Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for • БЛАЗАРТ • 🎸🦋🛸

Channel

• БЛАЗАРТ • 🎸🦋🛸

@blazart

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

6,725subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001668546972
TypeChannel
Username@blazart
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/blazart

Growth

6,7256,7436,7346 August 2026 — 6,727 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,735 subscribers9 August 2026 — 6,737 subscribers12 August 2026 — 6,741 subscribers16 August 2026 — 6,738 subscribers19 August 2026 — 6,735 subscribers22 August 2026 — 6,737 subscribers25 August 2026 — 6,729 subscribers28 August 2026 — 6,727 subscribers1 September 2026 — 6,743 subscribers4 September 2026 — 6,725 subscribers6 August 20264 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 29 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,722–6,746 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Sept 2026, 05:376,725-18
1 Sept 2026, 02:476,743+16
28 Aug 2026, 15:536,727-2
25 Aug 2026, 09:276,729-8
22 Aug 2026, 15:346,737+2
19 Aug 2026, 12:176,735-3
16 Aug 2026, 08:246,738-3
12 Aug 2026, 19:476,741+4
9 Aug 2026, 17:426,737+2
6 Aug 2026, 14:506,735+8
6 Aug 2026, 07:056,727first reading

Engagement

56 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 13 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
18.9%
avg views ÷ 6,725 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,270
26 posts measured
Reaction rate
11.4%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
26
of 56 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 August 2026
Posts held56 (30 July 202619 August 2026)
Views total33,132
Reactions total3,778
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken20 Aug 2026, 05:06 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4m 26s
Average length
1m 07s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

8,791 reactions across 55 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥3,25037.0%
🍓2,18124.8%
🔥1,87121.3%
🥰7878.95%
🌭2883.28%
🍌2332.65%
💯1812.06%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 56 of the 56 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,959 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 56 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 19 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 56 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @blazart. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 56 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 July 2026 to 19 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

19 Aug 2026, 19:03 UTC589 views104 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Этих распродам и следующая партия будет новые, нарисованные с нуля. Так что если хотите ухватить, то не тяните

❤‍🔥80🥰14🔥7🍌2🍓1

19 Aug 2026, 18:37 UTC733 views97 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Скажите честно, вам Линч тут нравится?

🍓72🥰13🍌8❤‍🔥4

19 Aug 2026, 08:38 UTC≈1,000 views130 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Поясняю за телосложение Джона в этой аушке: межзвездные перелеты это не быстро, пока летишь через космический вакуум заняться особо нечем, кроме как кушать и тренироваться (ну кушать явно больше) 🤩

🍓96❤‍🔥27🔥7

19 Aug 2026, 00:20 UTC≈1,100 views219 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

АХАХАХХА Линч такая глиста рядом с ним Ну так и задумано

❤‍🔥150🍓48🌭15🥰6

19 Aug 2026, 00:07 UTC≈1,130 views277 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Кто не спит как обычно получает конфетки, я разучился рисовать что-то кроме чиби мерча, надо исправлять 🙂 #Линчфд #СайфайАУ

🍓160🔥52🥰46🍌6❤‍🔥5💯5🌭3

18 Aug 2026, 15:50 UTC≈1,160 views139 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Я сейчас в очень активном процессе сборки поставок на полки и подготовки к маркетам, параллельно рисую коммишки, работаю днями и ночами короче 🤩 Надеюсь вы всего дождетесь, объем работы правда огромный, стараюсь как могу, даже друзья помогают со сборкой 😿

🥰87🔥27🍌10🍓9❤‍🔥5🌭1

18 Aug 2026, 12:59 UTC≈1,180 views257 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Всё новое - это хорошо забытое старое. Прямоугольные значки вернулись! Теперь они чуть меньше, но зато качественнее и ярче, очень крутые 😯

🍓155❤‍🔥62🔥35🥰4🌭1

18 Aug 2026, 09:41 UTC≈1,220 views88 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Нашел, спасибо за отклик!

🍓84🌭3🍌1

18 Aug 2026, 08:50 UTC≈1,270 views176 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Ищу помощника (или даже несколько) на завтра, надо будет приехать в Мурино и упаковывать кучу мерча под ютубчик и в обнимку с котом, желательно чтобы вы могли прям весь день и до поздна, надо оооочень много успеть С меня обэд и что-нибудь из мерчика ❄️ Пишите в комменты если можете

❤‍🔥127🍌22🔥20🍓5🌭2

17 Aug 2026, 21:26 UTC≈1,300 views52 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

🍓49❤‍🔥3

17 Aug 2026, 17:54 UTC≈1,250 views117 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Forwarded from @laawvaVideo

ставь лайк не ленись😡 https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZP8WD9sNf/

❤‍🔥85🍓23🔥9

17 Aug 2026, 15:00 UTC≈1,390 views113 reactionsread 20 August 2026

🎉 Результаты розыгрыша: 🏆 Победитель: 1. 💤Ha? (@Soki_Frost) ✔️Проверить результаты

❤‍🔥74🍓18🌭13🍌6🔥2

Signed Randomize Bot 🎲 [Рандомайзер]

Showing the 12 most recent of 56 posts we hold for @blazart. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 59 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“• БЛАЗАРТ • 🎸🦋🛸” (@blazart), 6,725 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/blazart.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.