Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Kesselbunte

Channel

Kesselbunte

@Kesselbunte

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,502subscribers

+6 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001370959074
TypeChannel
Username@Kesselbunte
Created22 February 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 September 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Kesselbunte

Growth

1,4801,5021,4916 August 2026 — 1,496 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,496 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,492 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,489 subscribers19 August 2026 — 1,487 subscribers23 August 2026 — 1,484 subscribers26 August 2026 — 1,483 subscribers1 September 2026 — 1,480 subscribers5 September 2026 — 1,502 subscribers6 August 20265 September 2026
9 measurements spanning 31 days, net +6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,477–1,505 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Sept 2026, 22:011,502+22
1 Sept 2026, 17:561,480-3
26 Aug 2026, 09:591,483-1
23 Aug 2026, 03:481,484-3
19 Aug 2026, 13:381,487-2
16 Aug 2026, 18:461,489-3
13 Aug 2026, 15:561,492-4
6 Aug 2026, 11:361,496no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:491,496first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 1 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
5m 34s
Average length
1m 51s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

127 reactions across 18 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍2217.3%
🤮1915.0%
😁1713.4%
🤬1511.8%
🔥1310.2%
💩118.66%
🖕75.51%
🤡75.51%
43.15%
😈43.15%
🤔43.15%
🤪32.36%
🙏10.787%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 127 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 1 March 2026 to 11 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Mar 2026, 08:21 UTC≈1,420 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://www.bild.de/politik/inland/skandal-im-jugendzentrum-muslimische-taeter-ungeschoren-senat-greift-ein-69af181b64d1f5a2cd517f4c

🔥31

11 Mar 2026, 07:40 UTC≈1,210 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @rosenbuschVideo

„Schicken Sie uns Ihre Söhne — es lohnt sich für Sie“ Der legendäre Georg Schramm 2008 zum Iran. t.me/Rosenbusch

👍9

11 Mar 2026, 07:39 UTC≈1,020 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @reitschusterde

Ausgerechnet die CDU entdeckt plötzlich das Ehegattensplitting als Problem. Bildungsministerin Karin Prien will Steuerklassen und Splitting verändern – im Namen der Gleichberechtigung. Mathematik-Professor Thomas Rießinger nimmt die Argumente auseinander und stellt eine unangenehme Frage: Wem nützt diese Reform wirklich? https://reitschuster.de/post/frontalangriff-aufs-ehegattensplitting-ausgerechnet-von-cdu-minister

🔥5😁1

11 Mar 2026, 07:36 UTC812 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @mischpokerPhoto

Firmenpleiten um 58% gestiegen!

😁2🤔1

11 Mar 2026, 05:11 UTC705 viewsread 7 August 2026

https://x.com/EvaHermanEx_ARD/status/2031316900903358476?s=20

10 Mar 2026, 08:55 UTC≈1,190 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

. Der Bürokratieabbau in Deutschland: https://www.bild.de/politik/ronzheimer-report-landwirtin-soll-fahrtenbuch-fuer-sackkarre-fuehren-69ad67ca161cd9d527cd87a9

💩5🤪2

10 Mar 2026, 06:23 UTC634 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

😳 Update: https://www.bild.de/news/inland/in-rheinland-pfalz-meteoriten-teile-beschaedigen-haeuser-69adc532161cd9d527cd8e5c

🔥1

7 Mar 2026, 09:00 UTC705 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @dennis_hohlochVideo

Aus diesem Grund werden die Altparteien nie etwas gegen hohe Spritpreise unternehmen.

🔥1

7 Mar 2026, 08:58 UTC588 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @apollonews_dePhoto

Eine Lehrerin in Nordrhein-Westfalen hat ihren Schülern gesagt, dass sie sich beim Essen „wegdrehen“ sollen, um muslimische Schüler, die fasten, nicht zu provozieren. Eltern berichten zudem, dass ihre Kinder bedrängt und ausgeschlossen wurden. https://apollo-news.net/wegen-ramadan-lehrerin-sagt-schlern-sie-sollen-sich-beim-essen-wegdrehen/

🤬111🔥1🤡1

7 Mar 2026, 08:56 UTC523 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @mkl1960Photo

Weiterhin gestaltet sich der Kampf der Brüsseler Bürokratur gegen den Mittelstand erfolgreich. Die Gesellschaft wird enteignet und entrechtet und von globalen Konzernen abhängig gemacht. Insbesondere die heimische Landwirtschaft wird unter Druck gesetzt, weil sie gesunde Nahrung erzeugt. Der Klimaschutz verlangt, daß die Menschen sich von Wanzen und Mehlwürmern und sonstigen Unappetitlichkeiten ernähren sollen, die v

💩3🔥1😈1

7 Mar 2026, 08:55 UTC477 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @tomdabassmanPhoto

Gibt es beim interkulturellen Fastenbrechen, wie hier zb an der Uni Hannover, eigentlich auch ein saftiges Schweinenackensteak, aus Rücksicht auf die christlichen Teilnehmer?? Es ist ja interkulturell, Toleranz und so. https://x.com/i/status/2030062402675323308

🤮4💩2😁21

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @Kesselbunte. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Snicklink unzensiert
@snicklink3000 · 32,231
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 5 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Kesselbunte” (@Kesselbunte), 1,502 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Kesselbunte.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.