۱۰درصد بونوس شارژ اضافه از طریق کریپتو به همراه پوکر انلاین با میزهای پر از بازیکن Https://brool90.com/

Channel
خورشید کشتی
@Khorshide_Koshti
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
50,757subscribers
+298 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001267653920 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Khorshide_Koshti |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 36 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Khorshide_Koshti |
Topic
Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Sept 2026, 07:37 | 50,757 | -356 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 06:35 | 51,113 | -114 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 20:16 | 51,227 | -49 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 00:38 | 51,276 | -61 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 13:37 | 51,337 | -42 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 21:41 | 51,379 | -43 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 10:38 | 51,422 | -42 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 00:57 | 51,464 | +169 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 19:41 | 51,295 | +169 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 08:52 | 51,126 | +151 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 09:35 | 50,975 | +105 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 06:12 | 50,870 | +67 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 03:45 | 50,803 | +87 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 03:26 | 50,716 | +119 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 05:23 | 50,597 | +72 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 08:46 | 50,525 | +144 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 08:53 | 50,381 | +126 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 08:16 | 50,255 | +90 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 08:16 | 50,165 | +183 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 17:55 | 49,982 | first reading |
Engagement
1,091 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 107 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 3.62%
- avg views ÷ 50,757 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,840
- 535 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 2.34%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 537
- of 1,091 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 435 of 535 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 1,091 (5 August 2026 – 25 September 2026) |
| Views total | 982,851 |
| Reactions total | 19,205 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 26 Sept 2026, 05:27 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 2h 41m
- Average length
- 51s
Measured directly from 188 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
30,507 reactions across 782 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 13,455 | 44.1% | |
| 🔥 | 6,447 | 21.1% | |
| 👍 | 3,024 | 9.91% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2,307 | 7.56% | |
| 🤣 | 1,545 | 5.06% | |
| 💔 | 1,538 | 5.04% | |
| 👎 | 1,043 | 3.42% | |
| 👌 | 288 | 0.944% | |
| 😍 | 227 | 0.744% | |
| 💯 | 113 | 0.37% | |
| 👏 | 112 | 0.367% | |
| 😐 | 110 | 0.361% | |
| ⚡ | 91 | 0.298% | |
| 🏆 | 50 | 0.164% | |
| 😱 | 50 | 0.164% | |
| 😢 | 40 | 0.131% | |
| 😭 | 33 | 0.108% | |
| 🫡 | 22 | 0.072% | |
| 😎 | 12 | 0.039% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 798 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 30,507 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 9 August 2026 to 25 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 5
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 5
- of 995 we hold a reading for · 0.5%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Khorshide_Koshti. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold for this entry (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 9 August 2026 to 25 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
🔥هیجان را در بت روول تجربه کنید🔥 💥آپشنهای متنوع با بالاترین ضرایب 🧮انواع روشهای شارژ ریالی و کریپتو ✳️کریپتو شارژ کن کریپتو برداشت کن 📝پشتیبانی ۲۴ ساعته 💸واریز جوایز در سریعترین زمان 📲لینک اصلی سایت 👇 Https://brool90.com/ هم اکنون به ما بپیوندید👇🏻 https://t.me/+F3tc1A9Lu9FjMjY0
❤1
#شب_بخیر❤️🌹 #maryam @khorshide_koshti
❤22🤣4❤🔥1
دوستان راجب امین کاویانی نژاد اشتباه کردیم دوپینگی شخص دیگه ای بوده ولی خب دوستان میگن اسمش رو نبرین عرض معذرت خدمت امین کاویانی نژاد #SORENA @Khorshide_Koshti
❤15
4 دوپینگی کشتی فرنگی در یک سال اخیر: ایمان محمدی در قهرمانی امید های جهان 2025 ناصر علیزاده در قهرمانی کشور 2026 محمدامین حسینی در قهرمانی کشور 2026 همگی افراد مقصر را افرادی دانسته اند که به آنها مکمل داده اند و فدراسیون هم به دلیل اینکه هرکس دوپینگ میکند مشکل را مکمل اشتباه می داند برایش این قصه تکراری شده است و رای را به وادا سپرده است. #SORENA @Khorshide_Koshti
👍19❤3
#بازی_های_آسیایی_ناگویا_2026 تحلیلی از محمدجواد رضایی نماینده 67 کیلوگرم ایران در بازی های آسیایی و ویدیویی از منتخب کشتی های او با تایشی ناریکونی🇯🇵 قهرمان جهان و رزاق بیشکیف🇰🇬 قهرمان آسیا🔥🔥🔥 با تشکر از آناهیتای عزیز بابت فرستادن این دو کشتی🙏🙏🙏 بدون شک و هیچ اغراقی محمدجواد رضایی را می توان مرد پیروز چرخه انتخابی سال 2026 دانست؛ او ابتدا در مسابقات کشوری و سپس در رنکینگ آلبانی قهرمان شد و بعد از آن در قهرمانی آسیا…
❤27❤🔥1😍1
🇺🇸🎙 صحبتهای کایل اسنایدر در اپیزود سوم پادکست اتحادیه جهانی کشتی پیرامون رفاقتش با حسن یزدانی! #DeBruyne @khorshide_koshti
❤55🔥7👎2
#سوپرلیگ_کشتی_ایران_1405 کنده فرنگی های خیره کننده رضا آذرشب در لیگ برتر امروز در قم🥶🥶🥶 #SORENA @Khorshide_Koshti
❤🔥33❤7👌2
#سوپرلیگ_کشتی_ایران_1405 پیروزی 6 به 4 استقلال قم در گام اول لیگ برتر کشتی فرنگی ⚪️میکائیل احمدی 5 🔵کیانوش شمشیری 13 ⚪️حسین جاویدی 4 🔵امیرعلی حیدری 3 ⚪️امید احمدی 4 🔵رضا قیطاسی 3 ⚪️رضا عباسی 4 🔵علی چوبک زن 3 ⚪️محمدمعراج مهمدی 6 🔵ابوالفضل شیری 3 ⚪️امیررضا اسکندری فر 0 🔵امیر عبدی 8 ⚪️قریشوندی 0 🔵رضا آذرشب 9 ⚪️محمدامین احمدپور 3 🔵محمدحسین استادمحمد 7 ⚪️علی عابدی درزی 3 🔵امیررضا مرادیان 7 ⚪️آرمان طهماسبی 1 🔵وح…
🔥16❤3🤣3👍1
خورشید کشتی pinned «#قهرمانی_جهان_قزاقستان_2026 #بازی_های_آسیایی_ناگویا_2026 #قهرمانی_امیدهای_جهان_2026 برنامه اختصاصی فرنگی کاران در یک ماه آینده: *قهرمانی جهان آستانه شنبه 2 آبان: پیام احمدی 55 علی احمدی وفا 60 علی اسکو 77 غلامرضا فرخی 82 مراحل 1/16 تا 1/4 نهایی: 9:00…»
#قهرمانی_جهان_قزاقستان_2026 #بازی_های_آسیایی_ناگویا_2026 #قهرمانی_امیدهای_جهان_2026 برنامه اختصاصی فرنگی کاران در یک ماه آینده: *قهرمانی جهان آستانه شنبه 2 آبان: پیام احمدی 55 علی احمدی وفا 60 علی اسکو 77 غلامرضا فرخی 82 مراحل 1/16 تا 1/4 نهایی: 9:00 تا 13:00 نیمه نهایی: 17:30 تا 19:00 یکشنبه 3 آبان: دانیال سهرابی 72 محمدهادی ساروی 97 فردین هدایتی 130 مراحل 1/16 تا 1/4 نهایی و شانس مجدد 4 وزن اول: 9:00 تا 13:0…
❤15❤🔥1
کم کم رقابت کشتی شروع میشه🔥🔥 #Nico @Khorshide_Koshti
🔥8
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,091 posts we hold for @Khorshide_Koshti. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@Khorshide_Koshti edited 8 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 9 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 5 September 2026
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
از پوشش رقابت های فرنگی راضیی بودید؟
- بله83%
- خیر17%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 9 August 2026 to 25 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@wepari2 · 6,81350 postsمل بت
@melbet_chaneel · 49,17312 postsMelBet | مل بت
@MelBet_Iran1 · 114,6365 postsآموزش لاین بت
@global_line10 · 10,5774 postsWinro.io
@winro_io · 11,7293 postsYEKBET - یکبت
@yekbet · 77,7653 postsBest Form
@best_form · 25,4202 postsکانال شرطبندی دربی کلاب
@derbybetm · 342,1732 postsآموزش وان ایکس بت
@Education_iran_wanx · 5162 postsHUNTER BET
@HUNTTER_BET · 7,1052 posts𝗟𝗜𝗡𝗘𝗕𝗘𝗧 لاین بت
@linebet_tel · 60,0482 posts1xbet channel
@onexbetiranm · 20,6092 postsRitzoBet
@Ritzobets_official · 5,0452 postsبازی های آسیایی
@ar_sportt · 1,5781 postDobordcom
@dobordcom · 2,8391 postوان ایکس بت
@onexbet_iran_chanel · 99,1301 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@Khorshide_Koshti named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 12 September 2026 – 12 September 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@koshti_media · 37,684#1
@varzesh_iran1401 · 6,672#2
@varzesh3 · 1,294,847#3
@total_fut · 145,447#4
@iMTProto · 7,575,470#5
@ft360_ir · 420,170#6
@JiimmyJump · 24,459#7
@drtel · 776,962#8
@channel_varzeshiran · 3,563#9
@iawfir · 13,155#10
@iRoProxy · 7,909,421#11
@TweetyChannel · 786,652#12
@esteghlalpage · 413,274#13
@UniiqueSport · 1,671#14
@EsteghlalFc_We · 145,064#15
@khanehkoshti_ir · 3,506#16
@SportBadTweet · 142,520#17
@proxy_qavi · 3,388,327#18
@MemeHubOriginal · 97,113#19
@alonews · 1,021,488#20
@Abion · 15,443#21
@Ye_DaneshAmoz · 934,193#22
@EfshaKhabar · 274,371#23
@bistodo_ir · 141,471#24
@KH_B2 · 4,517,513#25
@hasanyazdani73 · 1,406#26
@chekhabarre · 245,390#27
@futballbadtv · 323,404#28
@FutballBadBoys · 107,222#29
@SportTime_Tel · 7,424#30
@SportBaadNews · 901,685#31
@vaarzesh_plus · 316,357#32
@bistodo · 388,024#33
@rapking · 308,288#34
@CottageOrg · 799,794#35
@totalfut_plus · 58,762#36
@VolleyWorld · 52,606#37
@Futball180TV · 400,330#38
@NBAmentality · 7,501#39
@Badss_ir · 46,788#40
@FUTBALLI18 · 489,664#41
@badsoccer · 123,169#42
@footballvision2 · 70,624#43
@Dashaghnews · 112,241#44
@darkproxy · 4,702,475#45
@Varzesh_IRAN24 · 602#46
@FutNewsCH · 30,524#47
@Barca_We · 170,577#48
@SikimSportz · 249,065#49
@hip_hopi · 312,236#50
@NationalFantasyy · 2,720#51
@bistodo_tweet · 28,753#52
@funhiphop · 253,076#53
@darknews · 88,920#54
@RapGodNews · 189,276#55
@PersianGulf_Fantasy · 2,548#56
@OlympicMentality24 · 955#57
@FutballBoys · 2#58
@Realmadrid_we · 144,012#59
@total_twitt · 30,874#60
@Megavolleyball · 10,880#61
@Sorkh1967 · 1,903,686#62
@tweet_varzeshplus · 32,888#63
@tarafdari · 101,894#64
@Footballii_Apps · 1,095#65
@iran_sport2024 · 14,366#66
@lran_Varzesh2023 · 548#67
@officialpersiatwiter · 567,891#68
@EsteghlalfcTelegram · 240,122#69
@es_qb · 5,028,986#70
@razcom · 1,232,708#71
@sportIsna · 8,458#72
@RapBad_Newz · 270,156#73
@Esteghlallinews · 1,676,320#74
@Futball_Fuckk · 759,192#75
@RapPlusNews · 88,900#76
@fcpersepolis_club · 204,227#77
@raptv · 365,865#78
@HipHopTweety · 207,619#79
@RegaPlus · 1,474,377#80
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 25 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@IRIVF · 54,410
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 24 August 2026
@VolleyWorld · 52,606
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 24 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“خورشید کشتی” (@Khorshide_Koshti), 50,757 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Khorshide_Koshti.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.