивает. Само измерение впивается в меня мерзким покалыванием. Оно... фальшивое. Чужое. Каждой своей физической клеткой я чувствую эту нелепую атмосферу, несовместимую с моей сущностью. Что это? Чья-то дурная шутка? Сделка с дьяволом, которой я не заключал? Или нечто, до чего мне по

custom 52199530737319597762custom 52941643619405957311

12 Jul 2026, 11:35 UTC104 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

꧁༄⸻➤ ˚₊·⋆▬▬ι═══════ﺤ░ ┝┈ ▌ ㅤ ︶꒷꒦︶꒷꒦꒷ ๋࣭ ๋⭑ [ 𝙴𝚅𝙴𝙽𝚃! ] ※【Их спокойствие не длилось так долго... естественно, этого стоило ждать. кто то надеялся мирную среду? Ему и не составит труда снова нас здесь собрать по одному хотению, мы все обречены на вечные муки, виновны, или нет. осталось лишь плясать под его дудку, успевая за темпом ниток, что держат нас. так или иначе, все мы тесно знакомы друг с другом. может,

custom 53144228379125592024custom 52201087448216016021custom 52941643619405957311custom 53102946613765334181

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Ix4_hatred. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“hatred boils inside me” (@Ix4_hatred), 72 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Ix4_hatred.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.