ㅤㅤ 🚀 𝗖𝗔𝗧𝗔𝗟𝗢𝗚𝗨𝗘 𝗗𝗘𝗦 𝗖𝗛𝗔𝗜𝗡𝗘𝗦 🚀 ✥━━━━•••••━━━━✥ 🚦Culture générale 🚦Actualités & Infos 🚦Films & Séries 🚦 Informatique 🚦Développement personnel 🚦Sports 🚦Livres numériques ✥━━━━•••••━━━━✥ ➤ 𝗥𝗲𝗷𝗼𝗶𝗴𝗻𝗲𝘇-𝗻𝗼𝘂𝘀 𝗺𝗮𝗶𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗻𝗮𝗻𝘁 𝗮𝘃𝗮𝗻𝘁 𝗹𝗮 𝘀𝘂𝗽𝗽𝗿𝗲𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗱𝘂 𝗺𝗲𝘀𝘀𝗮𝗴𝗲 !

Channel
INSPIRAT™
@winner_en_serie
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
51,422subscribers
-1,550 since we began measuring on 16 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001432982677 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @winner_en_serie |
| Description | 🧠 Le Mindset 💎 La Psychologie Humaine 🏆 Les Leçons de Vie 📊 Les Histoires Inspirantes 🧘♂️ Le Développement personnel 🚀 Me contacter : @finnss Buy Ads : telega.io/channels/winner_en_serie/card?r=giqN7wPG |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 16 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 24 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/winner_en_serie |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 58% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 23:17 | 51,422 | -100 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 18:39 | 51,522 | -76 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 04:57 | 51,598 | -55 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 13:15 | 51,653 | -68 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 11:17 | 51,721 | -178 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 03:21 | 51,899 | -137 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 10:17 | 52,036 | -62 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 00:28 | 52,098 | -73 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 18:47 | 52,171 | -61 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 19:26 | 52,232 | -44 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 21:07 | 52,276 | -49 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 20:55 | 52,325 | -44 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 21:17 | 52,369 | -47 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 18:44 | 52,416 | -36 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 22:05 | 52,452 | -40 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 20:34 | 52,492 | -46 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 23:04 | 52,538 | -83 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 06:57 | 52,621 | -99 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 15:38 | 52,720 | -57 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 12:33 | 52,777 | first reading |
Engagement
155 posts held, back to 17 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 82 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.09%
- avg views ÷ 51,422 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 563
- 107 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 1.41%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 107
- of 155 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 103 of 107 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 155 (17 July 2026 – 19 September 2026) |
| Views total | 60,223 |
| Reactions total | 835 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 25 Sept 2026, 18:33 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈1,000
- Videos
- ≈23
- Links
- ≈125
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
1,353 reactions across 151 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 648 | 47.9% | |
| 👍 | 330 | 24.4% | |
| 🔥 | 317 | 23.4% | |
| 👏 | 26 | 1.92% | |
| 💯 | 23 | 1.70% | |
| ✍ | 3 | 0.222% | |
| 😢 | 2 | 0.148% | |
| 🤩 | 2 | 0.148% | |
| 🏆 | 1 | 0.074% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.074% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 151 of the 155 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,353 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 155 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 19 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 1
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 1
- of 155 we hold a reading for · 0.6%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @winner_en_serie. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 155 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 July 2026 to 19 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
🚨 We're tired of these market swings 🥱 Nevertheless, we accurately predicted over 90% of the outcomes — just look through our previous posts. Most traders only react once the move is already happening. We look for the move before it becomes obvious. Our team has just published the latest cryptocurrency market analysis, including what we're watching right now. The next opportunity may already be forming. 👀 Link …
❤2👍2👏1🔥1
🚨 We're tired of these market swings 🥱 Nevertheless, we accurately predicted over 90% of the outcomes — just look through our previous posts. Most traders only react once the move is already happening. We look for the move before it becomes obvious. Our team has just published the latest cryptocurrency market analysis, including what we're watching right now. The next opportunity may already be forming. 👀 Link …
❤2👏1🔥1
Sticker, posted without a caption
❤6
⚠️ Et souviens-toi : 🧠 Si tu ne prends jamais le temps de penser à ta propre vie, quelqu’un d’autre finira par décider à quoi elle doit ressembler. 🛡 Protège ton temps. 🎯 Protège ton attention. 🔥 Protège ta vision. 🚀 Ton avenir mérite quelques minutes de silence chaque jour.
❤18🔥10👍2
🧘 La solitude volontaire n’est pas du temps perdu. 🎯 C’est le moment où tu reprends le contrôle de ta direction.
👍16❤4🔥4
⏰ Tu n’as pas besoin de passer 10 heures par jour à travailler sur tes rêves. 🎯 Mais tu dois être capable de leur accorder une place réelle dans ta journée. 👀 Car ce à quoi tu consacres constamment ton attention finit par façonner ta vie. ❌ Alors crée ton espace. 📵 Pose ton téléphone. 🔇 Éloigne-toi du bruit. 📝 Prends un carnet. 🤔 Réfléchis. 📚 Lis. 🗓 Planifie. 💡 Écris tes idées. 🌱 Travaille sur toi. 🏆 Imag…
👍10❤6✍3💯3🏆1
💡 C’est dans ces moments de solitude que les idées apparaissent, que les priorités deviennent plus claires et que les décisions importantes commencent à prendre forme.
🔥6👍5❤3
🧘 C’est pourquoi tu dois apprendre à t’isoler volontairement, ne serait-ce que quelques dizaines de minutes par jour. 💭 Pas forcément pour travailler. 🧠 Mais pour penser. ❓ Demande-toi : Où est-ce que je vais ? 🧭 Est-ce que ce que je fais aujourd’hui me rapproche réellement de la vie que je veux ? 📖 Qu’est-ce que je dois apprendre ? ✂️ Qu’est-ce que je dois arrêter ? 👤 Quelle personne suis-je en train de deven
❤8👍4🔥2
🌍 Le monde est constamment en train de réclamer ton attention. 📱 Les notifications. 💬 Les messages. 📲 Les réseaux sociaux. 🧑🤝🧑 Les problèmes des autres. 🎮 Les divertissements. 📰 Les informations. 🚨 Les urgences qui ne sont pas réellement les tiennes. 🔇 Et au milieu de tout ce bruit, il devient difficile d’entendre ta propre voix.
❤7👍4🔥3😢2
🎯 Peu importe ce que tu cherches à accomplir. 💼 Créer une entreprise. 💵 Devenir financièrement libre. 🚀 Changer de carrière. 📚 Développer une compétence. 🏗️ Construire ton avenir. 🌱 Devenir une meilleure version de toi-même. ⏳ Si tu ne prends aucun moment chaque jour pour être seul, couper le bruit extérieur et réfléchir profondément à ta propre vie, alors tu risques de passer ton temps à exécuter les priorités des…
❤11🔥4👍3
Photo, posted without a caption
🔥4❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 155 posts we hold for @winner_en_serie. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@UniversMotivation · 28,646#1
@CahiersJaunesX · 27,447#2
@LeCitateurM · 25,277#3
@Coachnba42 · 5,223#4
@LeScribe · 42,917#5
@ecoledelavieteramevision · 17,231#6
@deslivresenpdf · 90,893#7
@cultineo · 10,457#8
@motivationfocus · 15,988#9
@leportail · 20,659#10
@lebrainchanel · 20,242#11
@lecanapecoquin · 14,105#12
@intelligence_strategique · 8,772#13
@LEMONDEDESINFOS · 26,132#14
@IAMinute · 12,337#15
@Penseeintelligente · 27,242#16
@geoeconomie · 26,540#17
@docteurlv · 13,575#18
@lepouvoirausucces · 11,939#19
@entrepro · 5,205#20
@king_pense · 14,263#21
@Objectif_MilIionnaire · 2,077#22
@forexafricaschool · 1,938#23
@bellescitations · 24,197#24
@proverbe228 · 13,140#25
@PsychologieClinique · 3,575#26
@jeuneleaderdedemain · 3,728#27
@Inspirationducoeur · 10,460#28
@succes_finance · 2,733#29
@SEDUCTION18 · 2,447#30
@ActuInternationale · 53,898#31
@Univers_Business · 12,295#32
@TopMercato · 27,959#33
@diplomaties · 37,191#34
@RealMadridinfos · 63,188#35
@intelligenceeconomique · 25,139#36
@Motivations_Canal · 41,149#37
@UniversCryptos · 9,511#38
@les_pros_du_tic · 43,828#39
@mondedufootball · 96,119#40
@intelligence_economique · 34,926#41
@curieusement · 29,834#42
@CanalPlusSportInfos · 88,656#43
@ObservateurPhotoAdamou · 6,901#44
@techcrypt1 · 18,050#45
@Senegal24 · 23,676#46
@go_softbusiness · 2,159#47
@collections_books · 15,991#48
@Info24monde · 21,069#49
@PARTAGESdeLIVRES · 48,212#50
@loeildadam · 25,661#51
@ClashFootball · 12,958#52
@formationsetlivres · 21,409#53
@leveil2022 · 35,630#54
@entrepreneuriat_web · 6,938#55
@multiphilo · 2,759#56
@masterpronostics0 · 6,615#57
@chinemonde · 14,623#58
@BRICSTV · 25,977#59
@canalactu_com · 5,899#60
@poeme_sms_amour · 16,392#61
@grand_reequilibrage · 41,716#62
@livres_2020 · 51,147#63
@papersnest · 12,983#64
@PLFRANCE · 30,391#65
@Vpoutine · 41,723#66
@world_web_3_hub · 10,772#67
@atmospherecitation · 2,896#68
@leo_messifans · 10,214#69
@nudgemarketing · 20,074#70
@intelligencestrategique · 22,818#71
@infosportsplus · 44,188#72
@fansbarcelonais · 32,295#73
@strategie_militaire · 22,265#74
@Ultra_drole · 18,331#75
@res01S2LV1 · 11,868#76
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 24 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@bellescitations · 24,197
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 16 September 2026
@UniversMotivation · 28,646
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 9 September 2026
@Soif_de_Succes · 30,148
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 10 September 2026
@CahiersJaunesX · 27,447
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 10 September 2026
@Motivations_Canal · 41,149
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 29 August 2026
@LeScribe · 42,917
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 28 August 2026
@LeCitateurM · 25,277
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 14 September 2026
@NouvelleEcoleFrance · 26,685
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 34 here — alongside 33 others — read 11 September 2026
@gags_rires · 42,028
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 29 August 2026
@les_pros_du_tic · 43,828
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 27 August 2026
@Pensee_Positive · 83,348
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 18 August 2026
@ClesduPouvoir · 28,851
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 9 September 2026
@Krobett · 48,088
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 17 here — alongside 16 others — read 27 August 2026
@MoodCineFr · 143,333
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 39 here — alongside 38 others — read 16 August 2026
@amazing_forex_trading · 31,819
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 9 September 2026
@filmromantique1 · 64,114
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 25 here — alongside 24 others — read 21 August 2026
@deslivresenpdf · 90,893
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 17 August 2026
@Culturos · 27,304
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 11 September 2026
@FILMSSERIE2024 · 35,095
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 35 here — alongside 34 others — read 2 September 2026
@PARTAGESdeLIVRES · 48,212
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 26 August 2026
@TopMercato · 27,959
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 9 September 2026
@curieusement · 29,834
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 7 September 2026
@afrikaZik · 21,455
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 23 September 2026
@Actu_Foot_Fr · 3
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 23 August 2026
This channel appears in 31 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“INSPIRAT™” (@winner_en_serie), 51,422 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/winner_en_serie.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.