🇺🇸【降维打击!35岁格列兹曼美职联15场13球6助,带队杀入季后赛区】 美职联常规赛,奥兰多城2-2战平纽约城,格列兹曼打入一球,连续11轮直接参与联赛进球。35岁的法国前锋今年7月离开马竞加盟奥兰多城,截至目前代表球队出战20场,贡献14球6助攻,其中联赛15场打进13球并送出6次助攻。 格列兹曼加盟前,奥兰多城在美职联东区大部分时间排名第10名开外,如今已升至第7位,暂时处于直通季后赛的区域。不过,球队仅凭净胜球优势领先身后对手,常规赛还剩最后3轮,仍需全力争胜以确保季后赛席位。

Channel
体育赛事红单推荐 78.com 【独家冠名】(接广告合作)
@JNTY999
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
52,389subscribers
-19,128 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001831092408 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @JNTY999 @tyhwi |
| Description | 78.com 【独家冠名】 🏆 体育赛事红单推荐|专业分析 · 精选赛事 欢迎来到体育赛事红单推荐!频道专注足球、篮球及热门电竞赛事,提供赛前数据分析、球队状态、历史交锋、伤停情报、大小球与让球方向参考。紧跟全球热门赛事,精选值得关注的比赛,从数据与基本面出发,帮助你更全面地了解赛事走势,理性看待每一场比赛。 ⚽️ 足球推荐|🏀 篮球分析|🎮 电竞赛事|📊 数据研判 |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 97 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/JNTY999 |
Topic
Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Oct 2026, 10:44 | 52,389 | no change |
| 25 Oct 2026, 08:40 | 52,389 | -67 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 12:29 | 52,456 | -43 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 06:48 | 52,499 | -210 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 10:54 | 52,709 | -33 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 06:30 | 52,742 | +377 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 09:26 | 52,365 | -92 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 05:28 | 52,457 | +781 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 03:55 | 51,676 | -17 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 00:19 | 51,693 | -210 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 02:41 | 51,903 | -17 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 19:48 | 51,920 | -146 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 23:21 | 52,066 | -25 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 16:38 | 52,091 | -126 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 21:08 | 52,217 | -12 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 14:47 | 52,229 | -29 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 17:46 | 52,258 | -27 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 11:08 | 52,285 | -67 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 17:29 | 52,352 | -36 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 13:06 | 52,388 | first reading |
Engagement
536 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 168 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 5.99%
- avg views ÷ 52,389 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 3,140
- 219 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.041%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 220
- of 536 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 49 of 219 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 536 (3 August 2026 – 25 October 2026) |
| Views total | 687,756 |
| Reactions total | 71 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 25 Oct 2026, 15:28 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈9,030
- Videos
- ≈1,000
- Links
- ≈3
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 26m 32s
- Average length
- 1m 12s
Measured directly from 22 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
359 reactions across 184 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 212 | 59.1% | |
| 👍 | 80 | 22.3% | |
| 👏 | 21 | 5.85% | |
| 🔥 | 14 | 3.90% | |
| 👌 | 8 | 2.23% | |
| 🎉 | 7 | 1.95% | |
| 💩 | 5 | 1.39% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 0.557% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 0.557% | |
| 👻 | 1 | 0.279% | |
| 😘 | 1 | 0.279% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 0.279% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 0.279% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.279% | |
| 🤬 | 1 | 0.279% | |
| 🥴 | 1 | 0.279% | |
| 🫡 | 1 | 0.279% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 185 of the 536 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 359 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 536 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 25 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
🏴【费尔南德斯终于回报信任,热刺🏴进入争四行列只是时间问题】 热刺客场2-0击败切尔西后,足球评论员詹俊认为,球队取胜的关键在于中场铁三角逐渐成型。此前,德泽尔比一直在调整中场组合,而本场比赛终于确立了费尔南德斯、托纳利与麦迪逊等球员的搭配。费尔南德斯在拖后中场位置上展现出更强的正面对抗能力、防守意识和组织视野,帮助热刺掌握中场主动权。即使麦迪逊下半场被换下,替补登场的加拉格尔也能迅速融入体系。 詹俊表示,热刺今夏花费8500万英镑从西汉姆联引进费尔南德斯,如今他终于回报了俱乐部的信任。随着中场配置逐渐稳定,热刺有望重返积分榜前十,甚至加入英超争四行列。
🇪🇸【对攻大战!🇪🇸巴萨本赛季打进39球西甲最多,🇪🇸皇马23球第二多】 北京时间10月26日04:00,巴萨将在西甲第10轮比赛中主场对阵皇马。 巴萨本赛季联赛打进39球,进球数量断层领跑西甲各队,皇马本赛季联赛打进23球,西甲球队之中第二多,双方是否会上演精彩的对攻大战,让我们拭目以待。
🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 0审核|包出款🤩🤩🤩 东南亚大事件联合担保🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩(电子) 🤩亿级域名|78.COM 🤩官方飞投|充提自由 🔝实力派:78.COM 数字够短 品牌够大 🔥香港六合彩 · 独家盈利无上限! 🤩所有的特码🤩🤩倍 🤩连码三中三🤩🤩🤩倍 🤩百家乐全网最高起步返水🤩% 🤩电子|棋牌|捕鱼起步返水🤩.🤩% 🤩十三水|德州自主组队,无抽佣; 🏆电子单注🤩🤩🤩🤩U一拉; ⭐️百家乐真人视讯台红🤩🤩万U; 🚩诚招代理合作 1.打码返佣,限指定平台; 2.可叠加占成,自选占成比例及游戏平台; 🤩🤩🤩🤩:@DL78 💥高额战绩,巅峰记录持续刷新: 🥇PP电子|极速糖果1000 玩家游戏中购买30000u超级免费旋转,高倍爆奖,最终拿下378万U,已出款; 🥈PG电子|麻将胡了 又又又欧气爆棚,5000U一拉,连番触发,单局斩获233万U; 🥉香港六合彩|特码49倍 爱拼才会赢,大佬单码下注18万U, 一注直接拿下本期最…
2026.10.25 足球早盘推荐 俄超18:45 罗斯托夫VS莫斯科火车头 推荐:客队+0.25 荷甲19:15 福图纳锡塔德VS SBV精英队 推荐:客队0 意甲19:30 国际米兰VS佛罗伦萨 推荐:主队-1.5 西甲21:00 毕尔巴鄂VS赫塔菲 推荐:主队-1 英超22:00 水晶宫VS纽卡斯尔联 推荐:全场大3球 意甲22:00 亚特兰大VS弗洛西诺尼 推荐:主队-1 德甲00:30 弗赖堡VS拜仁慕尼黑 推荐:全场大3.75球 荷甲23:45 鹿特丹斯巴达VS阿贾克斯 推荐:全场大3.5球 西甲01:30 皇家社会VS莱万特 推荐:全场大3球 比甲02:15 圣吉罗斯VS色格拉布鲁日 推荐:主队-1.5
【马卡:姆巴佩和亚马尔上演广告国家德比,两人已赚盆满钵满】 据西班牙《马卡报》报道,即将打响的西班牙国家德比,不但是皇马和巴萨两队的较量,也是姆巴佩和亚马尔在商业领域的比拼。 想象一下现代球迷的一天:你可能住在姆巴佩代言的酒店里,早餐喝着亚马尔推荐的饮料,戴着姆巴佩同款眼镜出门,耳朵上挂着两人共同代言的耳机。当然,到了球场上,你还会穿上他们各自代言的战靴去冲锋陷阵。 在即将到来的皇马对阵巴萨的“国家德比”背后,另一场关于商业价值的较量早已打响。 两位巨星的“吸金”成绩单 亚马尔: 社交媒体粉丝约6000万。合作品牌包括阿迪达斯、Visa、Powerade(动乐)、Beats 耳机、雀巢Nesquik、麦当劳等。 姆巴佩: 粉丝高达1.36亿。手握On(昂跑)、Oakley(欧克利)、Hublot(宇舶表)、迪奥(Dior)、Loewe(罗意威)等高端代言。 据《福布斯》估算,亚马尔每年的广告收入约2000万欧元,而姆巴佩则高达…
【支云官方:新的舞台在前方铺开,不会忘记这份沉甸甸的期待】 中甲联赛第28轮,南通支云1-0深圳青年人,提前两轮锁定下赛季中超准入席位,赛后南通支云官方发文庆祝球队冲超。 南通支云官方: 终场哨响,全取三分!南通支云,成功冲超! 这一刻的荣耀,属于每一位并肩同行的支云第十二人。 我们深知,胜利从不是孤军奋战。回望整个赛季,有焦灼苦战,有跌宕起伏。顺境时,蓝色看台人声鼎沸;低谷里,你们依旧不离不弃,呐喊从未停歇。无论奔赴主客场,还是守在屏幕前支持,是你们持续不断的信任与呐喊,给予了支撑着球队走到此刻的力量。 江海潮涌,矢志相随!新的舞台已经在前方铺开,俱乐部不会忘记这份沉甸甸的期待,中超赛场,我们继续并肩,扎根南通,为南通而战!
🏴【积分平🏴曼城!🏴阿森纳2-0埃弗顿🏴英超3连胜 孔萨处子球加布建功】 英超联赛第8轮,阿森纳坐镇酋长球场迎战埃弗顿。 上半场孔萨破门,马杜埃凯造险,阿森纳暂1-0埃弗顿;下半场加布里埃尔破门, 最终阿森纳2-0埃弗顿,收获英超三连胜,积分追平曼城。
🇪🇸【皇马国家德比大名单:姆巴佩、贝林厄姆领衔,维尼修斯停赛】 西甲第10轮比赛的国家德比,皇马将前往客场挑战巴萨。目前,皇马已经公布了本场比赛大名单,姆巴佩、贝林厄姆领衔,维尼修斯停赛。 以下为具体名单: 门将:库尔图瓦、卢宁、梅斯特雷 后卫:米利唐、赫伊森、阿诺德、科纳特、库库雷利亚、卡雷拉斯、吕迪格、邓弗里斯 中场:贝林厄姆、卡马文加、巴尔韦德、楚阿梅尼、居莱尔、B席、皮塔奇 前锋:恩德里克、姆巴佩、埃斯皮、布拉欣·迪亚斯、迪奥曼德
🏴【拔刺高手!🏴切尔西英超近5战🏴热刺全胜,帕尔默贡献3球2助攻】 切尔西将在本轮英超焦点战迎战热刺,帕尔默的表现值得关注。 数据统计显示,切尔西在英超近5战交锋热刺时保持全胜,而帕尔默在此期间贡献3球2助攻,堪称热刺的最大克星。
🏴【伦敦德比!🏴切尔西官方发布对阵🏴热刺海报,亨德森出镜】 本轮英超将迎来焦点战切尔西对阵热刺,蓝军官方也发布海报为本场比赛预热,海报中是亨德森主罚任意球照片。 切尔西目前7轮过后积13分位列第四,热刺积6分位列第17位。
🏴【冲击8连胜,🏴曼城官方发布对阵🏴维拉海报:谢尔基、胡桑诺夫出镜】 本轮英超曼城将迎战维拉,球队官方也发布海报为本场比赛预热。 海报中谢尔基、胡桑诺夫以及鲁本·迪亚斯出镜,球队目前在英超积分榜上7连胜领跑。
Showing the 12 most recent of 536 posts we hold for @JNTY999. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@JNTY999 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 22 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 22 August 2026
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@tiyuquan · 109,829#1
@tiyutuidan · 8,547#2
@tiyu_hongdan · 6,059#3
@ccty005 · 26,276#4
@tuidan5 · 1,845#5
@tiyu_3 · 87,374#6
@TG408 · 14,001#7
@duanzib · 84,143#8
@tiyutuidan08 · 23,024#9
@gfzs7 · 3,229#10
@xpjty · 6,637#11
@leifengqun · 1,588#12
@tiyutd168 · 27,471#13
@dianjingtuidan1 · 111,927#14
@tiyu09 · 9,706#15
@ybtytd · 162,385#16
@tiyu_188 · 49,999#17
@tiyutuidanguanfang · 217#18
@TJ988 · 5,889#19
@mltytxdy · 48,770#20
@dailibu2 · 1,516#21
@tiyutuidan1 · 1,559#22
@tiyuu_3 · 13#23
@JNTYTD · 259#24
@ybergou · 10,329#25
@TC991919 · 2,005#26
@AFD214 · 1,800#27
@yb188188 · 1,176#28
@qiumi66 · 518#29
@DFHtiyu · 198#30
@xingkongtiyuim · 2,476#31
@daqiugou · 332#32
@zuqiu8 · 35,564#33
@tiyupindao6 · 248#34
@obzs999g · 3,400#35
@tuidanwang888 · 985#36
@wus0088 · 6,269#37
@qiuliao001 · 2,169#38
@jiuyou449 · 13,502#39
@tiyu_pindao · 1,351#40
@fggk57k5 · 663 (as read 22 August 2026)#41
@qiqi89win · 1,101#42
@CP888666 · 1,501#43
@dianjingtuijian · 13,212#44
@zqsh888 · 4,310#45
@xyq836 · 2,613#46
@tiyutuidan5 · 686#47
@Snake188365 · 953#48
@JIAOQIU0009 · 33,272#49
@ybgf9 · 28,523#50
@cftiyu · 2,008#51
@wenjie0425 · 1,656#52
@princeandlisa · 13,827#53
@xieyiqiu9888 · 1,169#54
@bbpp11 · 783#55
@xieyiqiu66 · 9,374#56
@yhtytd · 781#57
@dav6691 · 2,142#58
@briansit666 · 6,856#59
@k0Nof99n5VZlNzY1 · 2,376#60
@ling191919 · 1,434#61
@dashifu1 · 1,575#62
@Jayzzz88 · 2,604#63
@mimi2888 · 10,204#64
@nene8888 · 8,813#65
@zuqiuxieyi · 2,192#66
@fatwinwinwin888 · 1,817#67
@chuhuo8888 · 59,240#68
@gdb012 · 2,691#69
@Jktiyu1 · 4,612#70
@KY99886 · 1,593#71
@aokkodo · 15,823#72
@TG994 · 5,530#73
@fanzha66666 · 644#74
@zbxinwen · 8,510#75
@popo1688 · 223#76
@dabiaoge88888888 · 191#77
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 22 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@mltytxdy · 48,770
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 18 August 2026
@ybtytd · 162,385
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 14 August 2026
@dianjingtuidan1 · 111,927
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 15 August 2026
@tiyuquan · 109,829
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 15 August 2026
@duanzib · 84,143
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 15 August 2026
@tiyu_3 · 87,374
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 14 August 2026
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“体育赛事红单推荐 78.com 【独家冠名】(接广告合作)” (@JNTY999), 52,389 subscribers as measured 25 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/JNTY999.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.