Channel
@LeCitateurM
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
25,277subscribers
-117 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001930991591 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @LeCitateurM |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 28 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/LeCitateurM |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 44% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 07:57 | 25,277 | -11 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 02:56 | 25,288 | +2 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 06:39 | 25,286 | -5 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 11:57 | 25,291 | -12 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 08:02 | 25,303 | -24 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 23:41 | 25,327 | -14 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 09:39 | 25,341 | -9 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 00:49 | 25,350 | -15 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 20:05 | 25,365 | -10 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 20:14 | 25,375 | -3 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 21:19 | 25,378 | -2 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 20:35 | 25,380 | +11 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 18:29 | 25,369 | -3 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 21:04 | 25,372 | -4 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 20:37 | 25,376 | -2 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 03:43 | 25,378 | -11 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 19:24 | 25,389 | -7 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 15:42 | 25,396 | +4 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 16:53 | 25,392 | +56 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 13:23 | 25,336 | first reading |
127 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 55 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 36 of 39 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 127 (4 August 2026 – 2 September 2026) |
| Views total | 45,613 |
| Reactions total | 626 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 10:34 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
2,154 reactions across 120 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,040 | 48.3% | |
| 🔥 | 601 | 27.9% | |
| 👍 | 242 | 11.2% | |
| 🤣 | 63 | 2.92% | |
| 👏 | 56 | 2.60% | |
| 😁 | 52 | 2.41% | |
| 🥰 | 19 | 0.882% | |
| 🙏 | 17 | 0.789% | |
| 👎 | 16 | 0.743% | |
| 😢 | 14 | 0.65% | |
| 🤔 | 10 | 0.464% | |
| 💯 | 5 | 0.232% | |
| 🍾 | 3 | 0.139% | |
| 🖕 | 3 | 0.139% | |
| 🤷♀ | 3 | 0.139% | |
| 🥱 | 3 | 0.139% | |
| ☃ | 1 | 0.046% | |
| 🍌 | 1 | 0.046% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 0.046% | |
| 💊 | 1 | 0.046% | |
| 3 further kinds | 3 | 0.139% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 120 of the 127 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,154 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 127 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
La jalousie des autres n'est pas un problème à résoudre. C'est une preuve à encadrer. Si personne ne parle de toi en mal, c'est peut-être que tu n'as encore rien fait d'assez grand pour déranger. @LecitateurM ♤
🔥10❤5👏3
Nous en avons assez de ces fluctuations du marché 🙄 Néanmoins, nous avons prédit avec précision plus de 90 % des résultats — comme en témoignent toutes les publications sur notre canal Notre équipe aide notre communauté à gagner de l'argent avec nous. Nous avons publié notre dernière analyse du marché des cryptomonnaies — consultez-la avant que nous ne retirions le lien 🔒 👉 https://t.me/+WuKiGliaovs2Y2Iy
🟡 Nouvelle vidéo sur YouTube TikTok vs Instagram vs LinkedIn : où investir ton temps en 2026 ? On se disperse tous entre trop de plateformes. Dans cette vidéo, je te donne la vraie force de chacune pour que tu arrêtes de perdre ton temps et que tu saches où concentrer ton énergie. 👉 https://youtu.be/SIX1IZflJnQ Dis-moi en commentaire sous la vidéo : t'es plutôt actif où en ce moment ?
❤3
On ne devient pas fort en évitant la douleur. On devient fort en refusant qu'elle décide à ta place. La différence entre celui qui abandonne et celui qui continue, ce n'est jamais la souffrance — c'est ce qu'il en fait. @LecitateurM ♤
❤14🔥3👏2
Même quand tu es dans le besoin, reste digne ! @LecitateurM ♤
❤7👍5🔥1🥰1
La sagesse des nations dit que le bien mal acquis ne profite jamais. Je soutiens qu'il profite plus aux voleurs qu'aux volés... @LecitateurM ♤
🔥16❤6😁3
🎥 Nouvelle vidéo en ligne ! Le charisme, c'est pas un don. C'est 5 habitudes que tu peux adopter dès aujourd'hui — et je te montre lesquelles. 👉 https://youtu.be/5puRU02accs Dans cette vidéo : ✅ Le regard qui change tout ✅ La posture qui inspire confiance ✅ Le silence que personne n'utilise ✅ L'écoute qui marque les gens ✅ Le rituel de 2 minutes avant une interaction importante Essaie-les pendant 7 jours et dis-…
❤3
A voir comment la nouvelle génération de youtubeurs qui s'acharnent à monter des vidéos très animés pour capter l'attention, nous allons juste finir tous, épileptiques... 🤕 @LecitateurM ♤
😁2❤1
🚀 FORMATION OFFERTE | IA Générative — Maîtrise Complète Tu veux comprendre et utiliser l'Intelligence Artificielle comme un pro ? 🎓 Cette formation complète sur l'IA Générative est disponible sur Udemy avec un code promo exclusif — à prix réduit (ou gratuit selon le coupon) ! ✅ Ce que tu vas apprendre : • Comprendre le fonctionnement des IA génératives • Utiliser les outils IA pour booster ta productivité • Créer …
👏1
Tu perds de vue tes objectifs dès que la vie devient compliquée. C'est humain, mais c'est aussi dangereux pour ta progression. Garde-les visibles, physiquement, tous les jours devant toi. Ce que tu ne vois plus, tu finis par l'oublier. Affiche tes objectifs, ne les enterre pas. 📌 👉 linktr.ee/MonsieurJauneX
🔥12❤2
La route est longue, sinueuse, parfois épuisante. Personne ne t'a promis que ce serait facile ou rapide. Mais chaque virage franchi te rapproche un peu plus du sommet. Ce n'est pas la vitesse qui compte, c'est de ne jamais t'arrêter. Garde le rythme, la montagne finira par céder. 🏔️ 👉 linktr.ee/MonsieurJauneX
❤11🔥7
Regarde tous ces projets que tu as commencés puis abandonnés. Chaque rature raconte une promesse que tu t'es faite à toi-même. Ce n'est pas grave d'avoir arrêté, c'est grave de ne jamais recommencer. Le stylo est cassé, mais tes idées ne le sont pas. Prends-en un nouveau et termine, cette fois. 📝 👉 linktr.ee/MonsieurJauneX
❤12🔥5
Showing the 12 most recent of 127 posts we hold for @LeCitateurM. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 14 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 31 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Le Citateur Méchant 👨🎓” (@LeCitateurM), 25,277 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LeCitateurM.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.