💻晚场的两个小比赛收 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 ✔️瑞士超,年青人-0.5/1,2-0圣加仑 ✔️法国乙,圣埃蒂安-0.5/1,1-0南特 😸😹🤖😺赛后结账,可以走u

Channel
足球❤协议球❤️一手资源🥇包赢
@zuqiu8
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
35,564subscribers
-96 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001491328771 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @zuqiu8 |
| Description | 一手协议足球,体育,包赢,电竞假赛! 赛后盈利55分👾最低5000起投,大额可以面交。‼️首次合作先去看频道置顶消息的合作说明 ⚽️不中包赔全额,合作伙伴共赢!👺唯一联系方式@yc12149 ✅收U地址: TU2ijS4WTJHGrAAR923hu6qi6u88888888 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 47 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/zuqiu8 |
Topic
Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Oct 2026, 09:44 | 35,564 | -17 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 07:30 | 35,581 | -12 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 09:04 | 35,593 | -15 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 12:26 | 35,608 | -9 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 05:30 | 35,617 | -6 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 05:58 | 35,623 | +4 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 06:21 | 35,619 | -15 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 07:26 | 35,634 | +6 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 09:49 | 35,628 | -5 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 12:35 | 35,633 | -15 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 11:28 | 35,648 | -20 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 14:56 | 35,668 | -13 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 05:50 | 35,681 | -69 |
| 9 Oct 2026, 02:21 | 35,750 | -109 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 18:57 | 35,859 | -49 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 23:57 | 35,908 | -109 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 14:38 | 36,017 | -17 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 11:38 | 36,034 | -12 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 23:16 | 36,046 | -13 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 06:01 | 36,059 | first reading |
Engagement
156 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 144 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 3.41%
- avg views ÷ 35,564 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,210
- 73 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 44.4%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 73
- of 156 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 33 of 73 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 156 (23 July 2026 – 24 October 2026) |
| Views total | 88,447 |
| Reactions total | 18,881 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 25 Oct 2026, 12:18 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈5,950
- Videos
- ≈130
- Links
- ≈166
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 2m 38s
- Average length
- 6s
Measured directly from 27 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
81,647 reactions across 106 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 18,389 | 22.5% | |
| 👍 | 18,208 | 22.3% | |
| 🎉 | 18,201 | 22.3% | |
| ❤ | 18,135 | 22.2% | |
| 🤩 | 4,388 | 5.37% | |
| 🥰 | 4,326 | 5.30% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 109 of the 156 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 81,647 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 156 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 24 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
💻周六开门红,先收一场 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 ✔️中甲,南通支云-0.5/1,全场1-0深圳青年人,赢一半 😸😹🤖😺赛后结账,可以走u
💻周六开工,在线的合作伙伴私信上车 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😸😹🤖😺赛后结账,可以走u
❤1
💻足球4场全红,明天继续,周六比赛多 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 ✔️3.00,英超,伊普斯维奇+0/0.5,全场1-1 😸😹🤖😺赛后结账,可以走u
💻足球继续收,三场全红 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 ✔️丹麦甲,科治+0.5,全场2-2哈维德夫 😸😹🤖😺赛后结账,可以走u
💻足球先收2场,晚场继续 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 ✔️罗马尼亚甲,佩特罗鲁+0.5,全场3-1直接赢博托沙尼 ✔️俄罗斯甲,伏尔加格勒甲+0.5,全场1-1莫斯科鱼雷 😸😹🤖😺赛后结账,可以走u
💻CBA出单,在线的合作伙伴速度上车 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😸😹🤖😺赛后结账,可以走u
💻4场全红,收工睡觉,下午7点左右CBA,提前做好准备 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 ✔️7.00,NBA,费城76让2.5分,全场114-106骑士 😸😹🤖😺赛后结账,可以走u
💻足球继续收,今天三场全部拿下舒服 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 ✔️3.00,欧洲协会联赛,霍芬海姆-0.5/1,全场3-0里昂 😸😹🤖😺赛后结账,可以走u
💻足球继续收,猛猛干,明天下午7点也有CBA的比赛 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 ✔️12.45,欧洲协会联赛,卢加诺+0/0.5,直接5-2打爆赫塔费 😸😹🤖😺赛后结账,可以走u
💻CBA打满拿下,12点出足球初盘 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 ✔️山西vs上海,小198.5分,全场103-92,195分 😸😹🤖😺赛后结账,可以走u
💻7点出CBA的单子,在线的合作伙伴7点私信我 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😸😹🤖😺赛后结账,可以走u
Showing the 12 most recent of 156 posts we hold for @zuqiu8. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@chuhuo8888 · 59,240#1
@xyq836 · 2,613#2
@xyq8866 · 19,679#3
@hgxyll88889 · 26,501#4
@gdb012 · 2,691#5
@qiuliao001 · 2,169#6
@JIAOQIU0009 · 33,272#7
@xieyiqiu8688 · 1,415#8
@heimanba365 · 2,339#9
@TGbigfix888 · 315 (as read 1 September 2026)#10
@aa588918 · 67#11
@Snake188365 · 953#12
@xieyiqiu888000 · 442#13
@Jiaoshenweb3 · 414#14
@lanqiuwnba · 300#15
@xieyiqiu9888 · 1,169#16
@SheHuo9 · 344#17
@tuidanwang888 · 985#18
@tiyu09 · 9,706#19
@FootballGPTch · 1,186#20
@dashui22 · 4,796#21
@mltytxdy · 48,770#22
@yinhezhixing · 251#23
@jinqiubaobei_shadu · 1,148#24
@tiyutuidan1 · 1,559#25
@ybtytd · 162,385#26
@YeSu00066 · 4,326#27
@tuidan5 · 1,845#28
@hgw8800 · 3,673#29
@ccty005 · 26,276#30
@tiyu_hongdan · 6,059#31
@TG408 · 14,001#32
@gfzs7 · 3,229#33
@TJ988 · 5,889#34
@hggd88 · 95#35
@heihao2886 · 287#36
@zuqiutuijian08 · 1,304#37
@popo1688 · 223#38
@tyds688 · 651#39
@jiuzhouxinaomenneimu1 · 2,457#40
@hga000 · 10,334#41
@zqds8881 · 2,256#42
@tiyu_pindao · 1,351#43
@Ac03711 · 3,342#44
@jnty4617 · 757#45
@leifengqun · 1,588#46
@tiyu_bet007 · 373#47
@zqsh888 · 4,310#48
@cttacfy · 296#49
@xinaoliu · 559#50
@zuqiuxieyi · 2,192#51
@yb188188 · 1,176#52
@xkty100 · 855#53
@cousin888 · 3,238#54
@lafengxieyi · 382#55
@tongzhi8889 · 413#56
@AFD214 · 1,800#57
@lusjka881 · 6,429#58
@xingyunkaijiang · 32,316#59
@paLiWkL3bs05NjB · 9,986#60
@FixOdds888original · 17,971 (as read 1 September 2026)#61
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 1 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@JIAOQIU0009 · 33,272
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 18 September 2026
@chuhuo8888 · 59,240
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 25 August 2026
@hgxyll88889 · 26,501
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 43 here — alongside 42 others — read 9 September 2026
@mltytxdy · 48,770
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 18 August 2026
@ybtytd · 162,385
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 14 August 2026
@ccty005 · 26,276
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 5 September 2026
@JNTY999 · 52,389
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 22 August 2026
@dianjingtuidan1 · 111,927
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 15 August 2026
@tiyuquan · 109,829
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 15 August 2026
This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“足球❤协议球❤️一手资源🥇包赢” (@zuqiu8), 35,564 subscribers as measured 25 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zuqiu8.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.