Channel
@Captionissm
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
51,664subscribers
-2,386 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001079655927 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Captionissm |
| Description | ارتباط با ما و تبلیغات👇🏻 @creatoorm |
| Created | Between 1 September 2016 and 30 September 2017 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 29 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Captionissm |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 45% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Sept 2026, 23:36 | 51,664 | -127 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 09:35 | 51,791 | -77 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 00:55 | 51,868 | -49 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 00:46 | 51,917 | -59 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 21:18 | 51,976 | -86 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 18:25 | 52,062 | -72 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 18:43 | 52,134 | -84 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 21:52 | 52,218 | -61 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 18:22 | 52,279 | -50 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 20:52 | 52,329 | -35 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 19:54 | 52,364 | -63 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 08:06 | 52,427 | -77 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 16:39 | 52,504 | -95 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 12:23 | 52,599 | -47 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 11:44 | 52,646 | -59 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 11:36 | 52,705 | -70 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 10:38 | 52,775 | -118 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 16:49 | 52,893 | -190 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 05:46 | 53,083 | -79 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 23:56 | 53,162 | first reading |
116 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 66 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 116 (2 August 2026 – 6 September 2026) |
| Views total | 461,010 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Sept 2026, 20:51 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
⭕️سلام مریم صالحی ام ۲۲ سالمه و دانشجوم حقوقم ماهی ۳۰۰- ۴۰۰ میلیونه و پولدارترین فرد خانوادم هستم همه میپرسن رمز چی میزنی شوگر داری گنج پیدا کردی انقدی که میپرسن خسته شدم یکبار و برای همیشه میگم این چنل بود که زندگیمو عوض کرد ازش ممنونم جوین بشید👇 https://t.me/+p9u4DlmOGV01NTA0 https://t.me/+p9u4DlmOGV01NTA0
پست زیر تبلیغ میباشد، و هیچ مسئولیتی به عهده کانال کپشنیسم نمیباشد.
دیروز یه جملهی کوردی دلبر یاد گرفتم که میگفت: «درد چاویل مستت له گیانم» یعنی: «درد و بلای چشای مستت به جونم» برای اونایی که چشماشون قشنگه، خیلی کاربرد داره... @Captionissm
دستِ کم ما یکدیگر را داریم اثر لوکا پونزاتو. @Captionissm
یه افسانهی خیلی قشنگی هست که میگه: «اگه لایقش باشی بهت تعلق میگیره و اگه لیاقتِ بیشتر از اونو داشته باشی ازت گرفته میشه…» پس بیخود برای چیزای که از دست دادید ناراحت نباشید، حتماً قراره بهترش گیرتون بیاد! @Captionissm
پسر خوشگله در واقع اون پسریه که باهات خوشگل رفتار میکنه؛ وگرنه که دست بالای دست بسیاااااره :)) @Captionissm
آدم در بزرگسالی یاد میگیره که گاهی دوستیها منقضی میشن. تقصیر کسی هم نیست. انگار عمرش تموم میشه و یواشیواش میمیره، بدون اینکه دلخوریای پیش اومده باشه. @Captionissm
kind women are not free therapists. زنهای مهربون تراپیست رایگان شما نیستن. @Captionissm
صبح بخیر... خورشید، سلامش را با نور فرستاده؛ تو هم امروز را با امید آغاز کن، شاید زیباترین اتفاق، همین امروز در انتظارت باشد.🍃🤍 @Captionissm
تا اینجای زندگی فقط حق با فروغ فرخزاد بوده که گفته: از دست زندگی خسته شدهام. هرقدر به مسخرگی میگذرانم میبینم نمیشود که نمیشود. @Captionissm
آیا کسی رنج مرا میبیند اثر لوکا پونزاتو. @Captionissm
دکتر بابایی زاد تو پادکستش گفت: "تا جایی مسئولیت بپذیر که مانع مسئولیت پذیری دیگران نشی" درخشان✨️ @Captionissm
Showing the 12 most recent of 116 posts we hold for @Captionissm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 2 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“كـپشنيسم” (@Captionissm), 51,664 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Captionissm.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.