Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝑱𝒂𝒏𝒆 𝑫𝒐𝒆

Channel

𝑱𝒂𝒏𝒆 𝑫𝒐𝒆

@janedoeblogg

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

34subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003920980860
TypeChannel
Username@janedoeblogg
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 19 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged3 times, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/janedoeblogg

Growth

3335348 August 2026 — 33 subscribers11 August 2026 — 33 subscribers16 August 2026 — 35 subscribers31 August 2026 — 34 subscribers8 August 202631 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 23 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 33–35 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
31 Aug 2026, 18:4334-1
16 Aug 2026, 21:5735+2
11 Aug 2026, 01:3033no change
8 Aug 2026, 12:3233first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 19 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

2 reactions across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥2100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 09:24 UTC10 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @TheGreatestNoliPhoto

был перезапуск... 👻🌟🤩🤩🌟👻👻🍉nd in the end. . . 🌟🏝nly emptiness remains . 🤩🤩🤩 👻⚗️отите блог, где Ноли — это оригинальный миф? 🎀 🥛ечтаете поговорить с самим божеством Пустоты? 🔝 👻⚗️отите повлиять на развитие АУ? 🦷 🤍🤍🤍 Добро пожаловать в блог 👻👻👻👻👻👻👻Мифа Ноли 🎀 👻👻👻📝 🐣avigation . . 🔵

10 Aug 2026, 09:22 UTC9 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @bl0g1x4Photo

🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 ೀ܀⊹˙┆ ☣️🔤🔤🔫𝜗┆˙⊹܀ೀ [🍋‍🟩🩻⚔️] — 4РГХХ!! Д4 к4к!.. 4 в0т. Вс3м д0бр0г0 вр3м3н1.. 4й, д4 ид1т3 н4х//! Я в1д3л к4к м0и н3кот0ры3 зн4к0мые в3ли Т3легр4мм к4нал пр0 св0ю ж1знь и н4зыв4л1 эт0.. Бл0г, п0 мо3му. Н3 з4п0мнил. Я р3шил т0же п0пр0бов4ть. Н3 об3щаю п1с4ть прям вс3. Кхм.. Ну н4верн0е пр1шл0 вр3мя пр3дстав1ться. Мо3 1мя 1х1х1х1, кр4тче м0жн0 1х4. Я в0ссозд4ние к0е чь3й нен4вист1. Д4же пр0т1вно н4зывать э

22 Jul 2026, 20:17 UTC42 viewsread 11 August 2026

: ̗̀➛ 𝑷𝑶𝑺𝑻 𝐼’𝑚 𝑠𝑜 𝑡𝑖𝑟𝑒𝑑 -ˋˏ✄┈┈┈┈ •Джейн замялась, она честно хотела провести с ним больше времени, в конце-концов - они тут были не так уж и долго вместе, по крайней мере так казалось ей. Но она понимала, что если её муж хочет - то пускай так будет, она не могла его заставить остаться с ней здесь• — Позже.. да.. да, конечно •Даже так, даже если они тут были не так долго, у неё была новая пищ

20 Jul 2026, 14:00 UTC36 viewsread 11 August 2026

: ̗̀➛ 𝑷𝑶𝑺𝑻 𝐼’𝑚 𝑠𝑜 𝑡𝑖𝑟𝑒𝑑 -ˋˏ✄┈┈┈┈ •Джейн напряглась, а её лицо выглядело слегка удивлённым. Она вызывает у Джона дежавю?.. значит ли это то, что рано или поздно - она сможет достучаться до него.. там? На вряд ли, может это просто.. не важно. Нельзя давать себе ложные надежды, так?• — Да.. я Джейн, Джейн Доу.. Мои поступки? Это интересно, не думаешь? •Она нервно сделала шаг ближе, слегка дрожа, н

20 Jul 2026, 12:43 UTC26 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026

: ̗̀➛ 𝑷𝑶𝑺𝑻 𝐼’𝑚 𝑠𝑜 𝑡𝑖𝑟𝑒𝑑 -ˋˏ✄┈┈┈┈ •Девушка осторожно отходила, её напрягало всё, от движений мужчины, до его слов. С какой-то стороны, он был прав. Сад был явно заброшен, и тут можно было найти кого угодно и что угодно, так ведь? Но она явно не ожидала увидеть именно его. — Ты.. ты наверное прав.. •Пробубнила она, сжав руки так, что это уже приносило какую-то боль. Она вздохнула, собираясь с сил

❤‍🔥2

20 Jul 2026, 11:58 UTC22 viewsread 11 August 2026

: ̗̀➛ 𝑷𝑶𝑺𝑻 𝐼’𝑚 𝑠𝑜 𝑡𝑖𝑟𝑒𝑑 -ˋˏ✄┈┈┈┈ •Девушка спокойно работала и убиралась в саду, как вдруг услышала до боли знакомый но искаженный голос, обернувшись, Джейн замялась. Она ходила в этот сад уже несколько месяцев, убиралась в нём и так далее, это был её способ утешения себя, и она точно не ожидала встретить здесь Джона. Ни разу за эти месяца она тут никого не встречала, но тут он.• — Джон?.. у мен

20 Jul 2026, 11:23 UTC19 viewsread 11 August 2026

: ̗̀➛ 𝑷𝑶𝑺𝑻 𝐼’𝑚 𝑠𝑜 𝑡𝑖𝑟𝑒𝑑 -ˋˏ✄┈┈┈┈ — Я.. пол дня убиралась с самого утра, как собственно я и обещала сделать, да. Это на самом деле выматывает.. Я уже и забыла, каково это, тратить столько времени на уборку. Зато, теперь там чисто, и мой стол не заставлен кучей бумаг. В такой обстановке убираться будет в любом случае легче. Сейчас, я снова в этом саду с белыми цветами, знали

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @janedoeblogg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝑱𝒂𝒏𝒆 𝑫𝒐𝒆” (@janedoeblogg), 34 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/janedoeblogg.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.