Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Kref

Channel

Kref

@Kref_sews

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

146subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002976611664
TypeChannel
Username@Kref_sews
CreatedBetween 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live3 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 3 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Kref_sews

Growth

146149147.511 August 2026 — 149 subscribers11 August 2026 — 149 subscribers19 August 2026 — 147 subscribers3 September 2026 — 146 subscribers11 August 20263 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 22 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 146–149 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Sept 2026, 00:54146-1
19 Aug 2026, 10:57147-2
11 Aug 2026, 19:53149no change
11 Aug 2026, 17:17149first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 5 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
12s
Average length
6s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

35 reactions across 8 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🍓1337.1%
custom 52850378699692182981131.4%
617.1%
custom 523333417748663586338.57%
custom 528726224212175017425.71%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 35 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 5 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 09:57 UTC15 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

custom 52850378699692182982🍓1

Signed 𐌺ρᥱɸ!

31 Jul 2026, 17:13 UTC39 views6 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Просто так

🍓3custom 52872622421217501742custom 52333341774866358631

Signed 𐌺ρᥱɸ!

30 Jul 2026, 18:32 UTC40 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Старый заказ 🤩 🧽 🪽϶н∂и 🤩🤩 ❌❌🤩❌🌟 🥹 🤩 Цᴇнᥲ🥹 425 ⲣγδ᧘ᴇй 🤩 Затраченное время ➡️ 4 ∂ዘᴙ ⊂делан для — @alicerwep_46 🥹 🤩🤩 🌟 🤩 Оⲧⳅьɩɞ оⲧ ⳅакᴀзчυка: Я очень довольна! В жизни ещё круче, чем на фото. Перейдайте тому, кто шил, что скилл заметно улучшился. Желаю двигаться только вперёд! Спасибо большое 🖤 🖤 🍌🍌 🥹 ዘужен похожий брелок ? 🥹 🌟 Предзаказы ◀️ 🤩 ( Оᥴⲧᴀᴧᴏсь 2 слσтᥲ ) 🧽

3custom 52850378699692182981

Signed 𐌺ρᥱɸ!

30 Jul 2026, 17:36 UTC38 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Зип зип зиипипи 🤩 Скоро ещё пост будет)) #Арт #Ос

custom 52850378699692182983

Signed 𐌺ρᥱɸ!

11 Jul 2026, 18:38 UTC66 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Закончил 😈 #Арт #Ос

custom 52850378699692182982custom 52333341774866358631

Signed 𐌺ρᥱɸ!

9 Jul 2026, 18:31 UTC71 views6 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

И вот таких еще 6 штук 🌟 #Ос

🍓4custom 52850378699692182982

Signed Юᥴя 𐌺ρᥱɸъ

7 Jul 2026, 12:53 UTC79 views6 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

🤩 по быстренькому #Арт #Ос

3🍓1custom 52333341774866358631custom 52850378699692182981

Signed Kreꜰ̆̈ъ.̶͒ ̀̎́͂̏͠ .̶̛̛̘̚͠.̶̹̝̻͚̬̫͔͛̏͋̔̑͐̑̉͗͑͘͠.̷̼͉̞̗̖͎͇̹̍̅͗͂̓̏͒̕

5 Jul 2026, 19:43 UTC77 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @blazartPhoto

Хочу сказать вам огроменное спасибо за арты и поздравления с днём рождения! Это только первая часть 🤩 1. @Krefe1d 2. @thenoisberry 3. @Oda_Doza_659 4. @sofibun 5. @lemmelle 6. @e1lkea 7. @Revived_May 8-9. Из анонимки 🍦

🍓4

Signed Kreꜰ̆̈ъ.̶͒ ̀̎́͂̏͠ .̶̛̛̘̚͠.̶̹̝̻͚̬̫͔͛̏͋̔̑͐̑̉͗͑͘͠.̷̼͉̞̗̖͎͇̹̍̅͗͂̓̏͒̕

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @Kref_sews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Kref” (@Kref_sews), 146 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Kref_sews.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.