National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 84% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
58 measurements spanning 91 days, net -178. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 21,912–22,197 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 58
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Nov 2026, 23:20
21,959
+13
4 Nov 2026, 22:26
21,946
-4
3 Nov 2026, 19:47
21,950
-14
2 Nov 2026, 20:54
21,964
-5
1 Nov 2026, 21:57
21,969
-1
31 Oct 2026, 23:36
21,970
+5
30 Oct 2026, 22:36
21,965
+20
29 Oct 2026, 22:50
21,945
-9
28 Oct 2026, 22:46
21,954
-5
27 Oct 2026, 21:38
21,959
-16
26 Oct 2026, 19:27
21,975
-4
25 Oct 2026, 22:27
21,979
-1
24 Oct 2026, 20:36
21,980
+5
23 Oct 2026, 23:36
21,975
+10
23 Oct 2026, 01:21
21,965
-4
21 Oct 2026, 23:21
21,969
+6
20 Oct 2026, 18:40
21,963
-1
18 Oct 2026, 19:37
21,964
+4
17 Oct 2026, 19:49
21,960
+15
16 Oct 2026, 16:31
21,945
first reading
Engagement
271 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 77 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
4.10%
avg views ÷ 21,959 subscribers
Avg views / post
900
52 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.34%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
52
of 271 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 46 of 52 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held
271 (2 August 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total
46,822
Reactions total
556
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Nov 2026, 02:48 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈3,010
Videos
≈81
Links
≈5,590
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
13s
Average length
7s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,897 reactions across 245 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
987
34.1%
👍
857
29.6%
🔥
495
17.1%
👎
250
8.63%
😁
165
5.70%
🤔
51
1.76%
🕊
42
1.45%
😱
27
0.932%
🥰
8
0.276%
👏
7
0.242%
👌
5
0.173%
💯
2
0.069%
❤🔥
1
0.035%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 246 of the 271 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,897 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 271 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
6
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 271 we hold a reading for · 0.4%
Most on one post
6
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @LeMondeFRANCE. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 271 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 August 2026 to 6 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 52 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🗞États-Unis: sept morts et plus de 5.000 cas de rougeole confirmés
Les États-Unis traversent leur plus grave résurgence de rougeole depuis 35 ans, enregistrant sept décès et franchissant la barre des 5.000 cas confirmés depuis le début de l'année. La crise sanitaire s'est illustrée par le décès d'un nourrisson de 7 mois dans l'État de New York, une première en plus de trois décennies sur ce territoire. Alors que la …
🗞De nouvelles alertes à la bombe dans des avions en Europe, le gouvernement annonce une enquête en cours
Matignon a annoncé quatre nouvelles alertes à la bombe ce vendredi à bord d'avions qui ont survolé la France, tandis que la police tchèque a prévenu d'une "nouvelle menace" à bord d’un grand nombre d’avions à destination et en provenance de l'aéroport de Prague. Au moins 11 vols sont concernés.
Source | @LeMonde…
🗞Donald Trump prédit un "très grand" accord avec la Russie sur l'Ukraine qui pourrait "englober toute l'Europe"
Jeudi 5 novembre, Donald Trump a évoqué un "grand accord" futur avec la Russie qui concernera l'Ukraine, alors que des pourparlers entre les deux pays doivent se tenir prochainement. Selon le président américain, ce dernier pourrait même englober "toute l'Europe".
Source | @LeMondeFrance
📂 Chaînes d’actualité géopolitique sélectionnées à la main et vérifiées — dans un seul dossier
Telegram n’a pas d’algorithme pour faire remonter les bonnes chaînes — on les trouve par hasard, ou quelqu’un vous remet une liste sélectionnée. Voici donc cette liste — considérez votre fil d’actualité comme amélioré.
Les chaînes sont ajoutées à la main, pas aspirées par un bot — chacune est vérifiée avant de rejoindre l…
🗞Melania Trump : de l'ombre à l'influence ?
Melania Trump est-elle une Première dame américaine influente ? À l'occasion de la réception à la Maison blanche de représentants russes et ukrainiens, jeudi 5 novembre, retour sur les évolutions de Melania Trump entre le premier mandat et le second mandat de Donald Trump, avec Mylène Specklin, journaliste BFM2.
Source | @LeMondeFrance
🗞Guerre en Ukraine: Volodymyr Zelensky évoque "l'espoir" de plus de soutien américain après la victoire démocrate aux "midterms"
Au surlendemain des midterms, le président ukrainien affirme que la vague bleue démocrate nourrit "l'espoir" d'un renforcement du soutien de Washington à Kiev, près de cinq ans après le début de l'invasion en Russie.
Source | @LeMondeFrance
🗞Donald Trump se dit "pas du tout" inquiet d'une éventuelle procédure de destitution contre lui
Le président américain Donald Trump s'exprime depuis le chantier de la salle de bal de la Maison Blanche, après la défaite des républicains aux élections de mi-mandat, ce mercredi 4 novembre.
Source | @LeMondeFrance
🗞Midterms: comment la défaite des Républicains va impacter la fin du mandat de Donald Trump
Les nouveaux élus démocrates, désormais en majorité au Congrès américain, seront en capacité de dicter l'agenda législatif, de peser sur le budget fédéral, mais aussi de lancer des enquêtes parlementaires sur le président républicain Donald Trump et ses proches.
Source | @LeMondeFrance
🗞Midterms 2026: la Caroline du Nord et la Caroline du Sud basculent côté démocrates
Les démocrates reprendront-ils le contrôle du Congrès aux républicains? Tel est le principal enjeu de ces élections de mi-mandat pour lesquelles près de 250 millions d'électeurs américains étaient appelés aux urnes ce mardi 3 novembre.
Source | @LeMondeFrance
🗞"Une nouvelle incroyable": cinq personnes secourues aux Kiribati après avoir dérivé trois mois dans l'océan Pacifique
Neuf personnes étaient parties d'une île de Micronésie le 30 juillet dernier. Elles ont été secourues par des habitants de l'île de Fanning, aux Kiribati, ce dimanche, environ 5.400 kilomètres à l'est de leur destination initiale.
Source | @LeMondeFrance
🗞Midterms: l'explosion des prix des carburants, l'épine dans le pied de Donald Trump pour les élections de mi-mandat
Le président américain a attendu la dernière minute pour se préoccuper de la question du coût de la vie et notamment des prix du carburant, un sujet qui préoccupe pourtant de nombreux Américains.
Source | @LeMondeFrance
❤7🔥2👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 271 posts we hold for @LeMondeFRANCE. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 22 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
CULTIMONDE🌏 @cultimonde · 19,664 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 30 September 2026
SENEGAL 24 🇸🇳 @Senegal24 · 23,994 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 17 September 2026
CLES DU POUVOIR @ClesduPouvoir · 28,444 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 9 September 2026
𝐙𝐞́𝐫𝐨 𝐅𝐚𝐮𝐭𝐞 🇫🇷 @orthographisme · 21,271 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 23 September 2026
𝙻𝚎 𝚜𝚊𝚟𝚒𝚎𝚣-𝚟𝚘𝚞𝚜❓ @curieusement · 29,620 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 7 September 2026
𝐋𝐞 𝐒𝐜𝐫𝐢𝐛𝐞™️ @LeScribe · 42,784 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 28 August 2026
Univers Motivation ⚡️ @UniversMotivation · 28,270 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 9 September 2026
𝑷𝑬𝑵𝑺É𝑬𝑺 𝑷𝑶𝑺𝑰𝑻𝑰𝑽𝑬𝑺 🧠 @Pensee_Positive · 79,874 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 18 August 2026
Actu Internationale 🗞 @ActuInternationale · 52,990 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 24 August 2026
𝐈𝐧𝐜𝐫𝐨𝐲𝐚𝐛𝐥𝐞 𝐦𝐚𝐢𝐬 𝐯𝐫𝐚𝐢 @incroyablemaisvrai · 19,267 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 2 October 2026
𝘽𝙀𝙇𝙇𝙀𝙎 𝘾𝙄𝙏𝘼𝙏𝙄𝙊𝙉𝙎 🌹 @bellescitations · 23,406 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 16 September 2026
Chroniques des conflits | Russie • Ukraine • Iran • USA • Israël @chroniques_des_conflits · 35,348 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 2 September 2026
EurasianForm @eurasianform · 26,284 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 13 September 2026
Infographies! @geoeconomie · 26,548 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 12 September 2026
Guerre économique! @intelligence_economique · 34,798 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 2 September 2026
Stratégies Mondiales @Strategiescontinentales · 35,903 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 2 September 2026
GeoRadar @georadarinfo · 23,236 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 17 September 2026
𝐀𝐄𝐒 𝐀𝐂𝐓𝐔 🚨 @InfosAes · 52,930 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 23 August 2026
PourLaCulture 🔰 @Culturos · 26,659 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 11 September 2026
GEOPOL🛡ADDICT @diplomaties · 36,906 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 1 September 2026
InfoDefenseFRANCE 1 @infodefenseFRreserve · 28,723 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 9 September 2026
Motivation Citations @Motivations_Canal · 38,920 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 29 August 2026
Onze Mondial ⚽️ @OnzeMondial · 20,827 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 22 September 2026
Que s'est-il passé? @intelligenceeconomique · 25,013 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 14 September 2026
This channel appears in 46 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Le Monde FR 🇫🇷” (@LeMondeFRANCE), 21,959 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LeMondeFRANCE.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.