Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝐙𝐞́𝐫𝐨 𝐅𝐚𝐮𝐭𝐞 🇫🇷

Channel

𝐙𝐞́𝐫𝐨 𝐅𝐚𝐮𝐭𝐞 🇫🇷

@orthographisme

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

21,281subscribers

-160 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001425915728
TypeChannel
Username@orthographisme
Description✍🏼 Voulez-vous apprendre le français ? ✍🏼 Voulez-vous perfectionner votre français ? 🔘 Si oui, ce canal est fait pour vous. Contact : @nousecrirebot Buy ads: https://telega.io/c/orthographisme
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 November 2026
Measurements held57
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/orthographisme

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

21,28121,48821,384.57 August 2026 — 21,441 subscribers7 August 2026 — 21,441 subscribers8 August 2026 — 21,434 subscribers9 August 2026 — 21,419 subscribers10 August 2026 — 21,413 subscribers11 August 2026 — 21,470 subscribers12 August 2026 — 21,464 subscribers13 August 2026 — 21,460 subscribers15 August 2026 — 21,443 subscribers16 August 2026 — 21,433 subscribers17 August 2026 — 21,419 subscribers18 August 2026 — 21,413 subscribers19 August 2026 — 21,488 subscribers20 August 2026 — 21,478 subscribers22 August 2026 — 21,472 subscribers23 August 2026 — 21,488 subscribers25 August 2026 — 21,479 subscribers26 August 2026 — 21,472 subscribers28 August 2026 — 21,466 subscribers29 August 2026 — 21,476 subscribers30 August 2026 — 21,469 subscribers30 August 2026 — 21,468 subscribers1 September 2026 — 21,456 subscribers1 September 2026 — 21,458 subscribers3 September 2026 — 21,444 subscribers5 September 2026 — 21,436 subscribers8 September 2026 — 21,433 subscribers11 September 2026 — 21,423 subscribers13 September 2026 — 21,429 subscribers14 September 2026 — 21,418 subscribers16 September 2026 — 21,401 subscribers19 September 2026 — 21,395 subscribers25 September 2026 — 21,423 subscribers4 October 2026 — 21,407 subscribers8 October 2026 — 21,393 subscribers12 October 2026 — 21,403 subscribers14 October 2026 — 21,393 subscribers15 October 2026 — 21,385 subscribers16 October 2026 — 21,374 subscribers17 October 2026 — 21,383 subscribers18 October 2026 — 21,380 subscribers19 October 2026 — 21,379 subscribers20 October 2026 — 21,374 subscribers22 October 2026 — 21,369 subscribers23 October 2026 — 21,359 subscribers24 October 2026 — 21,347 subscribers25 October 2026 — 21,340 subscribers26 October 2026 — 21,337 subscribers28 October 2026 — 21,331 subscribers29 October 2026 — 21,325 subscribers30 October 2026 — 21,320 subscribers31 October 2026 — 21,312 subscribers1 November 2026 — 21,304 subscribers2 November 2026 — 21,301 subscribers3 November 2026 — 21,292 subscribers4 November 2026 — 21,286 subscribers5 November 2026 — 21,281 subscribers7 August 20265 November 2026
57 measurements spanning 90 days, net -160. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 21,250–21,519 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 57
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 10:5621,281-5
4 Nov 2026, 09:0621,286-6
3 Nov 2026, 07:0921,292-9
2 Nov 2026, 10:2921,301-3
1 Nov 2026, 06:5521,304-8
31 Oct 2026, 03:2521,312-8
30 Oct 2026, 04:3121,320-5
29 Oct 2026, 05:2821,325-6
28 Oct 2026, 02:4021,331-6
26 Oct 2026, 02:4621,337-3
25 Oct 2026, 01:5521,340-7
24 Oct 2026, 00:5621,347-12
23 Oct 2026, 02:0121,359-10
22 Oct 2026, 02:5021,369-5
20 Oct 2026, 18:0621,374-5
19 Oct 2026, 17:0421,379-1
18 Oct 2026, 19:3821,380-3
17 Oct 2026, 20:1621,383+9
16 Oct 2026, 19:0921,374-11
15 Oct 2026, 15:5521,385first reading

Engagement

57 posts held, back to 24 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 74 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.57%
avg views ÷ 21,281 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,040
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.51%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 57 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 November 2026
Posts held57 (24 March 2026 – 3 November 2026)
Views total8,148
Reactions total123
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken5 Nov 2026, 14:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
127
Videos
5
Links
197

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

2,581 reactions across 55 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1,68665.3%
❤63224.5%
🙏1114.30%
🎉732.83%
🏆532.05%
🤝261.01%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 55 of the 57 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,581 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 57 most recent posts we hold, published 24 March 2026 to 3 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
7
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 57 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
7
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @orthographisme. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 57 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 March 2026 to 3 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 4 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

3 Nov 2026, 09:54 UTC908 views29 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

✔️ On écrit : ● Nous soussignées, Valérie et Sophie, déclarons… ● Je soussigné, Maître Cornille, meunier… ❌et non : ● Nous, soussignées Valérie et Sophie, déclarons… ● Je, soussigné Maître Cornille, meunier… Le mot soussigné s'accorde en genre et en nombre avec le sujet. On met la virgule après je soussigné ou nous soussignés. 🆔 @orthographisme

👍16🙏9❤3🎉1

1 Nov 2026, 09:43 UTC≈1,300 views36 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

■ QUAND LE SUJET EST " LA PLUPART ". le verbe s'accorde comme si le sujet était " ILS " : 📝Exemples : ● La plupart des élèves ont compris la leçon. ● La plupart disent la vérité.

👍26❤6🙏4

25 Oct 2026, 09:28 UTC≈2,450 views45 reactions7 Starsread 5 November 2026
Photo

📔 ON ÉCRIT DES "CHEFS-D'ŒUVRE" OU DES "CHEFS-D'ŒUVRES" ? Il s’agit d’un nom composé uni par une préposition, et seul le premier nom prend la marque du pluriel. 📝 Par exemple : ● un arc-en-ciel ➡️ des arcs-en-ciel ● une gueule-de-loup ➡️ des gueules-de-loup

👍32🙏8❤4🎉1

13 Oct 2026, 09:25 UTC≈3,490 views13 reactionsread 5 November 2026

📖✨ Accordez correctement le participe passé ✨📖 Des histoires d’animaux, j’en ai (lire) plusieurs dans ce recueil de fables.

❤13

3 Oct 2026, 15:41 UTC≈4,680 views40 reactionsread 5 November 2026

📔 « À VÉLO » OU « EN VÉLO » ? 🔘 On écrit « à vélo » : selon l'Académie française, la règle est simple, il faut utiliser « en » pour les véhicules dans lesquels on peut s'installer, et « à » pour les autres. Le vélo étant un véhicule « ouvert », qu'on enfourche, il faudrait donc écrire « à vélo » Conformément à cette règle, on écrit aussi à moto, à pied, à cheval etc. ✍🏼 Exemple : ▪️C'est à vélo qu'elle vient au tr…

👍34❤6

2 Oct 2026, 09:10 UTC≈4,020 views50 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

📔 L’expression « après que » introduit un fait déjà réalisé, déjà accompli. On utilise donc normalement l’indicatif, le mode des faits réels. À l’inverse, « avant que » évoque une action qui n’est pas encore réalisée, ce qui explique l’emploi du subjonctif. 📝 Exemples : ✅ Après qu’il est parti, nous avons commencé la réunion. ✅ Après qu’elle a terminé son travail, elle est rentrée chez elle. 🆔 @orthographisme

👍37❤11🎉2

25 Sept 2026, 08:08 UTC≈3,840 views62 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

📔 QUELLE EST LA DIFFÉRENCE ENTRE « QUOIQUE » ET « QUOI QUE » ? 🔹 Quoique : Une conjonction en un seul mot qui signifie « bien que » ou « même si ». 🔹 Quoi que : Une locution en deux mots qui veut dire « quelle que soit la chose que » ou « peu importe ce que ». 📝 Exemples : 📍 Quoique : Il est venu travailler, quoique très fatigué. 📍 Quoi que : Quoi que tu fasses, je reste à tes côtés. 🆔 @orthographisme

👍48❤11🎉2🙏1

18 Sept 2026, 08:05 UTC≈4,180 views55 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

📔 QUELLE EST LA DIFFÉRENCE ENTRE « CONJECTURE » ET « CONJONCTURE » ? 🔹 Conjecture : Une simple hypothèse ou une supposition basée sur des intuitions, sans preuve concrète. 🔹 Conjoncture : L'ensemble des événements et des circonstances qui définissent une situation à un moment précis (souvent liée à l'économie). 📝 Exemples : 📍 Conjecture : « C’est une pure conjecture : personne ne sait vraiment ce qui s’est passé…

👍41🙏8❤6

16 Sept 2026, 17:03 UTC≈3,510 views39 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

📔 Mot du jour : Terreau ✨ Définition : Au sens propre, le terreau est une terre riche en humus favorable aux plantes. Au sens figuré, il désigne une base fertile ou un environnement favorable à quelque chose. 📝 Exemple : Cette région est un terreau fertile pour l’innovation technologique. 🔄 Synonymes : Substrat, humus, fondement. 💡 Parlez d’un environnement propice avec « terreau » ! 🆔 @orthographisme

👍26🙏8❤5

15 Sept 2026, 19:51 UTC≈3,350 views26 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Poll

Quel nom désigne le pelage d’un chien ?

  1. Le manteau37%
  2. Le pull20%
  3. La robe42%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

👍15❤8🎉2🙏1

14 Sept 2026, 08:05 UTC≈3,740 views50 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

📔 Définition L'expression « de fil en aiguille » signifie progressivement, en passant d'une chose à une autre de manière continue et naturelle. Elle est généralement utilisée pour décrire le déroulement d'une conversation, le développement d'une histoire ou une suite d'événements qui s'enchaînent sans rupture. 📝 Exemples : 📍Dans une conversation : « Nous avons commencé par parler de la météo, puis, de fil en aigu…

❤25👍18🎉5🙏2

11 Sept 2026, 08:19 UTC≈3,540 views75 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

🍊 Quelle est la différence entre « Mandarine » et « Clémentine » ? 🔹Mandarine : C’est l’agrume d’origine. Originaire de Chine, elle possède une peau fine, mais souvent plus difficile à détacher des quartiers. Elle contient généralement des pépins, avec une saveur acidulée et un parfum prononcé. 🔹 Clémentine : C’est un hybride obtenu par croisement. Elle est issue d’une mandarine et d’une orange douce, et a été créé…

👍47❤25🤝2🙏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 57 posts we hold for @orthographisme. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@orthographisme edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
17 August 2026
Most recent edit
17 August 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 1 post on @orthographisme as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
9 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
9 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
32 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Polls

The 6 most recent of 15 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

15 Sept 2026, 19:51 UTCAnonymous Quiz897 voters

Quel nom désigne le pelage d’un chien ?

  1. Le manteau37%
  2. Le pull20%
  3. La robe42%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

9 Sept 2026, 07:45 UTCAnonymous Quiz875 voters

Quel est l’un des synonymes de « débonnaire » ?

  1. Affable57%
  2. Capricieux15%
  3. Extravagant28%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

7 Sept 2026, 11:30 UTCAnonymous Quiz840 voters

Qu'est-ce que "la politique de l'autruche" ?

  1. Comportement insouciant, qui ne mesure pas le danger.51%
  2. Être conscient du danger mais ne pas pouvoir l'éviter49%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

2 Sept 2026, 08:29 UTCAnonymous Quiz774 voters

Que signifie « castrateur » au sens figuré ?

  1. Qui encourage l'initiative et la créativité3%
  2. Qui fait preuve d’indulgence5%
  3. Qui inhibe, restreint ou empêche l'expression ou le développement92%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

26 Aug 2026, 07:59 UTCFinal Results385 voters

Que signifie le mot « baroque » dans son sens artistique ?

  1. Simple et minimaliste14%
  2. Caractérisé par l’exubérance et l’ornementation excessive66%
  3. Rigoureux et géométrique20%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

19 Aug 2026, 07:55 UTCFinal Results351 voters

Que signifie l'adjectif « erratique » ?

  1. Qui erre volontairement pour explorer19%
  2. Qui manque de régularité et est imprévisible71%
  3. Qui est très ponctuel et prévisible11%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 57 most recent posts we hold, published 24 March 2026 to 3 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

𝐋𝐞 𝐒𝐜𝐫𝐢𝐛𝐞™️
@LeScribe · 42,784
#1
PARLEZ-VOUS FRANÇAIS ??🇨🇵 📚
@PARLEZVOUSFR97 · 18,408
#2
Le Citateur Méchant 👨‍🎓
@LeCitateurM · 25,021
#3
Guerre économique!
@intelligence_economique · 34,808
#4
BRICS TV ( FRANCE )
@BRICSTV · 25,755
#5
Infographies!
@geoeconomie · 26,548
#6
CHINE TV 🇨🇳
@chinemonde · 14,715
#7
Papersnest News
@papersnest · 12,788
#8
INFOS CERTIFIÉES
@INFOSCERTIFIEES · 11,978
#9
FIN/TECH
@Fintechnewsfr · 9,888
#10
𝐀𝐄𝐒 𝐀𝐂𝐓𝐔 🚨
@InfosAes · 52,960
#11
𝐋𝐞 𝐏𝐨𝐫𝐭𝐚𝐢𝐥 𝐈𝐧𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐦𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐪𝐮𝐞
@leportail · 20,646
#12
CahiersJaunes ♤
@CahiersJaunesX · 27,202
#13
🧘‍♀️Zentitude🧘‍♂️!
@intelligence_strategique · 8,870
#14
Le Grand Rééquilibrage
@grand_reequilibrage · 41,789
#15
Cultineo
@cultineo · 10,254
#16
OASIE POINT TV ⚡️
@OASIEPOINT · 5,237
#17
Développement personnel!
@sciencespolitiques · 14,655
#18
Rybar FR
@rybarFR · 21,442
#19
Le Monde FR 🇫🇷
@LeMondeFRANCE · 21,946
#20
Rémi Check
@remicheck · 11,773
#21
InfoDefenseFRANCE 1
@infodefenseFRreserve · 28,708
#22
COACH NBA🏀⚽️🏆
@Coachnba42 · 5,200
#23
⚖️ Le Droit pour tous! ⚖️
@geo_strategie · 17,792
#24
GeoRadar
@georadarinfo · 23,266
#25
Univers Motivation ⚡️
@UniversMotivation · 28,276
#26
CULTIMONDE🌏
@cultimonde · 19,661
#27
Chroniques des conflits | Russie • Ukraine • Iran • USA • Israël
@chroniques_des_conflits · 35,341
#28
Nature & Biologie
@NatureBiologie · 8,257
#29
Multipolarra
@multipolarra · 1,277
#30
La Nouvelle Donne 🔔
@lanouvelledonne · 22,788
#31
Smart & Ingénieux
@SmartIngenieux · 1,364
#32
Black Bond PTV ⚔️🦅😇
@StoryOfBlackBond · 44,353
#33
English Classroom
@CLasseDAnglais · 17,268
#34
Thomasovitch 🇫🇷✈️🇷🇺
@thomasovitch · 20,024
#35
Silvano Trotta Officiel
@trottasilvano · 120,044
#36
Bibliothèque @EpubFR
@Bibliotheque_EpubFR · 53,293
#37
𝙻𝚎 𝚜𝚊𝚟𝚒𝚎𝚣-𝚟𝚘𝚞𝚜❓
@curieusement · 29,630
#38
𝐈𝐧𝐜𝐫𝐨𝐲𝐚𝐛𝐥𝐞 𝐦𝐚𝐢𝐬 𝐯𝐫𝐚𝐢
@incroyablemaisvrai · 19,273
#39
Que s'est-il passé?
@intelligenceeconomique · 25,015
#40
GEOPOL🛡ADDICT
@diplomaties · 36,917
#41
Actu Internationale 🗞
@ActuInternationale · 53,018
#42
L’éveil 2022
@leveil2022 · 35,050
#43
OBSERVATEUR A
@ObservateurPhotoAdamou · 6,777
#44
International Reporters
@internationalreporters · 57,273
#45
Hamas/Tsahal 🇺🇸🇮🇱⚡️🇮🇷
@strategie_militaire · 22,044
#46
Russie🇷🇺⚡️Ukraine🇺🇦!
@strategiemilitaire · 12,861
#47
🌴Nature!🍁
@nudgemarketing · 20,063
#48
USA INFOS 🇺🇸
@USAINFOS · 6,799
#49
Citations & Proverbes!
@intelligencestrategique · 22,582
#50
Vladimir Poutine
@Vpoutine · 41,223
#51
STRATPOL
@stratpol · 70,731
#52
La vie en Russie
@lavieenrussie · 8,188
#53
ODNEWSS
@ODNEWSS · 14,587
#54
🇷🇺Laurent Brayard Reporter🇫🇷
@laurentbrayarddonbass · 5,360
#55
SENEGAL 24 🇸🇳
@Senegal24 · 23,962
#56
Sports Addict!
@addict_sports · 3,229
#57
SOFTBUSINESS 🪐
@go_softbusiness · 2,062
#58
Gavroche
@GavrocheFrance · 16,227
#59
EurasianForm
@eurasianform · 26,275
#60
Press TV Français
@PressTVFr · 15,457
#61
FOOT AFRICA 🌍
@FootAfrica · 14,807
#62
Le SIONISME démasqué
@lesionismedemasque · 6,456
#63
💻 Cabuntu Solution 📱
@les_pros_du_tic · 41,782
#64
Wild Life Story
@wildlifestory · 890 (as read 23 September 2026)
#65
𝐄𝐬𝐨𝐭𝐞́𝐫𝐢𝐤𝐚𝐞
@esoterikae · 566
#66
Stratégies Mondiales
@Strategiescontinentales · 35,884
#67
Prozorov en français
@prozorov_fr · 24,362
#68
DW Afrique
@dwfrancais · 1,798
#69
Katya Kopylova
@kopylovakatya · 10,296
#70
Infosport Football 🚨 ⚽️
@mondedufootball · 94,874
#71

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 23 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

𝐋𝐞 𝐒𝐜𝐫𝐢𝐛𝐞™️
@LeScribe · 42,784
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 28 August 2026
CULTIMONDE🌏
@cultimonde · 19,661
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 30 September 2026
𝐋𝐞 𝐏𝐨𝐫𝐭𝐚𝐢𝐥 𝐈𝐧𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐦𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐪𝐮𝐞
@leportail · 20,646
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 26 September 2026
💻 Cabuntu Solution 📱
@les_pros_du_tic · 41,782
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 27 August 2026
CahiersJaunes ♤
@CahiersJaunesX · 27,202
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 10 September 2026
Infographies!
@geoeconomie · 26,548
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 12 September 2026
Que s'est-il passé?
@intelligenceeconomique · 25,015
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 14 September 2026
Guerre économique!
@intelligence_economique · 34,808
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 2 September 2026
𝐈𝐧𝐜𝐫𝐨𝐲𝐚𝐛𝐥𝐞 𝐦𝐚𝐢𝐬 𝐯𝐫𝐚𝐢
@incroyablemaisvrai · 19,273
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 2 October 2026
BRICS TV ( FRANCE )
@BRICSTV · 25,755
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 13 September 2026
L'oasis des médecins ✨
@MedOasis · 26,637
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 12 September 2026
L-frii Média
@lfriiactu · 27,524
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 9 September 2026
𝙻𝚎 𝚜𝚊𝚟𝚒𝚎𝚣-𝚟𝚘𝚞𝚜❓
@curieusement · 29,630
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 7 September 2026
Neodia
@neodia · 47,537
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 26 August 2026

This channel appears in 14 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝐙𝐞́𝐫𝐨 𝐅𝐚𝐮𝐭𝐞 🇫🇷” (@orthographisme), 21,281 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/orthographisme.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.