🕵♂ Je suis retombé sur ça, les OG savent, on voulait déjà dev du crypto trading bot en 2016, de mémoire le seul CEX qui proposait une API et on avait pas Cursor ou Claude 😂
❤15👍15👏12

Channel
@informateurcrypto
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
27,002subscribers
-8,281 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001175984072 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @informateurcrypto |
| Description | @informateurcrypto_admin |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 35 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/informateurcrypto |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 89% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 16:42 | 27,002 | -82 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 02:01 | 27,084 | -91 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 01:38 | 27,175 | -37 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 11:41 | 27,212 | -98 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 14:01 | 27,310 | -167 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 00:21 | 27,477 | -259 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 17:55 | 27,736 | -268 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 16:21 | 28,004 | -541 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 10:17 | 28,545 | -485 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 12:28 | 29,030 | -830 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 13:58 | 29,860 | -822 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 15:32 | 30,682 | -804 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 17:44 | 31,486 | -764 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 15:52 | 32,250 | -830 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 15:11 | 33,080 | -150 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 16:03 | 33,230 | -453 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 17:52 | 33,683 | -534 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 16:58 | 34,217 | -624 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 22:37 | 34,841 | -255 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 11:35 | 35,096 | first reading |
98 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 64 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 50 of 55 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 98 (30 July 2026 – 23 September 2026) |
| Views total | 127,699 |
| Reactions total | 981 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 23 Sept 2026, 17:41 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
1,539 reactions across 89 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 774 | 50.3% | |
| 👍 | 313 | 20.3% | |
| 🔥 | 243 | 15.8% | |
| 👏 | 71 | 4.61% | |
| 🙏 | 41 | 2.66% | |
| 🤩 | 40 | 2.60% | |
| 🎉 | 31 | 2.01% | |
| 👌 | 26 | 1.69% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 90 of the 98 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,539 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 98 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 23 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @informateurcrypto. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 98 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 July 2026 to 23 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🕵♂ Je suis retombé sur ça, les OG savent, on voulait déjà dev du crypto trading bot en 2016, de mémoire le seul CEX qui proposait une API et on avait pas Cursor ou Claude 😂
❤15👍15👏12
💰 Le détenteur moyen d'un ETF liés au Bitcoin est de nouveau en positif pour la première fois depuis janvier, grâce à une récente hausse qui a permis au BTC de dépasser le prix d'achat moyen estimé de ces ETF : soit 81.722$ par Bitcoin. 🕵♂ Ce niveau de prix est intéressant à surveiller, nous sommes actuellement entrain de retracer (sur le NASDAQ également). Idéalement rester au-dessus de 81-82k serait rassurant po…
❤6
J'ai jamais FOMO. À traduire en : "J'ai raté de bonnes occasions." À traduire aussi en : "J'ai jamais perdu de l'argent inutilement." Donc prenez votre temps. Comprenez en profondeur. Une fois le plan prêt, vous l'appliquez et vous vous y tenez.
❤15
🕵♂ Un narratif que je veux particulièrement surveiller : les stablecoins et RWA. Après plusieurs années de flou réglementaire, que nous avons vu évoluer et analyser à travers l'actualité ici même au fil des posts et années, le cadre commence progressivement à se structurer : MiCA en Europe. GENIUS Act aux États-Unis (Clarity bientôt...) ETF Bitcoin. RWA Tokenisation des actifs financiers, Blackrock dans la course.…
❤26👍3
🕵♂ Le prochain cycle ne sera pas simplement une répétition du précédent. Certains tokens déjà établis ont encore énormément de potentiel, pour ne pas les citer une fois de plus ici. Mais il y aura aussi des projets qui vont naître, et des first cycle tokens qui vont exploser (tokens récents qui n'ont jamais connu de bullrun/altsaison). Et de nouveaux narratifs encore sous les radars. L'objectif n'est pas de devi…
❤23👍19
🕵♂ Depuis 2020, on avance ensemble. On a vécu des bullruns, des bear markets, des narratifs qui ont explosé (Perps Dex, Privacy, RWA, IA) et d'autres qui nous ont appris à nos dépens (NFT, Gamefi et j'en passe). On a gagné ensemble. On s'est trompés ensemble. Et surtout, on a appris. Au fur à mesure, ma façon de voir le marché a évolué, car sa structure même est en constante évolution (comportement investisseur, …
❤62👍32👏4
⚡️🪙 Solana vient de lancer sur son testnet public Alpenglow, une mise à jour majeure qui vise à faire passer la vitesse des transactions d’environ 12,8 secondes à seulement 150 millisecondes.
❤14🔥1
⬆️ Toujours en LONG sur $BTC, prix actuel 86450$, je vais dormir bonne nuit. Update : SL -1.5 RR, double top H4 en formation, possible retour au 83-84k, on va attendre un retracement et des confirmations claires pour reprendre des LONG.
👍9❤4
🕵♂ J'ai des alertes de momentum et une belle config sur BTC. ⚡️ LONG $BTC Entrée market : 86500 ⛔️ SL 86290 (c'est court, pareil on vise des gros RR, TP1 mini 5 ou petite perte 🤟) Update : SL, c'est le jeu, le SL était court, petite perte, le dernier trade couvre 23 fois cette perte, on vise des gros RR, n'oubliez pas d'adapter votre taille de position en fonction, on privilégie le RR au winrate. ⚠️ Je garde qu…
🔥7❤1
🏆 $HYPE ATH 97$ https://t.me/informateurcrypto/8954 🫡 x10 en 22 mois, la bonne lecture des différents narratifs propre à chaque cycle est déterminante dans votre sélection d'altcoins.
👍20👏20🙏15❤2
Ceux qui me suivent depuis longtemps le savent : je ne monte pas un groupe VIP chaque année, et surtout pas tout au long de l’année comme beaucoup de média/influenceurs pour LEURS profits. Quand je décide de lancer quelque chose, c’est parce que je considère que la période (altsaison) et les conditions de marché justifient réellement de le faire pour VOS PROFITS (et actuellement, plusieurs de nos indicateurs repass…
❤48👍29🎉20🔥14
Pour ne pas passer à côté, ca vous tente un groupe privé avec signaux (+ copy auto pour ceux qui n'ont pas la dispo) ?
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
👌9👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 98 posts we hold for @informateurcrypto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@informateurcrypto edited 7 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Pour ne pas passer à côté, ca vous tente un groupe privé avec signaux (+ copy auto pour ceux qui n'ont pas la dispo) ?
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Le bottom de notre cycle est :
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Prochaine étape pour Bitcoin ?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Prochaine étape pour Bitcoin ?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 98 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 23 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 10 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 21 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🕵️♂️⚡️ L'informateur Crypto” (@informateurcrypto), 27,002 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/informateurcrypto.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.