✍🏼 Voulez-vous apprendre le français ?
✍🏼 Voulez-vous perfectionner votre français ?
🔘 Si oui, ce canal est fait pour vous.
Contact : @nousecrirebot
Buy ads: https://telega.io/c/orthographisme
Created
Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
57 measurements spanning 90 days, net -160. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 21,250–21,519 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 57
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
5 Nov 2026, 10:56
21,281
-5
4 Nov 2026, 09:06
21,286
-6
3 Nov 2026, 07:09
21,292
-9
2 Nov 2026, 10:29
21,301
-3
1 Nov 2026, 06:55
21,304
-8
31 Oct 2026, 03:25
21,312
-8
30 Oct 2026, 04:31
21,320
-5
29 Oct 2026, 05:28
21,325
-6
28 Oct 2026, 02:40
21,331
-6
26 Oct 2026, 02:46
21,337
-3
25 Oct 2026, 01:55
21,340
-7
24 Oct 2026, 00:56
21,347
-12
23 Oct 2026, 02:01
21,359
-10
22 Oct 2026, 02:50
21,369
-5
20 Oct 2026, 18:06
21,374
-5
19 Oct 2026, 17:04
21,379
-1
18 Oct 2026, 19:38
21,380
-3
17 Oct 2026, 20:16
21,383
+9
16 Oct 2026, 19:09
21,374
-11
15 Oct 2026, 15:55
21,385
first reading
Engagement
57 posts held, back to 24 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 74 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
9.57%
avg views ÷ 21,281 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,040
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.51%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 57 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 November 2026
Posts held
57 (24 March 2026 – 3 November 2026)
Views total
8,148
Reactions total
123
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
5 Nov 2026, 14:47 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
127
Videos
5
Links
197
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
2,581 reactions across 55 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
1,686
65.3%
❤
632
24.5%
🙏
111
4.30%
🎉
73
2.83%
🏆
53
2.05%
🤝
26
1.01%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 55 of the 57 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,581 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 57 most recent posts we hold, published 24 March 2026 to 3 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
7
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 57 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
7
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @orthographisme. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 57 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 March 2026 to 3 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 4 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
✔️ On écrit :
● Nous soussignées, Valérie et Sophie, déclarons…
● Je soussigné, Maître Cornille, meunier…
❌et non :
● Nous, soussignées Valérie et Sophie, déclarons…
● Je, soussigné Maître Cornille, meunier…
Le mot soussigné s'accorde en genre et en nombre avec le sujet. On met la virgule après je soussigné ou nous soussignés.
🆔 @orthographisme
■ QUAND LE SUJET EST " LA PLUPART ".
le verbe s'accorde comme si le sujet était " ILS " :
📝Exemples :
● La plupart des élèves ont compris la leçon.
● La plupart disent la vérité.
📔 ON ÉCRIT DES "CHEFS-D'ŒUVRE" OU DES "CHEFS-D'ŒUVRES" ?
Il s’agit d’un nom composé uni par une préposition, et seul le premier nom prend la marque du pluriel.
📝 Par exemple :
● un arc-en-ciel ➡️ des arcs-en-ciel
● une gueule-de-loup ➡️ des gueules-de-loup
📔 « À VÉLO » OU « EN VÉLO » ?
🔘 On écrit « à vélo » : selon l'Académie française, la règle est simple, il faut utiliser « en » pour les véhicules dans lesquels on peut s'installer, et « à » pour les autres. Le vélo étant un véhicule « ouvert », qu'on enfourche, il faudrait donc écrire « à vélo »
Conformément à cette règle, on écrit aussi à moto, à pied, à cheval etc.
✍🏼 Exemple :
▪️C'est à vélo qu'elle vient au tr…
📔 L’expression « après que » introduit un fait déjà réalisé, déjà accompli. On utilise donc normalement l’indicatif, le mode des faits réels.
À l’inverse, « avant que » évoque une action qui n’est pas encore réalisée, ce qui explique l’emploi du subjonctif.
📝 Exemples :
✅ Après qu’il est parti, nous avons commencé la réunion.
✅ Après qu’elle a terminé son travail, elle est rentrée chez elle.
🆔 @orthographisme
📔 QUELLE EST LA DIFFÉRENCE ENTRE « QUOIQUE » ET « QUOI QUE » ?
🔹 Quoique : Une conjonction en un seul mot qui signifie « bien que » ou « même si ».
🔹 Quoi que : Une locution en deux mots qui veut dire « quelle que soit la chose que » ou « peu importe ce que ».
📝 Exemples :
📍 Quoique : Il est venu travailler, quoique très fatigué.
📍 Quoi que : Quoi que tu fasses, je reste à tes côtés.
🆔 @orthographisme
📔 QUELLE EST LA DIFFÉRENCE ENTRE « CONJECTURE » ET « CONJONCTURE » ?
🔹 Conjecture : Une simple hypothèse ou une supposition basée sur des intuitions, sans preuve concrète.
🔹 Conjoncture : L'ensemble des événements et des circonstances qui définissent une situation à un moment précis (souvent liée à l'économie).
📝 Exemples :
📍 Conjecture : « C’est une pure conjecture : personne ne sait vraiment ce qui s’est passé…
📔 Mot du jour : Terreau
✨ Définition : Au sens propre, le terreau est une terre riche en humus favorable aux plantes. Au sens figuré, il désigne une base fertile ou un environnement favorable à quelque chose.
📝 Exemple : Cette région est un terreau fertile pour l’innovation technologique.
🔄 Synonymes : Substrat, humus, fondement.
💡 Parlez d’un environnement propice avec « terreau » !
🆔 @orthographisme
📔 Définition
L'expression « de fil en aiguille » signifie progressivement, en passant d'une chose à une autre de manière continue et naturelle.
Elle est généralement utilisée pour décrire le déroulement d'une conversation, le développement d'une histoire ou une suite d'événements qui s'enchaînent sans rupture.
📝 Exemples :
📍Dans une conversation : « Nous avons commencé par parler de la météo, puis, de fil en aigu…
🍊 Quelle est la différence entre « Mandarine » et « Clémentine » ?
🔹Mandarine : C’est l’agrume d’origine. Originaire de Chine, elle possède une peau fine, mais souvent plus difficile à détacher des quartiers. Elle contient généralement des pépins, avec une saveur acidulée et un parfum prononcé.
🔹 Clémentine : C’est un hybride obtenu par croisement. Elle est issue d’une mandarine et d’une orange douce, et a été créé…
👍47❤25🤝2🙏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 57 posts we hold for @orthographisme. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@orthographisme edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
17 August 2026
Most recent edit
17 August 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 1 post on @orthographisme as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
9 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
9 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
32 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0
Polls
The 6 most recent of 15 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 57 most recent posts we hold, published 24 March 2026 to 3 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 23 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
𝐋𝐞 𝐒𝐜𝐫𝐢𝐛𝐞™️ @LeScribe · 42,784 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 28 August 2026
CULTIMONDE🌏 @cultimonde · 19,661 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 30 September 2026
𝐋𝐞 𝐏𝐨𝐫𝐭𝐚𝐢𝐥 𝐈𝐧𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐦𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐪𝐮𝐞 @leportail · 20,646 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 26 September 2026
💻 Cabuntu Solution 📱 @les_pros_du_tic · 41,782 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 27 August 2026
CahiersJaunes ♤ @CahiersJaunesX · 27,202 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 10 September 2026
Infographies! @geoeconomie · 26,548 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 12 September 2026
Que s'est-il passé? @intelligenceeconomique · 25,015 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 14 September 2026
Guerre économique! @intelligence_economique · 34,808 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 2 September 2026
𝐈𝐧𝐜𝐫𝐨𝐲𝐚𝐛𝐥𝐞 𝐦𝐚𝐢𝐬 𝐯𝐫𝐚𝐢 @incroyablemaisvrai · 19,273 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 2 October 2026
BRICS TV ( FRANCE ) @BRICSTV · 25,755 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 13 September 2026
L'oasis des médecins ✨ @MedOasis · 26,637 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 12 September 2026
L-frii Média @lfriiactu · 27,524 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 9 September 2026
𝙻𝚎 𝚜𝚊𝚟𝚒𝚎𝚣-𝚟𝚘𝚞𝚜❓ @curieusement · 29,630 Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 7 September 2026
Neodia @neodia · 47,537 Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 26 August 2026
This channel appears in 14 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝐙𝐞́𝐫𝐨 𝐅𝐚𝐮𝐭𝐞 🇫🇷” (@orthographisme), 21,281 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/orthographisme.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.