Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Univers Crypto 🇫🇷

Channel

Univers Crypto 🇫🇷

@UniversCryptos

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,641subscribers

-153 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001694477083
TypeChannel
Username@UniversCryptos
DescriptionNous partageons des informations en temps réel sur la crypto, blockchain et des opportunités d’investissements. Collab & pub : @universpro Pub 👉 https://telega.io/c/universcryptos
Created17 December 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 26 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/UniversCryptos

Growth

9,6419,7949,717.57 August 2026 — 9,794 subscribers8 August 2026 — 9,789 subscribers11 August 2026 — 9,760 subscribers14 August 2026 — 9,720 subscribers17 August 2026 — 9,706 subscribers20 August 2026 — 9,681 subscribers24 August 2026 — 9,649 subscribers26 August 2026 — 9,641 subscribers7 August 202626 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 19 days, net -153. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,618–9,817 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Aug 2026, 21:029,641-8
24 Aug 2026, 04:369,649-32
20 Aug 2026, 22:259,681-25
17 Aug 2026, 12:199,706-14
14 Aug 2026, 02:389,720-40
11 Aug 2026, 00:139,760-29
8 Aug 2026, 09:579,789-5
7 Aug 2026, 13:489,794first reading

Engagement

47 posts held, back to 15 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 34 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.55%
avg views ÷ 9,641 subscribers
Avg views / post
632
30 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.219%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
30
of 47 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 13 of 30 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 August 2026
Posts held47 (15 July 202627 August 2026)
Views total18,948
Reactions total19
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 05:41 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
3,870
Videos
245
Links
1,790

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

50 reactions across 18 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1632.0%
👍1428.0%
🔥1020.0%
👎48.00%
😁48.00%
🙊12.00%
🤨12.00%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 47 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 50reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 47 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 27 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

27 Aug 2026, 20:28 UTC273 views2 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

IMPORTANT ‼️ 🚨 #AlerteCyberGend 📱 Le détournement de carte SIM Votre téléphone perd soudainement le réseau ? 📵 Cela peut être le signe qu’un pirate vient de prendre le contrôle de votre ligne. ⚠️ Le SIM Swapping permet notamment aux cybercriminels d’intercepter vos SMS et vos codes de validation afin d’accéder à vos comptes. 👀 Retrouvez dans le visuel ci-dessous les signes qui doivent vous alerter et les bons réf

1🤨1

27 Aug 2026, 19:17 UTC281 viewsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Les ETF Bitcoin ont enregistré de forts afflux de capitaux cette semaine. La demande institutionnelle reste forte, les achats d'ETF se poursuivant. 👀

26 Aug 2026, 10:43 UTC397 viewsread 29 August 2026

🗞️ Revolut lance son propre stablecoin euro, l’EURR. (Tweet)

25 Aug 2026, 20:59 UTC462 views1 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

X va bientôt lancer une nouvelle fonctionnalité qui vous permettra d'acheter et de vendre des cryptomonnaies. On dirait que X veut devenir une autre plateforme d'échange de cryptomonnaies 😂

😁1

24 Aug 2026, 14:38 UTC536 viewsread 29 August 2026

🗞️ Le Trésor américain envisagerait de puiser près de 1 000 milliards de dollars dans son compte général (TGA) pour financer ses rachats d’obligations. 🇺🇸 (CNBC)

23 Aug 2026, 17:20 UTC617 viewsread 29 August 2026
Photo

🚨 #Bitcoin reste EXTRÊMEMENT sous-évalué, selon le modèle du graphique "Rainbow". Le BTC se trouve toujours dans la zone de sous-évaluation profonde du modèle. 👀₿ Pourrait-ce être l'une de ces phases de consolidation rares ?

23 Aug 2026, 15:18 UTC576 viewsread 29 August 2026
Photo

🚨 $BTC EST SUR LE POINT DE FAIRE L'HISTOIRE Le Bitcoin est actuellement en hausse d'environ 22 % en août. Si la tendance se maintient en positif, cela pourrait être le premier mois d'août positif pour le BTC lors d'une année d'élections de mi-mandat aux États-Unis. Ce cycle continue de surprendre. 👀₿

22 Aug 2026, 11:29 UTC555 viewsread 29 August 2026
Photo

3 cryptomonnaies avec un multiplicateur de 3x en août 🔐 Mais il est très facile de transformer 100 $ en 500 $ ou même en 1 000 $ ! Consultez les noms des cryptomonnaies ici : https://t.me/+Zbhd3SKnUrswZDUy

21 Aug 2026, 08:57 UTC619 views1 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

SOMMET SUR LA CRYPTO À LA MAISON BLANCHE : Qu’ont réellement dit les plus grands noms ? La crypto est désormais une priorité stratégique pour les États-Unis. 🇺🇸

1

21 Aug 2026, 07:44 UTC621 viewsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Important message de #BINANCE : Transactions impliquant certaines plateformes crypto

Showing the 12 most recent of 47 posts we hold for @UniversCryptos. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 533,104 of 1,626,711entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

💻 Cabuntu Solution 📱
@les_pros_du_tic · 45,139
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 27 August 2026
Infositons
@Infositons · 45,116
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 27 August 2026
INSPIRAT™
@winner_en_serie · 52,325
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 24 August 2026
Motivation Citations
@Motivations_Canal · 42,049
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 29 August 2026
Actu Internationale 🗞
@ActuInternationale · 54,172
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 24 August 2026
Annonces Baby Doge
@BabyDogeAnnFR · 87,039
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 17 August 2026
Neodia
@neodia · 48,816
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 26 August 2026
INFO SPORTS ⚽️
@infosportsplus · 44,138
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 28 August 2026
𝐀𝐄𝐒 𝐀𝐂𝐓𝐔 🚨
@InfosAes · 54,974
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 23 August 2026
Infosport Football 🚨 ⚽️
@mondedufootball · 97,007
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 16 August 2026
CANAL DU FOOT ⚽
@CanalPlusSportInfos · 89,934
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 17 August 2026

This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Univers Crypto 🇫🇷” (@UniversCryptos), 9,641 subscribers as measured 26 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/UniversCryptos.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.