Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for کاغظ|KAAGHZ

Channel

کاغظ|KAAGHZ

@Kaa_ghz

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,030subscribers

-141 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001453443330
TypeChannel
Username@Kaa_ghz
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Kaa_ghz

Topic

Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 63% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

9,0309,1719,100.56 August 2026 — 9,171 subscribers7 August 2026 — 9,167 subscribers9 August 2026 — 9,165 subscribers12 August 2026 — 9,156 subscribers15 August 2026 — 9,145 subscribers18 August 2026 — 9,138 subscribers22 August 2026 — 9,127 subscribers25 August 2026 — 9,112 subscribers28 August 2026 — 9,098 subscribers31 August 2026 — 9,092 subscribers3 September 2026 — 9,083 subscribers8 September 2026 — 9,071 subscribers12 September 2026 — 9,061 subscribers15 September 2026 — 9,047 subscribers19 September 2026 — 9,030 subscribers6 August 202619 September 2026
15 measurements spanning 44 days, net -141. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,009–9,192 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 17:219,030-17
15 Sept 2026, 15:209,047-14
12 Sept 2026, 05:219,061-10
8 Sept 2026, 07:409,071-12
3 Sept 2026, 12:189,083-9
31 Aug 2026, 12:479,092-6
28 Aug 2026, 13:039,098-14
25 Aug 2026, 04:169,112-15
22 Aug 2026, 06:139,127-11
18 Aug 2026, 12:049,138-7
15 Aug 2026, 19:289,145-11
12 Aug 2026, 13:549,156-9
9 Aug 2026, 18:119,165-2
7 Aug 2026, 01:569,167-4
6 Aug 2026, 07:219,171first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 26 April 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 31 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 21 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

732 reactions across 21 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
42758.3%
👍22430.6%
😢456.15%
🕊212.87%
😁121.64%
👎30.41%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 732 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 26 April 2025 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 14:41 UTC932 views15 reactionsread 28 August 2026

واقعا رمز هر موفقیتی استمراره! میخوای زبان یاد بگیری؟ استمرار. هیکل قشنگ؟ استمرار. ساز جدید؟ استمرار. رزومه ی قوی؟ استمرار... خلاصه که سمج بودن جواب میده. @Kaa_ghz

👍87

3 Aug 2026, 21:07 UTC≈1,510 views32 reactionsread 28 August 2026

تشکر‌کردن رو یاد بگیرید؛ از نگهبان پارکینگ از راننده اسنپ از شریک عاطفی از دوستی که برات کاری انجام داده از همکاری که کمکت کرده آدم‌ها برده ما نیستند… @Kaa_ghz

👍2111

14 Jul 2026, 14:59 UTC≈2,370 views42 reactionsread 28 August 2026

جنوبیای عزیز، عمری سفره‌نشین خوانِ کرَمِ شما بودیم. قلب ما در این شب‌ها برای شما سرمایه‌دارانِ همیشه بی‌نصیب می‌تپه 🫂♥️ @Kaa_ghz

38😢3😁1

14 Feb 2026, 09:46 UTC≈4,210 views32 reactionsread 28 August 2026

حدود ۱۱۰ میلیارد انسان تا امروز به دنیا آمده‌اند. بیش از ۹۰٪شان حالا زیر خاک‌اند. همه‌شان بعد از خلقت آمدند، نفس کشیدند، جنگیدند، عاشق شدند، خراج و مالیات دادند… و رفتند. هرکدام فکر می‌کردند زمانه‌شان خاص است. ما هم همین‌طور فکر می‌کنیم. تاریخ، قبرستانِ اعتماد به‌نفس بشر است. @Kaa_ghz

28😢4

12 Feb 2026, 14:41 UTC≈4,100 views26 reactionsread 28 August 2026

«رنج‌های ما اگرچه پیرمان کرد، اما از ما کسی را ساخت که هرگز فکر نمی‌کردیم برای آن به دنیا آمده باشیم.» @Kaa_ghz

26

29 Jan 2026, 14:10 UTC≈4,890 views44 reactionsread 28 August 2026

ما كه جوانى نكرديم ! يعنى وقت و حوصله‌اش را نداشتيم ! ما سرمان شلوغ بود، خيلى شلوغ !!! به قدرى فكر و مشغله روىِ سرمان سنگینی مى‌كرد كه درکِ درستى از سن و سال نداشتيم ... ما حتى كودكى هم نكرديم ، چشم باز كرديم و پیر بوديم ... ما قربانيانِ بدترين برهه‌ى تاريخ بوديم ! نسلِ جوانى هایِ بر باد رفته ... نسلِ بحران و بلا تكليفى ... نسلى كه بدونِ فرياد ،در دلِ آتشِ زمانه سوخت ! ما كم سن و سال ترين سالمندانِ تاريخ بوديم

😢1612👍8🕊8

4 Jan 2026, 15:26 UTC≈4,830 views39 reactionsread 28 August 2026

امیدوارم روزی اگه همه چی درست شد هنوز درونمون شور و ذوقی واسه زندگی کردن مونده باشه ؛) @Kaa_ghz

👍16😢108👎3🕊2

30 Dec 2025, 18:39 UTC≈4,870 views29 reactionsread 28 August 2026

قبل از اینکه با کسی بحث کنید از خود بپرسید: آیا این شخص از لحاظ ذهنی به اندازه کافی بالغ است تا مفهوم دیدگاه متفاوت را درک کند؟ اگر نه، دلیلی برای بحث نیست تمام @Kaa_ghz

19👍6🕊4

27 Dec 2025, 21:10 UTC≈4,590 views8 reactionsread 28 August 2026

‏" بعضی از روابط مثل دندون عقلن " شاید با تموم کردنش یک دفعه درد زیادی رو تحمل کنی اما باید ازش بگذری تا مجبور نباشی مدام یه درد تدریجی رو تحمل کنی... چون این درد تدریجی از درون نابودت میکنه،خوشیاتو، عزت نفس و اعتماد به نفستو ازت میگیره به خاطر چی، به خاطر موندن تو یک رابطه مسموم.. @Kaa_ghz

👍62

26 Oct 2025, 05:37 UTC≈6,080 views24 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

زندگی چیست؟ •داستایفسکی: جهنم است •سقراط: امتحان است •ارسطو: ذهن است •نیچه: قدرت است •فروید: مرگ است •مارکس: ایده است •پیکاسو: هنر است •گاندی: عشق است •شوپنهاور: رنج است •راسل: رقابت است •استیو جابز: ایمان است •اینشتین: دانش است •هاوکینگ: امید است •کافکا: آغاز است @Kaa_ghz

22🕊2

17 Sept 2025, 11:04 UTC≈6,210 views40 reactionsread 28 August 2026

هرچی بزرگتر میشی میفهمی پخته‌ترین و‌ موثرترین راه مجازات برا آدما تنش نیس بلکه تحریم ارتباطی اوناس @Kaa_ghz

21👍19

5 Sept 2025, 23:26 UTC≈7,190 views39 reactionsread 28 August 2026

‏خودش شبیه "تراکنش ناموفقه" از ظاهر دیگران ایراد می‌گیره. @Kaa_ghz

17👍11😁11

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @Kaa_ghz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ته خیار...
@tah_khiar · 38,990
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 31 August 2026
BOOK | کتاب
@BooksCom · 62,106
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 21 August 2026
كـپشنيسم
@Captionissm · 50,965
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 2 September 2026
استور‌ی فیک (اینستاگرام)
@storyefake · 125,068
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 15 August 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“کاغظ|KAAGHZ” (@Kaa_ghz), 9,030 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Kaa_ghz.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.