Channel
@KedrLubnany
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,950subscribers
-19 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001179522300 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @KedrLubnany |
| Created | 13 July 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/KedrLubnany |
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 01:38 | 1,950 | -6 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 19:39 | 1,956 | -2 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 22:38 | 1,958 | -5 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 19:18 | 1,963 | +1 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 03:04 | 1,962 | -4 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 23:53 | 1,966 | +2 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 13:12 | 1,964 | -1 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 23:07 | 1,965 | -2 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 04:26 | 1,967 | -4 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 07:05 | 1,971 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 11:52 | 1,970 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 06:32 | 1,969 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:18 | 1,969 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
252 reactions across 17 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤬 | 96 | 38.1% | |
| 😢 | 39 | 15.5% | |
| 👍 | 34 | 13.5% | |
| 🔥 | 25 | 9.92% | |
| 🤡 | 22 | 8.73% | |
| 👏 | 12 | 4.76% | |
| ❤ | 7 | 2.78% | |
| 🤔 | 7 | 2.78% | |
| 😁 | 4 | 1.59% | |
| 👎 | 3 | 1.19% | |
| 🤯 | 2 | 0.794% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 0.397% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 297 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
США направили Израилю сообщение о том, что Хезболла не нарушила соглашение о прекращении огня, и призвали его воздержаться от ответных атак. Вашингтон отметил, что по оценке Израиля СВУ было заложено до прекращения огня. Израиль продолжает атаковать населенные пункты юга Ливана. В ночь на пятницу армия Ливана вошла в населенный пункт аль-Мансури, чтобы расчистить дороги после израильских обстрелов и ударов. Пытаясь…
🤬8👍1
Последствия ночного удара армии Израиля по Бурдж-эш-Шамали.
🤬4🔥1🤔1🤡1
В Риме проходит третий и заключительный день переговоров между представителями Израиля и Ливана, посвященных реализации соглашения о выводе израильских войск с юга Ливана в ответ на разоружение Хезболлы. В среду переговоры завершились на три часа раньше назначенного времени. Представитель Госдепартамента США заявил, что досрочное завершение произошло из-за "событий на местах". Двое израильских солдат погибли и 7 был…
🤔1
Израильский танк Меркава выпускает снаряды по окраине населенного пункта аль-Хания на юге Ливана.
🤬9😢3👏1🔥1😱1
После ранения израильских военнослужащих в Мадждаль-Зуне ЦАХАЛ интенсифицировал удары по югу Ливана. Уничтожается водная инфраструктура и сельскохозяйственные угодья.
🤬7👍4
⚡️ Армия Израиля нарушила режим прекращения огня Израиль выпустил предупреждение об эвакуации для жителей населенного пункта Мансури на юге Ливана и нанес серию авиаударов. ЦАХАЛ заявил, что авиаудары по населенному пункту стали ответом на гибель двух и ранение семи израильских военнослужащих в результате подрыва самодельного взрывного устройства, заложенного Хезболлой.
🤬6👍2
Премьер-министр Ливана Наваф Салам опубликовал ответ лидеру Хезболлы, обвинившему власти Ливана в помощи Израилю: На самом же деле наибольшую поддержку Израилю оказал именно тот, кто «прославился» тем, что втянул Ливан в бессмысленные военные авантюры под предлогом «оказания поддержки», тем самым дав врагу повод для агрессии против нашей страны, попрания ее суверенитета, разрушения городов и сел, убийства граждан и …
👍10❤4👏1
Спутниковые снимки свидетельствуют, что почти все жилые дома в городе Айта аш-Шааб на юге Ливана разрушены армией Израиля.
😢11🤬3🔥2
Лидер Хезболлы шейх Наим Касем выступил с телевизионным обращением в преддверии нового раунда переговоров между Израилем и Ливаном в Риме. В обращении он обвинил правительство Ливана в том, что вступив в очередные переговоры с Израилем, оно работает на интересы Израиля, а не собственного народа. Кроме этого, шейх Касем заявил, что не видит препятствий для встречи Хезболлы и сирийских лидеров. Он подчеркнул, что ста…
🤡7👎3👍1🤯1
Сообщается, что в воскресенье 5 солдат армии Ливана получили легкие ранения в результате израильской атаки во время сопровождения местных жителей в Кафре на юге Ливана. ЦАХАЛ отвергает обвинения и заявляет, что автомобиль подорвался на взрывном устройстве, которое принадлежало не Израилю, а Хезболле.
🤬5👏3🤡1🤯1
Армия Израиля сбрасывает зажигательные боеприпасы на Талет Али Аль Тахер на юге Ливана.
🔥7😢7🤬6🤔3
Президент Ливана Джозеф Аун посетил Турцию с официальным визитом. Это первый визит президента Ливана в Турцию за последние 17 лет (и всего третий за 70 лет). Аун выразил намерение заручиться поддержкой Турции в реализации рамочного соглашения с Израилем и экономического восстановления юга Ливана. Президент Турции Реджеп Эрдоган подтвердил поддержку и заявил, что Турция готова участвовать в международных инициатива…
👏7🤡5
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @KedrLubnany. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Кедр Ливанский” (@KedrLubnany), 1,950 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/KedrLubnany.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.