https://youtu.be/egJ-msZJk90?si=xj_RKK8nTz1R_Vcz

Channel
Krobet
@Krobett
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
49,349subscribers
-216 since we began measuring on 27 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001456954202 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Krobett |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 27 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Krobett |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 03:54 | 49,349 | -64 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 02:03 | 49,413 | -87 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 04:57 | 49,500 | -65 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 17:45 | 49,565 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 6 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 5 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
7 reactions across 4 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 7 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 19 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
https://youtu.be/KkzCzoX5MTU?si=ss0s1HpeuwhvtMES
Mes prédictions finales de ce match de CDM ⚽🏆 🇫🇷 Victoire de la France ✅ ⚽ Les deux équipes marquent : OUI 📈 Plus de 2,5 buts ✅ 📊 Score exact disponible dans le groupe privé 😍
❤1
https://youtu.be/jfDB7hCDAbs?si=gLIsq3Xh-PCSBbl9
https://youtu.be/-E4bnnENqvw?si=BdYg84vHYJzTPKgR
https://youtu.be/jEgIUeHFw-M?si=MCIh0BBZb2wZWhqe
https://youtu.be/HZ3xqCMhQaM?si=tYD0Ykbm9lDMddTG
Les deux équipes marquent validé ✅✅✅✅✅✅✅✅✅✅✅✅✅
❤3
https://youtu.be/8Y4birwwkhc?si=G4PVmJos6UxnkseY
Pronostics validés ⚽⚽✅✅ 🇪🇸 Victoire de l'Espagne ✅👌 ⚽ Plus de 1,5 but ✅👌 📊 Score exact : 2-1 ⚽✅ Félicitations les gars 🔥💪💸💯
❤2
Photo, posted without a caption
❤1
https://youtu.be/7F2L6dF4rmw?si=ewY4tmlVxT0xXEoU
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Krobett. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@MAX72_PRONOS · 33,419#1
@InfosAnimeZone · 67,239#2
@babelseypro235 · 45,321#3
@OtakusZone · 44,250#4
@HSNCENTER · 47,303#5
@calistenie_zone · 22,447#6
@Solo_leveling_2_VF · 7,287#7
@jcctradinglab · 6,936#8
@ParierFacile · 12,046#9
@ActuFootZone · 10,784#10
@INFOSPORT_ZONE · 7,676#11
@winner_en_serie · 52,325#12
@UniversMotivation · 28,814#13
@canalactu_com · 5,892#14
@RFI_Fr · 14,591#15
@butsenvideo · 2,157#16
@PremierLeagueFR · 26,703#17
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 27 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@InfosAnimeZone · 67,239
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 20 here — alongside 19 others — read 27 August 2026
@babelseypro235 · 45,321
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 14 here — alongside 13 others — read 27 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Krobet” (@Krobett), 49,349 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Krobett.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.