Channel
@JID27B
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
10,359subscribers
+25 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002171116389 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @JID27B |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 2 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 23 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 2 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/JID27B |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2 Sept 2026, 15:04 | 10,359 | +10 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 11:05 | 10,349 | +17 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 09:58 | 10,332 | +4 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 07:24 | 10,328 | -9 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 09:22 | 10,337 | +7 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 08:37 | 10,330 | +22 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 07:02 | 10,308 | +8 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 05:54 | 10,300 | +13 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 05:13 | 10,287 | +5 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 13:26 | 10,282 | -5 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 02:02 | 10,287 | -5 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 23:13 | 10,292 | -7 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 23:25 | 10,299 | +3 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 19:55 | 10,296 | -4 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 21:52 | 10,300 | -3 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 13:22 | 10,303 | +3 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 02:16 | 10,300 | +1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 19:43 | 10,299 | +5 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 17:18 | 10,294 | -10 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 16:02 | 10,304 | first reading |
40 posts held, back to 7 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 41 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 21 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 40 (7 July 2026 – 28 August 2026) |
| Views total | 69,578 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 29 Aug 2026, 15:14 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @JID27B. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 40 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 July 2026 to 28 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
أرىٰ كثيرًا مِن طالِبات العلم يثقن ثقةً كاملة بِكلِّ مَن يُحسب علىٰ أهلِ العلم، وكأنَّه معصوم أو ملاك مِن السَّماء لا يُخطئ. وهَٰذه الثقة المُطلقة قد تجرُّها فيما بعد لِلهاوية. سمعتُ قصصًا كثيرة واطلعتُ علىٰ عشرات الشكاوىٰ وأكثرها -للأسف- مِن أشخاصٍ يقدّمون أنفسهم علىٰ أنَّهم طلبة علم؛ هَٰكذا بِكلِّ بساطة. وأتمنىٰ لو كان بإمكاني مُشاركة تلك القصص لِلعظة والعبرة لا للتشهير؛ ليعرفن الأخوات أنَّ المظاهر كما يُقال" خدّ…
ㅤㅤ مِن الشَّبابِ مَن لا همَّ لهُ إلاَّ خِداع الفَتيات والتَّغرير بِهنّ فيخدَعهنّ بِكلامهِ المَعسول ووعودهِ الكاذِبة. فـ إذا نالَ مُراده أخذَ يبحثُ عَن فتاةٍ أُخرىٰ، وهـٰكذا كانَ دَيدنهُ لا يردعهُ دينٌ ولا حيَاء، مِثل الوَحش الضَّاري يَهيم فِي الصَّحراء يبحثُ عَن فريسةٍ يُسكت بِها جوعهُ ولا بُدَّ لِكلِ مُجرم مِن نهايةٍ مهما طَال الزَّمن فـَلا بُدَّ أن يَقع وأن يَشرب مِن نفسِ الكأس.. ! وكَما تدينُ تُدان.. والجَزاء مِ…
عَنْ أُبَيِّ بْنِ كَعْب رضي الله عنه قَالَ: قُلْتُ : يَا رَسُولَ اللهِ إنِّي أُكْثِرُ الصَّلَاةَ عَلَيْكَ فَكَمْ أَجْعَلُ لَكَ مُنْ صَلَاتِي؟ فَقَالَ: مَا شِئْتَ قَالَ قُلْتُ الرُبُع؟ قَالَ : مَا شِئْتَ فَإنْ زِدْتَ فَهُوَ خَيْرٌ لَكَ قُلْتُ النِّصْفَ؟ قَالَ: مَا شِئْتَ فَإتْ زِدْتَ فَهُوَ خَيْرٌ لَك قَالَ قُلْتُ فَالثُّلُثَيْنِ؟ قَالَ: مَا شِئْتَ فَإنْ زِدْتَ فَهُوَ خَيْرٌ لَكَ قُلْتُ أَجْعَلُ لَكَ صَلَاتي كُلَّهَا؟…
الحب في إطار علاقة غير شرعية لا يُسمّى حبًا، وإنما خطيئة نتوب منها، ونرجع عنها، ونسأل الله ألّا يؤاخذنا بها، فليس كل ما سكن القلب كان حقًّا له، ولا كل ما سمّيناه حبًّا كان يستحق أن نبقى فيه. _منارة مفتاح
خطورة العلاقات المحرمة
سلام على إناثٍ صم بكم عُميٍ في الحب ، ولم يتخذن أخدان حتى يأتيهم النصيب .. وكذلك ألف سلام على قلوب رجالٍ ابتغوا العِفه في زمن ضج بِالفتن .. !
كان عليك المُغادرة منذ انقباضة صدرك الأولى.. لكنك غامرت! ودخلت علاقةً لا تُرضي الله، بالرغم من أنه سبحانه حذّرك منها ليحفظ لك قلبك لكنك غامرت.. فكيف حالُ قلبك اليوم بعد أن عصيت الله، وفقدت من تُحب؟ «وَلا يَحْمِلَنَّ أَحَدَكُمُ اسْتِبْطاءُ الرِّزْقِ أَنْ يَطْلُبَهُ بِمَعْصِيَةِ اللهِ، فَإِنَّ اللهَ تَعالى لا يُنالُ ما عِنْدَهُ إلَّا بِطاعَتِهِ»
"كلُّ رجلٍ وفتاةٍ حفظا قلبَيهما عن العلاقات المحرَّمة، جازاهُما الله بشريكِ حياةٍ صالحٍ يَقُرُّ أعيُنَهما، بإذنِه ورحمتِه."
نلتمس منكم الدعاء
ㅤ أوُّل مَراحل الفشل فِي الحياة أنْ تَجعل شخصًا جزءًا مِن روتينكَ اليوميِّ ㅤㅤ
العلاقات غير الشرعية: بين الوهم والحقيقة! الجزء الأول: تشخيص نفسي واجتماعي وميزان الشريعة الجزء الثاني: كيف نحصل على الحصانة ونصل إلى التعافي؟ كتيب مهم ونافع بإذن الله
الـزَّواج عَن حُب..!
Showing the 12 most recent of 40 posts we hold for @JID27B. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“العلاقات المحرمة .” (@JID27B), 10,359 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/JID27B.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.