Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for أُمَـوُيّة.

Channel

أُمَـوُيّة.

@sar_ra255

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

14,192subscribers

-430 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001727862265
TypeChannel
Username@sar_ra255
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held27
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/sar_ra255

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 59% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

14,19214,62214,40713 August 2026 — 14,622 subscribers13 August 2026 — 14,622 subscribers14 August 2026 — 14,602 subscribers16 August 2026 — 14,582 subscribers17 August 2026 — 14,564 subscribers18 August 2026 — 14,556 subscribers19 August 2026 — 14,538 subscribers20 August 2026 — 14,525 subscribers21 August 2026 — 14,502 subscribers23 August 2026 — 14,482 subscribers25 August 2026 — 14,475 subscribers25 August 2026 — 14,461 subscribers26 August 2026 — 14,455 subscribers27 August 2026 — 14,444 subscribers29 August 2026 — 14,428 subscribers29 August 2026 — 14,419 subscribers31 August 2026 — 14,411 subscribers1 September 2026 — 14,397 subscribers2 September 2026 — 14,377 subscribers3 September 2026 — 14,358 subscribers5 September 2026 — 14,354 subscribers8 September 2026 — 14,307 subscribers11 September 2026 — 14,285 subscribers13 September 2026 — 14,262 subscribers14 September 2026 — 14,246 subscribers16 September 2026 — 14,221 subscribers18 September 2026 — 14,192 subscribers13 August 202618 September 2026
27 measurements spanning 37 days, net -430. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,128–14,687 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 19:5914,192-29
16 Sept 2026, 12:1814,221-25
14 Sept 2026, 15:1714,246-16
13 Sept 2026, 03:1514,262-23
11 Sept 2026, 07:5514,285-22
8 Sept 2026, 11:3814,307-47
5 Sept 2026, 06:0214,354-4
3 Sept 2026, 13:5814,358-19
2 Sept 2026, 08:1514,377-20
1 Sept 2026, 05:2514,397-14
31 Aug 2026, 02:3514,411-8
29 Aug 2026, 23:1914,419-9
29 Aug 2026, 01:1814,428-16
27 Aug 2026, 22:2814,444-11
26 Aug 2026, 20:2514,455-6
25 Aug 2026, 22:1314,461-14
25 Aug 2026, 01:4314,475-7
23 Aug 2026, 14:3714,482-20
21 Aug 2026, 23:4814,502-23
20 Aug 2026, 20:3814,525first reading

Engagement

154 posts held, back to 10 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 38 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.929%
avg views ÷ 14,192 subscribers
Avg views / post
132
70 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
70
of 154 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held154 (10 August 20262 September 2026)
Views total9,234
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 18:38 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 154 we hold a reading for · 0.6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @sar_ra255. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 154 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 17:47 UTC23 viewsread 2 September 2026

أتدري؟ لو أنك تعلمت قول لا، لربما حظيت بوقت أكثر لنفسك. - د. جابور ماتيه| خرافة العادي.

2 Sept 2026, 09:57 UTC61 viewsread 2 September 2026

لربما ليس في قدرتك أن تغيّر العالم أجمع، لكن بالتأكيد في قدرتك أن تجعله محتملًا بقدر ما تمنحه له وللعالمين من خير. أن تكون إنسانًا مأمونًا جانبه، مُتَّقى بوائقه، طيّب القلب، عفيف اللسان، لا يجرح، ولا يؤذي، ولا يخون! نعم، لن يسير العالم وفق خطتك، لكن على الأقل هناك شخص سيقابلك يومًا، ويشعر بالامتنان تجاه الحياة؛ لأنها جمعته، ولو صدفة، بشخص مثلك. ـ سمر إسماعيل.

2 Sept 2026, 07:28 UTC74 viewsread 2 September 2026

الفراغ قاتل؛ فمن عوّد نفسه على الضغط والعمل المتواصل، ستقتله أول خمس دقائق من الفراغ.

1 Sept 2026, 22:49 UTC98 viewsread 2 September 2026

أنا مأخوذة بعمق وعي وعلم: د. جابور ماتيه جداً..

1 Sept 2026, 22:42 UTC97 viewsread 2 September 2026

إن أشد الناس حساسية هم: من قدموا أعظم الإسهامات الثقافية في تاريخ البشرية، وهم أيضاً من ذاقوا أشد الألم خلال حياتهم في الغالب. يمكن للحساسية أن تكون مزيجاً معقداً: هبة ولعنة في آن. - د. جابور ماتيه| خرافة العادي.

1 Sept 2026, 22:40 UTC92 viewsread 2 September 2026

لدى الحساسين القدرة على أن يكونوا أكثر وعياً، وحكمة، وابتكاراً، ودفنّاً، وتعاطفاً. شريطة ألا تدمرهم المعاملة السيئة أو الاحتقار. - د. جابور ماتيه| خرافة العادي.

1 Sept 2026, 21:58 UTC92 viewsread 2 September 2026

فلا يغرّنْك ما منّت وما وعدت! إنّ الأمـانيّ والأحـلام تضْـلـيـلُ..

1 Sept 2026, 07:58 UTC124 viewsread 2 September 2026

"أتأمّل حالَ الإنسان إذا أحبَّ إنسانًا؛ كيفَ يُشرِكه في دعائِه، حتَّىٰ في صِلته بربّه لا ينسَاه، بلْ يذكره بينَ يدي الله، ورُبما آثره علىٰ نفسِه في الدُّعاء. وما رأيتُ للمحبّة معنىً أرقَّ ولا منزِلةً أسمىٰ مِنْ هذا المقَام!"

31 Aug 2026, 21:49 UTC131 viewsread 2 September 2026

لا نستجيرُ من الجراحِ، وإنما.. من فرْط نخوتنا نجير جراحنا!

31 Aug 2026, 21:49 UTC124 viewsread 2 September 2026

هون عليك فلا هناك ولا هنا وجهاً لوجهٍ قلْ لموتك ها أنا..

Showing the 12 most recent of 154 posts we hold for @sar_ra255. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@sar_ra255 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
24 August 2026
Most recent edit
24 August 2026

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

19 Aug 2026, 11:24 UTCAnonymous Quiz27 voters

ما هوَ اسم المصدر؟

  1. مفعول بهِ.22%
  2. اسم جامد.19%
  3. اسم يدل على حدث.59%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 154 most recent posts we hold, published 10 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

الجَنَّةُ هِي المَقْصِد "🤍🇵🇸
@mennatarek12 · 24,739
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 15 September 2026
أُسَيْد..🍂
@usayd_98 · 135,258
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 13 August 2026
للهِ فُـؤادُهـا
@Aauchi5 · 25,020
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 14 September 2026
كن ذا أثر
@kon_ze_athar · 107,598
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 14 August 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“أُمَـوُيّة.” (@sar_ra255), 14,192 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sar_ra255.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.